PARTICLE DARK MATTER CANDIDATES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine UC Berkeley 11 October 2004.
Advertisements

WIMPs and superWIMPs Jonathan Feng UC Irvine MIT Particle Theory Seminar 17 March 2003.
Missing E T – Not! Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 17 April st the LHC UC Riverside, WCLTN.
Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ. & ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ.
Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn University) Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn University) October 4,
DARK PARTICLES: WIMPS AND BEYOND Cornell Colloquium 7 November 2011 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 7 Nov 11Feng 1.
WIMPS AND BEYOND Princeton Colloquium 24 February 2011 Jonathan Feng
27 Oct 08Feng 1 WIMPS AND THEIR RELATIONS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 27 October 2008 MIT Nuclear and Particle Physics Colloquium.
Dark Matter: A Mini Review Jin Min Yang Hong Kong (杨 金 民)(杨 金 民) Institute of Theoretical Physics Academia Sinica, Beijing.
11 May 07Feng 1 SUPERSYMMETRIC DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 11 May 2007 Fermilab Wine & Cheese Hunt for DM Workshop.
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine University of Washington 4 March 2005.
WIMPs and superWIMPs Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SUGRA20 18 March 2003.
12 July 07Feng 1 COLLIDER PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine GRG18 and Amaldi7 Sydney, 12 July 2007.
23 September 05Feng 1 COSMOLOGY AT COLLIDERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 23 September 2005 SoCal Strings Seminar Graphic: N. Graf.
WIMP PARADIGM: CURRENT STATUS 23 Mar 11Feng 1 FNAL Colloquium International Symposium on Experiments on the Cosmic Frontier Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 23.
SuperWIMP Cosmology and Collider Phenomenology Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine SUSY04, Tsukuba 21 June 2004.
WIMPLESS DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 13 May 2009 UCI Joint Particle Seminar Work with Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar, John.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES AND SIGNALS SLAC Colloquium 1 June 2009 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
2 June 05Feng 1 DARK MATTERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 2 June 2005 UCSC Colloquium Graphic: N. Graf.
DARK MATTER IN EARLY LHC DATA Jonathan Feng UC Irvine West Coast ATLAS Forum 24 March 2010.
4 Mar 08Feng 1 DARK MATTERS CaJAGWR Caltech-JPL 4 March 2008 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
WIMPS AND THEIR RELATIONS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine CIFAR, Mont Tremblant 7 March 2009 Work with Jose Ruiz Cembranos 1, Manoj Kaplinghat.
DARK MATTERS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine Physics Department Colloquium University of Chicago 2 December 2004.
WIMPs and superWIMPs from Extra Dimensions Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Johns Hopkins Theory Seminar 31 January 2003.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PARTICLE DARK MATTER KISS Dark Matter Workshop 15 July 2009 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 15 Jul 09Feng 1.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine Arlington LC Workshop January 2003.
20 June 07Feng 1 MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine CAP Congress 20 June 2007.
The LC and the Cosmos: Connections in Supersymmetry Jonathan Feng UC Irvine American Linear Collider Physics Group Seminar 20 February 2003.
SuperWIMP Dark Matter Jonathan Feng UC Irvine FNAL Theoretical Astrophysics Seminar 17 May 2004.
THE DARK UNIVERSE Jonathan Feng Department of Physics and Astronomy UCI Distinguished Faculty Lecture 26 October 2004.
8 Oct 07Feng 1 THE SEARCH FOR DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 8 October 2007 CSULB Colloquium Graphic: N. Graf.
20 June 06Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND SUPERGRAVITY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 20 June 2006 Strings 2006, Beijing.
DARK MATTER PHENOMENOLOGY CIPANP Jonathan Feng San Diego
The Dark Universe Progress, Problems, and Prospects Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine APS April Meeting, Denver 1 May 2004.
30 Jul – 1 Aug 07Feng 1 SUPERSYMETRY FOR ASTROPHYSICISTS Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 29 Jul – 1 Aug 2007 SLAC Summer Institute Graphic:
5 Feb 07Feng 1 ILC AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine BILCW07 5 February 2007 Graphic: N. Graf.
Feng 1 LHC PROSPECTS FOR COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine COSMO 09, CERN 7 September 2009.
DARK MATTERS Hawaii Colloquium 9 September 2010 Jonathan Feng UC Irvine 9 Sep 10Feng 1.
9 Oct 08Feng 1 DARK MATTERS 9 October 2008 Caltech Physics Colloquium Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
12 Apr 06Feng 1 RECENT PROGRESS IN SUSY DARK MATTER Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 12 April 2006 Texas A&M Mitchell Symposium Graphic:
The Complete Phase Diagram of Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions Jonathan Feng UC Irvine work in progress with Jose Ruiz Cembranos and Louis Strigari KITP,
19 Mar 099 Oct 08Feng 1 DARK MATTER CANDIDATES AND SIGNALS 19 March 2009 UCSC Physics Colloquium Jonathan Feng UC Irvine.
WIMP AND RELATED MIRACLES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar, Huitzu Tu, Haibo Yu Inaugural Workshop, Center for Particle Cosmology.
Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn University) Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn University) September.
DARK MATTER MEETS THE SUSY FLAVOR PROBLEM Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine SLAC NAL 18 March 2009 Work with Manoj Kaplinghat, Jason Kumar,
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
24 Sep 2013 DaMaSC 2 Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND ITS PARTICLE PROPERTIES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Dark Matter in Southern California (DaMaSC 2) Keck Institute.
Masato Yamanaka (Saitama University) collaborators Shigeki Matsumoto Joe Sato Masato Senami arXiv: [hep-ph]Phys.Lett.B647: and Relic abundance.
24 April 14 Feng 1 DARK MATTER AND THE LHC 24 April 2014 Technion Colloquium UC Irvine Jonathan Feng.
DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Cody Carr, Minh Nguyen December 9 th, 2014.
The Linear Collider and the Rest of the Universe Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine ALCPG Victoria Meeting 28 July 2004.
Dark Matter Detection in Space Jonathan Feng UC Irvine SpacePart 03, Washington, DC 10 December 2003.
DARK MATTER FROM THE EARLY UNIVERSE AND PARTICLE PHYSICS CANDIDATES Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine Dark Matter Universe: On the Threshold of Discovery NAS Sackler.
19 May 14 Feng 1 WIMPS: AN OVERVIEW, CURRENT CONSTRAINTS, AND WIMP-LIKE EXTENSIONS Debates on the Nature of Dark Matter The 8 th Harvard-Smithsonian Conference.
Direct Detection of Vector Dark Matter
Lecture II: Dark Matter Candidates and WIMPs
Dark Matter: A Mini Review
DARK MATTER AND THE LHC 7 July 2014 Munich Physics Colloquium
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
DARK MATTER AND INDIRECT DETECTION IN COSMIC RAYS
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
GOLDILOCKS COSMOLOGY Work with Ze’ev Surujon, Hai-Bo Yu (1205.soon)
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Testing the Standard Model and Beyond
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Masato Yamanaka (Saitama University)
Presentation transcript:

PARTICLE DARK MATTER CANDIDATES Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 22 March 2007 Beckman Center, NAS Astrophysical Probes of DM 22 Mar 07

Dark Matter Tremendous recent progress: WDMh2 = 0.113 ± 0.009 Unambiguous evidence for new particles What is it? Not baryonic Not hot Not short-lived Here review recent progress: Proliferation of candidates Many as well-motivated as neutralino dark matter, but with completely different implications for structure formation, etc. 22 Mar 07

HEPAP/AAAC DMSAG Subpanel (2007) Candidates Masses and interaction strengths span many, many orders of magnitude Diverse motivations DAMA HEAT HESS Small scale structure 511 keV photon line … HEPAP/AAAC DMSAG Subpanel (2007) 22 Mar 07

HEPAP LHC/ILC Subpanel (2005) The WIMP “Miracle” cc ↔ f f Wc ~ <sAv>-1 ~ mc2/(ka2) mc (TeV) → ← / cc  f f Wc / WDM / cc ↔ f f HEPAP LHC/ILC Subpanel (2005) [k = 0.5 – 2, S- and P-wave] Remarkable “coincidence”: particles required for electroweak symmetry breaking ~100 GeV  right amount of dark matter! 22 Mar 07

STABILITY This all assumes the WIMP is stable How natural is this? New Particle States Stable Standard Model Particles 22 Mar 07

LEP Large Electron Positron Collider at CERN, 1989-2000 Confirmed the standard model, stringently constrained effects of new particles Problem: new particles should be above ~ 3 TeV, far heavier than ~100 GeV required by electroweak symmetry breaking Barbieri, Strumia (1999) 22 Mar 07

LEP constraints ↔ Discrete symmetry ↔ Stability SOLUTION SM new particle This assumes new particles mediate interactions at tree-level. Simple solution: impose a discrete parity, so all interactions require pairs of new particles. This also makes the lightest new particle stable. Cheng, Low (2003); Wudka (2003) The Cosmological Legacy of LEP: LEP constraints ↔ Discrete symmetry ↔ Stability The WIMP paradigm is more natural than ever before Dark matter is easier to explain than no dark matter, and with the proliferation of EWSB models has come a proliferation of WIMP possibilities 22 Mar 07

EXAMPLES Supersymmetry Universal Extra Dimensions Branes Superpartners R-parity Neutralino c with significant WDM Goldberg (1983); Ellis et al. (1984) Universal Extra Dimensions Kaluza-Klein partners KK-parity Appelquist, Cheng, Dobrescu (2000) B1 (“heavy photon”) with significant WDM Servant, Tait (2002) Cheng, Feng, Matchev (2002) Branes Brane fluctuations Brane-parity Branons with significant WDM Cembranos, Dobado, Maroto (2003) 22 Mar 07

WIMPS FROM SUSY The classic WIMP: neutralinos predicted by supersymmetry Goldberg (1983), Ellis et al. (1983) Supersymmetry: For every known particle X, predicts a partner particle X̃. Stabilizes weak scale if masses are ~ 100 GeV. Neutralino c  ( g̃, Z̃, H̃u, H̃d ): neutral, weakly-interacting. In many models, c is the lightest supersymmetric particle and stable. All the right properties for dark matter! 22 Mar 07

Minimal Supergravity Focus point region Black: too much DM Blue: too little DM Red: just right Co-annihilation region Baltz, Gondolo (2004) Bulk region WDMh2 = 0.113 ± 0.009 excludes many possibilities, favors certain models 22 Mar 07

WIMPS FROM EXTRA DIMENSIONS Servant, Tait (2002); Cheng, Feng, Matchev (2002) Extra spatial dimensions could be curled up into small circles of radius R Particles moving in extra dimensions appear as a set of copies of SM particles New particle masses are integer multiples of mKK = R -1 Garden hose … 4mKK 3mKK 2mKK DM mass mKK 22 Mar 07

Minimal Universal Extra Dimensions Not enough DM Kakizaki, Matsumoto, Senami (2006) Too much DM WMAP preferred 22 Mar 07

WIMP DETECTION c c f  f f  f Annihilation c f  f Scattering Crossing symmetry Correct relic density  Efficient annihilation then  Efficient annihilation now (indirect detection)  Efficient scattering now (direct detection) 22 Mar 07

Is there an exception to this rule? ALTERNATIVES TO WIMPS Must DM have weak force interactions? Strictly speaking, no – the only required DM interactions are gravitational (much weaker than weak) But the relic density “coincidence” strongly prefers weak interactions Is there an exception to this rule? 22 Mar 07

SuperWIMPs: The Basic Idea Supersymmetry also predicts gravitinos Pagels, Primack (1982); Weinberg (1982) Most typically: mass ~ 100 GeV, couplings ~ MW/MPl ~ 10-16 G̃ not LSP Assumption of most of literature SM LSP G̃ G̃ LSP Completely different cosmology and particle physics SM NLSP G̃ 22 Mar 07

SUPERWIMP RELICS Suppose gravitinos G̃ are the LSP WIMPs freeze out as usual But then all WIMPs decay to gravitinos after MPl2/MW3 ~ hours to month G̃ WIMP ≈ Gravitinos naturally inherit the right density, but interact only gravitationally – they are superWIMPs (also axinos, KK gravitons, quintessinos, etc.) Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2003); Bi, Li, Zhang (2003); Ellis, Olive, Santoso, Spanos (2003); Wang, Yang (2004); Roszkowski et al. (2004); … 22 Mar 07

SuperWIMP Detection SuperWIMPs evade all conventional dark matter searches Direct detection Indirect detection But superweak interactions  very late decays l ̃ → G̃l , g ̃ → G̃g  observable consequences Small scale structure Big Bang nucleosynthesis CMB m distortions 22 Mar 07

STRUCTURE FORMATION SuperWIMPs are produced in late decays with large velocity (0.1c – c) Suppresses small scale structure while preserving WIMP motivations: warm! Typical decay times are 105 – 106 s, but can be arbitrarily long by adjusting mG̃ (metaCDM) Cembranos, Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2005) Dalcanton, Hogan (2000) Lin, Huang, Zhang, Brandenberger (2001) Sigurdson, Kamionkowski (2003) Profumo, Sigurdson, Ullio, Kamionkowski (2004) Kaplinghat (2005) Cembranos, Feng, Rajaraman, Takayama (2005) Strigari, Kaplinghat, Bullock (2006) Bringmann, Borzumati, Ullio (2006) 22 Mar 07

CONCLUSIONS Many interesting, well-motivated new candidates for particle dark matter Cosmological legacy of LEP: stability of a new particle is common feature of many viable particle models WIMPs: many new candidates; excellent prospects for direct and indirect dark matter searches, colliders SuperWIMPs: warm DM with all the virtues of WIMPs 22 Mar 07