Status Januar Verification of test normality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
Advertisements

WLTP Number of Tests Different Options And Their Consequences IWG in Stockholm, Christoph Lueginger, BMW WLTP-10-26e.
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
RDE Working group Brussels, September 2015 Collection of NO x emissions data - First preliminary results RDE working group 14 September 2015 European Commission.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
RDE COM Meeting ACEA Page 1 Random Cycle Generator.
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
Random Cycle Generator
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Evaluation of PEMS tests Veh 01 & Veh 02 with the CLEAR Method
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
RDE Task Force Meeting, 7th January 2014
RDE Commission Meeting Oct 16th.
Improvement of Family definitions
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
CLEAR Graz Stefan Hausberger, Nikolaus Furian
RDE Task Force Meeting, 28th November 2013, Brussels
28th of November 2013, Brussels
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
BRAKE PARTICLE EMISSIONS
RDE Regulation Random Cycle, Cycle Generation
Pems route and parameters
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
absolutely essential first level
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Drafting of physical PEMS protocol –
The prospect for diesel and the likely real-world impact of RDE and WLTP: how effective will they be? Aidan Revie 9 November 2017.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
JAMA position on RDE Boundary Condition
main topics Robust law is essential
Input ACEA Boundary Conditions.
Dutch driving behavior analyses | Norbert Ligterink
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
DATA EVALUATION VEHICLE #5 Diesel EU6
Additional RDE trip indicator(s)
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
Analyses related to dynamic effects in vehicle speed and NOx emission measurements by H. Steven
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
RDE Discussion of Conformity Factors - JRC views on the ACEA propsal - - August 2015 – RDE Data Evaluation group European Commission - Joint Research Centre.
Emissions testing in the laboratory and on the road: Preliminary results for one Euro 6 diesel vehicle Pierre Bonnel Martin Weiss Joint Research Centre.
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
Correlation Improvements
16th of November 2013, Brussels
Real Driving Emissions IWG Recommendations for Data Collection & EU Dataset
Work plan and next steps – RDE-LDV working group
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment criteria and work plan -
Emissions testing with PEMS versus random laboratory driving cycles
Comparing EMROAD and the ACEA RDE Evaluation Tool
Boundary conditions - Status
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Assessment of RDE data evaluation methods: Set-up of "reference database“ - 16th of September 2013, Brussels Pierre Bonnel.
RDE-LDV working group 20 November 2012, Brussels, EU Pierre Bonnel
Informal document GRPE-79-20
RDE Task Force Meeting, 16th December 2013, Brussels
Analysis for WLTP UF development
Working Group “Real-Driving Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles” Work Progress – December
Informal document GRPE Rev.1
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
IWG Worn tyres Tyre Industry work status July 17th 2019
Presentation transcript:

Status Januar 2014 - Verification of test normality Trip #1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i Emission [g/km] Different trips, routes, driving behaviours „any time – any place“ Result of emission measurement Approach 1: „Normalisation“ of all data Approach 2: Limitation of „Boundary Conditions“ Driving style Emission [g/km] Road incline Emission [g/km] Vehicle velocity Emission [g/km] Shifting Emission [g/km] Macro transient: soft  aggressive Incline distribution Average velocity Shifting behaviout typical  unusal cumulative positive altitude gain Maximum velocity Micro transient: “Pedal Pumping” Idling

Round Robin Test Data and methodology Major goals of the Round Robin tests: Evaluate the influence of route composition and driving style on emission results. Evaluate the performance of normalization tools. Identify driving characteristics which possibly affect emission results and are not corrected by normalization in a proper manner.

Round Robin Test Data and methodology To ensure confidentiality, ADA (Abgaszentrum der Automobilindustrie) was asked to conduct a round robin exercise with PEMS measurement systems and evaluate the data In total more than 60 PEMS-tests were performed using 3 state of the art 2xPC / 1xSUV diesel vehicles on 4 different test routes with most selling 4 cyl Turbocharged Diesel.  Underfloor SCR-System  SRC on DPF  Combined NSC + SCR  Power to weight ratios [kW/to]: 58 to 67 During the test campaign in spring 2014, ambient temperatures ranged from 6 -20 °C The driver remained unchanged throughout the campaign, but were told to perform the test driving in three different styles Test results were analyzed using CLEAR (1.5) and EMROAD (5.7 and 5.8 –> average values).

Round Robin Test Stuttgart Neckarsulm Wolfsburg Steyr The test routes were defined in a way that the share of urban, rural and highway driving matches future legal requirements as good as possible (based on the respective shares discussed today). Altitudes ranged from 60 m to 500 m above sea level.

Round Robin Test - Correlation between NOx and (v*apos)95%ile Every EU6 car shows same behaviour (distinguish well between bias and non bias driving behavior) Intended aggressive driving as indicated by(vapos)95%ile results in higher NOx-emissions

Additional data - Correlation between NOx and driving dynamics Source : OEM data pool

Analysis of Driving Style (v x apos) P95% [m²/s³] vehicle speed [km/h] ACEA proposal: Based on map classification mod./extend. minimum moderate maximum extended maximum (v x apos)95%ile 2 + 0,288*vmean 11 + 0,288*vmean 14 + 0,288*vmean The Percentile based proposal allows 5% of a PEMS-Trip without any restriction (max. acceleration is allowed)

Explaining v*apos95% driver selected trip (Compact class)

Explaining v*apos95% intended aggressive (compact class)

Comparison driving dynamics upper limit ACEA / TUG proposal Dyn. BC Threshhold Indicator Source U* R* M* Driving style Lower rpa TUG 0,14 0,08 0,04 ACEA Higher P95 (v x a)95th perc. 14 24 P95 (v x a) 95th perc. 20 *) Categorisation by v-threshholds instead od map based Stillstand: v < 2 km/h (analog EMROAD) Urban: v < 60 km/h Rural: 60 km/h < v < 90 km/h Motorway: v > 90 km/h

Validity evaluation of HB efa cycles All cycles are covered

Summary – driving dynamics Need to add an dyn. BC to avoid too “harshly and gently” driving (as already stated in EU COM dec 2014 draft) Sensitivity towards emission has been demonstrated Pre-Selection of a suitable indicator has been successful Working hypotheses have been derived to quantify possible upper and lower threshholds for the driving behavior Findings are based on PEMS measurements of TUG data base (> 250? Measurements of different parties) Findings are confirmed by ACEA PEMS measurements (> 500 measurements) Findings cover all HB-EFA cycles

Next steps – driving dynamics Need to prove validity of working hypotheses of suggested lower and upper thresholds to avoid “false failures” by WLTP data base evaluation according to the RDE regulation criteria (per vehicle and tripwise, with > 90 min trip length until end of CW 10/15 Further PEMS measurements (e.g. TÜV measurements) until end of CW XX/15 Present technical proposal to next suitable RDE-LDV