Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Company LOGO Amy Weinmann Education Program Specialist 2009 NCLB Technical Assistance Staying the Course Amidst Change April 1 & 2, 2009.
Title III Update Planning for Success In
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan SY
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.
Title III, Part A Update Texas Education Agency Division of NCLB Program Coordination Institute for Second Language Achievement (ISLA) Texas A&M University.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education AMAO Calculations for /10/2015Oregon Department of Education1.
LEP Collection Kim Miller – Title III New and Recent Directors September 27, 2011.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations & Implications for California’s Accountability System Robert Linquanti Cathy George Project Director & Sr.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Questions and Responses: New Joint Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education Office of Education Equity – Title III.
Oregon Department of Education September 24,
RESPRO Area 1C Area 1C RESPRO Meeting RESPRO Area 1C November 24, 2009.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
ANNUAL MEASURABLE ACHIEVEMENT OBJECTIVES (AMAO) North Carolina Department of Public Instruction K-12 Programs Title III/ESL Office.
English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21 st Century (E L P A 21) (Required for DTCs, STCs, and ELPA21 TAs)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Meeting Private School Student Participation Requirements Under Title III West Virginia Department of Education.
VDOE Updates VESA Meeting October 1, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
English as a Second Language (ESL) Requirements Limited English Proficient (LEP) Ivanna M T Anderson, NCDPI ESL/Title III Consultant
Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education AMAO Calculations for /9/2016Oregon Department of Education1.
E L P A. ELPA Understand the definition and purpose of the English Language Proficiency Assessment Administer ELPA appropriately Objectives.
Assessment Options for English Language Learners Kim Miller Education Specialist – Assessment Title III Directors Meeting October.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education September 26, 2011.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
English as a Second Language (ESL) Requirements Limited English Proficient (LEP) Ivanna M T Anderson, NCDPI ESL/Title III Consultant.
English as a Second Language (ESL) Requirements English Learner (EL) Marshall Foster, NCDPI ESL/Title III Consultant Leadership Training October 10, 2016.
Assessing LEP Students for English Language Proficiency
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Title I A Comparability Report
Numbered Memorandum ELPA Participation
Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status
Linguistic Accommodations and ELL Assessments September 2015
Title III AMAO Improvement Plan Webinar
English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
English Language Proficiency Assessment
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
ABOUT STUDENTS WITH ADDITIONAL ACADEMIC NEEDS Guidance for the support of students with ELL and special education (ELL/SPED) eligibility November, 2012.
E L P A.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
AYP and Report Card.
English Language Proficiency Assessment
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
ESL/Title III Consultants
English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century (ELPA21)
Presentation transcript:

Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education AMAO Calculations for 2011-12 Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education Oregon Department of Education 11/22/2018

Oregon Department of Education Overview Reviewing AMAO District Preview Numbered Memorandum exclusions AMAO 1 Target AMAO 2A and 2B Targets Important AMAO reminder 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO District Preview The ODE provides districts the opportunity to preview the final AMAO determinations, prior to the AMAO media release. ODE anticipates Mid-September District Preview The AMAO media release for the 2011-12 AMAO Report is October 1, 2012. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

How to view the District Preview The ODE loads the AMAO District Preview into the ODE District Secure AYP/Report Card application. District staff must have a password to access the ODE District secure web site, AND District staff must have permission to view the AYP/Report card Application. Please contact the District Security Administrator if you do not have permission for this application. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education District Preview The 2011-12 AMAO District preview data is only available for a limited amount of time. Districts are encouraged to download this data and keep a copy locally. Data provided in the district preview includes district AMAO determinations as well as school building-level data. Only District AMAO determinations are provided to the media, not school-level data. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO Media Release The AMAO media release is provided to local newspapers, as well as announced on the ODE web page. District-level AMAO determinations are released. Districts must meet all three (3) AMAOs in order to have a determination of met. The 2011-12 AMAO media release is on 10/1/2012 at 12:01 am (just after midnight). This means the morning edition may include the AMAO district determinations. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Numbered Memorandum 007-2011-12 ELL participation in ELPA During the 11-12 school year, the ODE revised a previous ELPA participation memorandum. All eligible ELLs, who are enrolled during the official English Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) testing window, are required to participate in the ELPA. Eligible students who did not participate in the ELPA, but were enrolled and present anytime during the official ELPA testing window, will be included in the district AMAO report as not making sufficient gains in proficiency as defined by AMAO1. AMAO1 measures whether students gain one or more proficiency level(s) annually. Identified ELL students who are enrolled and present anytime but do not participate in ELPA will be included in the denominator of the AMAO 1 calculation. Their gain will be included in the AMAO 1 numerator as a zero (0). The ODE defines the official ELPA testing window as the dates posted on the Oregon Statewide Testing Schedule, located in the Oregon Test Administration Manual: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?=486. This policy regarding the ELL student participation in the annual ELPA ensures that Oregon is compliant with ESEA Title III rules and guidance. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Number Memorandum scenarios ODE has outlined the AMAO 1 exclusion scenarios in the 2011-12 AMAO Manual http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3408 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO 1 Target As part of ODE’s compliance with the final Notice of Interpretations (NOI), ODE reviewed current practices both in Oregon and across the U.S. This research has resulted in a revision to the AMAO 1 calculation and target. For 2011-12, the new target for AMAO 1 is 57%. This target will increase annually. NOI dated Oct 17, 2008. Located at: http://www.thompson.com/images/tpg/nclb/titleiii/titleiii-notice-of-final-interpretations-2008-10-17.pdf 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO 1 Targets School Year Percent of LEP Students Showing Progress toward Attaining English Language Proficiency 2009- 2010 50% LEP students will move one proficiency level higher at the end of the school year which is 3% increase over baseline. 2010- 2011 53% LEP students will move one proficiency level higher at the end of the school year which is 3% increase from the previous year. 2011-2012 57% LEP students will move one proficiency level higher at the end of the school year which is 4% increase from the previous year. 2012-2013 61% LEP students will move one proficiency level higher at the end of the school year which is 4% increase from the previous year. 2013-2014 66% LEP students will move one proficiency level higher at the end of the school year which is 5% increase from the previous year. The current year’s targets are over a baseline figure that was calculated , not over the previous year,. These calculations are new and the increase is not aligned with the previous’ years results. You will notice that over the next few years there is annual percentage increase that begins at 3% and grows to 5%/ 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 1 Numerator inclusion Student must be identified as LEP/ELL in 2011-12. AND Identified as LEP in the LEP Collection for at least one of the previous three school years (2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, or 2010- 11). The student must have a valid ELPA test score for 2011-12, as well as a valid ELPA test score in any of the previous collection years where they were identified as LEP (2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09 , 2009-10, or 2010-11). In response to the NOIs, it is required that ODE calculate a gain when we have more than one data point. ODE is defining two data points as the two most recent adjacent scores. Students who have only one ELPA score (only participated in one assessment, are permitted to be excluded from this calculation. Go to Numbered Memorandum and AMAO manual for AMAO 1 enrollment scenarios – page 20 of manual 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 1 Numerator inclusion (cont.) In order to having made a gain, a student must either: Have an average gain of 1 proficiency level per year of English language instruction since their most recent administration of ELPA; OR Scored a 5 on a previous ELPA and maintained a 5 on the 11-12 ELPA; OR Be exited by the district as ‘proficient’. Students who have not made an average gain of 1 proficiency level per year of English language instruction or maintained a 5 on ELPA or exited will not be included in the AMAO1 numerator. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

IEP Students Inclusion Rule If a LEP/ELL student has an IEP that exempts the student from all domains of ELPA, then the student is not included in the AMAO 1 numerator or the AMAO 1 denominator. This exemption is determined by the ELPA Test Administration Code E – being entered in Student Centered Staging by the District Test Coordinator. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Questions on AMAO 1 Numerator inclusion rules 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 1 Denominator inclusion rules To be included in the AMAO 1 Denominator for 2011-12 a student must: Be identified as LEP/ELL in the 2011-12 LEP Collection AND Be identified as LEP/ELL in any of the following LEP Collections (2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11). OR Exit as proficient in 2011-12. For example, a student new to the program in 2011-12 who scores as proficient and exits the same school year as entering the ELD program. This exit applies only to students who have only one ELPA score and are only in the 2011-12 LEP Collection. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 1 Denominator inclusion rules (cont.) A student identified as 3-H (ineligible) on the 2011-12 LEP Collection, regardless of being identified as LEP/ELL on any previous LEP Collection is not included in the AMAO 1 Denominator. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 1 Denominator inclusion rules (cont.) A student identified as LEP/ELL on the 2011-12 LEP Collection, but is not included in any previous LEP Collection as being identified as LEP, they are not included in the AMAO 1 Denominator, unless the student exited for proficiency in 2011-12. An example of this exclusion is a students who is enrolled as Kindergartener in 2011-12. This student has only participated in one ELPA assessment and has only been reported to the 2011-12 LEP collection. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Questions on AMAO 1 Denominator inclusion rules 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO 2 Targets In keeping with the Notice of Interpretations (NOI) for Title III, ODE has revised the calculations for AMAO 2. AMAO 2 will have two separate calculations: AMAO 2 A - 17.0% of the total ELL population achieve proficiency; AND AMAO 2 B - 26.5% of the ELL population being identified for five or more years achieve proficiency. Districts will need to meet both AMAO 2A and AMAO 2B targets to meet AMAO 2 The current year’s targets are over a baseline figure that was calculated not over the previous year. The baseline figure comes from actual ODE statewide data. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Percent of all LEP Students Attaining English Language Proficiency AMAO 2 A Targets School Year Percent of all LEP Students Attaining English Language Proficiency 2009- 2010 14% of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 1.5% increase over baseline/ 2010- 2011 15.5 % LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 1.5% increase from the previous year. 2011-2012 17.0% LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 1.5% increase from the previous year. 2012-2013 19% LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 2% increase from the previous year. 2013-2014 21% LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is a 2% increase from the previous year. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 2A Denominator inclusion rules To be included in the AMAO 2A Denominator a student must: Be identified as an LEP/ELL student in the 2011-12 LEP Collection. AMAO 2 is a calculation that includes all ELL students in the state. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 2A Numerator inclusion rules To be included in the AMAO 2A numerator a student must: Be identified as an LEP/ELL student in the 2011-12 LEP Collection. AND Have a valid LEP Exit Date during the 2011-12 school year. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education AMAO 2 B Targets School Year Percent of LEP Students Having Five or More Years in an ELD Program Attaining English Language Proficiency 2009- 2010 22% % of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 2% increase over baseline. 2010- 2011 24.0% of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 2% increase from the previous year. 2011-2012 26.5% of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 2.5% increase from the previous year. 2012-2013 29.0% of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 2.5% increase from the previous year. 2013-2014 32.0% of LEP students will attain proficiency at the end of the school year which is 3% increase from the previous year 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 2B Denominator inclusion rules To be included in the AMAO 2B Denominator a student must: Be identified as an LEP/ELL student for five or more years and be in the 2011-12 LEP Collection. AMAO 2B includes only ELL students who have been identified for five or more years. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

AMAO 2B Numerator Inclusion Rules To be included in the AMAO 2B numerator a student must: Be identified as an LEP/ELL student for five or more years and be in the 2011-12 LEP Collection. AND Have a valid LEP Exit Date during the 2011-12 school year. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Questions on AMAO 2 inclusion rules 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Questions on AMAO calculations for 2011-12 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Important AMAO Reminder Districts need to send AMAO parent notification letters within 30 days of receiving notice of the district’s AMAO rating. ODE is requiring districts to provide ODE a copy of the AMAO letter sent to parents. The copy must include the date the letter was sent and a signature. Please submit a copy of each language provided to parents. Please send a copy of the letter(s) sent to parents to Leslie Casebeer (leslie.casebeer@state.or.us ) by November 15, 2012. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education RESOURCES AMAO documents and statewide determinations are located on the ODE AMAO web page. http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3408 AMAO manuals and determinations for 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 are available. As inclusion rules and policies are subject to change, please refer to the appropriate year’s manual when reviewing determination. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Title III Improvement plan training Districts who have not met AMAOs for two consecutive years (2010-11 and 2011-12) are required to: Develop an improvement plan. Address the factors that prevented the district from meeting the AMAOs in the district’s improvement plan. This year, districts who do not meet AMAOs (based on the 2011-12 data) will be required to review, evaluate, and revise curriculum, program, and methods of instruction that prevent the district from meeting AMAOs. Training for districts entering 2-year Title III improvement status is via Webinar on October 11, 2012. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Improvement Plan Training (cont.) A district is identified in district improvement when it has failed to meet all criteria (overall rating) of AMAOs for four or more consecutive years. Districts MUST fulfill 4-year improvement requirements listed below, and those under the 2-year improvement plan listed above. Districts who have not met AMAOs for four consecutive years (2008-09, 2009-10, 2010- 11 and 2011-12) must submit a Title III Improvement Plan that addresses the federal requirements listed below. Title III regulations require the state to: Require the LEA to modify the curriculum, program, and methods of instruction; OR Make a determination on the continuation of funding; AND Require such entity to replace educational personnel relevant to the entity’s failure to meet such objectives. Title III 20 USC 6842(b) (4) (A) (B) (i) (ii) Training for districts entering 4-year Title III improvement status is via Webinar on October 12, 2012. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Improvement Plan due dates Two-year Title III Improvement Plans are due November 13, 2012 Four-year Title III Improvement Plans are due November 30, 2012 These plans are implemented during the 2012-13 school year. 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education Contact Information Kim Miller – Education Specialist (503) 947-5712 Kim.a.miller@state.or.us Carmen West – Education Specialist (503) 947-5669 Carmen.west@state.or.us Leslie Casebeer – Office Specialist Leslie.casebeer@state.or.us 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education

Oregon Department of Education 11/22/2018 Oregon Department of Education