O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faster-Than-Light Paradoxes in Special Relativity
Advertisements

Special Relativistic Paradoxes PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
Lecture 20 Relativistic Effects Chapter Outline Relativity of Time Time Dilation Length Contraction Relativistic Momentum and Addition of Velocities.
Building Spacetime Diagrams PHYS 206 – Spring 2014.
Classical Relativity Galilean Transformations
Physics Lecture Resources
relativity Quantum Classic physics Modern physics.
Time dilation D.3.1Describe the concept of a light clock. D.3.2Define proper time interval. D.3.3Derive the time dilation formula. D.3.4Sketch and annotate.
 Today we will cover R4 with plenty of chance to ask questions on previous material.  The questions may be about problems.  Tomorrow will be a final.
Wednesday, October 24: Midterm #1 Material covered: Events, reference frames, spacetime The interval Simultaneity (and relativity thereof) Lorentz transformations.
Postulates of Special Relativity The Relativity Postulate –The laws of physics are the same in every inertial reference frame The Speed of Light Postulate.
Theory of Special Relativity
Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Feb. 4, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Einstein’s.
1 Special Relativity 2. 2 Topics l Recap l Length Contraction l Cosmic Ray Muons l Spacetime l Summary.
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations
SPECIAL RELATIVITY -Postulates of Special Relativity -Relativity of time –> time dilation -Relativity of length –> length contraction © 2005.
Theory of Relativity Albert Einstein Physics 100 Chapt 18.
PH604 Special Relativity (8 lectures)
Principle of special relativity Their is inconsistency between EM and Newtonian mechanics, as discussed earlier Einstein proposed SR to restore the inconsistency.
PHY 1371Dr. Jie Zou1 Chapter 39 Relativity (Cont.)
LECTURE # 4 DOPPLER –SPACETIME DIAGRAMS PHYS 420-SPRING 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
Special Relativity & General Relativity
Chapter 37 Special Relativity. 37.2: The postulates: The Michelson-Morley experiment Validity of Maxwell’s equations.
4-vectors: Four components that Lorentz transform like ct, x, y, z.
Lecture 14 Space-time diagrams (cont) ASTR 340 Fall 2006 Dennis Papadopoulos.
IB Physics – Relativity Relativity Lesson 2 1.Time dilation 2.Lorentz Factor 3.Proper time 4.Lorentz contraction 5.Proper length 6.Twin paradox and symmetric.
A lecture series on Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics The Relativistic Quantum World University of Maastricht, Sept 24 – Oct 15, 2014 Marcel Merk.
The Death of High Mass Stars. Quiz #8 On the H-R diagram, a high mass star that is evolving off the main sequence will become redder in color and have.
Twin Paradox The Theory of Relativity. About Relativity As an object approaches the speed of light, time slows down. (Moving clocks are slow) (Moving.
PH 301 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 4. Review Outline  Lorentz transformation  simultaneity  twin paradox  Consequences of Einstein’s postulates  length.
Page 1 Phys Baski Relativity I Topic #9: Special Relativity I Transformation of Variables between Reference Frames –Non-relativistic Galilean Transformation.
Special relativity.
Special Relativity. Objectives State Einstein’s postulates Recognize the consequences of Einstein’s postulates Calculate the effects of time dilation,
Special Relativity: Time Dilation and Length Contraction SPH4U.
Time Dilation We can illustrate the fact that observers in different inertial frames may measure different time intervals between a pair of events by considering.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Education Physics Deparment UNS
Consequences of Lorentz Transformation. Bob’s reference frame: The distance measured by the spacecraft is shorter Sally’s reference frame: Sally Bob.
Physics 2170 – Spring Special relativity Homework solutions are on CULearn Remember problem solving sessions.
Physics Lecture 2 1/26/ Andrew Brandt Monday January 26, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Special Relativity 2.Galilean Transformations 3.Time.
Einstein’s theory of special relativity makes some very bizarre and counter-intuitive predictions. Anything that violates common sense like this must.
Special Relativity I wonder, what would happen if I was travelling at the speed of light and looked in a mirror?
Einstein’s theory of special relativity makes some very bizarre and counter-intuitive predictions. Anything that violates common sense like this must.
Monday, Feb. 9, 2015PHYS , Spring 2014 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6 Monday, Feb. 9, 2015 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Relativistic Velocity.
Consequences of Special Relativity Simultaneity: Newton’s mechanics ”a universal time scale exists that is the same for all observers” Einstein: “No universal.
Spacetime diagrams can help you to visualize relativity. They are similar to scale diagrams and freebody diagrams.
Special relativity Part II Recall Einstein’s Postulates (1905) First Postulate –The laws of physics are the same in any inertial frame of reference (principle.
Mon. Jan. 28 – Physics Lecture #4 Relativity – Basic Postulates 0) Quiz 1) Basic Postulates 2) Relative velocities 3) Light Clocks 4) Comparing time between.
1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #5 Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2013 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Time Dilation & Length Contraction Relativistic Velocity Addition Twin Paradox.
Derivation of Lorentz Transformations Use the fixed system K and the moving system K’ At t = 0 the origins and axes of both systems are coincident with.
1 1.Time Dilation 2.Length Contraction 3. Velocity transformation Einstein’s special relativity: consequences.
Time Dilation. Relative Time  Special relativity predicts that events seen as simultaneous by one observer are not simultaneous to an observer in motion.
Consequences of Relativism SPH4U. Wind Back the Clock Two consequences of relativism discussed: To a stationary observer, time appears to slow down in.
X’ =  (x – vt) y’ = y z’ = z t’ =  (t – vx/c 2 ) where   1/(1 - v 2 /c 2 ) 1/2 Lorentz Transformation Problem: A rocket is traveling in the positive.
Lecture 5: PHYS344 Homework #1 Due in class Wednesday, Sept 9 th Read Chapters 1 and 2 of Krane, Modern Physics Problems: Chapter 2: 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14,
By: Jennifer Doran. What was Known in 1900 Newton’s laws of motion Maxwell’s laws of electromagnetism.
Problem: A rocket travels away from earth at constant speed v to planet Q. The trip takes 100 years, as measured on earth but only 25 years as measured.
Some places where Special Relativity is needed
Wacky Implications of Relativity
Physics Special Relativity
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #6
Relativity.
Lorentz Transformation
Einstein’s Relativity Part 2
Special Relativity Lecture 2 12/3/2018 Physics 222.
An Introduction To ‘High Speed’ Physics
Special relativity Physics 123 1/16/2019 Lecture VIII.
Part 2: Time Dilation.
Time Dilation Observer O is on the ground
Time dilation recap: A rocket travels at 0.75c and covers a total distance of 15 light years. Answer the following questions, explaining your reasoning:
Presentation transcript:

O’ O X’ X Z’ Z 5. Consequences of the Lorentz transformation 5.1 Time dilation A light source in S’ a flash of light lasting t’ seconds Z Y X O Z’ Y’ X’ O’ The flash starts at time t’1, and goes off at time t’2, as measured by a clock in S’ t’ = t’2 – t’1 A strobe light located at rest in S’, produces a flash of light lasting t’ seconds. We take the flash on and off as two events. Also: x’ = x’2 – x’1 = 0 How does an observer in S views the light on and off events? Light on time: Light off time:

x’ = 0 Light duration time measured by a clock in S: -- S is the moving frame w.r.t the strobe light -- t is called tmoving --S’ is the rest frame w.r.t the Strobe flash -- t’ is called trest(the proper time) The clock in S’ is at rest relative to the strobe light, so the frame S’ is called the clock’s rest frame and t’ is called trest, or the proper time. Similarly the clock in the frame S is moving relative to the strobe light, t is called tmoving we have tmoving > trest, this effect is called time dilation on a moving clock, or moving clock runs slower, i.e., Observer in S see’s the clock in S’ runs slower because the clock in S’ is moving w.r.t to him. trest is also called the proper time (the shortest) of the two events.

Experimental demonstration of time dilation effect: Cosmic Ray evidence for ‘time dilation’  Mesons are formed at heights > 10 km in atmosphere. Observations found that most of them manage to survive down to sea level –despite their half-life being only Muons are sub-atomic particles generated when cosmic rays strike the upper levels of our atmosphere. They have a half lifetime of about 2 microseconds (µs) meaning that every 2 µs, their population will reduce by half. The slowing of clocks in a moving system is a real effect and it applies equally to all kinds of time, for example biological, chemical reaction rates, even to the rate of growth of a cancer in a cancer patient! Even moving at c, half should have decayed in a distance of: But: as they move so fast their clocks (proper time) run slower due to “ time dilation”. If v=0.999c,  =22.37 http://www.jlab.org/~cecire/cosmic.jpg

The Twin Paradox Right after their 20th birthday, L blasts off in a rocket ship for a space trip, travelling at a speed 0.99c to a nearby star 30 light years away, then comes back with same speed, while M stay on Earth.. -- In the view of M: The journey will take time T = 2*30*c*year/0.99c = 60 year, so L will return when M is 20+60=80 yr. How much will L aged over the same period? L was travelling at a high speed and L’s clock, including her internal biological clock, were running slowly compared to M’s, therefore when L reunites with M, L will have aged by T’ = T/  = 60/7 < 9 yr. So L is much younger than M. There are two twins M and L who were born at exactly the same moment (a biological impossibility). There are numerous ways of trying to resolve the paradox. Here we shall briefly mention one of the most common and simple one. We know that we can only do physics in inertial frames of reference. However, L is not in such a frame, the principal of inertia is violated for L when she blasts off from Earth, again when she fires her thrusters to turn around, and once again, when she lands on Earth. If you were riding with L, you would “feel” these non-inertial force when you are pushed into your seat or lifted from it when M’s rocket is firing. -- In the view of L: M was travelling away at a high speed and M’s clock, including her internal biological clock, were running slowly compared to L’s, therefore when M reunites with L, M is younger than L. Conclusion: In one frame of reference, L is younger while from the other frame of reference, M is younger. This is the paradox. http://www.phys.vt.edu/~takeuchi/relativity/notes/section15.html

Worldlines in M’s or the Earth’s frame) The invariant between two events D and R: x ct M L T D R M: x=0 the proper time for her is tDR L: moves quickly, so (x’) 0, so her proper time out to event T and back again will be much smaller by factor of  than tDR. Let's draw this now in L's frame: We can explain this paradox in worldlines of L and M. The worldlines of L and M are plotted in the rest frame of the Earth (frame S), with L's departure marked as event D, L's turnaround at the distant star as T and her return home as R. ……… We cannot choose both because they are different frames: L changes frames at event T. The time dilation effect is reciprocal: as observed from the point of view of any two clocks which are in motion with respect to each other, it will be the other party's clock that is time dilated. A problem: just what frame do we choose? Frame S’ that is L's rest frame on her way out to the space? Frame S’ that is L's rest frame on her way back? OR L changes frames at event T This breaks the symmetry and resolves the paradox: M travels from event D to event R in a single frame with no changes, while L changes frames. L's worldline is crooked (non-inertial) while M's is straight (inertial)! Therefore: M’s point of view is right, L will be younger than M

What is the length of the rod measured in S? 5.2 Length contraction - A rod lies on the x’ axis in S’, at rest relative to S’ O x S y zx O’ S’ y’ z’ x’ u -its two ends measured as x’1 and x’2 The length of the rod in S’ is What is the length of the rod measured in S? Because the rod is moving relative to S, we should measure the x-coordinates x1 and x2 of the ends of the rod at the same time, i.e., t=t2-t1=0, L = x2 –x1 Using Eq 6

Call L’ as the Lrest, since the rod is at rest to S’ L the Lmoving since it moves with velocity u relative to S, which shows the effect of length contraction on a moving rod. -The length or the distance is measured differently by two observers in relative motion - One observer will measure a shorter length when the object is moving relative to him/her Note: the ladder paradox involves a long ladder travelling near the speed of light and being contained within a smaller garage -The longest length is measured when the rod is at rest relative to the observer---proper length -Only lengths or distances parallel to the direction of the relative motion are affected by length contraction

6. Velocity addition A) Velocity Transformation How velocities are transformed from one Ref. Frame to another? Differentiating L.T. equations: --In order to avoid confusion, we now use  for the speed of the reference frame S’ w.r.t. S in x direction. Suppose a particle has a velocity in S’ in S: Differentiate Eq. (5)

L5

The velocity transformation equation from S’ to S is The inverse velocity transformation equation is From Eq(7) and (8) we have: i). When v and ux, ux’ << C, ux = ux’ + v , the L.T G.T ii). When ux‘ = C,  Ux = C, and when ux=Cux’=C L.T. includes the constancy of the speed of light, as well as G.T. for the low speed world.