3. Practical screen Theory development with systematic literature reviews Chitu Okoli for ICT University, Fall 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Academic References
Advertisements

Appraisal of Literature. Task 4 The task requires that you:  Obtain a piece of literature from a journal, book or internet source. The literature should.
IR1 IMEM RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Formulating Research Problem, BREDA SEP2011.
The National Library of Medicine online resources Salima M’seffar INH- Bibliotheque
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
Critical appraisal of the literature Michael Ferenczi Head of Year 4 Head of Molecular Medicine Section, National Heart and Lung Institute.
Find 8 scholarly articles related to your dependent variable and target population. How does the literature theoretically define your dependent variable?
Publishing qualitative studies H Maisonneuve April 2015 Edinburgh, Scotland.
Disasters and Human Factors Literature Nestor L Osorio Northern Illinois University.
Problem Identification
Advanced Technical Communication
Using Databases for Education Research EBSCOhost ProQuest.
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing. The Literature Review ? “Literature reviews …… introduce a topic, summarise the main issues and provide.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
Systematic Reviews.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PROJECT.
Identifying the evidence Laura Macdonald Health Protection Scotland
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
1 DATABASE INTERNATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY OF PERIODICAL LITERATURE IN THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES ONLINE.
Three indexes: Social Science Citation Index Index to Legal Periodicals Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals.
Systematic Review Krit Pongpirul, MD, MPH. Johns Hopkins University.
How to Write Literature Review ww.ePowerPoint.com
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
INTRO TO LIBRARY RESEARCH LITERATURE REVIEWS. RESEARCH IN 5 STEPS 1.Define your topic; brainstorm keywords 2.Choose the right tool 3.Keyword search 4.Cycle.
Publishing Research Papers in Applied Linguistics and TESOL Jinyan Huang, Ph.D., Professor Niagara University, United States Wuhan University of Technology.
Building a bibliography Mura Ghosh Senate House Library.
A1 & A2 The aim: (separate) Critique a Qualitative study on “Telemonitoring of blood glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes.” Critique a Quantitative.
Understanding Populations & Samples
Data Mining for Expertise: Using Scopus to Create Lists of Experts for U.S. Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs Good afternoon, my name.
Understanding Populations & Samples
Understanding and Critically Appraising the Literature Review
How to write a publishable qualitative article
A Systematic Review of Discourse’s Outcomes
2. Protocol and training Theory development with systematic literature reviews Chitu Okoli for ICT University, Fall 2015.
Understanding and Critically Appraising the Literature Review
Do Adoptees Have Lower Self Esteem?
Chapter 2: Hypothesis development: Where research questions come from.
Review of Related Literature
1. Objectives of theory-mining reviews
TJTS505: Master's Thesis Seminar
Interprofessional Online Learning for Primary Health Care:
iHEA Boston 2017 Congress, Boston Massachusetts, USA 8-11 July 2017
Using Mixed Methods to Produce a Systematic Review of the Literature
SYLVIA ROBERTS Communication Librarian
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
The impact of transition on health
Parts of an Academic Paper
Title of Research Project
Lifestyle factors in the development of diabetes among African immigrants in the UK: A systematic review Alloh T. Folashade Faculty of Health and Social.
SYLVIA ROBERTS Communication Librarian
Unit 4 Introducing the Study.
Breakdown: Film and Television Index
Locating & Evaluating Sources
Building the Literature Review
Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing
Research Methods unit 2 lecture vocabulary
Writing Cochrane Protocol Cochrane Thailand Workshop 2017
The Advising Literature Review: Make it Systematic!
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
PubMed.
Developing Research Proposal Writing a Literature Review
RESEARCH TOOLS OR INSTRUMENTS
Genevieve Young-Southward1 Christopher Philo2 Sally-Ann Cooper3
What are systematic reviews and why do we need them?
Google Scholar: 8,554 publications Systematic search:
Chapter 3 Finding Relevant Evidence to Answer Clinical Questions
Performing literature searches and using EndNote Online
Systematic Review (Advanced Course: Module 6 Appendix)
Nursing bioinformatics
Presentation transcript:

3. Practical screen Theory development with systematic literature reviews Chitu Okoli for ICT University, Fall 2015

What is a practical screen? The practical screen is the set of decisions about which kinds of studies to look for and which ones to not even look for. Reduces the number of studies to be analyzed to a number that can be practically handled by the reviewers Not a quality appraisal, but pragmatic restriction of the scope of the study

Practical screen criteria with theoretical importance (Okoli 2015)

Types of articles to include Journal rankings Restrictions not usually justifiable on theoretical grounds Peer-reviewed vs. grey literature Restrictions might be counterproductive for TLRs and TCRs; might be justifiable for TTRs as an implicit quality screen; however, susceptible to publication bias Conference articles Restrictions justifiable when journal publications are terminal publications; even then, recently published conference articles should be included Practitioner publications Inclusion could be valuable for TLRs and TCRs; usually inappropriate for TTRs

Topic of study Subject databases Content Should at least include all relevant content research fields, but should be as broad as is practical Content Topics and concepts must match research questions

Nature of empirical studies Empirical versus conceptual studies TLRs and TCRs should include conceptual studies; TTRs are restricted to empirical studies Study setting Restrictions of settings depend on boundary conditions of theory For example, why might the theory only apply in developing countries? Participants or subjects Restrictions of types of participants depend on boundary conditions of theory Program, intervention or means of data collection Nature or means of application of interventions or data collection may affect theory Research design Restrictions rarely justified on theoretical grounds Quantitative versus qualitative studies Depends on chosen synthesis approach Source of financial support Potential bias of studies should be noted

Bibliographic characteristics of the articles Dates Restrictions rarely justified on theoretical grounds; however, end dates of literature search should be noted Publication language English studies are required; other languages also encouraged Authors Restrictions rarely justified on theoretical grounds

Practical tips for the practical screen After the search, read titles and abstracts to determine if the inclusion criteria are met If necessary, refer to the full text In reference management software, create folders for excluded articles, with reasons for exclusion Different reviewers should maintain their own exclusion folders Enables comparison, verification, and tests of interrater reliability

Sources Okoli, Chitu. The view from giants’ shoulders: guidelines for developing theory with theory-mining literature reviews. Working paper, 2015.