Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Department of Human Genetics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Department of Human Genetics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Human Genetics
Genomic microarrays: Applications to gene discovery and molecular karyotype August, 2005 David H. Ledbetter, Ph.D. Department of Human Genetics Emory University

2 Human Telomere Structure
centromere (T2AG3)n 3 -20 kb Unique DNA kb Subtelomeric Region Martin and Ledbetter 2

3 Telomere Abnl. Frequency in MR
Biesecker, Am. J. Med. Genet. 107: , 2002 Reviewed 14 studies, 1,718 patients with MR 6% overall abnormal results (range 2-29%) 50% of abnormalities inherited from balanced translocation parent Conclusion: G-banding alone is insufficient to identify clinically significant segmental aneusomy. Additional molecular cytogenetic technologies are needed.

4 Subtelomere Analysis on 12,000 Cases
Britt Ravnan, James Tepperberg, Christa Martin Genzyme, LabCorp and U. Chicago >12,000 cases examined 3.2 % abnormals identified 0.4% polymorphisms, benign variants 2.8% clinically significant In collaboration with Britt Ravnan at Genzyme Genetics and Jim Tepperberg at LabCorp,

5 Molecular Ruler 1 Mb contig 1 clone/500 kb to 5 Mb (T2AG3)n
This schematic illustrates a molecular ruler for one telomere region that incorporates multiple clones that span the most distal 5 Mb region. For the most distal one megabase, it is useful to have a contig of overlapping clones so that smaller rearrangements can be characterized. Then, for the remaining 4 Mb, one clone per every 500 kb is used. (T2AG3)n Subtelomeric Region Telomere probe Unique DNA 2

6 17p: Genotype/Phenotype
Normal Miller-Dieker ILS tel – 68F18 ABR 1029F21 CRK I&II 14-3-3 RPA1 LIS1 HIC1 2.8 Mb 2.5 Mb 2.0 Mb 1.5 Mb 500 kb 250 kb 1 Mb 13 genes can be deleted without phenotype 17p Cardoso et al. (2003) Am J Hum Genet,72: Lese Martin et al. (2002) J Med Genet 39(10):

7 Limitations of Telomere FISH
Does not assay whole genome Labor intensive Need for a whole genome approach to submicroscopic deletions/duplications which is amenable to automation

8 Array CGH Patient DNA Gain Resolution = clone size ~ 100 kb Loss
Genomic Clones Gain Resolution = clone size ~ 100 kb Loss Control DNA Pinkel et al., Nat Genet (1998), 20(2):207-11

9 CGH array format GenoSensor™ Array 300 (N = 287)
Telomere array (N = 165) Each telomere Five X and two Y chromosome clones “Molecular ruler” on 1p, 16p, 17p, and 22q. TEL CEN 5.0 Mb 1.5 Mb 2.0 Mb 2.5 Mb 1Mb

10 Array Examples Patient DNA (male) Control DNA (female) Gain = green
Loss = red Normal = gray Normal Each clone is spotted multiple times for reproducibility Clones from the same chromosomal region are placed apart from each other MALE POC THIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS ALL OF OUR RESULTS…

11 Array Examples Patient DNA (male) Control DNA (female) Gain = green
Loss = red X X Y X Normal MALE POC THIS NEXT SLIDE SHOWS ALL OF OUR RESULTS… Trisomy 21

12 Ratio Display: female, 16p+; 17p-
X Y

13 MR - Blinded Study Results
# 1 3 2 5 4 Detected by array yes yes (3) yes (2) yes (5) yes (4) FISH 1p deletion 6q deletion 9q deletion 16p duplication 17p deletion 22q deletion Derivative chrom. ALL 17 IMBALANCES WERE IDENTIFIED USING CGH-ARRAYS

14 Case 1: 8p deletion Phenotype: MR, hypopigmentation 8p tel
Ratio = 0.51 8p tel Ratio = 0.52 Phenotype: MR, hypopigmentation

15 Case 2: 1ptel deletion with size of 4 Mb
Multiple 1ptel clones from telomere to 4 Mb Phenotype: MR, obesity

16 Telomere Molecular Rulers
aCGH results Size estimation 22q tel deletion 130 kb 17p tel deletion 1.9 Mb 16p tel duplication, 17p deletion 3.5 Mb for 16p, ~2.7 Mb for 17p 1p tel deletion 4 Mb 16p tel duplication 6.5 Mb 10 Mb

17 Patient DNA (male), Control DNA (female)
22q11 duplication 22q Ratio: 1.4 V300 ARRAY Patient DNA (male), Control DNA (female) Gain = green, Loss = red

18 22q11 duplication

19 Microduplications Identified by Array
4qtel duplication: MR, seizures, cerebellar atrophy Phenotypically normal mother has same duplication. 10qtel duplication: Microcephaly, spasticity Phenotypically normal father has same duplication. 10qtel duplication (2 clones): Microcephaly, autism (parents pending) 22q11 duplication: bilateral colobomas, DD, seizures, left ptosis (Cat Eye)

20 MR Blinded Study Conclusions
Demonstrates the sensitivity and accuracy of CGH-arrays since we detected 100% of all imbalances (n=17) identified by FISH; Identified 4 small duplications not detectable by metaphase FISH, at least one clinically significant. Potential for a more sensitive and cost-effective test for telomere and genome-wide screening since the assay is automatable.

21 Pericentromeric “Rulers”
Development of Centromere Molecular Rulers for identification and “calibration” of supernumerary marker chromosomes Most proximal unique genomic clone to each pericentromeric “junkyard” 1 Mb contig plus 1 clone every 500 kb to 5 Mb away from pericentromeric region Validated as unique FISH signal, map position and order

22 Pericentromeric region
α - satellite ( TTAGGG) n Pericentromeric region Unique DNA Subtelomeric repeats

23

24 Chromosome 13

25 Phenotype – Chromosome 10 Marker
Routine prenatal for AMA At 1 year of age patient exhibited slightly delayed expressive language skills At 19 months, oral motor dyspraxia noted At 2 years expressive language delays resolving

26 Chromosome 10p Chromosome 10p

27 Chromosome 10q Chromosome 10q

28 Results # Cases Chromosome # Result 1 10 p-;q+ 2 13 or 21 q- 6
16 p+;q-

29 Array Formats LOW RESOLUTION
Targets only clinically relevant loci and clones are not spaced evenly across genome Commercial Vysis/Abbott, Spectral Genomics,… Home Brew Baylor, Signature Genomics,… 400 clones

30 Array Formats HIGH RESOLUTION Range from 1-3 Mb spacing
to complete genome tiling path consisting of >32,000 clones! Commercial Spectral Genomics,… Home Brew UCSF, British Columbia Genome Center,… 12 mm 2,500 clones; 1.4 Mb Array image from UCSF website

31 Array Formats – High Resolution
 coverage 32,855 BACs ~79 kb resolution Developed by: BC Cancer Agency Genome Sciences Center Krzywinski et al., Nucleic Acids Res (2004) 32(12):

32 aCGH-15 Pilot Study- Clone Selection
Tiling Path Clones Chose the two re-array plates that had the highest number of clones in the 15q11-15q13 region. (Plates 2B1 and 3A1) 3A1 was a partially filled plate of 43 clones 135 tiling path clones total Homebrew clones 36 clones at significant loci on chr. 15 Breakpoints genes segmental duplications 7 Sex Chrm. Clones Total clones: 178 Average coverage on chr15: clone ~ 470 kb Average coverage in q11-q13: 1 clone ~150 kb

33 aCGH-15 Pilot Study Class II deletion Class I deletion

34 aCGH-15 Pilot Study aCGH-15 Patient 1 Pervasive Developmental Delay
Phenotype suggestive of PW

35 As normal as normal can be?

36 ~150 kb every 1 Mb (50 kb detection size)
Sebat et al. Iaftrate et al. Technique ROMA* - 20 indiv. Array CGH - 55 indiv. Resolution ~1 probe / 35 kb (105 kb detection size) ~150 kb every 1 Mb (50 kb detection size) # of Loci 76 255 Length Avg kb median kb 150 kb – 2 Mb Avg. diff. b/t any 2 indiv. 11 12.4 *ROMA = Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis) Only 11 loci in common (within 1 Mb) In both studies, half were observed in >1 indiv.

37 Acknowledgements Vysis/Abbott: Emory University Kim Wilber
Walter King Teresa Ruffalo Emory University Christa Lese Martin, Ph.D. Andrew Wong, Ph.D. Lorraine May, M.S. David Johnson, B.S. Devan Pressley, B.S. Courtney Works, B.S. Grant Support: March of Dimes NIH Vysis/Abbott, Inc.


Download ppt "Department of Human Genetics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google