doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> April 2018 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Evaluation Results on Preamble of PM PHY Date Submitted: 24 April 2018 Source: Sang-Kyu Lim, Il Soon Jang, Jin-Doo Jeong, Tae-Gyu Kang [ETRI] Address: 218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34129, Korea Voice:[+82-42-860-1573], FAX: [+82-42-860-5218], E-Mail:[sklim@etri.re.kr] Re: Abstract: This document provides the evaluation results on preamble of PM PHY to TG13. Purpose: Contribution to IEEE 802.15.13 Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI) <author>, <company>

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> April 2018 Evaluation Results on Preamble of PM PHY Sang-Kyu Lim, Il Soon Jang, Jin-Doo Jeong, Tae-Gyu Kang [ETRI] Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI) <author>, <company>

Evaluation Framework of PM PHY April 2018 Evaluation Framework of PM PHY Preamble : Detection probability (for false alarm rate = 0.1%) vs. SNR (cf. doc. 15-18-0106/r0) and required SNR where prob. of misdetection (timing error) < 0.1% Header : BER vs. SNR for the header incl. 8B10B and RS(36,24) coding assuming random data for the header information Payload : BER vs. SNR for the payload incl. 8B10B or HCM and RS(255,248) coding assuming random data for the payload Results are expected for AWGN, D3 in scenario 3 and D7 in scenario 4 (Fig. 25) where LED1-6 are used together from https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/15/15-15-0746-01-007a-tg7r1-channel-model-document-for-high-rate-pd-communications.pdf. CIRs: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.15/dcn/15/15-15-0747-00-007a-tg7r1-cirs-channel-model-document-for-high-rate-pd-communications.zip a companion file. In case of questions, please, use TG13 email reflector. Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Background on New TDPs for Preamble April 2018 Background on New TDPs for Preamble Before After (6 TDPs from the 15-bits Gold Sequences) (6 TDPs selected from the 31-bits Gold Sequences) P1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 P1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 P2 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 P2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 P3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 P3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 P4 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 P4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 P5 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 P5 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 P6 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 P6 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 TDP ~ TDP TDP ~ TDP TDP ~ TDP 60 bits 62 bits TDPs selected from 15-bits Gold Sequences for preamble have been changed to TDPs selected from 31-bits Gold Sequences in order to resolve the comment that there were more than 5 consecutive ones or zeros in the Gold sequences. As the results, the new 6 TDPs with less than 4 consecutive ones or zeros are proposed and the cross correlation characteristics between them selected from 31-bits Gold Sequences have been much improved. Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Auto & Cross correlations between New TDPs April 2018 Auto & Cross correlations between New TDPs Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Simulation Set-up for Preamble (1) April 2018 Simulation Set-up for Preamble (1) (6 TDPs selected from the 31-bits Gold Sequences) P1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 P2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 P3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 P4 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 P5 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 P6 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 (1) AWGN only Model AWGN 62 bits / 50,000 times Modulation CIR Channels Preamble Detector = TDP ~ TDP + Detection Probability @ 0.1% FA Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Simulation Set-up for Preamble (2) April 2018 Simulation Set-up for Preamble (2) (2) CIR Channel Model AWGN 62 bits / 50,000 times Modulation CIR Channels Preamble Detector TDP ~ TDP = + Detection Probability @ 0.1% FA Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

April 2018 D3 in Scenario 3 (Home) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

D7 in Scenario 4 (Manufacturing Cell) April 2018 D7 in Scenario 4 (Manufacturing Cell) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P1 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P1 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P2 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P2 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P3 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P3 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P4 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P4 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P5 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P5 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P6 TDP @ AWGN only April 2018 Results for P6 TDP @ AWGN only False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P1 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P1 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P2 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P2 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P3 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P3 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P4 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P4 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P5 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P5 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P6 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P6 TDP @ D3 in S3 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P1 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P1 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P2 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P2 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P3 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P3 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P4 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P4 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P5 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P5 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

Results for P6 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % April 2018 Results for P6 TDP @ D7 in S4 False Alarm = 0.1 % Detection Probability SNR (dB) Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)

April 2018 Summary The new 6 TDPs showing almost the same cross-correlation characteristics with less than 4 consecutive ones or zeros were selected for preamble from 31-bits Gold Sequences. As the optical clock rate change, the performance of the preamble patterns has been evaluated under AWGN only, D3 in S3, and D7 in S4 channels. The detection threshold was determined to the level that FA(False Alarm) is < 0.1%, which was already fixed last meeting. If we use down-sampling that the signal is sampled on the point close to the center of the bit, i.e. if we consider the best case, then there will be no variation in performance below OCR≈100MHz in D3/S3 and OCR ≈ 25MHz in D7/S4. However, the channel effects caused by ISI are shown from when OCR is lower rate, compared to the best sampling. I think it’s because we used down-sampling through averaging process in this simulation. Sang-Kyu Lim (ETRI)