VHT Packet Duration Signaling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0534r1 Submission Duration in L-SIG Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: May 2010.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, ETRISlide 1 Green-Field 11ac Packet for TGah Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0818r0 Submission July 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Padding Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /1079r0 Submission Sept. 13, 2010 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 Max Frame Sizes Date: Authors:
Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /0324r2 Submission March 2012 Short Ack Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Doc.:IEEE /0820r0 Submission July 13, 2010 Sudhir Srinivasa et al.Slide 1 MCS Selection and Padding Equations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1064r2 Submission Channelization for 11ac Date: Youhan Kim, et al.Slide 1 Authors: September 2010.
Doc.:IEEE /0064r5 Submission May 19, 2010 Yong Liu, MarvellSlide 1 VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
VHT Frame Padding Date: Authors: Month Year
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
1MHz SIG Field Discussions
L-Header spoofing and bit reuse
80MHz Tone Allocation Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
AID Selection Date: Authors: September 2010 Month Year
Preamble Parameters Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Sounding and P Matrix Proposal
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Bandwidth Indication Design for 120MHz
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Smoothing Bit and Beam-Change Indication Bit for 2MHz Preamble
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
VHTSIG Considerations
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: Authors: September 2010
VHT Frame Padding - Summary
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
MU-MIMO support for Heterogeneous Devices
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
VHT Packet Length Calculation
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Various Bit Order Date: Authors: April 2011 Month Year
Single User MCS Proposal
Stream Partition Index for MU-MIMO Transmissions
160 MHz Transmissions Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Straw Polls and Motions on 256 QAM and BW: Optional-Mandatory Features
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
11ac 80MHz Transmission Flow
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Duration in L-SIG Date: Authors: May 2010 Month Year
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
TGac Preamble Auto-detection Comparisons
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Multiplexing of Acknowledgements for Multicast Transmission
160 MHz Transmission Flow Date: XX Authors: September 2010
Odd Mesh Header Date: Authors: March 2008
False L-STF Detection Issue
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
NGV PHY Performance Results
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

VHT Packet Duration Signaling Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2010 VHT Packet Duration Signaling Date: 2010-07-12 Authors: Youhan Kim, et al. John Doe, Some Company

July 2010 Introduction Bits in VHT-SIG A are very precious resource to signal important system parameters Length field in L-SIG already contains sufficient information to convey the duration of a VHT packet [1] More details are provided on how to signal the VHT packet duration using the L-SIG length field Youhan Kim, et al.

July 2010 11ac Packet Length A 4 ms long VHT packet using 80 MHz, 4 streams, 256-QAM 5/6, short GI can transport ~800 Kbytes Requires 20 bits if length in bytes was indicated in preamble as in 11n Number of bits required for length in bytes for VHT packets is actually higher since 11ac supports 160 MHz, max. 8 streams and 256-QAM 5/6 [2] 22 bits required to support 4 ms packet duration 2 symbol VHT-SIG A has 34 useful bits 48 bits – 8 CRC bits – 6 tail bits 22 bit length field would use 65% of the valuable VHT-SIG A resource And this is not even considering DL MU-MIMO Clearly, signaling the length of the packet in bytes in VHT-SIG A is not an efficient scheme Youhan Kim, et al.

11ac Packet Duration: Number of Symbols July 2010 11ac Packet Duration: Number of Symbols Alternative is to signal the number of OFDM symbols of the packet But L-SIG already has sufficient information for RX to determine the number of OFDM symbols See following slides Do not need to indicate VHT packet duration again in VHT-SIG A Very efficient usage of the valuable VHT-SIG A resources Youhan Kim, et al.

L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (1) July 2010 L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (1) Similar to 11n, use L-SIG spoof rate of 6 Mbps for 11ac packets 3 bytes / symbol Long GI packet 4 us / symbol Legacy spoof symbols = L-SIG length / 3 bytes per symbol VHT payload symbols = Legacy spoof symbols – VHT preamble symbols legacy spoof symbols = L-SIG length / 3 bytes per symbol 20 usec L preamble VHT preamble VHT Payload VHT payload symbols = legacy spoof symbols – VHT preamble symbols L-SIG spoof rate is fixed at 6 Mbps (3 bytes / symbol) Youhan Kim, et al.

L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (2) July 2010 L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (2) Short GI packet 3.6 us / VHT symbol End of frame may not be aligned to a 4 us boundary Legacy devices using L-SIG may find the end of the packet to occur up to 3.6 usec after the energy on the air has disappeared But this is existing problem in 11n Short GI symbol time= 3.6 usec 3.6 * VHT symbols L preamble VHT preamble VHT Payload Remainder <= 3.6 usec Legacy spoof time = 4 usec per symbol * legacy spoof symbols L-SIG symbol time = 4.0 usec Legacy spoof symbols = L-SIG length / 3 Youhan Kim, et al.

L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (2) July 2010 L-SIG Length Conveys Number of Symbols (2) Short GI packet 3.6 us / VHT symbol L-SIG can only indicate time in units of 4 us End of frame may not be aligned to a 4 us boundary Two 3.6 us short GI boundaries may map to the same 4 us normal GI boundary used by L-SIG Short GI packet with N symbols 3.6 3.6 3.6 Short GI packet with N+1 symbols 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 L-SIG spoof with M symbols 4 4 4 Youhan Kim, et al.

Short GI Packet Duration Signaling July 2010 Short GI Packet Duration Signaling Use two bits for short GI indication in VHT-SIG A b00 : Long GI packet # symbols = ceil(L-SIG length / 3) b01 : Reserved b10 : Short GI packet # symbols = floor(ceil(L-SIG length / 3) * 4 / 3.6 ) b11 : Short GI packet # symbols = floor(ceil(L-SIG length / 3) * 4 / 3.6 ) – 1 L-SIG spoof with M symbols 4 4 4 Short GI packet with N+1 symbols Short GI: b10 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Short GI packet with N symbols Short GI: b11 3.6 3.6 3.6 Youhan Kim, et al.

July 2010 Conclusions Do not need to indicate VHT packet duration again in VHT-SIG A Length field in L-SIG already has sufficient information to signal the duration of a VHT packet Propose to use 2 bits for short GI indication in VHT-SIG A One bit for long/short GI indication One bit for short GI packet length ambiguity mitigation Youhan Kim, et al.

July 2010 Straw Poll #1 Do you support adding the following item into the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? R3.2.X: The number of OFDM symbols in a VHT packet shall be computed using the length field in L-SIG. Youhan Kim, et al.

July 2010 Straw Poll #2 Do you support adding the following row into Table 1 in the specification framework document, 11-09/0992? Field Bits Description Short GI 2 – b00 : Long GI packet • # symbols = ceil(L-SIG length / 3) – b01 : Reserved – b10 : Short GI packet • # symbols = floor(ceil(L-SIG length / 3) * 4 / 3.6 ) – b11 : Short GI packet • # symbols = floor(ceil(L-SIG length / 3) * 4 / 3.6 ) – 1 Youhan Kim, et al.

July 2010 References [1] Kim, Y. et al., Duration in L-SIG, IEEE 802.11-10/0534r1, May 2010 [2] Stacey, R. et al., Specification Framework for TGac, IEEE 802.11-09/0992r11, May 2010 [3] Liu, Y. et al., VHT frame padding, IEEE 802.11-10/0064r5, May 2010 Youhan Kim, et al.