Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.

Advertisements

April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.

NCLB Program Planning Process for the Consolidated Grant NCLB Program Planning Process for the Consolidated Grant Presented by Suzanne Ochse, Director.

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.

A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.

NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: New Jersey Association of School Administrators April 30,

NJDOE TALENT DIVISION OVERVIEW prepared for: NJPSA ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE CONFRENCE AND MEMBERSHIP MEETING March 30,

Reading First Program Notes for Russ Sweet March 2 & 3, 2006 Eugene, Oregon © 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and.

SDPI Competitive Grant Program Planning Meeting 1 IHS Diabetes Competitive Grant Program: Overview and Update Kelly Acton, MD, MPH, FACP Director, IHS.

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Grant Program Nancy Sharkey, Program Officer Charles McGrew, Program Officer Kristen.

Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.

Atlanta Public Schools Principal Selection Process Human Resources, Center of Expertise Updated March 3, 2014 East Region Community Meeting April.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,

Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.

Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.

Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.

Summary Document March 2010 Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official notice of.

1 Building District Capacity through State Monitoring of SIG The Massachusetts Model March 22, 2011 Presented by Karla Brooks Baehr, Deputy Commissioner.

1 Michigan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 August 11, 2009 State Board of Education.

Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.

SASA WEBGRAM State Title I Directors July 27, 2011 Topic: 2011 Grantee Satisfaction Survey Patricia A. McKee Acting Director Student Achievement and School.

I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.

Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.

School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.

Michigan Department of Education Office of Field Services Consolidated Application Schedule.

Indistar Summit February 28-29, 2012 Biloxi, Mississippi Mississippi Department of Education School Improvement Grants: SIGnaling Positive Changes in Mississippi.

Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.

Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.

QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.

Alabama State Department of Education Federal Programs FY 2011 SIG Technical Assistance Mini-Webinar: March 18, 2011.

State Board of Education Meeting Race to the Top Update August 1, RTTT3 Overview Allocation of Funds (State and District) State-Level Activities.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction An Informational Webinar with The California Department of.

ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.

Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.

NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.

Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.

District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.

Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.

Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.

School Improvement Grants Webinar July 23, Webinar Troubleshooting Pin # enables audio communication Questions may be submitted via the chat or.

1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.

The Texas State Literacy Plan Creating College and Career Ready Texans Age 0 to Grade 12 Texas Literacy Initiative (TLI)

Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio

School Improvement Grant (SIG) Title I Section, 1003g Renewal Requirements March 2012.

NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.

February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.

Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Michigan Department of Education August 16, 2010.

Association of Government Accountants “Maximizing Government Efficiency Through Technology and Oversight” April 29, 2016 * 9:30 am 1.

Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting

Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs

A Multi-tiered Framework for Monitoring ESEA & IDEA Programs

Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund

Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program

Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.

Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements

Featuring: Patricia King, Minnesota Dept. of Education

Tier I and II Technical Assistance WebEx

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT

ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System

New Jersey Department of Education

Applicants’ Orientation Meeting

Michigan School Improvement Grant

ESEA Flexibility: An overview

ECDS Early Childhood Data System Texas Student Data System

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Office of School Improvement Resource Allocation Review Requirements September 19, 2018.

Maryland WIOA Alignment and Integration

Step 3. Initiate Proposal

Principal residency Grant program, cycle 3 Competitive grant opportunity ESC Region 13.

Presentation transcript:

Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions: NEW JERSEY Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions: Moving Beyond Compliance Presented by: Suzanne Ochse & Pat Mitchell 1

Webinar Goals NJ’s Statewide System of Support & SIG Statewide activities for SIG recipients - building district & school capacity

NJ’s Statewide System of Support State Committee/MACC Stakeholder Committee History of Statewide System of Support (SSS) Building Capacity through SSS 11/24/2018

NJ Statewide System of Support 4

SIG State Application Approved by the USDE 32 Tier I and Tier II Schools 11 Districts Tier III Competitive Process District/School Application 11/24/2018

SIG - Funding Total available: $63,338,647 25%: $15,834,661 25%: $15,834,661 Total after 25%: $47,503,986 Minimum is $50,000 and maximum is $2 million in each of three years State Admin: $3.3 million over three years 11/24/2018

SIG: Timeline March 3 – Informational Meeting March 10 – Letter of Intent March 22 & 29 – Technical Assistance April 9-15 – Peer Review April 29 – Application Due Date May-June – External Reader Panel June – Interdivisional Committee Review June 14 – Notification of Awards July – Pre-contract/Peer Review July 30 – Final Award Notice August – Summer Leadership Academy

Statewide Activities: Building Support & Capacity Peer Review Network Turnaround Officer Leadership Academy & Network External Evaluation NJDOE Interdivisional Committee The following statewide activities are using the administrative funds over a three-year period. Peer Review – The goal of the peer review is to build support for a strong application prior to submission and because the school applications will be considered the school improvement plan (Unified Plan) which requires a peer review. The activity is occurring now

Resources USDE Information http://www.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html School Improvement Grant Guidance (FAQs) Final Requirements SEA Application Fact Sheets NJDOE Information ARRA School Improvement http://www.state.nj.us/education/arra/sig/ Teaching & Learning Tool http://www.nj.gov/education/capa/docs/tool4day.pdf Handbook Guide at: http://www.nj.gov/education/capa/docs/visit4day.pdf The resources listed include federal information in the first group. The second group is on our state website: First is the access to the SIG Notice of Grant Opportunity Second the Teaching and Learning Tool used during school visits for conducting the comprehensive needs assessment. Lastly, the handbook for the needs assessment visit. 11/24/2018

SIG Notice of Grant Opportunity http://www.state.nj.us/education/arra/sig/# application 11/24/2018

NJDOE Presenters Suzanne Ochse, Director Office of Student Achievement & Accountability 609-292-1828 Suzanne.ochse@doe.state.nj.us Pat Mitchell, Manager School Improvement Bureau 973-727-6063 Pat.mitchell@doe.state.nj.us The following statewide activities are using the administrative funds over a three-year period. Peer Review – The goal of the peer review is to build support for a strong application prior to submission and because the school applications will be considered the school improvement plan (Unified Plan) which requires a peer review. The activity is occurring now