Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNC MSK Course Day 9 Lab XR UNKNOWNS (for self study)
Advertisements

Anatomical alignment, but not goniometry, predicts femorotibial cartilage loss as well as mechanical alignment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 
The association between metacarpal ratio, radiographic hand and knee osteoarthritis and its progression after meniscectomy  P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander,
Lateral and medial joint space narrowing predict subsequent cartilage loss in the narrowed, but not in the non-narrowed femorotibial compartment – data.
The role of imaging modalities in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis and clinical assessment of peripheral joint osteoarthritis  C.Y.J. Wenham, A.J.
Comparison of MR-arthrography and CT-arthrography in hyaline cartilage-thickness measurement in radiographically normal cadaver hips with anatomy as gold.
Validity and responsiveness of a new measure of knee osteophytes for osteoarthritis studies: data from the osteoarthritis initiative  M. Hakky, M. Jarraya,
Prevalence of labral tears and cartilage loss in patients with mechanical symptoms of the hip: evaluation using MR arthrography  G. Neumann, M.D., A.D.
Subchondral bone marrow lesions are highly associated with, and predict subchondral bone attrition longitudinally: the MOST study  F.W. Roemer, T. Neogi,
Increased risk for radiographic osteoarthritis features in young active athletes: a cross- sectional matched case–control study  F.W. Roemer, M. Jarraya,
Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis
P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander, M. Englund 
Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort  W. Wirth, M.S., M.-P. Hellio.
Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. doi: /nrrheum
Osteoimmunology in mucopolysaccharidoses type I, II, VI and VII
Osteoarthritis as a disease of mechanics
Cyst-like lesions of the knee joint and their relation to incident knee pain and development of radiographic osteoarthritis: the MOST study  A. Guermazi,
H. Oka, M. D. , S. Muraki, M. D. , Ph. D. , T. Akune, M. D. , Ph. D
Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score)  D.J. Hunter, A. Guermazi, G.H. Lo, A.J. Grainger,
Knee osteoarthritis in community-dwelling older adults: are there characteristic patterns of pain location?  L.R.J. Wood, Ph.D., M.C.S.P., G. Peat, Ph.D.,
P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander, M. Englund 
Bone marrow lesions, subchondral bone cysts and subchondral bone attrition are associated with histological synovitis in patients with end-stage knee.
Cancellous bone differences between knees with early, definite and advanced joint space loss; a comparative quantitative macroradiographic study  Elizabeth.
Sensitivity to Change of 3D Meniscal Measures in Rapidly Progressing Knee Osteoarthritis and Association With Radiographic Joint Space Width Loss  M.
Radiographic evaluation of posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: the Kellgren– Lawrence scale is reliable and correlates with clinical symptoms  N.
Structural correlates of pain in joints with osteoarthritis
Lateral and medial joint space narrowing predict subsequent cartilage loss in the narrowed, but not in the non-narrowed femorotibial compartment – data.
S. Reichenbach, M. D. , A. Guermazi, M. D. , J. Niu, M. B. B. S. , D
Radiographic and MRI assessment in osteoarthritis efficacy studies and anti-nerve growth factor programs: Characteristics and differences  A. Guermazi,
S. Sonne-Holm, M.D., Dr. Sci., S. Jacobsen, M.D. 
Evaluations of radiographic joint space – do they adequately predict cartilage conditions in the patellofemoral joint of the patients undergoing total.
Knee Images Digital Analysis (KIDA): a novel method to quantify individual radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis in detail  A.C.A. Marijnissen,
Christopher Buckland-Wright, D.Sc  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Pre-radiographic osteoarthritic changes are highly prevalent in the medial patella and medial posterior femur in older persons: Framingham OA study  D.
Anatomical alignment, but not goniometry, predicts femorotibial cartilage loss as well as mechanical alignment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative 
Radiograph view influences patient selection and patient-reported outcomes in injection therapy for knee osteoarthritis  M.A. Meyer, T.S. Leroux, D.M.
Rates and sensitivity of knee cartilage thickness loss in specific central reading radiographic strata from the osteoarthritis initiative  S. Maschek,
Osteoarthritis of the knee after meniscal resection: long term radiographic evaluation of disease progression  P.T. Paradowski, L.S. Lohmander, M. Englund 
N. Segal, E. Frick, M. Nevitt, J. Torner, D. Felson, A. Guermazi, D
M.D. Westby, D.A. Marshall, C.A. Jones  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
G. Neumann, D. Hunter, M. Nevitt, L. B. Chibnik, K. Kwoh, H. Chen, T
A graphic user interface for the evaluation of knee osteoarthritis (GEKO): an open- source tool for histological grading  H.E. Kloefkorn, B.Y. Jacobs,
Comments on Beattie et al
Who should have a joint replacement? A plea for more ‘phronesis’
Relevance of imaging in anti nerve growth factor inhibitor (aNGF) studies with a focus on eligibility and on-study safety – A pictorial overview  F.W.
Progression of cartilage damage and meniscal pathology over 30 months is associated with an increase in radiographic tibiofemoral joint space narrowing.
Hip strengthening reduces symptoms but not knee load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: a randomised controlled trial 
Development of Asian hip stem 1 – Three dimensional morphology study
Associations between MRI-detected early osteophytes and knee structure in older adults: a population-based cohort study  Z. Zhu, L.L. Laslett, W. Han,
X. Li, Ph. D. , C. Benjamin Ma, M. D. , T. M. Link, M. D. , D. -D
A pilot study of the reproducibility and validity of measuring knee subchondral bone density in the tibia  D. Dore, BBiotech.(Hons.), C. Ding, M.D., G.
In vivo structural analysis of subchondral trabecular bone in osteoarthritis of the hip using multi-detector row CT  K. Chiba, M. Ito, M. Osaki, M. Uetani,
C. Ratzlaff, M. Koehoorn, J. Cibere, J. Kopec 
Location-specific hip joint space width for progression of hip osteoarthritis: predictive validity and responsiveness of a new computerized measure  C.
D. J. Hunter, N. Arden, F. Cicuttini, M. D. Crema, B. Dardzinski, J
Typical findings of osteoarthritis at the hip using routine T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI. (A) Sixty-three years M, T1FS and T2-weighted sequences showing.
Location-specific hip joint space width for progression of hip osteoarthritis – Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative  C. Ratzlaff, C. Van Wyngaarden,
Knee cartilage defects: association with early radiographic osteoarthritis, decreased cartilage volume, increased joint surface area and type II collagen.
Investigations in generalized osteoarthritis
Measurement of structure (disease) modification in osteoarthritis
Is the atrophic phenotype of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis associated with faster progression of disease? The MOST study  M.D. Crema, D.T. Felson, A. Guermazi,
Preliminary study on diffraction enhanced radiographic imaging for a canine model of cartilage damage  C. Muehleman, Ph.D., J. Li, M.D., Z. Zhong, Ph.D. 
T.D.V. Cooke, M.A., M.B., B.Chir., F.R.C.S. (c) 
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Value of tomosynthesis for lesion evaluation of small joints in osteoarthritic hands using the OARSI score  K. Martini, A.S. Becker, R. Guggenberger,
Fig. 4. Anteroposterior radiographs of the left hip joint in a 47-year-old female. (A) The preoperative radiograph shows moderate joint space narrowing.
Abnormalities identified in the knees of asymptomatic volunteers using peripheral magnetic resonance imaging  K.A. Beattie, B.Sc., P. Boulos, M.D., F.R.C.P.
Osteoarthritis year 2012 in review: imaging
Association between bone marrow lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and knee pain in community residents in Korea  I.J. Kim, D.H. Kim, J.Y.
General Information Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Presentation transcript:

Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised R.D. Altman, M.D., G.E. Gold, M.D.  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage  Volume 15, Pages A1-A56 (January 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009 Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Hand DIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Hand DIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Hand PIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Hand PIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 marginal osteophyte, (C) grade 2 marginal osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 marginal osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Hand DIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Hand DIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Hand PIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Hand PIP: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Hand IP of the thumb: (A) normal, (B) marginal osteophyte, and (C) joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Hand IP of the thumb: (A) normal, (B) marginal osteophyte, and (C) joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Hand trapezionavicular joint: (A) normal, (B) marginal osteophyte, and (C) joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Hand trapezionavicular joint: (A) normal, (B) marginal osteophyte, and (C) joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 9 Hand malalignment of the (A) DIP, (B) PIP, and (C) (subluxation) trapeziometacarpal joint. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 9 Hand malalignment of the (A) DIP, (B) PIP, and (C) (subluxation) trapeziometacarpal joint. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 10 Hand DIP: (A) erosion, (B) central erosion, (C) pseudowidening, and (D) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 10 Hand DIP: (A) erosion, (B) central erosion, (C) pseudowidening, and (D) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 11 Hand PIP: (A) erosion, (B) subchondral cyst, and (C) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 11 Hand PIP: (A) erosion, (B) subchondral cyst, and (C) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 12 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) erosion, (B) subchondral cyst, and (C) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 12 Hand trapeziometacarpal joint: (A) erosion, (B) subchondral cyst, and (C) subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 13 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior acetabular osteophyte, (C) grade 2 superior acetabular osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 superior acetabular osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 13 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior acetabular osteophyte, (C) grade 2 superior acetabular osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 superior acetabular osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 14 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 superior femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 superior femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 14 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 superior femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 superior femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 15 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 inferior femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 inferior femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 inferior femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 15 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 inferior femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 inferior femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 inferior femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 16 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 superior joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 superior joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 16 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 superior joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 superior joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 superior joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 17 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 medial joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 medial joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 17 Hip: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial joint space narrowing, (C) grade 2 medial joint space narrowing, and (D) grade 3 medial joint space narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 18 Hip: (A) normal, (B) inferior acetabular osteophyte, (C) acetabular subchondral cyst, and (D) acetabular subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 18 Hip: (A) normal, (B) inferior acetabular osteophyte, (C) acetabular subchondral cyst, and (D) acetabular subchondral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 19 Hip: (A) normal, (B) subchondral femoral sclerosis, (C) flattening of the femoral head, and (D) thickening of the femoral medial calcar (buttressing). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 19 Hip: (A) normal, (B) subchondral femoral sclerosis, (C) flattening of the femoral head, and (D) thickening of the femoral medial calcar (buttressing). Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 20 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 medial femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 medial femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 20 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 medial femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 medial femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 21 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial tibial osteophyte, (C) grade 2 medial tibial osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 medial tibial osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 21 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial tibial osteophyte, (C) grade 2 medial tibial osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 medial tibial osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 22 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 lateral femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 lateral femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 22 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral femoral osteophyte, (C) grade 2 lateral femoral osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 lateral femoral osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 23 Knee (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral tibial osteophyte, (C) grade 2 lateral tibial osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 lateral tibial osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 23 Knee (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral tibial osteophyte, (C) grade 2 lateral tibial osteophyte, and (D) grade 3 lateral tibial osteophyte. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 24 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial tibiofemoral narrowing, (C) grade 2 medial tibiofemoral narrowing, and (D) grade 3 medial tibiofemoral narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 24 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 medial tibiofemoral narrowing, (C) grade 2 medial tibiofemoral narrowing, and (D) grade 3 medial tibiofemoral narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 25 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing, (C) grade 3 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing, and (D) grade 3 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 25 Knee: (A) grade 0 normal, (B) grade 1 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing, (C) grade 3 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing, and (D) grade 3 lateral tibiofemoral narrowing. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 26 Knee: (A) normal, (B) medial tibial attrition, (C) medial tibial sclerosis, and (D) lateral femoral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions

Fig. 26 Knee: (A) normal, (B) medial tibial attrition, (C) medial tibial sclerosis, and (D) lateral femoral sclerosis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007 15, A1-A56DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009) Copyright © 2007 Terms and Conditions