ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
Advertisements

ERLP Overview Hywel Owen ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Overview of ILC Plans D.Rubin April 17, D. Rubin2 ILC R&D Activities and Plans 1.Positron Source 2.Damping Ring 3.Low Emittance Transport - damping.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
LEP3 RF System: gradient and power considerations Andy Butterworth BE/RF Thanks to R. Calaga, E. Ciapala.
Progress of SRF and ERL at Peking University Lu Xiangyang Institute of Heavy Ion Physics Peking University.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Highly HOM-damped cavities S. Belomestnykh Brookhaven National Laboratory and Stony Brook University March Washington, DC FCC Week 2015.
I.V. Bazarov, Multivariate Optimization of High Brightness DC Gun Photoinjector, UCLA Workshop, 8-10 November CHESS / LEPP ERL DC Gun Injector.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
I.V. Bazarov, ERL advisory mtg, Sept 2012 CLASSE Cornell University CHESS & ERL Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based ScienceS and Education (CLASSE)
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
Making the ATF into an ERL-FFAG May 27, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC R&D retreat1 In relation to eRHIC risks addressed.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
SRF Requirements and Challenges for ERL-Based Light Sources Ali Nassiri Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory 2 nd Argonne – Fermilab Collaboration.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
1Matthias Liepe08/02/2007 ERL Main Linac: Overview, Parameters Cavity and HOM Damping Matthias Liepe.
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 Future Options Matthias Liepe.
Review 09/2010 page RF System for Electron Collider Ring Haipeng Wang for the team of R. Rimmer and F. Marhauser, SRF Institute and Y. Zhang, G. Krafft.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
FLS2010 Workshop, Stanford, March 1-5, 2010 Florian Loehl (Cornell University) Commissioning of the High Current ERL Injector at Cornell Florian Loehl.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
Photocathode based Electron Sources for Particle Accelerators – Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow B.L. Militsyn STFC ASTeC, UK European Workshop on Photocathodes.
UBW2012, A. Matveenko Michael Abo-Bakr (presented by Alexander Matveenko) Unwanted Beam Workshop (UBW 2012) Dark Current Issues for Energy.
WG2: Beam Dynamics, Optics and Instrumentation – Summary
An Electron source for PERLE
Degradation and Recovery of Cavity Performance
Introduction of PAL and Activities in Superconducting RF
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
WG3 Summary High current and CW accelerators
Plans of XFELO in Future ERL Facilities
BUNCH LENGTH MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR 500 KV PHOTOCATHODE DC GUN AT IHEP
Joint Accelerator Research JGU & HZB
A. Plastun¹, B. Mustapha, Z. Conway and P. Ostroumov
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
CBETA, a 4-turn ERL with FFAG arc
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
High Q Cavity Operation in the Cornell Horizontal Test Cryomodule
Erdong Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory
SRF Pb/Nb photoinjector; recent results
MIT Compact X-ray Source
Background, IBS, gas scattering halo, collimation and etc. *
Operational Experience with the Cornell ERL Injector SRF Cavities
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
ERL working modes Georg Hoffstaetter, Professor Cornell University / CLASSE / SRF group & ERL effort High Current mode High Coherence mode High Buch charge.
ERL2015 WG4: RF & superconducting RF for ERL
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Performance Degradation cERL Injector Cryomodule
Electron Source Configuration
XFEL Oscillator in ERLs
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
Physics Design on Injector I
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
MEIC Polarized Electron Source
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Presentation transcript:

ERL Main-Linac Cryomodule Why ? and What ? CW linac R&D DC-gun R&D SRF injector R&D Undulator R&D Georg H. Hoffstaetter, October 5, 2004

Cornell history: The ERL principle Energy recovery needs continuously fields in the RF structure Normal conducting high field cavities can get too hot. Superconducting cavities used to have too low fields. Georg H. Hoffstaetter, October 5, 2004

ERL on Cornell’s campus as extension of CHESS ERL@CESR, Cornell Georg H. Hoffstaetter, October 5, 2004

Parameters Required beam parameters drive MLC choices 5 GeV, 100mA, 8pm emittances, 2ps bunch length

From beam parameters to MLC 5 GeV, 100mA, 8pm emittances, 2ps bunch length 8pm: requires small bunch charge and therefore high repetition rate – results in 1.3GHz Cost optimization: Construction (favors high gradients and small length) + 10 year operation (favors low gradient and small cooling needs) - results in 15MV/m < Eacc < 20MV/m 100mA: By far the largest current in an SRF linac, produces strong Higher Order Modes. To damp these modes, cavities cannot be too long - results in 7-cell cavities with a beam-pipe HOM absorber each. 5GeV and 15MV/m, i.e 312m of acceleration, 7-cells for 1.3GHz – results in 384 cavities ERL: Optics for two beam requires regular focusing – results in a quadrupole every 10m, and therefore a 10m long cryomodule. 10m MLC for cavities with HOM absorbers – results in 6 cavities per MLC

Cornell Energy Recovery Linac Project Design Definition Report (PDDR) 530 pages between conceptual design and engineering design. Contains considerations for MLC.

Beam parameter input to MLC requirements 8pm: Stringent alignment tolerances, obtained by orbit correction simulations small coupler kick limits obtained by RF and beam dynamics simulations 16MV/m High Q requirements and suitable cryogenic design 100mA: Strong HOM damping requirements, obtained by BBU simulations b) Georg H. Hoffstaetter, October 5, 2004

The right time for an ERL MLC ! Peak DC-gun voltage: 440kV (of 500kV required with beam) Peak bunched-beam current: 52mA with GaAs / 35mA with CsK2Sb for 8h   Typical bunch length: 2ps (up to spec) Smallest normalized thermal emittance: 0.25 mm mrad/mm radius Smallest normalized emittance after injector at 80pC: 0.7 mm mrad with normalized bunch core emittance : 0.3 mm mrad For this gun, 0.5 mm mrad is theoretical limit ! This bunch in a 5GeV ERL would produce X-rays brighter than any ring today. (a 50pmX50pm ERL/USR or a 0.6nmX6pm storage ring) Cathode research: reduction of the thermal emittance by 2 SRF-cavity: Q of 3.5E10 at 16MV/m without ERL couplers The injector prototype has already achieved ERL-quality beams. Now the rest of the accelerator, particularly the MLC has to be prototyped !

Charge to the MLC review committee Review the ERL’s MLC and evaluate whether it’s design is suitable for the ERL’s parameters. Consider the cryogenic and mechanical. Review the prototype MLC that will be tested individually, and evaluate whether its design and its planned tests will yield sufficient insight of the ERLs MLC. Write a short report of your findings, if possible before October 14, 2012.

Start of MLC review