Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Advertisements

Phase 2 of new ARVs TAF (TFV prodrug) - Study Study
Comparison of NRTI combinations  ZDV/3TC vs TDF + FTC –Study 934  ABC/3TC vs TDF/FTC –HEAT Study –ACTG A5202 Study –ASSERT Study  Comparison of TAF.
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV  STARTMRK  GS-US  SINGLE.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of RTV vs Cobi  GS-US Gallant JE. JID 2013;208:32-9 GS-US  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of COBI compared with RTV.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch from TDF to TAF  GS-US Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients maintaining HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT, snapshot)
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
ARV-trial.com Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to RPV/FTC/TAF Studies 1216 and
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study 1.
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US Study GS-US Study
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch ABC/3TC to TAF/FTC
ARV-trial.com Switch to E/C/F/TAF GS-US Study 1.
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DRV/r + 3TC DUAL Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to D/C/F/TAF EMERALD Study.
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch ABC/3TC to TDF/FTC
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of INSTI – Phase 2
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF GS-US GS-US GS-US
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to DTG-containing regimen
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Comparison of INSTI vs PI
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
ARV-trial.com Switch to DTG/ABC/3TC STRIIVING NEAT
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
DTG + 3TC vs DTG + TDF/FTC GEMINI.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Presentation transcript:

Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US-292-0109 Study GS-US-311-1089 Study ARV-trial.com Switch from TDF to TAF GS-US-292-0109 Study GS-US-311-1089 Study GS-US-366-1216 Study GS-US-366-1160 Study

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double blind W48 W96 HIV+ ≥ 18 years On RPV/FTC/TDF > 6 months HIV RNA < 50 c/mL ≥ 6 months eGFR (Cockroft-Gault) > 50 mL/min No resistance to RPV, FTC or TDF N = 316 RPV/FTC/TAF 25/200/25 mg QD + RPV/FTC/TDF placebo RPV/FTC/TDF 25/200/300 mg QD + RPV/FTC/TAF placebo N = 316 Endpoints Primary: proportion of patients maintaining HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 (ITT, snapshot) ; non-inferiority if lower margin of a two-sided 95.001% CI for the difference = - 8%, 85% power Secondary: percentage change for hip and spine bone mineral density between treatment groups ; 90% power to detect a 1.38% difference (non- inferiority margin) ; multiple adjustments to test for superiority GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Baseline characteristics and outcome RPV/FTC/TAF N = 316 RPV/FTC/TDF N = 314 Median age, years 46 44 Female, % 13 8 Race: white / black / other, % 75 / 21 / 4 75 / 17 / 8 CD4/mm3, median 673 668 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL, % 97 99 eGR (Cockroft-Gault), mL/min, median 103.5 99.7 Proteinuria: grade 1 / grade 2, % 10 / 0 9 / < 1 Discontinuation by W48, N (%) Adverse event Death Pregnancy Investigator decision Consent withdrawal Lost to follow-up Protocol violation 18 (5.7%) 4 1 2 6 18 (5.8%) 3 GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204 3

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Virologic outcome at W48 (ITT, snapshot) Difference (95% CI) = - 0.3% (- 4.2 to 3.7) 93.7 0.6 5.7 93.9 6.1 20 40 60 80 100 Success HIV RNA< 50 c/mL Virologic failure No virologic data % 313 * 316 RPV/FTC/TAF RPV/FTC/TDF Other efficacy results at W48 Per protocol analysis (HIV RNA < 50 c/mL) 99.3% RPV/FTC/TAF 100% RPV/FTC/TDF Virologic success was similar between treatment groups for the subgroups of age, sex, race, geographic region, and study drug adherence Mean changes in CD4/mm3 + 9 RPV/FTC/TAF - 1 RPV/FTC/TDF * 1 patient excluded from full-analysis set (was taking EFV/FTC/TDF) GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Resistance analysis Genotype and Phenotype testing if confirmed HIV RNA ≥ 50 c/mL and confirmatory sample ≥ 400 c/mL, or HIV RNA ≥ 400 c/mL at W48 or at the last visit on study drug 1 patient in the RPV/FTC/TAF group: re-emergence of archived mutations M41K, E44D, D67N, V118I, L210W, T215Y; no new mutations (did not re- suppress) 1 patient in the RPV/FTC/TDF group: no resistance detected, was re- suppressed on continued therapy Historical genotypes: resistance mutations to study drug in 3 participants 3 patients in the TAF group: M184V (N = 2), E138A, K101E + E138K 1 discontinued at W4 with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL, 3 with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 3 patients in the TDF group: M184V, E138A (N = 2) All 3 with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL at W48 GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Adverse events, % RPV/FTC/TAF N = 316 RPV/FTC/TDF N = 314 Adverse events related to study drug 6 12 Serious adverse event related to study drug 4 Adverse event leading to discontinuation 1 * 1 ** Most common adverse events (≥ 5% of patients) Upper respiratory tract infection Diarrhea Nasopharyngitis Headache Bronchitis Sinusitis 9 7 5 8 * Gastroesophageal reflux disease (N = 1), hiatus hernia and ulcerative oesophagitis (N = 1), fatigue (N = 1), leading to discontinuation), suicidal depression (N = 1) ** Drug hypersensitivity (N = 1), leading to discontinuation), increased ALT and AST (N = 1), chronic myeloid leukaemia (N = 1) GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Change in renal biomarkers at W48 - 18.8 - 7.8 - 18.0 - 29.0 7.3 16.8 21.5 12.0 - 50 40 30 20 10 P/Cr Alb/Cr RBP/Cr b2MG/Cr Cr: creatininuria ; P: proteinuria ; Alb: albuminuria ; RBP : retinol binding protein ; b2MG : béta-2 microglobinuria Urine protein to creatinine ratio (% median change) * p < 0.001 * F/TAF F/TDF Median change in eGFR: + 4.5 mg/dL on RPV/FTC/TAF vs + 0.7 mg/dL on RPV/FTC/TDF (p = 0.0024) No discontinuation for study-drug renal adverse event in either group No reported cases of proximal renal tubulopathy or Fanconi syndrome in either group GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Mean % change in bone mineral density through W48 (%, 95% CI) Hip Lumbar spine 3 1.61 2 1.04 1 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 0.08 RPV/FTC/TAF -1 - 0.25 RPV/FTC/TDF -2 Baseline W24 W48 Baseline W24 W48 Number assessed RPV/FTC/TAF RPV/FTC/TDF 184 173 175 171 168 165 187 176 178 174 172 168 ≥ 3 % BMD increase at W48 RPV/FTC/TAF 16% EFV/FTC/TDF 4% 27% 11% p < 0.001 GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Fasting lipids changes at W48 Increases in total cholesterol, direct LDL, HDL and triglycerides in the RPV/FTC/TAF group Stable in the RPV/FTC/TDF group Change in total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio: similar in both groups Introduction of lipid-lowering agent between baseline and W48: 4% in the RPV/FTC/TAF group vs 1% in the RPV/FTC/TDF group (p = 0.067) GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204

GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF ARV-trial.com GS-US-366-1216 Study: Switch RPV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TAF Conclusion Overall, virally suppressed, HIV-1 infected participants who switched to rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide maintained viral suppression at 48 weeks with low rates of virological failure, good tolerability, and improvements in measures of bone and renal safety compared with rilpivirine, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate GS-US-366-1216 Orkin C. Lancet HIV 2017 ; 4:e195-204