Goals and assumptions of the research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Cohesion Policy supporting health for regional development
Advertisements

Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
Impact analysis and counterfactuals in practise: the case of Structural Funds support for enterprise Gerhard Untiedt GEFRA-Münster,Germany Conference:
Operational Programme I – Cohesion Policy Event part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund Evaluation Plan for Maltas.
University of Athens, GREECE Innovation and regional development : Prof. Lena J. Tsipouri.
Rapporteur’s Report Professor John Coolahan Conference Theme “Better Assessment and Evaluation to Improve Teaching and Learning” How use assessment most.
Improving the added value of EU Cohesion policy Professor John Bachtler European Policies Research Centre University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
SWEDISH AGENCY FOR ECONOMIC AND REGIONAL GROWTH 1 Knowledge formation for structural change, innovation and growth – a challenge for Evaluation!
Bucharest, 18 February 2009 Evaluation of Structural Instruments in POLAND Stanislaw Bienias National Evaluation Unit Department of Structural Policy Coordination.
Impact of the cohesion policy on the level and quality of employment in Poland Project co-financed from financial means of the European Union within the.
COURSE OVERVIEW COURSE REQUIREMENTS KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS STUDENT EXPECTATIONS Global Business.
European Cruise Council 2009 Conference Rome, 19 May « Study on Tourist facilities in ports » Paul Nemitz Head of Unit for Maritime Policy Development.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
How the EU is financed EU spends around €140 billion euro per year across the Member States All Member States contribute to the EU budget In 2011, Ireland’s.
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
Chapter Twenty- Nine: The Global Economy and Policy.
The European Union & Business A2 Business Studies Unit 4.
The European agenda on improving the efficiency of employment and social policies: Bratislava, December 2011 The example of social experimentation.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Regional & Urban Policy Investments for growth & jobs Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities 6 th Report on economic, social.
TOWARDS “CLEAN” MINING TECHNOLOGY THROUGH TECHNICAL SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION Nicolae Ilias, Romania.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Maria Elena Valenzuela ILO ECLAC/ILO Bulletin Labour market and social protection policies to confront the crisis.
Institute for Structural Research Julian Zawistowski 22 September 2009 Institute for Structural Research1 Assessment of the benefits drawn by EU-15 countries.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
Investment into smart growth! How we can help!. “…the EU and its Member States should adopt a strategic and integrated approach to innovation whereby.
EuropeAid Migration & Development EU perspective 7 March 2013, Brussels.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
DG for Regional and Urban Policy European Commission
An Action Plan for nature, people and the economy COM(2017) 198 final Nicola Notaro Head of Unit Unit D.3 "Nature Protection" DG Environment Tallinn.
Mobilising structural funds as a response to the crisis:
dr Paweł Wais Deputy Directort Department for Regional Development
Results of the Research
Industry Development. in Ukraine. Analysis & Ideas of the
Priority 3 NMP: generalities
Financial Instruments as Agents of Regional Development: Lessons Learnt and Future Potential
PUBLIC HEARING - INTELLIGENT ENERGY FOR EUROPE
European Commission ECCP II WG 1: ECCP Review
European Investment Bank (EIB)
Kuwait – Germany Prospects for Cooperation
Roberto Barcellan European Commission - Eurostat
EU Funds in CEE Since the CEE countries became the EU members, EU co-financing has become an essential factor for they development.
The ERA.Net instrument Aims and benefits
Competition for Evaluations & 2016 Conference
The Role of Bilateral Donors in supporting capacity-building in the area of ICT Open Consultations on Financing Mechanisms for Meeting the Challenges.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2
Framework of the „Let’s train with our Neighbours” within European Union current policies Tbilisi, October 4, 2010.
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 25 February 2010
Welcome to the 2nd Mediterranean Natura 2000 Seminar Limassol, Cyprus November 2017 A milestone event of the Natura 2000 Biogeographical Process.
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Evaluation network meeting Brussels, September 22, 2009
Main results and conclusions of the
New Trends in the Innovation Policy in the European Union
COHESION POLICY DELIVERING BENEFITS FOR CITIZENS
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds: BRIDGE Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr) Groundwater Characterisation workshop, 25 June 2004.
6th Report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, July 2014
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Cohesion Policy and Small Businesses – The launch pad for SMEs Prof
Christine Kormann Eurostat Task Force Integrated Planning ESS RDG
EP Pilot project Comparative study of pressures and measures
EU Prize for Women Innovators
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
BRD The Development Bank of Rwanda Plc (BRD) is Rwanda’s only national Development Finance Institution Public limited company incorporated in 1967 and.
Director Generals meeting in Maastricht
The challenges of metropolitan regions and their position in the future Cohesion Policy post Juraj Droba.
R&D FUNDING To increase sharply gross R&D expenditure by 2006 to 1,5% of GDP, making it comparable to EU average (1,8% of GDP in 1998) To increase.
GDP, Spending, and Economic Growth
Water economics State-of-play of ongoing studies Lie Heymans
Presentation transcript:

Goals and assumptions of the research The main goal: Assessment of the benefits drawn by EU-15 countries as a result of cohesion policy implementation in Poland in order to: evaluate the results of cohesion policy in the broader context (innovative aproach) describe the impacts of cohesion policy on EU level find justification for continuation of cohesion policy after 2013 establish methodology for CP impact assessment on EU level The assumptions: cohesion policy creates impacts not only at the national level – CP as a European integration instrument cohesion policy creates not only the costs for UE-15 (especially for net payers) but also the benefits

Goals and assumptions of the research The main evaluation questions: Taking into account the increase of consumption and investment demand in Poland due to CP implementation, what is the total value and structure of goods and services exported by EU-15 countries to Poland? How many foreign companies from the EU-15 countries were the contractors in the projects co-financed from the structural funds in Poland? What is the aggregated value of structural funds absorbed by companies from the EU-15 countries which have been contractors for the EU co-financed projects in Poland?

Main conclusions The main conclusions: Cohesion policy is an effective European integration instrument – it creates positive socio- economic impacts on EU level CP ensures win-win situation generating not only the costs but also the significant benefits for EU-15 (especially for net payers) for each euro, spent on cohesion policy implementation in Poland, EU-15 countries recollected 32 cents by additional import of their goods CP stimulates the import that favours high technology development and creates knowledge-based economies

The main conclusions for CP evaluation: methodology: in order to find CP impacts on EU level – both - „top down” and „bottom up” approach should be used and integrated evaluation results are crucial arguments for the debate on the future of cohesion policy (CP as a success story) scope of CP evaluation could be extended to EU-15 countries in order to give the overall picture of CP impacts