Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Chapter 5 One- and Two-Sample Estimation Problems.
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Chapter 6 Cost and Choice. Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley LongmanSlide 6- 2 Figure 6.1 A Simplified Jam-Making Technology.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Tysons Tysons Corner Circulator Study Board Transportation Committee June 12, 2012.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
1 Innovative Tools October 27, 2011 Chi Mai. 2 Presentation Overview VISSIM Corridors VISSIM Protocol Hours of Congestion.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
STATISTICAL INFERENCE ABOUT MEANS AND PROPORTIONS WITH TWO POPULATIONS
Lecture 11: Algorithms and Time Complexity I Discrete Mathematical Structures: Theory and Applications.
Using the Parkride2.mac Macro to Model Park and Ride Demand in the Puget Sound Region 22 nd International Emme Users Conference September 15-16, 2011,
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Solve Multi-step Equations
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Mass Transit OSullivan Chapter 11. Outline of the Chapter Analyze some empirical facts about public transit in the United States Analyze the commuters.
Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Advisor: Dr. Kari Watkins P.E. October 16, 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, Washington.
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
ABC Technology Project
5-1 Chapter 5 Theory & Problems of Probability & Statistics Murray R. Spiegel Sampling Theory.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Traffic assignment.
In Portland, Oregon TRB Planning Applications Conference Reno, Nevada Mark Bradley Research & Consulting.
Q UANTIFYING P ARK & R IDE D EMAND U SING LEHD OD D ATA AND C ASE S TUDY A NALYSIS J ONATHAN B ROOKS A SSOCIATE T RANSPORTATION R ESEARCHER T RANSIT M.
Model City 2011: 22 nd International Emme Users Conference.
1 Analysis of Random Mobility Models with PDE's Michele Garetto Emilio Leonardi Politecnico di Torino Italy MobiHoc Firenze.
Hypothesis Tests: Two Independent Samples
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Chapter 10: The Traditional Approach to Design
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
TASK: Skill Development A proportional relationship is a set of equivalent ratios. Equivalent ratios have equal values using different numbers. Creating.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
FOCUS MODEL OVERVIEW Denver Regional Council of Governments June 24, 2011.
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MODEL ENHANCEMENTS FOR THE RED LINE PROJECT AMPO TRAVEL MODEL WORK GROUP March 20, 2006.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Mary Ross, P.E./Myung Sung. 2 3 Lower Atlantic Regular Gas Price HIGH: $4.03- July 2008 LOW: $1.60- Dec 2008.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Ying Chen, AICP, PTP, Parsons Brinckerhoff Ronald Eash, PE, Parsons Brinckerhoff Mary Lupa, AICP, Parsons Brinckerhoff 13 th TRB Transportation Planning.
EMME/2 Conference Gautrain Rapid Rail Link: Forecasting Diversion from Car to Rail 8 September 2004 Presented by Johan De Bruyn.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference presented by Arun Kuppam, Cambridge.
Presented to MTF Transit Committee presented by David Schmitt, AICP November 20, 2008 FSUTMS Transit Model Application.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Florida Transit Modeling Workshop presented by Thomas Rossi Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April 8,
Transit Pricing Programs Value Pricing for Transportation in the Washington Region June 4, 2003 Richard F. Stevens Washington Metropolitan Area Transit.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Use Survey to Improve the DFX Transit Model
Presentation transcript:

Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, Illinois GIS Estimation of Transit Access Parameters for Mode Choice Models GIS in Transit Conference October 16-17, 2013 Washington, DC

Presentation Outline Overview of the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning mode choice model The transit access sub-model Access modes Data inputs to estimate access distances GIS estimation of input parameters in TransCAD/Maptitude Sample plots Extensions 2

CMAP Trip Based Model PRE-DISTRIBUTION Travel Times and Distances by Mode TRIP DISTRIBUTION Person Trip Tables MODE CHOICE Person Trip Tables by Mode Person Trip Tables by Mode NETWORK ASSIGNMENT 3

Mode Choice Estimation 4 The CMAP model is a trip based model Home-work: transit, single occupant, ride share and carpool auto Home-other: transit and auto Non-home: transit and auto Simulates individuals choice of mode per trip Evaluate logit model for probabilities Monte Carlo method Pre-distribution model is the front end of the mode choice model Simulates 100 trips between zone pairs Estimates average travel times and distances by mode

Model Logic Flow 5 Read Origin Files (Origin to All Destinations) 1.Person Trips 2.Highway Times/Distances 3.Line-Haul Transit Service Attributes First, Priority and Last Mode In-Vehicle and Out-of-Vehicle Time First Headway Fares Repeat for all O-D Trips Repeat for all Origin Zones Set Program Options Destination Zone Zone and Transit/Hwy System Parameters Origin Zone Select Trip Evaluate Logit Mode Choice Equation Simulate Choice Add Trip to Trip Table All Trips to Destination Zone Simulated? Repeat for all Destination Zones No Compute Non-CBD Parking Walk Time and Cost Simulate CBD Parking Walk Time and Cost Compute Auto Operating Costs Simulate Transit Access/Egress Attributes In-Vehicle Time Out-of-Vehicle Time Fares Yes Access/Egress Sub-models

Sub-Models 6 Auto operating costs $=f(speed)*distance Relationship between $/mile and speed is input Speed determined from skimming network CBD parking Relationship between walk distance and CBD parking cost is input by zone Proportion of free CBD parking and auto occupancy also input by zone Free versus pay CBD parking determined by Monte Carlo simulation Pay CBD parking costs and walking distance determined by: Value of time based on income Reduction in parking costs due to parking further away from destination Auto occupancy also determined by Monte Carlo simulation Non-CBD parking Fixed rates depending on location Average auto occupancy by trip type Transit access costs and times

Transit Access Sub-Model 7 Inputs First, last, and priority (modes ordered in the sequence commuter rail, rail transit, express bus, local bus) mode Average speeds for transit access modes walk, bus and auto Fares Auto operating costs Drivers value of time Park and ride rates Walk times from park and ride Distance distribution parameters Costs and times for alternative transit access modes walk, bus, park and ride, kiss and ride, feeder bus (peak only) Least costly transit access mode selected for simulated trip

Model Estimation of Distance to Transit 8 Many of the transit access mode costs depend on distance to stops and rail stations Often use zone average distance to nearest stop station Challenge to estimate accurate access distances Average zone distances often introduce a bias against transit Relatively large transportation planning zones Location of zone centroids often reflect where activities are located not where transit is an alternative Zone Centroid

Access Sub-Model Calculations 9 Mean distance to stop/station and standard deviation of distance are input for each zone Normal distribution randomly sampled for each simulated trip Modes Commuter rail station Rail transit station Bus stop Feeder bus stop Park and ride station

Access Distance Approach 10 Caliper Corporation Maptitude/TransCAD Methodology Point layer of stations or stops Create areas of influence Overlay areas of influence over sub-zones (quarter-sections) Assign station/stop to subzone and calculate access distance Estimate zone mean access distances from subzone distances within zone Estimate standard deviation of access distance from subzones distances plus intra-subzone variance

Metra Station Point Layer 11

Metra Station Areas of Influence 12

Influence Areas 13 Thiessen or Voronoi polygons Each point within polygon is closer to station than any other station

Subzones Within CMAP Study Area 14

Subzone-Metra Station Match 15

Regional Model Zones 16

Model Zone Parameters 17

Rail Transit and Bus Areas of Influence 18 CTA Rail TransitCTA and PACE Bus

19 Rail Transit Extension Example: Initial Areas of Influence

Rail Transit Extension Example: Added Stations 20

21 Rail Transit Extension Example: Revised Areas of Influence

22 Rail Transit Extension Example: Impact on Adjacent Line

Final Thoughts 23 Systematic analytic approach that captures the differences between regional transit alternatives Reproducible Not dependent on planning judgment Directly linked to model coded transit networks General approach could be implemented in a variety of applications Improve access calculations in conventional models Component of activity based models – simulation of individual movements Substitute General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) data for model networks

Questions? 24 Ron Eash Parsons Brinckerhoff Chicago, IL