Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Advertisements

Perkins IV National Definitions and State Reporting: The Impact on Data Collection in Texas Gabriela Borcoman Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards REVISED March 19, 2014 PaRC Presentation E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
 Student Success: What Is It, and How Can We Measure It? Kim Harrell, Folsom Lake College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College David Morse, ASCCC Executive.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Presentation for Flex Day June 7, 2011 LATTC Accreditation
Illinois Community College Board DUAL CREDIT: Proposed Rule Revisions & Updates.
Monitoring Report 2015 – 01 Global Ends Statement.
ACCJC’s Annual Report Institution-Set Standards March 5, 2015 PaRC Meeting E. Kuo Foothill IR&P.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
League of Women Voters November 2, Governing Board Clackamas Community College Board of Education is a Governing Board CCC cannot legally exist.
College Credit for Veterans Cris McCullough - Academic Affairs, CCCCO Dean, Curriculum & Instruction Veterans Summit San Jose, California December 5, 2014.
REPORT TO THE SAN LUIS OBISPO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MARCH 7, 2012 SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT INSTITUTIONAL.
1. ACCJC INSTITUTION-SET STANDARDS DISCUSSION 2 A “standard” is the level of performance set by the institution to meet educational quality and institutional.
Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.
Revisiting Our Institution-Set Standards: Part II Bri Hays Campus-Based Researcher Presented to the Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Committee.
Ohio’s Mission to Expand Career-Technical Education William Bussey, Director Jamie Nash, Associate Director ∙ December 16, 2014.
Laney College Institutional Effectiveness Goal Indicators: Proposal for Adoption Draft Proposal June 13, 2016.
Student Achievement Data A first look at MPC’s institution-set standards Rosaleen Ryan, Institutional Researcher Catherine Webb, Accreditation Liaison.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Summer Data Conference – June 6, (2008) National Completion Goals (Lumina’s Big Goal: 60% of those will have an Associate Degree or above.
1 Foothill College, El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA | foothill.edu El Monte Road Los Altos Hills, CA foothill.edu Institutional-Set.
2016 AIR Pre-Conference Workshop
Outcome Metrics and Industry-Recognized Certification Reporting
Foothill-De Anza Accreditation Self Study Update
Student Success Scorecard: 2016 Report
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Student Success Scorecard and Institution-Set Standards 2014
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
2016 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
KCTCS Strategic Plan Update
Presentation to Board of Trustees
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
2017 Taft College Student Success Scorecard
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Florida College System Performance Based Funding
Dr. Brian Lofman, Dean April 18, 2017 Student Success Scorecard 2017:
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Accreditation and curriculum
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative
California State Performance Plan
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Meaningful Methods For Outcomes Assessment: A Case Study
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
New Certificate Program
Presented To: College Planning Council
Student Success Metrics
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
VISION FOR SUCCESS GOALS
Process for Local District Goal Setting
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Agency on the Move ACCJC Update
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting April 2019.
Presented To: College Planning Council
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Vision for Success Local Goal Setting Part 1
Presentation transcript:

Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness Setting Standards for Education Quality and Institutional Effectiveness Mehmet "Dali" Ӧztürk, Ph.D. Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness December 2016

The ACCJC Annual Report   Each year, the District is required to submit an Annual Report as well as an Annual Fiscal Report to the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC).

Dissect new standard that requires Institutional-Set Standards Proposed Steps for Reviewing/Revising and Updating Institutional-Set Standards Dissect new standard that requires Institutional-Set Standards Identify required areas Determine appropriate metrics Update/align with ACCJC definitions Collect and analyze data Update/reset minimum standards Propose recommendations and bring to Senior Management for discussion Follow participatory governance structure Obtain Board approval Publish and disseminate (e.g., post online, e-news, etc.)  

Accreditation Standards, Cross-Walked, with Glossary Terms1 What is the rationale for setting institutional standards?   Accreditation Standards, Cross-Walked, with Glossary Terms1 (Adopted June 2014) http://www.accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Accreditation_Standards_Adopted_June_2014_with-Cross-walk_and_Glossary_11_2014.pdf

ACCJC Guide to Evaluating and Improving Institutions What criteria and processes does the college use to determine its priorities and set minimum expectations (institution-set standards) for student achievement, including required expectations of performance for course completion, job placement rates, and licensure examination passage rates? (Federal Regulation) To what extent does the college achieve its standards? (Federal Regulation) How does the college use accreditation annual report data to assess performance against the institution-set standards? If an institution does not meet its own standards, what plans are developed and implemented to enable it to reach these standards? (Federal Regulation) http://www.accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Guide_to_Evaluating_and_Improving_Institutions_July_2015_REVISED.pdf

Course Completion Rate (14b. 12a.) Student Achievement Data Requested by ACCJC District level Course Completion Rate (14b. 12a.) Student Retention Rate-Fall to Fall (15b.) Student Degree Completion (16b. 13a.) Student Transfer to 4-year Colleges/universities (17b. 15a.) Student Certificate Completion (18b. 14a.)   Program level Career Technical Education (CTE) Licensure Employment

Methods for Setting and Using the Standards   Reasonable Appropriate Realistic

Proposed Method for Setting the Standards Review most current and historical performance (multi-year/longitudinal data disaggregated by ethnicity and other demographic characteristics as appropriate) Generate multi-year averages for performance (5-8 years) Determine performance indicators based on data analysis, institutional history and context (standards)  

Proposed Method for Using the Standards   Develop a performance range and/or color coding (Trapp, 2013): Range =>5% above target-excellent + or – 5%- on target-good =<5% below target-needs attention

Multi-Year District Average Institution-set Standard Recommendations Student Achievement Area Multi-Year District Average Recommendation* 2013-14 2014-15 Course Completion Rate (14b.) 67% (Fall 2005 to Fall 2012) 55% 69% 68% Student Retention Rate-Fall to Fall (15b.) 58% (Fall 2005 -> Fall 2006 to Fall 2012 -> Fall 2013) 50% 65% 64% Student Degree Completion (16b.) 843 (2005-06 to 2012-13) 700 1,089 1,122 Student Transfer to 4-year Colleges/universities (17b.) 35% (2002-03 to 2006-07) 30% 34% (2007/2008 Cohort) 33% (2008/2009 Student Certificate Completion (18b.) 409 300 756 668 *Approved by the COS Board of Trustees in February 2014

Thank You!