The PEFA Program – roll-out, impact and future focus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Bank Role in Disaster Risk Management and Finance 1 Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) Overview of Partnerships and Results.
Advertisements

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
1 The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC, May 1, 2008 Bill Dorotinsky IMF.
EuropeAid ENGAGING STRATEGICALLY WITH NON-STATE ACTORS IN NEW AID MODALITIES SESSION 2 EC Experiences in Engaging more Strategically with NSAs in the Context.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Application of the PEFA Framework at country-level Issues for consideration PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington DC November 2006 Franck.
How to build a sustainable framework for endogenous-led capacity development in the trade-related sector Phnom Penh, 5 February 2008 Fabio Artuso (
The PEFA Indicators – How are they being used Actionable Governance Indicators Course - April 29 th, 2010 Frans Ronsholt PEFA Secretariat.
Elaine Ireland Policy Adviser: Global Health Global Health Policy Forum 9 th September 2010 Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector: A civil society perspective.
ICGFM Conference Miami May 3, 2005 Monitoring Public Financial Management System Performance: Lessons and Future Directions Bill Dorotinsky The World Bank.
SPA-CABRI Project on “Putting Aid on Budget” Presentation to DAC Joint Venture on Public Finance Management Paris, July 2007 Peter Dearden, Strategic Partnership.
The PEFA Program – and the PFM Performance Measurement Framework
Development Cooperation and Partnerships Strategy ( ) October 2014 KIM Lumang Bopata Policy Department.
Global Task Team: Improving AIDS Coordination Among Multilateral Institutions and International Donors Briefing for Theme Group on HIV/AIDS 1 November.
1 The PEFA Framework – rationale, adoption and use Jim Brumby, World Bank PEMPAL Plenary Plus Istanbul, February 27, 2008.
COOPERATION AMONG EVALUATION UNITS IN MULTILATERAL IFIs Gregory K. Ingram Chair, Evaluation Cooperation Group Marrakech – February, 2004.
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 4: The Assessment Process, Stakeholders Involvement & Quality.
Measuring PFM Performance The PEFA program and tool CReCER Managua, October 29-31, 2012 Charles Seibert, PEFA Secretariat.
Developing Consensus Principles and Standards for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs) Progress Report to the Fifth Meeting of the.
Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
IHP+ Financial Management Technical Working Group One year after formation FMTWG (Nov 2015)
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Ministry of Finance and Treasury Donor Coordination Forum Meeting The Report on progress on Adherence to the Principles of the Paris.
Page 1 The PFM Performance Measurement Framework A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring Workshop on Applying the PFM Performance Measurement.
The AUC TVET Strategy for Youth Employme nt Windhoek, April 2014 Prudence Ngwenya Department for Human Resources Science & Technology.
Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT.
The PEFA Framework – a tool for monitoring government performance ICGFM – New Developments in Governmental Financial Management Miami, May 19-22, 2008.
PEFA FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Module 9: Comparisons over time & between countries.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
MOH 2 February Identify needs Prioritize needs Finalize list of endorsed needs Submit needs to MOPAD Consult with donor Negotiation (intra- and.
FM and the CAS Fiduciary Forum, March 2008 Ivor Beazley, OPCFM.
Country Level Programs
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
A service of UNAIDS Jonathan Brown Georgia, September 2007
Open and inclusive budgeting: Working beyond boundaries
Gerald Farthing PhD Chair, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Steering Committee on Education for Sustainable Development.
PFM Reform Programmes Presentation by Mary Betley
Moving PFM reforms forward: A Strengthened Approach
Ivor Beazley, World Bank
Africa Region Accra High Level Forum Preparatory Consultation Workshop Summary of Group 3 Discussions on Harmonisation and Alignment April,
PROCUREMENT FIDUCIARY ARRANGEMENTS IN SECTOR-WIDE APPROACHES (SWAps)
A Tool for PFM Performance Measurement and Monitoring
EuropeAid Co-operation Office
Asha Ayoung Lead Procurement Specialist, OPCPR
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
ZAMBIA PEFA EXPERIENCE
SWAPs: Based on Lessons Mainly from Morocco and Zambia
IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014
Session 4: SDG follow-up and review mechanisms
… using an approach to Bank assistance that maximizes the effectiveness of scarce resources Greater emphasis on dialogue and analytical work that builds.
PEMPAL – Facilitating Practical Solutions in PFM across ECA
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Progress in reforming budget elaboration process
PEFA Performance Measurement Framework Case Study - Ghana
Public Financial Management Performance Measurement Framework
Implementing Budget Reforms
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms
PEFA Assessments - Analytics to Action
Debt Management Performance Assessment Tool (DeMPA)
Moving Forward PFM reforms
2018 National PEFA Assessment Budget Community of Practice of PEMPAL
MONITORING PROGRESS ON JOINT EVALUATION AND PARTNER COUNTRY INVOLVEMENT February th meeting.
Notes: Rapid assessments.
Gernot Hutschenreiter
Presentation transcript:

The PEFA Program – roll-out, impact and future focus World Bank Fiduciary Forum March 28, 2008 Frans Ronsholt, PEFA Secretariat

Content PEFA background Status on rolling-out Impact on the Strengthened Approach Future focus of the PEFA program

PEFA background Objective: Results orientation in development of PFM systems & harmonization of PFM analytical work Established: in 2001 by WB and six other agencies. Today working in tandem with 25 donor members of OECD-DAC Joint Venture on PFM. Strategy: the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reform A country-led reform program A donor-coordinated program of support A common information pool – based on the PFM Performance Measurement Framework launched in June 2005

PEFA Assessments : roll-out trend The workflow of about 15 assessments developed in six months and has remained constant. Whilst 2 donors (WB and EC) have dominated the leading and funding assessments, at least 20 others have participated in various roles. Governments have initiated self-assessments in a number of cases, though still limited.

Geographical distribution

Assessment coverage Very good progress – globally Increasingly used for Sub-National govt guidelines for SN application issued March 2008 High country coverage in many regions BUT …… Few high-income countries assessed Middle-income countries want models to compare with Norway - self-assessment close to completion Few repeat assessments to date needed to track and document performance changes

Ownership and publicity High buy-in from donor agencies 13 agencies have taken a leading role – 10 others involved in reference groups etc Most assessments led by WB (52%) or/and EC (34%) Few assessments are truly government-led and owned Zambia, Bogota, Norway, Bolivia, Nepal, Maharashtra, Belarus Some other cases: Substantial government leadership (Ghana) or initial self-assessment (Nicaragua) Publicity of reports creates a truly common information pool linked to government ownership of assessment

Quality is key to credibility Methodology becoming well known by assessors few methodological mistakes, but still scope for improving extent and transparency of ‘the evidence’ and the analytical summary Ex-ante and ex-post measures to ensure quality Government engagement Full donor collaboration A well planned and managed process Adequate resources, quantitative & qualitative Multi-stakeholder review arrangements for CN and Reports

Impact of PEFA assessments Conclusions from Impact Study 2007 based on 12 country case studies The workflow of about 15 assessments developed in six months and has remained constant. Whilst 2 donors (WB and EC) have dominated the leading and funding assessments, at least 20 others have participated in various roles. Governments have initiated self-assessments in a number of cases, though still limited.

Impact factors at country-level Government ownership and use of the assessment: Active government engagement in the process (but can be constrained by capacity) Assessment clearly intended to assist government (i.e. not seen primarily as a donor requirement for aid) Comprehensive stakeholder involvement from an early stage Donor coordination for and use of the assessment: Strength of existing cooperation among donors Existence of a joint framework for dialogue with government Can the PEFA experience help the development of joint approaches to analytical work among non-traditional collaborators in other areas?

Strategic areas of PEFA focus Maintain/enhance assessment quality Tracking of PFM performance changes through repeat assessments Enhance government engagement in and ownership of the assessments Improve dissemination to partner governments – how? Provide training for government officials to substantially participate in or lead assessments – funding!! Help governments set up reform M&E systems to include PEFA indicators Timely completion and publication of assessment reports to create true common information pool Multi-year plans for PFM analytical work in each country with buy-in from all major stakeholders

Thank You for Your Attention