Status of National Qualifications Framework in Georgia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 IMPLEMENTING THE MALTA QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR LIFELONG LEARNING THE KEY CHALLENGES TIPTOE Conference: Working on EQF – From Framework to Practice.
Advertisements

3 The European Qualifications Framework for Life Long Learning Implications for the National Context – a View of a Member State Vienna, 21 October 2005.
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
FRAMEWORK FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA Tirana, March 2005.
Development of NQF in Montenegro
What is the relationship between the HE qualifications framework and quality assurance? Stephen Adam, June 2011.
State of Play and Main Challenges Related to Armenian National Qualifications Framework (ANQF) Armen Ashotyan Minister of Education and Science Strasbourg,
EUROPEAN UNION EDUCATION POLICY TOOLS PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: Challenging technical questions!
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Recent Development in Albanian VET System Chisinau, July 2011 Ilia Paluka &Marsela Robo.
Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina.
ASPECTS OF NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK WORK AND ROLE OF SECTOR COMMISSIONS Workshop on Recognition & Flexible Learning Paths Miločer, 5th – 6th July.
SQA Standards Colloquium 28 February 2013 – Can Qualification Frameworks Provide a Useful Basis for Comparing Qualifications? Aileen Ponton, CEO,SCQF Partnership.
ECVET principles ECVET and European policy context
Recognition of prior learning: report Micheline Scheys Bologna-Seminar, Amsterdam, december 2008.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
The European Credit system The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET)
1 Implementation of the Dutch national Qualifiation Framework, the NLQF June 17, 2010 Karin van der Sanden Projectleader NLQF Dutch Ministry of Education.
ECVET AIMS AND KEY DOCUMENTS DARKO MALI (CPI, LJUBLJANA) BLED, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013.
1 EQF – Referencing criteria Criteria and procedures in 10 points to ensure that the information made public - is validated by the competent authorities,
Beyond structures: implementation of national qualifications frameworks (general principles) Stephen Adam.
Bologna self-certification Implications and challenges.
EQF Facts and Questions. Conclusions The EQF has become a driver for national reform! A momentum has been created The EQF has become a driver for national.
CONFERENCE TO LAUNCH WORK ON THE ALBANIAN MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION March 2006 QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS Stephen Adam, University of Westminster.
Ss Cyril & Methodius University Skopje, June 2009 GUIDE FOR DESIGNING A NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR HE Elizabeta Bahtovska.
National Qualification Frameworks Vincent McBride, ETF.
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA THE NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK OF ARMENIA AND OBJECTIVES OF ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Tallinn, 19 November 2009 Mike Coles Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London The EQF – a platform for collaboration, integration and reform.
After Lisbon: Challenges for the Sport Education and Training Sector Dr. Karen Petry, German Sport University Cologne Sport & EU 5 th Annual Conference:
Albanian Qualifications Framework Ejvis Gishti, NAVETQ Kiev, March
6/26/2016 European Qualifications Framework Tekijän nimi.
National Qualifications Framework in the Republic of Moldova Veaceslav Nicic, LLL departament.
Making the AzQF compatible to the EQF, what does it mean? Olav Aarna Estonian Qualifications Authority, Kutsekoda.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
1 National qualifications frameworks in Europe – developments and challenges Jens Bjornavold, Strasbourg 26 October 2010.
International Information Seminar Seminar, Minsk October 2016, Minsk State Linguistics University MODULE BASED EDUCATION. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING.
National qualifications frameworks in Europe – developments and challenges Jens Bjornavold, Helsinki 17 June 2010.
What matters: the main tools to consolidate EHEA
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Belgrade, 1 November.
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
The Framework of Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
WORK PROGRAMME to support the implementation of the Recommendation
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Development of qualifications system in Ukraine:
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training in Kosovo
Why Qualifications Frameworks
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London
Recognition of prior learning: report
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS IN EUROPE
Yerevan, 7 December 2010 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer
Purpose of referencing
European frameworks for VET VLOR Brussels, 4 June 2014
Recognition of prior learning: report
NEW VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING STRATEGY IN ALBANIA
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Ministry of civil affairs of BiH Update on KOBIH: Development and implementation of the qualification framework of BiH ETF Seminar, Kiev, 10 March 2016.
Status of National Qualifications Framework in Georgia
2nd regional meeting of Ministers of Education on the implementation of the European Higher Education Area Palais de l’Europe, room 10, Council of Europe,
Alex Keys Quality and Qualifications Ireland. Alex Keys Quality and Qualifications Ireland.
Main steps in designing a national qualifications framework
The Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Area
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
ECVET The European Credit System for Vocational Education and Training: principles, application & outlook Monika Auzinger, 3s on behalf.
Presentation transcript:

Status of National Qualifications Framework in Georgia Thea Siprashvili, NCEQE Kiev, Ukraine 2016

Our NQF: status, aims, Legal status of NQF: The legal status guaranteed by Laws on Higher, Vocational and General Educations (and through international commitments: e.g. Bergen Communique and AA with Europe) adopted in 2010 by a Decree #120n of the Minister of Education and Science of Georgia and is an operational document A few amendments are in the pipeline Role NQF plays: Ensures transparency of qualifications; Promotes links between economy, labour market and the system of education; Focuses on the quality of education Promotes lifelong learning; Ensuring the flexibility; promotes recognition and mobility; Assists educational institutions in improving and designing programmes • make qualifications transparent for users, learners and potential employers so that the former know what they have to learn and the latter know what they can expect; • enable flexibility and transferability between different educational and occupational fields and between learning venues and, in doing so, eliminate barriers that currently block horizontal and vertical education paths.

Institutions, actors, stakeholders Lead institution(s) National Centre for Education Quality Enhancement (NCEQE) and its Qualifications Management Unit Resources of lead institution for implementing NQF A designated unit on management of qualifications Budget for administrative and development costs Platform to engage stakeholders Draft Published for comments and feedback Public hearings/discussions arranged Recommendations reviewed and incorporated Role of social partners: Sector Councils for VET and HE

NQF structure; outcomes in qualifications Progress in developing outcomes-based qualifications All qualifications are outcome based “Alignment” to EQF/ QF EHEA Structurally and at policy level aligned and operational. Self-certification is to be undertaken Links between HE and VET Acting version: separate framework NQF  consists of five documents: General Education Qualification Framework  Vocational Qualification Framework- a document  Higher Education Qualification Framework  The fourth Annex - a list of spheres of education, fields of education/specialties, subfield of education/specialties and vocational specializations. The fifth Annex - Rule of Qualification Formation Levels: 8 level system comparable to EQF levels Descriptors: Acting version - 6 descriptors in line with EHEA framework: 1. Knowledge and understanding 2. Applying Knowledge 3. Making judgments 4. Communication skills 5. Learning skills 6. Values. Envisaged under amendments – 3 descriptors in line with EQF LLL 1. Knowledge 2. Skills 3. Competencies Envisaged under amendment: single framework for GE, VET, HE

ACHIEVEMENTS, CHALLENGES, what now? Current priorities: A single framework for all qualifications Solutions for the deadend- a bridge qualification, better and more flexible entry points A classification of fields of education based on ISCED F2013 Preparation for self certification and referencing Achievements: Facilitates quality through offering outcomes framework Ensures transparency of Georgian qualifications for all stakeholders Ensures comparability of qualifications internally and internationally Facilitates mobility and recognition Principal obstacles to development: Separate frameworks, separate systems; challenges with progression pathways and transfer/portability of credits between systems Persisting deadends Classification of educational spheres not compatible and comparable with established classifications “Value” as an indicator difficult to assign a level or measure Current priorities