Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12 PERIOD HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren November 10, 2011.
Advertisements

11 October 2006Basic Layout of LER G. de Rijk1 Basic Layout of LER  The basic idea  VLHC type magnets  LER in the LHC tunnel  Layout  LER experiment.
LTU & Electron Beam Dump Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Technical Design.
Recirculating pass optics V.Ptitsyn, D.Trbojevic, N.Tsoupas.
PEP-II and BaBar DND Review M. Sullivan Mar 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Overview and MMS Status Michael Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
Fermilab Implementation of DOE Critical Decision Process FRA Project Management System Presentation by L Edward Temple Jr Head, Office of Project Management.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
SPS scrubbing experience: electron cloud observables L. Mether on behalf of the LIU-SPS e-cloud team LIU SPS scrubbing review, September 8, 2015.
WBS1 SBS Basic: Magnet and Infrastructure Robin Wines 11/4/ SBS DOE Review.
Undulator Orientation & Electron Beam Spacing Should the undulator frames be toward the central aisle or the tunnel walls? What is the optimum spacing.
Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
EBIS ARR Jim Alessi May 4- 7, 2010 Technical Overview.
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
ECOOL Meeting 03/26/10 1 Low-E cooler baseline decisions: 1.FNAL’s cooling section “as is” – with weak solenoids, correctors, etc. (to prevent over focusing.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Project X RD&D Plan Beam Transfer Line and Recycler Injection David Johnson AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
NSLS-II Transfer Lines BUDKER INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS NOVOSIBIRSK.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Proton Plan Director’s Review 8/15/06 Prebys Proton Plan Summary Director’s Review August 2006 Eric Prebys.
Dave Johnson July 12, 2010 NOvA/ANU Recycler Upgrades Review Optics, Apertures, and Operations Nova-doc 4930.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
Hybrid Synchrotron Arc: 2 Dipoles per Half Cell J. Scott Berg Advanced Accelerator Group Meeting 28 July 2011.
F James T Volk Arpil Permanent Magnets for Linear Colliders James T Volk Fermilab.
WBS – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration g-2 Accelerator – 30 Straight Section Reconfiguration D. Still Fermilab Muon g-2 IDR, June 5-7.
Jørgen S. Nielsen Center for Storage Ring Facilities (ISA) Aarhus University Denmark ESLS XXIII (24-25/ ), ASTRID2 facility 1.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Mini MAC II PEP-II hardware M. Sullivan Apr 23-24, 2009Page 1 PEP-II Hardware Status M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Mini-MAC II Frascati,
DR Interface to Sources and RTML
High energy beam transport.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
FFAG Recirculation and Permanent Magnet Technology for ERL’s
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Options and Recommendations for TL and Dumps
FFAG Magnets and Girders Meeting
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
SCU Next Phase Meeting July 8, 2014.
SuperB RF and Other Components
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
J. Seeman Assistant Director for PPA/LCLS
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, 2007
Conventional Facilities Status
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
MEIC Shifting Magnet Tim Michalski August 6, 2015.
JLEIC Engineering Status
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Transfer Line for EIC.
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
Presentation transcript:

Potential Use of PEP-II Magnets by Project X Jim Kerby, Fermilab for the Project X Design Group

Project Requirements (1) The current conceptual design of the transfer line from the 8 GeV H- linac to the Recycler injection straight section utilizes the following magnetic elements: 72 arc dipoles 3 required to ramp to ~500 gauss at 5 Hz for linac dump switch 69 run DC at a field of ~500 gauss 4 vertical dipoles at a DC field of ~500 gauss 45 quads in arc and straight which run on F and D bus at an integrated gradient of 1.3 to 1.6T 20 independently controlled quads with integrated gradients between 1 and 4T. 30 -35 Horizontal correctors with maximum integrated field of ~0.017T-m 30-35 Vertical correctors with maximum integrated field of ~ 0.009T-m For the present configuration, Project X has two options for the transfer line magnetic elements: 1) new permanent magnets and 2) re-use PEP II HER magnets.

Project Requirements (2) Configuration uncertainty. For CD-1 (currently anticipated Oct. 2010) the DoE order 413.3a requires the consideration of alternative designs to meet the mission need. This investigation could result in a lower energy linac, a new synchrotron, and multiple beam lines all yet undefined. Depending on the siting of such a facility, the required fields and gradients could exceed the specifications for the PEP-II magnets and/or require additional LCW systems for the Al conductor magnets. Until the Project X configuration is finalized for CD-1, i.e. linac energy and transfer line layout, FNAL cannot commit to a definite plan for procurement of PEP-II magnets.

ICD Configuration

Component Requests Based upon the current conceptual design of the transfer line and the magnetic requirements, the following is a list of PEP-II items that could potentially fulfill the project’s requirements. 86 HER main dipoles 76 for the arc and vertical bend 10 for spares 73 HER 4Q22 quads 65 for transport line 8 for spares 40 HER Horizontal correctors 40 HER Vertical correctors We cannot use any of the vacuum chambers If the linac energy remains 8 GeV and the permanent magnet option is selected, Project X is still interested in 6 of the HER dipoles (3 installed + 3 spares) and the correctors.

Scheduling We would like to complete low field measurements on a few magnets in advance of CD-1. Details of the measurements to be worked out. We will determine the preliminary list of requested magnets by CD-1. We will finalize the list of requested magnets by CD-2. We will be in a position to start accepting magnets following CD-3. The current Project X working schedule (not officially accepted by DOE at this time) shows: CD-0 in July 2009 CD-1 in December 2010 CD-2 in July 2012 CD-3 in August 2013 the beginning of the installation task starting fall of 2016.