Vascular Overviews Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Does the use of antipyretics in children prolong febrile illness? David King Clinical Research Fellow 05/09/2013.
Advertisements

Peptic ulcer disease.
UOG Journal Club: September 2012 Perinatal outcome in women treated with progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth: a meta-analysis Sotiriadis A,
Examples of systematic reviews Goran Poropat. Cochrane systematic reviews To make unmanageable amounts of information – manageable Identify, appraise.
1.A 33 year old female patient admitted to the ICU with confirmed pulmonary embolism. It was noted that she had elevated serum troponin level. Does this.
Meta-Analysis: Low-dose dopamine Increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death Annals of Internal Medicine 2005; 142:
Journal Club 1 The bigger picture. How we hope it works – Introduction – Discussion Points – Summary.
Systematic Reviews.
How to Analyze Systematic Reviews: practical session Akbar Soltani.MD. Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Shariati Hospital
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
An epidemiologic perspective on etoricoxib David J. Graham, MD, MPH Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology April 12, 2007.
Hydroxyurea For the Management of Childhood SCD in Kenyan County Hospitals Hydroxyurea for SCD Panel.
Gastrointestinal Review Highlights of the VIGOR Trial Lawrence Goldkind M.D.
1. Title and Abstract Improving abstracts should be a goal not only for authors but also for editors because so few citation browsers ever read more than.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF ARTICLE ON HARM. Among patients with acute rheumatic fever, will administration of non steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs have adverse.
Antithrombotic Trialists’ (ATT) Collaboration. Lancet 2009;373:
The Transition to What you need to know for Gastroenterology Date | Presenter Information.
ITU Journal Club: Dr. Clinton Jones. ST4 Anaesthetics.
Objectives  Identify the key elements of a good randomised controlled study  To clarify the process of meta analysis and developing a systematic review.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Collaboration and its outcomes in primary care compared internationally Sanneke Schepman Johan Hansen Ronald Batenburg Dinny de Bakker Netherlands Institute.
Applying CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage 2) in a Pre- Hospital Wilderness Context Paul B. Jones PGY1.
PVL_COUNTRY_DATE00/1 Département santé et recherche génésiquesDepartment of reproductive health and research Day 3 - Session 2 DAY (3) Session 2 Presentation:
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Clinical
2012 實證醫學系統課程 第一組 報告 吳敏誠、鍾宜倫、凌久惠 2012/08/07. Acyclovir for treating primary herpetic gingivostomatitis(Review) Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4.
Selenium supplementation for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a Cochrane review Clinical
Hot Topic Presentation Lars Halford, GP ST3 March 2010
EFFECT OF SEMI-RECUMBENT BODY POSITION ON REDUCING OF VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA IN ICU PATIENTS 主講者 : 張藖鏸 指導者 : 周幸生 副主任 時 間 : 101 年 12 月 19 日.
Famotidine Is Inferior to Pantoprazole in Preventing Recurrence of Aspirin-Related Peptic Ulcers or Erosions FOOK–HONG NG, SIU–YIN WONG, KWOK–FAI LAM,
Flow Diagram of the Trial Selection Process Jeffrey S. Berger et al, JAMA. 2006;295:
R1. 최태웅 / Pf. 김정욱. INTRODUCTION Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB) : incidence of 50–150 cases/100,000 : outcomes → by preexisting comorbidity,
LITERATURE REVIEW OF DECISION MODELS FOR DISEASES WITH SHORT-TERM FLUCTUATIONS/EPISODES: The Case of COPD Dr. Orpah Nasimiyu Wavomba
Adverse Effects of Single Dose Gentamicin in Adults - A Systematic Review Hayward R S, Harding J, Molloy R, Land L, Longcroft-Neal K, Moore D, Ross J D.
Meta-analysis Overview
Contact: Patrick Phillips,
Effectiveness of yoga for hypertension: Systematic review and meta-analysis Marshall Hagins, PT, PhD1, Rebecca States,
Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: Is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis  Riccardo Marmo, MD, Gianluca Rotondano, MD, Maria.
Systematic review of Present clinical reality
Point-of-care based coagulation management in cardiac surgery A meta-analysis of 8332 patients .
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Matt Warren. Gastroenterology North Tyneside Hospital
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Non-Variceal Upper GI Bleeding in Patients Already Hospitalized for Another Condition Tanja Muller, MD, Alan N. Barkun, MD, CM, MSc, Myriam Martel , BSc.
Reporter : R1 林柏任.
Foroutan N1,2, Muratov S1,2, Levine M1,2
Lifestyle factors in the development of diabetes among African immigrants in the UK: A systematic review Alloh T. Folashade Faculty of Health and Social.
Selection of NSAIDs for Osteoarthritis
Effects of gastroprotectant drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications: a meta-analysis of randomised trials 
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Pearls Presentation Use of N-Acetylcysteine For prophylaxis of Radiocontrast Nephrotoxicity.
Nutrition management for peptic ulcer
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials of Manual Thrombectomy in ST elevation myocardial infarction Investigators: Ashraf Alazzoni,
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta- analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials 
Identification Screening Eligibility Included Included
Paclitaxel-coated balloon reduces target lesion revascularization compared with standard balloon angioplasty  Nicholas Candy, MBBS, Eugene Ng, MBBS, Ramesh.
A meta-analysis of anticoagulation for calf deep venous thrombosis
Managing Pulmonary Embolism Posthospital Discharge
Zachary Bauman, DO, MHA, FACOS, FACS Rishsi Rattan, MD, FACS
Therapeutic writing for eating disorders: A systematic review
PPI prophylaxis for GI bleeding in ICU
Volume 382, Issue 9894, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 375, Issue 9719, Pages (March 2010)
Google Scholar: 8,554 publications Systematic search:
Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: Is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis  Riccardo Marmo, MD, Gianluca Rotondano, MD, Maria.
Delayed cerebral ischaemia prevention and treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review  M. Veldeman, A. Höllig, H. Clusmann,
Does cinnamon reduce fasting blood glucose in Type II diabetics?
Trent Regional SAPC Conference 19 March 2019
Identification Screening Eligibility Included Included
Metallic biliary endoprosthesis causing duodenal perforation and acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding  Benjamin J. Marano, MD, Charles A. Bonanno, MD 
Presentation transcript:

Vascular Overviews Group Effects of gastroprotectant drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications: a meta-analysis of randomised trials Vascular Overviews Group 15-March-2018

PRISMA Diagram 32826 articles identified 10260 through MEDLINE search 22555 through EMBASE search 11 through manual search 8155 duplicates removed 24671 identified for screening 22035 excluded on the basis of title and abstract 2636 full-text articles assessed for eligibility 1286 articles (including 1286 trials) excluded, plus an additional 17 trials reported in articles that also contained an eligible trial. These 1303 trials were excluded for the following primary reasons: - 229 trials not randomised - 92 trials too short (<2 weeks for prevention or healing trials) - 411 unsuitable or confounded comparison - 508 different-dose or within-class comparison - 20 trials of children (<18 years) - 13 trials in critical care settings - 10 review articles - 5 ongoing trials - 4 variceal indication - 11 articles unobtainable* 1350 eligible articles, including 1212 eligible trials† *Full-text copies of these articles were unobtainable from all available sources including the British Library. †Some trials were published in more than one article (and, conversely, a few articles reported results from more than one trial).

Gastroprotectant vs control Gastroprotectant vs gastroprotectant** Availability of data for measuring the effects of gastroprotectants   Prevention Trials Healing Trials Acute Bleeding Trials Trials (%) Participants (%) Gastroprotectant vs control Endoscopic ulcer* 162 (28) 31580 (29) 207 (89) 22086 (92) - Symptomatic ulcer* 73 (13) 21505 (19) Mortality+ 185 (32) 57472 (52) 43 (18) 6243 (26) 31 (86) 7596 (97) Further bleeding, endoscopy, surgery or transfusion 33 (92) 7662 (98) Bleeds, perforations or obstructions 115 (20) 41764 (38) No data available for any of the above outcomes 259 (45) 33122 (30) 18 (8) 1250 (5) 2 (6) 106 (1) Total 580 110626 233 24033 36 7826 Gastroprotectant vs gastroprotectant** 22 (14) 5781 (18) 150 (90) 25494 (90) 15 (9) 3199 (10) 61 (38) 10716 (33) 68 (41) 11739 (41) 16 (89) 3478 (96) 17 (94) 3518 (97) 41 (26) 8065 (24) 74 (46) 16813 (51) 14 (8) 2661 (9) 1 (6) 122 (3) 160 32959 167 28306 18 3640 * Duodenal, gastric or any (i.e, not subdivided). ** Only comparisons between two different class of gastroprotectants were included for analysis. + Cause-specific or total (i.e, all-cause) mortality. Trials with no events reported in both arms contributed to this table. In addition, there were 29 trials in which the number randomised was not reported.

Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on endoscopic ulcers 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on endoscopic ulcers No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Any PPI 29 314/6541 (4.8%) 937/4912 (19.1%) 0.20 (0.17 - 0.23) P A 22 228/3427 (6.7%) 435/2532 (17.2%) 0.26 (0.20 - 0.32) H2RA 105 1347/8074 (16.7%) 2298/6187 (37.1%) 0.32 (0.28 - 0.35) Any GPT 152 1889/18042 (10.5%) 3502/13255 (26.4%) 0.27 (0.25 - 0.29) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity c = 39.5, p<0.0001) Duodenal 59/3846 (1.5%) 286/3042 (9.4%) 0.14 (0.10 - 0.19) PA 17 96/3187 (3.0%) 132/2324 (5.7%) 0.41 (0.28 - 0.61) 81 1008/6939 (14.5%) 1709/5083 (33.6%) 0.29 (0.26 - 0.34) 116 1163/13972 (8.3%) 2085/10073 (20.7%) 0.27 (0.25 - 0.30) 39.0, p<0.0001) Gastric 19 212/4150 (5.1%) 501/3356 (14.9%) 0.26 (0.21 - 0.32) 127/3323 (3.8%) 310/2440 (12.7%) 0.22 (0.16 - 0.29) 39 327/3857 (8.5%) 572/2845 (20.1%) 0.39 (0.32 - 0.48) 74 666/11330 (5.9%) 1257/8277 (15.2%) 0.30 (0.27 - 0.33) 25.0, p<0.0001) 99% or 95% CI c c

Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on symptomatic ulcers 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2 Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on symptomatic ulcers No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Any PPI 8 28/2585 (1.1%) 152/2587 (5.9%) 0.15 (0.09 - 0.23) PA 4 14/4619 (0.3%) 41/4673 (0.9%) 0.38 (0.18 - 0.79) H2RA 39 481/2653 (18.1%) 943/2184 (43.2%) 0.27 (0.23 - 0.32) Any GPT 51 523/9857 (5.3%) 1136/9444 (12.0%) 0.25 (0.22 - 0.29) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity = 12.7, p=0.0018) Duodenal 1/60 (1.7%) 44/63 (69.8%) 0.05 (0.02 - 0.15) 7/4404 (0.2%) 14/4439 (0.3%) 0.52 (0.15 - 1.75) 29 404/2204 (18.3%) 786/1734 (45.3%) 0.26 (0.21 - 0.31) 31 412/6668 (6.2%) 844/6236 (13.5%) 0.25 (0.21 - 0.28) 19.6, p<0.0001) Gastric - 7/4444 (0.2%) 17/4482 (0.4%) 0.44 (0.14 - 1.38) 6 64/228 (28.1%) 97/224 (43.3%) 0.48 (0.28 - 0.83) 71/4672 (1.5%) 114/4706 (2.4%) 0.47 (0.32 - 0.69) 0.0, p=0.85) 99% or 95% CI c c c

0.1 0.5 1 2.5 Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on ulcer complications and all-cause mortality No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Bleeds PPI 18 14/5910 (0.2%) 88/4937 (1.8%) 0.21 (0.12 - 0.36) PA 3 33/4464 (0.7%) 53/4489 (1.2%) 0.63 (0.35 - 1.12) H2RA 29 43/3631 (1.2%) 84/2779 (3.0%) 0.49 (0.30 - 0.80) Any GPT 49 90/14139 (0.6%) 221/12130 (1.8%) 0.40 (0.32 - 0.50) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity 2 = 15.3, p=0.0005) Perforations 1/1917 (0.1%) 2/981 (0.2%) 0.31 (0.01 - 13.74) 1/4700 (0.0%) 8/4594 (0.2%) 0.19 (0.03 - 1.37) 0/49 (0.0%) 1/50 (2.0%) 5 2/6666 (0.0%) 10/5470 (0.2%) 0.21 (0.06 - 0.81) p=0.0089 0.2, p=0.92) Obstructions 1/1938 (0.1%) 1/1935 (0.1%) 0/4404 (0.0%) 3/4439 (0.1%) 0.14 (0.00 - 5.20) 3/394 (0.8%) 6/404 (1.5%) 0.52 (0.07 - 3.68) 4 4/6736 (0.1%) 10/6778 (0.1%) 0.43 (0.13 - 1.42) p=0.12 1.4, p=0.49) All-cause mortality 37/7471 (0.5%) 31/5352 (0.6%) 1.01 (0.50 - 2.05) 17/4853 (0.4%) 20/4752 (0.4%) 0.81 (0.32 - 2.00) 420/3520 (11.9%) 445/2959 (15.0%) 0.83 (0.61 - 1.13) 51 474/15844 (3.0%) 496/13063 (3.8%) 0.85 (0.69 - 1.04) p=0.11 0.5, p=0.77) 99% or 95% CI c c c c

ulcers, bleeds and all-cause mortality, subdivided by use of NSAIDs 0.1 0.25 0.5 1 2.5 Prevention trials - effects of gastroprotectants on endoscopic and symptomatic ulcers, bleeds and all-cause mortality, subdivided by use of NSAIDs No. tNSAID/ COXIB/ aspirin use Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Any endoscopic ulcer NSAID use 51 660/11409 (5.8%) 1220/8068 (15.1%) 0.27 (0.24 - 0.31) No NSAID use 34 397/2089 (19.0%) 784/1674 (46.8%) 0.26 (0.21 - 0.32) T otal 85 1057/13498 (7.8%) 2004/9742 (20.6%) 0.27 (0.25 - 0.29) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity 2 = 0.2, p=0.62) Any symptomatic ulcer 9 23/6871 (0.3%) 95/6917 (1.4%) 0.28 (0.17 - 0.46) 17 162/1369 (11.8%) 449/1127 (39.8%) 0.21 (0.16 - 0.27) 26 185/8240 (2.2%) 544/8044 (6.8%) 0.22 (0.18 - 0.26) 2.0, p=0.16) Bleeds 21 50/11706 (0.4%) 146/10106 (1.4%) 0.35 (0.24 - 0.52) 10 8/648 (1.2%) 24/555 (4.3%) 0.28 (0.10 - 0.79) 31 58/12354 (0.5%) 170/10661 (1.6%) 0.34 (0.26 - 0.45) 0.3, p=0.56) All-cause mortality 38/11944 (0.3%) 34/9826 (0.3%) 0.95 (0.50 - 1.81) 5 5/466 (1.1%) 2/462 (0.4%) 2.34 (0.25 - 21.96) 22 43/12410 (0.3%) 36/10288 (0.3%) 1.03 (0.64 - 1.65) p=0.90 1.3, p=0.25) 99% or 95% CI c c c c

Healing trials - effects of gastroprotectants on ulcer healing 0.5 1 2 5 Healing trials - effects of gastroprotectants on ulcer healing No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Endoscopic ulcer healing PPI 24 1650/1925 (85.7%) 650/1033 (62.9%) 5.22 (4.00 - 6.80) PA 37 1501/2452 (61.2%) 751/1729 (43.4%) 2.27 (1.91 - 2.70) H2RA 148 5714/7533 (75.9%) 2676/5670 (47.2%) 3.80 (3.44 - 4.20) Any GPT 207 8865/11910 (74.4%) 4050/8373 (48.4%) 3.49 (3.28 - 3.72) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity = 62.0, p<0.0001) Endoscopic duodenal ulcer healing 17 950/1095 (86.8%) 426/672 (63.4%) 5.91 (4.20 - 8.33) 19 866/1458 (59.4%) 382/953 (40.1%) 2.21 (1.77 - 2.77) 97 3924/5154 (76.1%) 1786/3929 (45.5%) 4.09 (3.63 - 4.61) 131 5740/7707 (74.5%) 2567/5495 (46.7%) 3.73 (3.45 - 4.03) 53.4, p<0.0001) Endoscopic gastric ulcer healing 4 648/774 (83.7%) 179/306 (58.5%) 4.47 (2.87 - 6.97) 16 435/698 (62.3%) 252/577 (43.7%) 2.60 (1.87 - 3.61) 45 1306/1675 (78.0%) 773/1421 (54.4%) 3.05 (2.47 - 3.76) 65 2389/3147 (75.9%) 1204/2304 (52.3%) 3.09 (2.73 - 3.50) 6.9, p=0.0325) 99% or 95% CI c c c

Acute UGI bleeding treatment trials - effects of gastroprotectants on 0.25 0.5 1 2 Acute UGI bleeding treatment trials - effects of gastroprotectants on further bleeding, need for blood transfusion and endoscopic interventions No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Further bleeding PPI 12 192/2234 (8.6%) 311/2198 (14.1%) 0.57 (0.44 - 0.73) H2RA 18 320/1487 (21.5%) 376/1478 (25.4%) 0.79 (0.63 - 1.00) Any GPT 30 512/3721 (13.8%) 687/3676 (18.7%) 0.68 (0.60 - 0.78) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity = 6.5, p=0.0107) Blood transfusion 5 449/974 (46.1%) 542/967 (56.0%) 0.67 (0.52 - 0.85) 266/434 (61.3%) 259/426 (60.8%) 1.01 (0.70 - 1.48) 10 715/1408 (50.8%) 801/1393 (57.5%) 0.75 (0.65 - 0.88) p=0.0003 6.2, p=0.0130) Endoscopic interventions 8 140/1890 (7.4%) 234/1906 (12.3%) 0.56 (0.42 - 0.75) - 0.56 (0.45 - 0.70) 99% or 95% CI c c

Acute UGI bleeding treatment trials - effects of gastroprotectants on 0.25 0.5 1 2 Acute UGI bleeding treatment trials - effects of gastroprotectants on surgery and all-cause mortality No. Events/Patients (%) Allocated GPT control Odds Ratio (95 or 99% CI) Less likely with GPT More likely Surgery PPI 12 120/2234 (5.4%) 187/2198 (8.5%) 0.62 (0.45 - 0.84) H2RA 15 197/1331 (14.8%) 239/1349 (17.7%) 0.81 (0.61 - 1.07) An y GPT 27 317/3565 (8.9%) 426/3547 (12.0%) 0.72 (0.61 - 0.84) p<0.0001 (Heterogeneity = 2.9, p=0.09) All-cause mortality 84/2234 (3.8%) 86/2198 (3.9%) 0.98 (0.64 - 1.48) 17 95/1526 (6.2%) 113/1525 (7.4%) 0.83 (0.57 - 1.22) 29 179/3760 (4.8%) 199/3723 (5.3%) 0.90 (0.72 - 1.11) p=0.31 0.5, p=0.46) 99% or 95% CI c c