Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lynn S. Fichter Dept Geology/Environmental Science James Madison University 1410h AN: ED23C-03.
Advertisements

James Gay Clouds in 1.3 Dimensions Can the fractal appearance of clouds tell us more about their nature?
Speciation Through Isolation Student Self Assessment 1. I barely know what the subject is. I need significant help. 2. I think I’m starting to get.
Darwin’s Influences Natural Selection Evidence Evolution Theory GeneticsSpeciation $ 200 $ 200$200 $ 200 $ 200 $400 $ 400$400 $ 400$400 $600 $ 600$600.
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Book Review on Per Bak By Erin Tomlinson & Maree Vincent.
An Analysis of Jenga Using Complex Systems Theory
Graphing in Science Class
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Numerical Experiments in Spin Network Dynamics Seth Major and Sean McGovern ‘07 Hamilton College Dept. of Physics Spin networks In one approach to quantum.
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Evolution Objective: K1 - Analyze & evaluate how natural selection produces changes in a population, not individuals & describe the three types of isolation.
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
“It’s the “It’s the SYSTEM !” SYSTEM !” Complex Earth Systems
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
DIFFERENT TYPES OF BAR GRAPHS. Simple Bar Graph Properties: 1.Can have horizontal or vertical bars 2.Can have spacing between the bars 3.Bars must be.
Section 2.4 Representing Data.
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
Earth Systems Do Not Evolve To Equilibrium Fichter, Lynn S., Pyle, E.J., Whitmeyer, S.J.
Coffee Shop System: A Coffee Shop from a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective myCoffeeShop.
Self-Organized Criticality Cellular Automata Boids Oscillating Reactions.
Biology SOL Review Evolution – Chpt 14,15. #1 Darwin reasoned that if natural selection operates over vast spans of time, then heritable changes would.
Graphing.
Do Now: Compare the two graphs below.
Patterns of Evolution.
LT- Today, I can apply my understanding of the evidence that supports evolution by writing an explanation for each concept of how it is a supporting factor.
Tennessee Adult Education 2011 Curriculum Math Level 3
Section 1.6 Functions.
Money and Banking Lecture 43.
Presentation of Data.
Evolution and Populations How Populations Change
Evolution Review 7A.
Section 3: Beyond Darwinian Theory
Evolution of Populations and Species
Breeding Bunnies Lab Observe the graph and discuss with your lab mate.
Warm Up 7 Punctuated equilibrium coevolution adaptive radiation
Theory of evolution.
Self-organized criticality of landscape patterning
Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter,
AP Environmental Chapter 6
9 Graphs and Graphing.
Biologist now know that natural selection is not the only mechanism of evolution
Unit 1: Evolution Lesson 3: HOW Evolution (Macro-Evolution)
Evolution.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
EVOLUTION JEOPARDY! EVIDENCE PATTERNS
Type Topic in here! Created by Educational Technology Network
EVOLUTION: DARWIN vs. LAMARCK
Patterns of Evolution.
Earth History: Organic Evolution
Evolution Review 7A.
Title of Notes: Evolution of Populations
Chapter 1 Linear Equations and Linear Functions.
Change over a period of time.
Monday, March 5, 2018 ratio slope dependent independent CCSS 8.EE.5
A population shares a common gene pool
EVOLUTION VOCABULARY.
11.1 Genetic Variation within Popln
Day 9: Evolution Homework due Friday 5/4/18
Learning Targets Students will be able to: Compare linear, quadratic, and exponential models and given a set of data, decide which type of function models.
L1 Natural Selection Learning Objectives:
Review Quarter 3.
I. Introduction II. Motivation III. Model IV. Results V. Summary
Objectives Compare linear, quadratic, and exponential models.
Biological Evolution and Environmental Factors
Ch. 23 Evolution of Populations
Review of Graphs Data analysis.
Presentation transcript:

Strategies and Rubrics for Teaching Chaos and Complex Systems Theories as Elaborating, Self-Organizing, and Fractionating Evolutionary Systems Fichter, Lynn S., Pyle, E.J., and Whitmeyer, S.J., 2010, Journal of Geoscience Education (in press)

Bak-Sneppen Ecosystem Model

Modeling an Evolutionary System The Bak-Sneppen evolutionary model is an “ecosystem” in which the fitness of each “species” changes because of its relationships with other “species”, following two simple rules Generation 1 Threshold fitness the highest level the lowest fitness species has reached Rule One - find the species with the lowest fitness and randomly change its fitness. Rule Two - at the same time the lowest fit species is changed, also randomly change the fitness of the species to the immediate left and right.

Modeling an Evolutionary System The Bak-Sneppen evolutionary model is an “ecosystem” in which the fitness of each “species” changes because of its relationships with other “species”, following two simple rules Generation 2 Threshold fitness the highest level the lowest fitness species has reached Rule One - find the species with the lowest fitness and randomly change its fitness. Rule Two - at the same time the lowest fit species is changed, also randomly change the fitness of the species to the immediate left and right.

Modeling an Evolutionary System The Bak-Sneppen evolutionary model is an “ecosystem” in which the fitness of each “species” changes because of its relationships with other “species”, following two simple rules Threshold fitness the highest level the lowest fitness species has reached An avalanche is a cascade of fitness changes below the threshold (i.e. all the blinking dots below the line) between one rise of the threshold fitness and the next rise. Rule One - find the species with the lowest fitness and randomly change its fitness. Rule Two - at the same time the lowest fit species is changed, also randomly change the fitness of the species to the immediate left and right.

Modeling an Evolutionary System We do not expect random processes to result in an organized outcome. Does any interesting behavior emerge from this simple system? Run Bak-Sneppen

? What Are the Implications ? Watch the species above the threshold. How stable are they? How much are they able to change on their own? How much do they contribute to raising the threshold line to the next level? P 2. Get personal. Pick out one species above the threshold line and identify with it; imagine it is you. Who is likely to be conservative; liking things just the way they are? Who is likely to be liberal; wanting things to change? Q How safe are you in this avalanche prone world? How much control do you have over your destiny? Why or why not? Are there any innocent victims? Is there any way to protect yourself in such a world? 3. Is there any part of this ecosystem that is isolated from the rest, sitting in a protected niche, independent and self sufficient?

Modeling an Evolutionary System Dynamics of the Bak-Sneppen Evolutionary Model Activity pattern for the Bak-Sneppen model. Time begins at an arbitrary time after the model has self-organized at the critical state near the 0.66 threshold. Species are arranged along the horizontal axis (from -20 to +20). Each circle indicates a time a given species undergoes a mutation. For example, at about time 2000 species -7 through +7 are undergoing mutations; by time 4000 activity has shifted to -20 to -10. That is, there is an avalanche in that portion of the ecosystem. As the avalanches move to other species the activity circles move to those other species, and species that are not mutating do not have activity circles for that time span.

Modeling an Evolutionary System Dynamics of the Bak-Sneppen Evolutionary Model Graph showing the climb of the threshold fitness for the whole ecosystem with time. Threshold fitness is the highest fitness the least fit species has attained. A step up to a new threshold occurs only when all species climb above the old threshold, thus ending an avalanche. As the graph shows this takes progressively more time as the threshold fitness rises. Note that the rise in ecosystem fitness is punctuational, or behaves like a Self Organized Critical sandpile.

Modeling an Evolutionary System Dynamics of the Bak-Sneppen Evolutionary Model The Devil's staircase shows the accumulated activity of one species. Horizontal lines are times of stasis. Vertical jumps are mutations; note these come in bundles over short time intervals (are punctuational). In reality there are many more mutation steps than shown. One can think of the number of changes as representing the amount of physical change in the animal, such as size. The Self Organized Criticality (aka "punctuated equilibrium“) nature of the curve is evident in the long times of stasis followed by jumps in activity.

Power Law Relationships – Bak-Sneppen Universality Properties of Complex Evolutionary Systems Power Law Relationships – Bak-Sneppen Avalanche sizes in the Bak-Sneppen model Mutation frequency in the Bak-Sneppen model

Maybe there is no “cause” to disasters and extinctions Stuart Kauffman “The critical point is not, as Stuart Kauffman once described it, “a nice place to be.” So “survival of the fittest” does not imply evolution to a state where everybody is well off. On the contrary, individual species are barely able to hang on - like the grains of sand in the critical sand pile.” Maybe there is no “cause” to disasters and extinctions Maybe disasters (avalanches) are just part of the dynamic of evolution.