Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 3 MAE 5595
Advertisements

Space Engineering I – Part I
Solar Imaging Radio Array (SIRA) Trajectory and Formation Analysis Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch Code 595 (572) Dave Folta Bo Naasz Frank.
Chapter 3: Motion in 2 or 3 Dimensions
Motion In Two Dimensions can be considered constant.
Dynamics of an Occulter Based Planet Finding Telescope Egemen Kolemen, N. Jeremy Kasdin Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Eng., Princeton University B.
ARO309 - Astronautics and Spacecraft Design Winter 2014 Try Lam CalPoly Pomona Aerospace Engineering.
Star Gazing Activity: Earth’s Seasons.
Axial tilt is an astronomical term regarding the inclination angle of Earth’s rotational axis in relation to a perpendicular to its orbital plane Solar.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Analysis of Trans-Lunar Spiral Trajectory [Levi Brown] [Mission Ops] February 12,
GN/MAE1551 Orbital Mechanics Overview 3 MAE 155 G. Nacouzi.
University of Paderborn Applied Mathematics Michael Dellnitz Albert Seifried Applied Mathematics University of Paderborn Energetically efficient formation.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Site Selection Workshop Oct , 2006 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California LCROSS Orbital.
Marco Concha Charles Petruzzo June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Flight Dynamics.
Understand the factors and requirements associated with a spacecraft launch Understand the dynamics of Gravity Assist and the basic principles of placing.
Two Interesting (to me!) Topics Neither topic is in Goldstein. Taken from the undergraduate text by Marion & Thornton. Topic 1: Orbital or Space Dynamics.
Solar Orbiter. Contents The mission The mission The orbit The orbit The instruments The instruments VIM: Visible-light Imager and Magnetograph VIM: Visible-light.
Mark Beckman - Flight DynamicsMB-1 Lunar Flight Dynamics Mark Beckman July 12, 2012.
Projectile Motion Projectile motion: a combination of horizontal motion with constant horizontal velocity and vertical motion with a constant downward.
GEOCENTRIC MODEL (EARTH- CENTERED MODEL)  Explains the daily motion of the planets, constellations and stars (East / West; appearance and disappearance)
1 Chapter 6: Motion in a Plane. 2 Position and Velocity in 2-D Displacement Velocity Average velocity Instantaneous velocity Instantaneous acceleration.
Final Version Steven Cooley Rich Luquette Greg Marr Scott Starin Flight Dynamics May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Bone Trajectories and Model Simulations Kathleen Mandt, Ray Goldstein, Christoph Koenders May 29, 2013 IES Team Meeting – San Antonio.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont UPC 10/19/00JMS- 1 Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont, UPC.
PTYS/ASTR 206Gravity (cont.) / Night Sky / Seasons 1/23/07 Newton’s Universal Law of Gravitation and planetary orbits.
ADCS Review – Attitude Determination Prof. Der-Ming Ma, Ph.D. Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Tamkang University.
PROJECTILE MOTION. Relevant Physics: The Independence of the Vertical and Horizontal directions means that a projectile motion problem consists of two.
What causes the Seasons?. The Earth’s orbit Seasons do NOT arise from the distance the Earth is from the Sun but rather as a result of the Earth’s annual.
Principles of Technology Physics
Some problems in the optimization of the LISA orbits Guangyu Li 1 , Zhaohua Yi 1,2 , Yan Xia 1 Gerhard Heinzel 3 Oliver Jennrich 4 1 、 Purple Mountain.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
SATELLITE ORBITS The monitoring capabilities of the sensor are, to a large extent, governed by the parameters of the satellite orbit. Different types of.
Satellite Climatology - Orbits Geostationary orbits Sun synchroneous orbits Precessing orbit Discussion.
Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite Project LCROSS Astronomer Workshop Feb. 29, 2008 NASA/ARC, Mountain View, California Mission Design & Observation.
Foundation of know-how I see colours Do you see what I see? Who Am I? The Final Frontier Hodge Podge.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Sun’s annual motion and the Seasons
Deployment Optimization for Various Gravitational Wave Missions
Lunar Trajectories.
Physics 2 – April 20, 2017 P3 Challenge – A kg block with an initial speed of 3.5 m/s is sliding on a level surface with a kinetic coefficient of.
Maxim Pathfinder Prework 16 August 1999
Examples of Solving Problems
Kinematics in Two Dimensions
Astronomy 340 Fall 2005 Class #3 13 September 2005.
Universal Gravitation
LRO Mission Baseline Ephemeris v10.0
AGI’s EAP Curriculum Orbital Mechanics Lesson 3 - Orbital Transfers
7.3 Forces in Two Dimensions
Chapter 4 motion in 2D and 3D
Swarm constellation options
Projectile Motion.
PHYS 211 Exam 1 HKN Review Session
Projectile motion Projectile Motion Subject to Gravity Assumptions:
Lecture Outline Chapter 4 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
The Sky (Celestial Sphere)
Physics 2048 Fall 2007 Lecture #4 Chapter 4 motion in 2D and 3D.
Chapter 4 motion in 2D and 3D
A projectile launched at an angle
Lecture Outline Chapter 4 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
Lecture Outline Chapter 4 Physics, 4th Edition James S. Walker
Chapter 4 motion in 2D and 3D
Physics 2048 Spring 2008 Lecture #4 Chapter 4 motion in 2D and 3D.
PROJECTILE MOTION.
Proba-3 is ESA’s – and the world’s – first precision formation flying mission.
3. Motion in 2- & 3-D Vectors Velocity & Acceleration Vectors
Projectile Motion Physics 101.
College Physics, 7th Edition
Propulsion Jon Lewis Mike Rhee 8/19/99
Kinematics in Two Dimensions
Presentation transcript:

Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99 MAXIM Flight Dynamics Michael Mesarch Frank Vaughn Marco Concha 08/19/99

Mission Assumptions Orbit Assumptions Maneuver Requirements Two spacecraft (optics and detector) in near-circular Heliocentric orbit at 1 AU ( Drift-away orbit) Launch in 2007-2010 Mission Lifetime: 3 years required Maneuver Requirements Desire to point to 150 inertial targets over 3 year mission lifetime Separation along optical axis to be maintained at 450 km  10’s of meters Misalignment perpendicular to optical axis  5 mm

MAXIM Range from Earth

MAXIM Trajectory in Solar Rotating Coordinates

Formation Flying Challenge The MAXIM formation flying concept is new - combination of previous implementations with a wrinkle Landsat-7 and EO-1 maintain a constant distance between each other in the same orbit while imaging the earth - image comparison is achieved because of close distance between s/c Constellation-X utilizes multiple s/c to observe the same target without any restriction on relative position MAXIM combines both constant separation and constant attitude/pointing. The detector s/c must ‘fly’ around the optics s/c continuously during an observation - its orbit will continually change. L7 EO1 d L2 Constellation-X d Maxim

Stationkeeping and Pointing Control Only simple cases have been considered : Continuous viewing of Ecliptic Pole Optics and detector S/C are in circular orbits which differ by a small inclination angle to achieve initial 450 km separation Continuous acceleration of detector S/C away from optics S/C at  1.7x10-8 (m/s2) will cancel relative out-of-plane motion for short periods Rotation to view opposite pole requires acceleration on the order of 4 degrees of magnitude higher Long-term effects require additional analysis Targets in Ecliptic plane Optics and detector S/C are in circular co-planar orbits which differ in semi-major axis to achieve initial 450 km separation Preliminary analysis indicates that maintaining 450 km separation is feasible in the short-term by canceling the initial velocity difference between the S/C, but this results in a larger separation in the long-term,( i.e, half an orbit later). How to maintain pointing in this case is not clear - requires management of multiple orbital variables Design of a pointing control strategy will not be a trivial undertaking

Ecliptic Pole Pointing - Uncontrolled Optics Detector

Ecliptic Pole Pointing - Controlled Detector Optics

Further Work Perform more detailed analysis on the simple cases considered to be certain the dynamics is fully understood Formulate a pointing control strategy Determine control authority (acceleration,thrust) required to transition from one target to another in a ‘reasonable’ amount of time (days?)