Marcelo Pando UNOS Region 5 Collaborative March, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VIRTUAL PRA AND CROSSMATCHING
Advertisements

Current CPRA Calculation Modified on December 5, 2013.
HLA: matching and donor selection
Current CPRA Calculation
PRA = 36% (21/58) Anti-A11 and B44.
Acceptable mismatches based on structural epitopes on HLA molecules Toulouse, April 2, 2008.
Rene Duquesnoy University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Complement in Heart Allograft Biopsies E. Rene Rodriguez W. M. Baldwin, III.
HLA TYPING D Middleton MDSC175: Transplantation Science for Transplant Clinicians (Online) POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP.
Objectives Overview of HLA genes and their function
Antibody Detection Relevance of cII-Specific Antibody
Medical Interventions
DNA-Based Tissue Typing
Immunologic Methods Part One Definitions Part Two Antigen-Antibody Reactions CLS 420 Clinical Immunology and Molecular Diagnostics Kathy Trudell MLS SBB(ASCP)
SOLID PHASE IMMUNOASSAYS: INTERPRETING PATTERNS Julie Houp, CHS Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Division of Immunogenetics and Transplantation.
Monitoring HLA-specific antibodies
Tissue Typing. E VERYONE HAS SEVERAL ANTIGENS LOCATED ON THE SURFACE OF HIS / HER LEUKOCYTES : One particular group of these antigens is called the HLA.
Greater Consistency in Candidate and Deceased Donor HLA Typing Requirements Across Organ Types Histocompatibility Committee Spring 2014.
The Ubiquitous HLA System: applications in transfusion and transplantation Dr Mary Purna Chacko Department of Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology.
IMMUNOGENETIC TESTS.
Single HLA Antigen Bead Data Interpretation: Normalized Ratios Peter Stastny Transplantation Immunology Division Departments of Internal Medicine and Pathology.
1 Proposal to Update the HLA Equivalency Tables Histocompatibility Committee Fall 2015.
Transplantation of Tissues and Organs
1 OPTN/UNOS Histocompatibility Committee Fall 2015.
Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA)
Donor Matching of Kidney Transplantation
Important for Sensitized Patients
HLA TYPING & ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Graft Dysfunction after Heart Transplantation
Evan P. Kransdorf, MD, PhD, Michelle M. Kittleson, MD, PhD, Jignesh K
Method Background Result Conclusion
Histocompatibility Committee
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 3 Antigenicity of HLA-DRDQDP Epitopes
2 Renal Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, BT9 7AB
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 2 Antigenicity of HLA-ABC epitopes Antibody reactivity analysis in different assays.
Effects of New KPD Histocompatibility Policy on Refusal Rate and Transplants R Leishman1, M Aeder2, M S Leffell3, C Murphey4, N Reinsmoen5, S Saidman6,
Implementation Insights
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 8 HLA Epitopes and Acceptable Mismatches for Sensitized Transplant Patients.
MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Immunological risk assessment: The key to individualized immunosuppression after kidney transplantation  Johann Pratschke, Duska Dragun, Ingeborg A. Hauser,
2015 Kidney Allocation Task Force HLA Working Group
Immune system-Acquired/Adaptive immunity
Single Antigen Beat Assay (Luminex) Allows Detection of Immunised Patients with an Increased Risk for Long Term Graft Survival Prior to Transplantation.
Transplantation Immunology Unit College of Medicine
Histocompatibility Committee
Manager: Deborah Pritchard Deputy Scheme Manager: Melanie Bartley
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
Kidney allocation to highly sensitized patients
Major Histocompatibility complex OR
HLA Compatibility and Heart Transplant Survival Using A Validated Matching Algorithm Andrew L. Rivard, MD, MS, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Naoru Koizumi,
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 6 Epitope Specificities of HLA Antibodies Tested in Ig- and C1q-Binding Assays and CDC.
بنام خداي زيبائيها.
Major Histocompatibility Complex
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Towards epitope matching in kidney allocation
Figure 2 Emerging models of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Hong Kong Workshop Lecture 4 Antigenicity of MICA epitopes
Figure 1 Identification of anti-HLA antibodies
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
OPTN Kidney Paired Donation (KPD) Histocompatibility Testing Policies
Heterozygous for all alleles in MHC II
Histocompatibility Committee
Histocompatibility Committee
Histocompatibility Committee
Histocompatibility Committee
Does rituximab help in HLA desensitization for kidney transplantation?
DQA epitope on DQA4,5,6 chains
Presentation transcript:

Marcelo Pando UNOS Region 5 Collaborative March, 2017 Histocompatibility Evaluation for Sensitized Patients: Maximizing the Patient’s Benefit. Marcelo Pando UNOS Region 5 Collaborative March, 2017

Disclosure Relevant Financial Relationship None Off Label Usage

Learning Objectives Understand the complexity of the HLA system. Discuss some of the methodologies we use to detect antibodies against HLA. Understand the current HLA practice in solid organ transplantation. Discuss some educational cases.

The Human Leukocyte Antigen In Medicine: In Nature: Organ Transplantation Ag presentation DIVERSITY! Disease association Pregnancy HLA Interaction with KIR Drug hypersensitivity Mate selection!

Then… HLA in Transplantation.

The First Crossmatch

Crossmatch by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC): Donor cells + CFDA Patient serum Complement EtBr carboxy- fluorescein diacetate

Crossmatch by Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC): NEGATIVE POSITIVE

The HLA System: Antigens and alleles HLA-A Serology: A2 Molecular: A*02:01 Alleles of A2: A*02:01, A*02:02, A*02:03, A*02:04…… A*02:336 carboxy- fluorescein diacetate

HLA Epitopes  AA Pos.                    10         20         30         40         50         60         70         80         90        100  A*01:01:01:01      GSHSMRYFFT SVSRPGRGEP RFIAVGYVDD TQFVRFDSDA ASQKMEPRAP WIEQEGPEYW DQETRNMKAH SQTDRANLGT LRGYYNQSED GSHTIQIMYG  A*02:01:01:01      ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---R------ ---------- -G---KV--- ---H-VD--- ---------A ----V-R---    AA Pos.                   110        120        130        140        150        160        170        180        190        200  A*01:01:01:01      CDVGPDGRFL RGYRQDAYDG KDYIALNEDL RSWTAADMAA QITKRKWEAV HAAEQRRVYL EGRCVDGLRR YLENGKETLQ RTDPPKTHMT HHPISDHEAT  A*02:01:01:01      ----S-W--- ---H-Y---- ------K--- ---------- -T--H----A -V---L-A-- --T--EW--- ---------- ---A------ --AV------    AA Pos.                   210        220        230        240        250        260        270        280        290        300  A*01:01:01:01      LRCWALGFYP AEITLTWQRD GEDQTQDTEL VETRPAGDGT FQKWAAVVVP SGEEQRYTCH VQHEGLPKPL TLRWELSSQP TIPIVGIIAG LVLLGAVITG  A*02:01:01:01      ------S--- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --Q------- ---------- -----P---- ---------- ---F------    AA Pos.                   310        320        330        340  A*01:01:01:01      AVVAAVMWRR KSSDRKGGSY TQAASSDSAQ GSDVSLTACK V  A*02:01:01:01      ---------- ---------- S--------- ---------- -  AA Pos    10         20         30         40         50  A*01      GSHSMRYFFT SVSRPGRGEP RFIAVGYVDD TQFVRFDSDA ASQKMEPRAP  A*02      ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---R------    AA Pos.   110        120        130        140        150  A*01      CDVGPDGRFL RGYRQDAYDG KDYIALNEDL RSWTAADMAA QITKRKWEAV  A*02      ----S-W--- ---H-Y---- ------K--- ---------- -T--H----A    AA Pos.   210        220        230        240        250  A*01      LRCWALGFYP AEITLTWQRD GEDQTQDTEL VETRPAGDGT FQKWAAVVVP  A*02      ------S--- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------    AA Pos.   310        320        330        340  A*01      AVVAAVMWRR KSSDRKGGSY TQAASSDSAQ GSDVSLTACK V  A*02      ---------- ---------- S--------- ---------- - 1 2 3 4 6 5 β1 α1 α2 β2 Epitopes are defined by the differences of the self antigen and the immunogenic antigen.

HLA Epitopes: The Bw4/Bw6 Case AA Pos. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 B*07:02:01 GSHSMRYFYT SVSRPGRGEP RFISVGYVDD TQFVRFDSDA ASPREEPRAP WIEQEGPEYW DRNTQIYKAQ AQTDRESLRN LRGYYNQSEA GSHTLQSMYG B*13:01:01 ---------- AM-------- ---T------ ---------- T---MA---- ---------- --E---S-TN T--Y--N--T ALR------- ---II-R--- B*13:02:01 ---------- AM-------- ---T------ ---------- T---MA---- ---------- --E---S-TN T--Y--N--T ALR------- ----W-T--- B*15:13:01 ---------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- ------S-TN T--Y--N--I ALR------- ---II-R--- B*15:16:01 ---F------ AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- --E-RNM--S ---Y--N--I ALR------- ----W-R--- B*44:02:01:01 ---------- AM-------- ---T------ -L-------- T---K----- ---------- --E---S-TN T--Y--N--T ALR------- ---II-R--- B*14:01:01 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------C-TN T--------- ---------- ------W--- B*14:02:01 ---------- A--------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------C-TN T--------- ---------- ------W--- B*15:01:01:01 ---------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- --E---S-TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R--- B*15:02:01 ---------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- ------S-TN T--Y------ ---------- ---II-R--- B*15:03:01 ---------- AM-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --E---S-TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R--- B*15:10:01 ---------- AM-------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------C-TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R--- B*15:11:01 ---------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- --------TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R--- B*15:11:02 *--------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- --------TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R--- B*15:11:03 *--------- AM-------- ---A------ ---------- ----MA---- ---------- --------TN T--Y------ ---------- ------R---

The Dogma of AMR Assumptions: Antibody to the Donor Antibody Mediated Rejection Assumptions: Antibody is specific to the donor The test detects clinical relevant antibodies There is enough antibody to trigger IR

The Dogma of AMR DSA AMR

Tests for Antibody Screening

Luminex: Two different targets PRA Beads Phenotype: A2, A3; B7, B44; Cw4, Cw7 Less sensitive More stable SAB SA: A2 High sensitivity Less stable = denature Ags = False Positives

SAB

Phenotype Beads (PRA Beads) AECI294 AECI294

Calculated Panel of Reactive Antibodies (cPRA) the percentage of donors that will be excluded probability of having a positive crossmatch likelihood of getting an incompatible organ 100-cPRA = probability of getting a compatible organ

Examples of cPRA Patient with 20% cPRA 20% of donors will be excluded 20% of crossmatches will be positive 80% probability of getting a compatible organ

Maximizing Successful Offers The CPRA game Likelihood of Compatible Donor

Allele Specific Antibody DRB3*02 Single Antigen Beads o con un unico antigeno de HLA

CPRA Single Antigen Beads o con un unico antigeno de HLA

Single Antigen Bead (SAB) test results: Single Antigen Beads o con un unico antigeno de HLA

Case 1: 100% cPRA patient

Case 2: 100% cPRA patient

Unacceptable antigens Case 1: A1 A2 A3 A11 A23 A24 A25 A26 A29 A36 A34 A43 A66 A68 A69 A80 B13 B27 B2708 B44 B58 B60 B61 B7 B73 B76 B8 B81 B57 DR4 DQ7 DQ8 DQ9 Case 2: A1 A3 A11 A2403 A25 A26 A29 A30 A32 A33 A34 A36 A43 A66 A68 A69 A74 A80 B7 B8 B13 B27 B2708 B42 B45 B49 B50 B56 B57 B58 B62 B63 B67 B71 B72 B73 B75 B76 B77 B81 Cw1 Cw5 Cw6 Cw7 Cw8 Cw12 Cw14 Cw16 Cw17 Cw18 DR1 DR4 DR7 DR8 DR10 DR103 DR11 DRB1*13:03 DRB1*14:02 DR15 DR16 DRw51 DRw52 DQB1*06:03 DQ2 DQ5 DQ7 DQA1*04:01 DPB1*01:01 DPB1*04:01 DPB1*05:01 DPB1*19:01

cPRA Case 1: A1 A2 A3 A11 A23 A24 A25 A26 A29 A36 A34 A43 A66 A68 A69 A80 B13 B27 B2708 B44 B58 B60 B61 B7 B73 B76 B8 B81 B57 DR4 DQ7 DQ8 DQ9 Case 2: A1 A3 A11 A2403 A25 A26 A29 A30 A32 A33 A34 A36 A43 A66 A68 A69 A74 A80 B7 B8 B13 B27 B2708 B42 B45 B49 B50 B56 B57 B58 B62 B63 B67 B71 B72 B73 B75 B76 B77 B81 Cw1 Cw5 Cw6 Cw7 Cw8 Cw12 Cw14 Cw16 Cw17 Cw18 DR1 DR4 DR7 DR8 DR10 DR103 DR11 DRB1*13:03 DRB1*14:02 DR15 DR16 DRw51 DRw52 DQB1*06:03 DQ2 DQ5 DQ7 DQA1*04:01 DPB1*01:01 DPB1*04:01 DPB1*05:01 DPB1*19:01 100% 99.5069% 100% 99.9971%

Probability of 1: 203 donors cPRA Case 1: Case 2: 100% 99.5069% Probability of 1: 203 donors 100% 99.9971% Probability of 1: 34,483 donors

Maximizing Successful Offers Unacceptable Ags A2: 48% CPRA

Summary An accurate definition of a antibody profile can give more opportunities to waiting list patients. Determining the list of HLA antigens to avoid is patient specific and depends on several factors. Highly sensitized patients, particularly the 100% cPRA, needs especial assessment to maximize their opportunities. These patients, although a minority in the waiting list, have enormous differences in the opportunity of getting a compatible organ.

Thanks!