A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 30

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PUBLIC SPEAKING DEFINITION
Advertisements

The Systems Analysis Toolkit
Lincoln-Douglas Debate An Examination of Values. OBJECTIVES: The student will 1. Demonstrate understanding of the concepts that underlie Lincoln-Douglas.
Chapter Twenty-Nine Speaking in Other College Courses.
WEEK 3 THE TERM PAPER. WHAT IS A TERM PAPER? An academic essay that is rather lengthy, prepared by an academic writer Written in a concise and well documented.
Academic Essays & Report Writing
Thesis  The overriding claim of the argument; what your paper will prove.  Brief sketch of how you will prove it.
Chapter Thirty Speaking in Other College Courses.
Writing a Critical Review
Principals of Research Writing. What is Research Writing? Process of communicating your research  Before the fact  Research proposal  After the fact.
Eight Is Enough In the Perfect Paper. Thesis  The overriding claim of the argument; what your paper will prove.  Brief sketch of how you will prove.
Development of 4Cs among students in the framework of Content and Language Integrated Learning through debates CLIL demands a reconceptualisation of the.
Welcome! Have your OneNote up and ready to go. Reminder: Units 4-6 Vocab Test Friday.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 3rd Edition Section(s)
Nancy Swisher Lecturer in ESL FLE 402 Fall 2016
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 29
Significance of Findings and Discussion
Project title: keep it simple and short if possible
Analysis, Persuasion CV’s and Posters
Critical Thinking Study Skills Academy 2016/17.
Argumentative Writing You need your performance assessment books!
ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY.
Becoming a Public Speaker
Debate Chapter 13 Pages
CRITICAL ANALYSIS Purpose of a critical review The critical review is a writing task that asks you to summarise and evaluate a text. The critical review.
Persuasive Speaking Structures and Appeals
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 33
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Argument Writing: Taking a Stand
IT 161 – PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS
Cambridge Upper Secondary Science Competition
Argumentative Writing
The argumentative essay
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Investigating science
Argumentative Writing
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Argumentative Writing
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
The argumentative essay
Constructing Arguments
Today’s goals Peer review the 3rd draft of our synthesis essays
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 31
The argumentative essay
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 5TH EDITION Chapter 1
Group 4 Project: Experimenting Environmental Conditions or Creating a working environmental sustainable product.
Argumentative Writing
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
A SPEAKER’S GUIDEBOOK 4TH EDITION CHAPTER 26
Annotated Bibliography And PowerPoint Presentations
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Argumentative Writing
How to read a scientific paper
Poster Title ___ Title is at top of the poster, short, descriptive of the project and easily readable at a distance of about 4-5 feet (words about
Title INTRODUCTION/PROBLEM/ BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS/OUTCOMES
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
Your Title Goes Here Your Title Goes Here Your Name, Co-authors
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Presentation transcript:

A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 30 Presentations Assigned across the Curriculum

The Review of Academic Articles Typically expected to: Identify the author’s thesis or hypothesis Explain the author’s methods Explain the author’s findings Identify the theoretical perspective (if applicable) Evaluate the study’s validity (if applicable)

The Review of Academic Articles (cont.) Describe the author’s sources Evaluate the validity of the sources Show alternative applications of findings Suggest possible leads for further research

The Team Presentation Type of oral presentation Delivered by three or more individuals Regularly used in the classroom Requires cooperation and planning

The Debate Calls upon skills in: Academic debate Persuasion Delivery Ability to think quickly and critically Academic debate Sides argue issue from opposing viewpoints

Take a Side Individual debate format Team debate format Two individuals face off Team debate format Two teams face off Wording modified/simplified. Was awkward using people.

Take a Side (cont.) Affirmative side Negative side Supports the topic with a resolution Seeks change or consideration of issue Negative side Attempts to defeat the resolution Dissuades audience from affirmative arguments

Advance Strong Arguments Claim Makes an assertion about an issue Evidence Support offered for the claim Reasoning Explanation of why evidence supports claim

Advance Strong Arguments (cont.) Debates are characterized by refutation. Each side attacks the other’s arguments. May refute: Claims Evidence Reasoning

Advance Strong Arguments (cont.) Refutation also involves rebuilding refuted arguments. New evidence may be added Opponent’s reasoning/evidence may be attacked

The Poster Presentation Concisely visually displays information about A study; An issue; A concept. Information is displayed on a poster.

The Poster Presentation (cont.) Follows scientific journal article structure: Abstract Introduction Description of methods Results Conclusion References

The Poster Presentation (cont.) Key findings are displayed on posters. Can be examined freely by participants Copies of the written report are available. Include full details of the study

The Poster Presentation (cont.) Consider the audience. Posters must be Concise; Visually appealing; Restricted to most important parts.

Preparing the Poster Select a concise, informative title. Use 84-point type or larger. Include an abstract (brief study summary). Offer compelling and “must know” points. Ensure logical, easy-to-follow flow.

Preparing the Poster (cont.) Ruthlessly edit text to a minimum. Use clear graphics wherever possible. Select a muted color for the poster. Use a contrasting, clear font color. Use a large font size. Text should be readable from three feet.

Preparing the Poster (cont.) All figures/diagrams must be legible. Make each viewable from a distance. Label each one. Provide a concise summary of each figure. Include a legend below each one.

Preparing the Poster (cont.) Be prepared to Provide brief descriptions of your poster; Answer questions. Keep explanations short.

The Service Learning Presentation Addresses a problem or need in a Community agency Non-profit organization

The Service Learning Presentation (cont.) Typically included: Description of the service task What organization did your project serve? What is the problem/issue? How was the problem/issue addressed?

The Service Learning Presentation (cont.) Description of what you learned about those you served How did the problem affect them? How did your solution help them? What differences did you observe?

The Service Learning Presentation (cont.) Explanation of how the service task and outcome related to your service learning course What course principals relate to your project? What observations indicate these principles apply?

The Service Learning Presentation (cont.) Application of learning to future understanding How was your understanding improved/expanded? How was your interest/motivated affected? What can you tell others about The experience? How it could affect them?

Preparing for On-the-Job Audiences Expert or insider audience Very knowledgeable about the topic/issue Colleagues within the field Share speaker’s knowledge of the field May be unfamiliar with specific topic

Preparing for On-the-Job Audiences (cont.) Lay audience No specialized knowledge of the field Mixed audience Combination of people Various levels of knowledge Most difficult audience to satisfy