School principal as a leader of instructional process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

Purpose of Instruction
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Foundations for Success Initial Findings and New Directions Jason Snipes Director of Research Council of the Great City Schools Defining the Achievement.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Hertfordshire PE and School Sport Conference Raising the standards of PE and school sport to support whole school improvement.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Chapter 6: Student Services Dr. Rob Anderson Spring 2011.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Learning Leadership L.L.C. Solutions for Teaching with Technology.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Bradfield CE (VA) Primary School School Development Priorities
Reservoir Primary School Literacy Share Day
Source: McKinsey Report Improvement Journey Poor to FairFair to GoodGood to GreatGreat to Excellent ThemeAchieving the basics of literacy and numeracy.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Practice of INSET in Mathematics and Science Teachers and its Impact on Quality of Basic Education in Kenya By ADEA-WGMSE.
Coaches Survey: Mining the Data May 8, 2006 PA High School Coaching Initiative.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
LLP Multilateral Comenius Partnership FUTURE EUROPEAN TEACHERS:TRAINING KIT ACCORDING TO THE LISBON STRATEGY ESkillsKit.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Peer Coaching Program Monica Gardelli Franco
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
+ Professional Development Characteristics Alternatives Stages Extending the Concept.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Teacher Assessment in Lithuania Dalia Brazienė, The Senior specialist of Culture, Education and Sports Department of Kaunas Region, Lithuania 12 / 04 /
EXPERIENCE OF AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM: WORKLOAD OF STUDENT AND TEACHER IN THE.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Building Teams and Empowering Members 1. Empowerment Empowerment is not bestowed by a leader, it is the process of an individual enabling himself to take.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Principal of LEPL Kutaisi #12 Public School
Praha, 1. – ročník mezinárodní konference k profesnímu rozvoji pedagogických pracovníků Profesní rozvoj pedagogů.
Middle Years Programme (MYP)
Mission Motto Learning for Life
Links with and between other Goals and Quality Frameworks
Accreditation External Review
Effective educational strategies of resilient schools
Liana Putkaradze Principal of LEPL Tbilisi #133 Public School
Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards
Joint lesson planning for improving students’ academic achievements
European Network on teacher Education Policies
Survey Results Overview
Roswell North Elementary School
EDU827 : EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Creating a School as a Self-improving Organization: Modern Challenges
Chapter 2: The teacher © VAN SCHAIK PUBLISHERS Chapter 2: The Teacher.
Inspection of social outcome in Norway?....
Principal of LEPL Vani #2 Public school Teona Adeishvili
Moris Dandurishvili LEPL KHaShuri #1 public school principal
The role of internal and external evaluation in an autonomous system
Instructional Leaders in Brevard County
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
New Prospect Elementary School
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Shared leadership and efficient professional development of teachers
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
ASEAN Conference Training high skilled human resources for the ASEAN
Summit Hill Elementary School
Roswell North Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

School principal as a leader of instructional process LEPL Rustavi #4 Public School Mamuka Khamkhadze

LEPL Zhiuli Shartava Rustavi #4 Public School

Major specifications Instructional profile- general educational Large contingent of pupils- 1730 Highly qualified pedagogical staff- 103 teachers

Highest results at school certificate exams Highest results at national exams

Excellent results in Olympiads and competitions Involvement in educational projects

Managing the instructional process Financial management Resources and facilities Current issues Administrative/ legal issues Management of human resources

Aspect #1 of the instructional process: Whom we teach- pupils 1700 pupils study at school, 62 fiscal groups in 2 shifts, 5-6-7 parallel groups Pupil contingent- the whole town (diverse cultures and expectations) Parent contingent- high expectations

Aspect #2 of the instructional process: Who teachers- teachers Goals of administration and school achievements: 1. Establishing collaborative culture, conducting activities in coordination 2. Planning professional activities and monitoring their implementation, providing feedback 3. Teacher professional development, efficient system of assessing and motivating teachers

Aspect #3 of the instructional process: How we teach- instructional environment major goal/outcome- creating efficient instructional environment Safe and working instructional environment in the classroom. Instructional process focused on pupils and its outcomes. Teaching with modern teaching methodology and research system. Guaranteeing excellent discipline for teaching/learning.

Aspect # 4 of the instructional process What we teach Aspect # 4 of the instructional process What we teach? Defining school goals- priorities Major goal of the school: Preparing pupils for successful life through giving them quality general education. priority of the primary level: developing reading and math literacy in each pupil; priorities of the basic level: creating realistic expectations in pupils and parents concerning pupils’ skills and acquired at school basic knowledge; priorities of the secondary level: creating optimal opportunities for pupils to fulfill their abilities.

What school did for achieving the goals? Defining strategic and stage instructional goals Intra-school system of teacher professional development System of monitoring and encouraging teachers’ activities System of semester testing at school System of organizing teachers’ work Establishing collaborative culture in teacher staff

Defining strategic and stage instructional goals For developing reading and math skills the school started participating in G-PRIED project; Compiling school teaching plan according to the set priorities; Providing teachers and pupils with necessary teaching resources.

Intra-school system of teacher professional development Involvement in instructional projects and conferences. Focus on active trainings. Sharing results of external and internal exams. Recruiting new teachers on the basis of competition. Participation in external researches and conducting researches inside the school.

System of monitoring and encouraging teacher’s activities System of monitoring teachers’ activities has been developed and introduced: Attending lessons and efficient feedbacks. Comparing results of internal and external assessments. School semester tests System of encouraging teachers has been developed and introduced: Mechanisms of material and moral encouragement. Rating system.

System of semester testing at school Goals of semester testing at school: Monitoring compliance of pupils’ achievements with the National Curriculum standards. Major specifications of school tests. Analysis and research of school results. Using test results in instructional practice at school, classroom and individual levels. Efficient usage of school tests at secondary level. Interdependence between testing system and school results.

System of semester tests at school

System of semester tests at school

System of semester tests at school

System of semester tests at school Joints school rating of 5th grade, semester I, acad. y. 2013-14 № name surname grade points 1 საბა გოზალიშვილი V დ 30 2 თეკლა ფხალაძე V ა 29 3 ანა ჯალიაშვილი V ბ 4 ლაშა სულიაშვილი V გ 5 ნიკა გელაშვილი 6 ანზორ გოგრიაშვილი 7 გიორგი ირემაშვილი V ვ 8 მარიამ გელაშვილი(ზურაბი) 28 9 კონსტანტინე კოკოვ 10 სანდრო მაკოევი 11 მაჩაიძე 12 მიმინოშვილი 13 თათია წიკლაური 14 ასანიძე 15 ქეთევან ბერაძე

System of organizing teachers’ activities At all the level teachers’ activities are coordinated: Holding test/quizzes in coordination. Acknowledging each other’s success and sharing experience among teachers. Coordinated teaching in grades 11-12 and analyzing its outcomes. Providing teachers with teaching resources.

Establishing collaborative culture in teacher staff Creating the atmosphere of trust, stability and acknowledgement. Acting as a role model. Assisting in identifying problems. Support: in implementing innovative ideas, solving conflicts…. Friendly rapport with teachers. Active usage of the method of persuasion. Active communication with pupils and parents.

What outcomes has the school achieved? At school efficient instructional environment has been established. The school holds the first place in school certificate exams. Pupils have impressive achievements in Olympiads and learning projects. 70 % of the teacher staff is certified and 45 teachers have maximum credits in the professional scheme. Tens of teachers and pupils have had trips to foreign countries. Demand on school is high and it has high rating.

What conclusions can be drawn? Establishing efficient instructional process is feasible through school principal’s direct engagement at each level of it. School community recognizes school principals’ significant role in school achievements. Principal must conduct the instructional process so as to have complete and constantly renewable information concerning functioning of each link in the instructional process. The major factor which affects pupils’ achievements is not highly developed infrastructure, but trust towards school.

Thanks for your time! Thanks for your attention!