Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
Advertisements

Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
WRAP Regional Haze Analysis & Technical Support System IMPROVE Steering Committee Meeting September 27, 2006.
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Tribal Causes of Haze Representativeness Assessment Phase I Mark Green, Alissa Smiley, and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Reason for Doing Cluster Analysis Identify similar and dissimilar aerosol monitoring sites so that we can test the ability of the Causes of Haze Assessment.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
CALIFORNIA CASE STUDIES WRAP Implementation Working Group Meeting San Diego, California ♦ April 17-19, 2007.
Status of Technical Analysis Technical Oversight Committee September 14, 2006.
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center April 25-26, 2006 AoH Work Group Meeting Regional Modeling Center Status Report AoH Workgroup Meeting Seattle, WA April 25-26,
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study (Dec 7, 2006) Analysis done for Dec 7, 2006 WRAP IWG meeting Starkey (STAR1) monitoring site in northeast.
TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools WRAP IWG Meeting Santa Fe, NM December 7, 2006.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Preliminary Evaluation of Data for Reasonable Progress Montana RH FIP Laurel Dygowski, EPA Region 8 IWG Meeting – April 2007.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Projection of Visibility Changes and Modeling Sensitivity Analysis.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Aerosol Composition and Trends Andrew Martahus. Particulate Matter: Solid or Liquid Particles in Air Size and Composition Although particulate matter.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
Weight of Evidence Discussion AoH Meeting – Tempe, AZ November 16/17, 2005.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
Reasonable Progress Demonstration Case Study for Saguaro Wilderness Area Arizona Regional Haze Stakeholder Meeting January 22, 2007.
Regional Haze Rule Promulgated in 1999 Requires states to set RPGs based on 4 statutory factors and consideration of a URP URP = 20% reduction in manmade.
1 Projects:/WRAP_RMC/Presents/ADEQ_Feb ppt Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) Regional Modeling Center (RMC) Preliminary Fire Modeling Results.
Progress on Technical Work to Support Haze SIPs Planning and Policy Group Colorado APCD October 11, 2007.
AoH Work Group Weight of Evidence Framework WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support System Project Update Combined Session – Emissions and Fire Emissions Joint Forums – Missoula, MT September.
Weight of Evidence Approach: Soil and Coarse Mass Case Studies WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists,
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Yellowstone National Park Very large Class I area (2,219,737 acres) Involves 3 states (WY, ID, MT) Not an isolated wilderness (2.87 million visitors in.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
Monitoring/Data Analysis Discussion Group June 10, 2005
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Reasonable Progress Demonstrations
Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Species Specific Reasonable Progress Analysis
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
AoH Phase 2 Update AoH Meeting – San Diego, CA January 25, 2006
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
DRAFT Reasonable Progress Demonstration
IMPROVE Data Processing
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
TAF Regional Haze Plan Update
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
Implementation Workgroup April 19, 2007
Paved and Unpaved Road Dust
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area Implementation Workgroup Meeting San Diego, California April 17 – 19, 2007

Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area Overview of Chiricahua NM & WA Monitoring/Baseline Conditions Annual Average 20% Worst Visibility Days Emissions & Source Apportionment Sources Species Reasonable Progress/Modeling Model Performance Modeling Results Visibility Projections Summary

Arizona Class One Areas Source: http://www.epa.gov/region09/air/maps/az_clss1.html

Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area 2km Terrain Map 20km Terrain Map The Chiricahua Wilderness is located south of the Chiricahua National Monument. The IMRPOVE monitor is located west of the National Monument. Source: WRAP Causes of Haze Website (http://coha.dri.edu)

Glide Slope Annual Average (in dv) Baseline Conditions: 8.75 dv Natural Conditions: 4.0 dv

Annual Light Extinction Results show particle extinction. The baseline extinction is 15.44 Mm -1.

Glide Slope for 20% Worst Days (in dv) Baseline = 13.43 dv; Natural Conditions = 7.2 dv

Baseline Extinction Budget Visibility impairment on worst days is mostly attributed to sulfates, coarse mass, fine soil, and organic carbon.

Baseline Species – Time Series This shows extinction for all species for each year of the baseline period.

Baseline Worst 20% Light Extinction

Average 20% Worst Day Composition (baseline ’00 – ‘04) Light Extinction (Mm -1) Source: Chart made from spreadsheet posted at: WRAP Technical Support System >> Resources >> Monitoring >> Composition

Average 20% Best Day Composition (baseline ’00 – ’04) Light Extinction (Mm -1) Source: Chart made from spreadsheet posted at: WRAP Technical Support System >> Resources >> Monitoring >> Composition

Species Glide Slope – Worst 20% This shows the baseline and glide slope by species.

Species Trends and URP Glide Slope (Worst Days)

Emissions & Source Apportionment

Upwind Residence Time on 20% Worst Visibility Days (2000-04) Highest values are located in southern Arizona, west Sonora, Baja California Norte, and north Chihuahua.

Sources Located Near Chiricahua Point Sources Douglas Power Plant; Douglas, AZ Apache Station (AEPCO); Wilcox, AZ Apache Nitrogen; St. David, AZ Chemical Lime; Paul Spur, AZ Area Sources Vehicle Emissions: highways, unpaved roads, recreational areas Other Sources Naco Dump: 40 miles south of wilderness area near Naco, Mexico

Source Apportionment for Sulfate (SO4) The left column shows 2002 (plan02c) and the right column shows 2018 (base18b) for each state and region. PSAT results indicate that sources in Arizona, Mexico, CENRAP, EUS, and pacific off-shore are the largest contributors.

Weighted Emissions Potential – SO4

Weighted Emissions Potential – SO4

Arizona SOx Emissions Source: Saguaro Reasonable Progress presentation on 1/22/07, L. Alter

Source Apportionment for Nitrate (NO3) The left column shows 2002 (plan02c) and the right column shows 2018 (base 18b) for each state and region. The largest contributors of nitrate are Arizona and California. Sources from CENRAP, Mexico, New Mexico, and pacific off-shore are also likely to contribute to nitrate.

Weighted Emissions Potential – NO3

Weighted Emissions Potential – NO3

Arizona NOx Emissions Source: Saguaro Reasonable Progress presentation on 1/22/07, L. Alter

Weighted Emissions Potential – Organic Carbon (OMC)

Weighted Emissions Potential – OMC

Arizona OC Emissions Source: Saguaro Reasonable Progress presentation on 1/22/07, L. Alter

Weighted Emissions Potential – Elemental Carbon (EC)

Weighted Emissions Potential - EC

Weighted Emissions Potential – Fine Soil (Soil)

Weighted Emissions Potential - Soil

Weighted Emissions Potential – Coarse Particulate Matter (CM)

Weighted Emissions Potential – CM

Modeling

Model Performance The left points are modeled data and the right points are from IMPROVE.

Visibility Modeling Results

Visibility Projections – NO3 This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Visibility Projections – SO4 This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Visibility Projections - OMC This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Visibility Projections - EC This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Visibility Projections – CM This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Visibility Projections – Soil This shows baseline conditions, glide slope, and projected 2018 light extinction.

Summary Largest Contributors to Visibility Impairment in Chiricahua Sulfates Coarse Mass, Fine Soil Organic Carbon

Continuing Progress Continuing Analysis of Chiricahua Additional WRAP Products (e.g. CoDust) Local Emission Inventories (e.g. Douglas/Agua Prieta) Nonattainment/Maintenance Area Plans Local analysis (FLM, Tribal) Impact from BART and other non-BART Microscale Modeling????