Your Institutional Report Step by Step

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Advertisements

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
1 NSSE Results Indiana University Kokomo Sharon K. Calhoon Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Presentation to Clerical.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
University Surveys and Assessments Department Chair and Dean Retreat.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Center for Institutional Effectiveness LaMont Rouse, Ph.D. Fall 2015.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
Capital Community College 2014 Graduate Survey
The University of Texas-Pan American
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
First-Year Experiences & Senior Transitions
Director, Center for Teaching, Learning, & Assessment
Graduation Initiative 2025
NSSE Data Conversations
Irish Survey of Student Engagement (ISSE) Results 2016
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Graduation Initiative 2025
NSSE Data Conversations
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The University of Texas-Pan American
What’s Your Evidence? Using Data to Support Student Success
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
Your Institutional Report Step by Step
Johnson Center Presentation Dr. Karla McCain
Imagine Success Engaging Entering Students Innovations 2009
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
AUB NSSE 2018 Report K. El Hassan, PhD. OIRA, AUB.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Performance Update St. Philip’s College.
Student Satisfaction Results
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
2018 UNC System employee engagement survey
NFO - Overview of WCU Students
GGC and Student Engagement
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
McPherson College, Fall 2017
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Your Institutional Report 2012 - Step by Step 9/6/2012 Student Learning at Gallaudet University NSSE Results: Campus Environment A Workshop Presented to Faculty and Staff for Professional Development Lindsay Buchko, Ph.D. & Leslie Rach, Ph.D. Fall, 2018

Questions to consider when you’re reviewing your NSSE results…. What NSSE items are of interest to you and your department? Given the Gallaudet mission, what results do you want to see on NSSE? Given your observations and understanding of Gallaudet students, what results do you expect to see? Do these results resonate with your view of Gallaudet? With other data? How well do you do in comparison to peers?

NSSE Engagement Indicators Overview The triangles show Engagement Indicators where our students’ average was significantly higher, and where our students’ average was significantly lower. As you might guess, if the triangle points up, and is in blue, GU results were higher than peers’; if the triangle points down, and is in purple, GU results were significantly lower. The darker the triangle the more significant the difference. Where there is a line, GU’s results are on par with results of peer institutions. WHAT DO YOU NOTICE?

NSSE Engagement Indicators: Peer Comparisons First Year Students Seniors = Peers Higher-Order Learning Reflective & Integrative Learning Quantitative Reasoning Collaborative Learning Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices Supportive Environment Below Peers Learning Strategies Discussions with Diverse Others Quality of Interactions = Peers Higher-Order Learning Reflective & Integrative Learning Quantitative Reasoning Collaborative Learning Student-Faculty Interaction Effective Teaching Practices Quality of Interactions Below Peers Learning Strategies Discussions with Diverse Others Supportive Environment In 2017, out of 10 Engagement Indicators GU is on par with peers in six Engagement Indicators for both FYS and SRS. (Review the seven). GU is on par with peers for FYS for an additional EI, and on par with peers for Seniors for a different EI (see orange). For two Engagement Indicators GU is below peers for by FYS and Seniors: Learning Strategies and Discussions with Diverse Others. For Quality of Interactions FYS are on par with peers, but Seniors are below peers. For Supportive Environment Seniors are on par with peers, by FYS are below peers. (see blue)

NSSE 2017 Engagement Indicator: Quality of Interactions The third theme in NSSE results is Campus Environment. Campus Environment is made up of two Engagement Indicators: Quality of Interactions and Supportive Environment. Both of these are ones we want to pay attention to. As you might guess, both Interactions and Environment support student achievement. First, Quality of Interaction. NSSE asks students directly what is the quality of their interactions with five different kinds of people on campus: Students, Academic Advisors, Faculty, Student Service Staff, and Other Administrative Staff (with examples such as Registrar’s Office and Financial Aid).

NSSE Engagement Indicators Overview Quality of Interactions is another Engagement Indicator that’s worth looking at for Gallaudet. You’ve seen the data on the Student Satisfaction Inventory that shows that student rate Sense of Belonging lower than expected. The Quality of the interactions students have at GU contributes to their sense of belonging. Quality of Interactions means interactions with the following types of people on campus: Other Students, Academic Advisors, Faculty, Student Services Staff, and Other Administrative Staff and Offices. Gallaudet was on par with peer institutions for FYS for Quality of Interactions. However, for Seniors we were not, and the difference with peers was highly significant.

NSSE Campus Environment Quality of Interactions – First Year Students Indicate the quality of your interactions with the following people at your institution? (% responding ‘6’ or ‘7’ where 7 = ”Excellent”) Data findings for first year students Gallaudet lower for all items in 2017 compared to Carnegie Gallaudet 2017 lower for interactions with students and faculty compared to Gallaudet 2014 How and in what ways can Gallaudet improve first year students’ quality of interactions with people at Gallaudet?

NSSE 2017: Campus Environment Quality of Interaction - First Year Students Here in YELLOW you see First Year Student responses regarding the quality of their interactions with each of those five groups (point to each group, GU responses) This graph also compares the GU student responses (YELLOW) to those of peer institutions (GREEN). The biggest gap between GU and peer responses is in Quality of Interactions with Faculty. Here there’s a 22% difference between GU and Peers. This gap has shown up in GU’s NSSE results repeatedly over the last 8 years. The next largest gap is in Quality of Interactions with Student Services Staff, then Students. For Admin Offices and SS Staff GU improved in the past three years. For Students and Faculty the results are lower. In every category GU’s results are below peers.

NSSE 2017: Campus Environment Quality of Interaction - First Year Students Another concern in this year’s data is that the scores in several Engagement Indicators dropped since the 2014 GU NSSE administration. Here you see a comparison of GU’s NSSE results on Quality of Interactions in 2014 (BLUE) with the 2017 results (ORANGE). Interactions with Faculty, which has been below peers for many years, dropped between 2014 and 2017. Interactions with Other Students also dropped since 2014. It’s nice to see, however, that there’s been a small improvement in Interactions with Student Services Staff and Other Administrative Staff.

NSSE Campus Environment Quality of Interactions – Seniors Indicate the quality of your interactions with the following people at your institution? (% responding ‘6’ or ‘7’ where 7 = ”Excellent”) Data findings for seniors Gallaudet lower for all items in 2017 compared to Carnegie Gallaudet 2017 lower for interactions with students, faculty, and student services staff compared to Gallaudet 2014 How and in what ways can Gallaudet improve seniors’ quality of interactions with people at Gallaudet?

NSSE 2017: Campus Environment Quality of Interaction - Seniors This graph shows the results for Seniors in 2017. Again, YELLOW shows GU, Green shows Peer Institutions. You can see the results are similar to those of First Year Students, although there’s a larger gap for Student Services Staff.

NSSE 2017: Campus Environment Quality of Interaction - Seniors This graph compares GU’s NSSE results for 2014 with results for 2017. Similar to First Year Students, Quality of Interactions have dropped between 2014 and 2017 with the exception of Academic Advisors and other administrative staff and offices.

NSSE 2017 Engagement Indicator: Supportive Environment NSSE has TEN Engagement Indicators. In this presentation, we’re focusing on GU’s results for THREE of those TEN. Supportive Environment is the third of the three.

NSSE Engagement Indicators Overview This section of NSSE asks: How much does your institution emphasize…? ….and then lists eight different areas for emphasis. Together all eight of those areas make up Supportive Environment. You’ll see those areas on the next slide. Here you can see that for Seniors GU is on par with Peers. And, for one of those eight areas, GU is HIGHER than peer institutions for first year students. Can anyone guess the area of support? ANSWER: “Institution emphasis on helping you manage your non-academic responsibilities.”

NSSE Campus Environment Supportive Environment – First Year Students How much does your institution emphasize the following? (% responding ‘6’ or ‘7’ where 7 = ”Excellent”) Data findings for first year students Gallaudet lower for all items in 2017 compared to Carnegie except helping them manage their non-academic responsibilities Gallaudet 2017 lower for all items compared to Gallaudet 2014 except attending campus activities and events How and in what ways can Gallaudet improve on emphasizing a supportive environment for first year students’?

NSSE Campus Environment Supportive Environment – Seniors How much does your institution emphasize the following? (% responding ‘6’ or ‘7’ where 7 = ”Excellent”) Data findings for seniors Gallaudet lower for all items in 2017 compared to Carnegie except three items Gallaudet 2017 lower for all items compared to Gallaudet 2014 except attending campus activities and events How and in what ways can Gallaudet improve seniors’ quality of interactions with people at Gallaudet?

Supportive Environment: GU Areas of Strength How much does your institution emphasize…? First Year Students Seniors + Peers Helping you manage your non- academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) = Peers Encouraging contact among students from different backgrounds Providing opportunities to be involved socially Providing support for your overall well-being (recreation, health care, counseling) Attending campus activities and events = Peers Encouraging contact among students from different backgrounds Helping you manage your non- academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.) Providing opportunities to be involved socially Attending campus activities and events Attending events that address important social, political, or economic issues First some good news: We’re doing as well or better than peer institutions in many of the eight areas of Supportive Environment. This chart lists the areas within Supportive Environment where GU is HIGHER than peers, and those areas where GU is equal to peers. On the left is the list for First Year Students. On the right is the list for Seniors. But you might ask: if we’re on par or above peers for these areas for First Year Students, why are we still significantly below peers for Supportive Environment. The answer’s in the numbers--- when you add all of the scores from the multiple items that contribute to the scale of supportive environment.

Supportive Environment: GU Areas for Focus First Year Students Providing support to help students succeed academically Using learning support services (tutoring, writing center, etc.) This slide shows Supportive Environment areas that warrant focus for Gallaudet action planning. These are areas where GU results for First Year Students were significantly below peers. These Areas for Focus also came up in the GU 2014 NSSE. They’re also similar to results in the Student Satisfaction Inventory.

Supportive Environment: GU Areas for Focus First Year Students Providing support to help students succeed academically Using learning support services (tutoring, writing center, etc.) Here you see a comparison of the NSSE results for GU from 2014 to 2017. You can see that both of these areas have dropped for GU since 2014. That’s particularly true for Providing Academic Support.

Supportive Environment: NSSE Student Comments* My institution need[s] to make sure that instructors work between tutor and students who are weak from the beginning of the semester because of little understanding in the course material. I need a more supportive [environment]. I need someone who I can trust who can doing well editing English paper and explain clear for any classes. *Comments are taken from responses to an open ended question for seniors asking “Is there anything your institution could have done better to prepare you for a career or further education.” This question was part of the First-Year Experience/Senior Transitions Module.

Questions to consider…. Given the Gallaudet mission, what results do you want to see on NSSE? Given your observations and understanding of Gallaudet students, what results do you expect to see? How and in what ways can Gallaudet improve students’ quality of interactions and supportive environment? What strategies can Gallaudet implement to improve students’ quality of interactions and supportive environment?

Continued Discussion…. Tuesday, August 21st at 2:30pm to 4:00pm Strategies for Key Indicators: Quality of Interactions and Supportive Environment Room: MLCB 220 (E-Learning Lab)

Supportive Classroom Environments Resources Creating a Learner Centered Syllabus Developing a Positive Classroom Syllabus Building Faculty Student Interactions Inclusion by Design Syllabus Template What Student Affairs Can Do Research Article on What Characteristics Predict Faculty- Student Interaction