Headline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mimi Calter Assistant University Librarian & Chief of Staff Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources 13 April 2012 Western Regional.
Advertisements

Auto-Graphics Update Mary E. Jackson Product Manager, Resource Sharing October 20, 2010.
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
Cooperative Print Archiving by Discipline Developing an Infrastructure to Sustain Scholarly Resources in Agriculture Amy Wood Project Director Center for.
New Archive Holder Orientation Bronze titles Webinars, Spring 2015.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... Library of Congress RDA Seminar, University of Florence, May 29-June 2, 2011.
Moving Shared Print to the Network Level Emily Stambaugh ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV June 27, 2014 “Looking to the Future of Shared Print” Shared.
Cataloging: Millennium Silver and Beyond Claudia Conrad Product Manager, Cataloging ALA Annual 2004.
Shared Print Management Metadata Guidelines Pilot Project OCLC project to develop and test recommendations for how libraries could use Worldcat.
Millennium Cataloging in Release 2005 Georgia Fujikawa Manager, Training Programs.
LSTA Digital Imaging Grants Presentation Projects Workshop September 13, 2002 Wendy Sistrunk Music Catalog Librarian University of Missouri—Kansas City.
University of Georgia Libraries / Cataloging design robin fay We will explore the following concepts: UNIT.
CERES AND COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES. PROJECT CERES Begun in 2013, Project CERES is a Center for Research Libraries Global Resources Agriculture.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Registry of Digital Masters A joint project of the Digital Library Federation and OCLC Taylor Surface, OCLC ALA Annual.
7: Basics of RDA Relationships for Serials Relationships in RDA Relationship designators Creators and other corporate bodies related to works Corporate.
VALIDATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT FOR SHARED PRINT JOURNAL ARCHIVES: UC JSTOR AND WEST CASES CRL Print Archives Network Meeting ALA Midwinter, Chicago January.
Technical Services & Cataloging and Classification Jennifer Anielski and Christina Tracy IS 554 Public Library Management.
Metadata Guidelines for Disclosing Shared Print Commitments Lizanne Payne Shared Print Consultant ALA Midwinter 2013.
5/14/2003ALAO Spring Workshop 2003 Providing Access Cataloging –Requirements –One record or separate records for multiple formats –CONSER policy for simultaneous,
OCLC Local Holdings Records (LHRs) for the UCs CAMCIG Training October 20, 2009 Presenter: Sara Shatford Layne.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center MFHD Local Holdings Project Status (a.k.a. UL Migration) Myrtle Myers Product Manager, Holdings and Local Data.
Cataloging and Metadata at the University Library.
Society of American Archivists Research Forum 18 August 2015 A Deep Dive into the Archival MARC Records in WorldCat (and ArchiveGrid) Jackie Dooley Program.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Kathy Kie December 2007 OCLC Cataloging & Metadata Services an introduction.
Organizing Internet Resources OCLC’s Internet Cataloging Project -- funded by the Department of Education -- from October 1, 1994 to March 31, 1996.
Focus on MARC 21 Holdings Sally H. McCallum Library of Congress.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for Georgia Cataloging Summit Aug. 9-10, 2011.
Local Holdings Maintenance: The Basics. Agenda Defining Local Holdings Accessing Connexion Searching in Connexion Understanding an LHR Deriving LHR’s.
What We Can Do Today: Measuring Print Archive Projects Amy Wood Center for Research Libraries Print Archives Network (PAN) Meeting Philadelphia, PA, Jan.
OCLC Reclamation Project Summer 2010 CCC June 3, 2010 rev. 8/05/2010 8/5/20101.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Union List Users Group Meeting Cathy Kellum Product Manager, WorldCat Resource Sharing Services ALA Chicago June.
Shared Print Gold Rush Library Content Comparison George Machovec, Executive Director Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries January 8, 2016 Print Archive.
Assessing current print periodical usage for collection development Gracemary Smulewitz Distributed Technical Services Rutgers University Libraries.
METADATA FOR ACCESS Monica Figueroa & Eve Grünberg.
Cooperative Print Archiving by Discipline Developing an Infrastructure to Sustain Scholarly Resources in Agriculture Amy Wood Center for Research Libraries.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Benjamin Walker Assistant.
The world’s libraries. Connected. RDA & OCLC Glenn Patton Director, WorldCat Quality Management.
Electronic Government Documents Developing an Effective Cataloging Workflow Debra Skinner Henderson Library Georgia Southern University GA COMO October.
Cooperative Print Retention Programs USAIN 2016 Biennial Conference A beginner’s guide to the essential elements for achieving success with every project.
AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.
Alliance Shared Print Trust George Machovec, Executive Director Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries September 12, 2016
Metadata for Shared Print
Lecture 12 Why metadata? CS 502 Computing Methods for Digital Libraries Cornell University – Computer Science Herbert Van de Sompel
Headline.
From the old to the new… Towards better resource discoverability
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000
Publishing to OCLC Yoel Kortick Senior Librarian.
Electronic Integrating Resources
Metadata Editor Introduction
Cleaning up the catalog: getting your data in order
What’s in it for your library? The lowdown direct from OCLC …
Marie Waltz Center for Research Libraries
ALEPH Version 22 Beginning Cataloging
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
Tableau Data Visualizations and Collection Analysis for Shared Print
Introduction to Alma Network Zone Topology
PAN FORUM UPDATE June 2018 Kim Armstrong, Chair, Operations Committee
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
Old Serials, Dirty Data: Print Retention as an Opportunity
PAN Forum June 27, 2014 ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV
Metadata Guidelines for Disclosing Shared Print Commitments
CSU Millennium to Alma migration
E-Resources in Prospector
Marie Waltz Special Projects Librarian
9:15 to 10:00 WorldCat Registration Workflow
Participant Survey Results
Emerging Acquisitions Workflows: Print DDA
Onboarding Webinar 13 April 2019 Presented by and.
Mary Miller Director of Collection Management & Preservation
Presentation transcript:

Headline

Alliance Shared Print Trust Workshop: Technical Services Overview and Issues Paul Moeller Director of Metadata Services Laura Wright Serials Cataloging Manager University of Colorado Boulder Libraries

Tech Services Overview What has been done so far Discussion of the 583 field Local disclosure versus broader disclosure Updating the MARC record, practical issues

CU Boulder Has assigned last copy/committed to retain status to monographs and serials in PASCAL (excludes special collections, Government Documents, and items with limits on circulation) Last copy status information in the 583 field in individual bibliographic records. Over 700,000 bib records have a 583

Example (Sierra staff view):

Prospector “classic” view

Suppressed in default public view:

But visible in “MARC display”

The 583 in the bibliographic and holdings formats contains information about processing, reference, and preservation actions. Processing – preliminary cataloging, recon Reference actions - statement about solicitation to acquire material, whether the solicitation is active or inactive, and the date of the last item of correspondence. Preservation actions may include a review of condition, queuing for preservation, or treatment received. Field 583 is repeatable

Base 583 First indicator 1 = (not private) $a (action) = “committed to retain” $c (time and date of action) = “YYYYMMDD” $d Action interval (date when commitment expires) = “20251231” $f Authorization (name of archiving program) = “WEST” $u URI linking to program documentation for the print archiving program identified in $f = http://www.cdlib.org/services/west/docs/WESTProgramStatement.pdf

Alliance base 583 583 1 $a committed to retain $c 20160101 $d 20410101 $5 CoU (MARC Code List for Organizations) $f Alliance Shared Trust $u https://www.coalliance.org/shared-print-archiving-policies $z (public note, used to identify completeness problems, i.e. gaps).

Completeness Note $z Optional note is used for serials or monographic sets which have been reviewed for completeness. Holdings are indicated, but not condition. A Completeness 853 is used along with the base level 583 action note using the following subfields: The first indicator should be set to 1 $3 (materials specified, holdings to which action applies. Should be the same as described in LHR 85x/86x or 866) $a (action) = “completeness reviewed” $c (time and date of action) = “YYYYMMDD”

Completeness note continued $5 Institution making the retention commitment $f (Authorization, i.e. name of archiving program) = “Alliance Shared Trust” $i (Method of action, i.e. validation level – volume-level, issue-level, page-level) $l (Status) = language to describe units – changes in binding, missing issues or reprints, etc.) $z (public note, used to identify completeness problems, i.e. gaps)

Completeness example 583 1# $3 v.1-v.32 (1949-1981), v.34-v44 (1983-1993) $a completeness reviewed $c 20151115 $5 Library Code (CoU) $f Alliance Shared Trust $i volume-level validation $l water damaged $z v.33 water damaged

Completeness example 583 1# 583 1# $3 v.1-v.3 (1960-1962), v.5-v.37(1964-1997), v.39-v.45 (1999-2002) $a completeness reviewed  $c 20110101 $f Alliance Shared Trust $f WEST $i volume-level validation $l missing volumes $z missing v. 4, v.38 $2 pda (Preservation & digitization actions: terminology for MARC 21 Field 583) $5 CoU

Condition Reviewed 583 1# $3 v.1-v.50 (1951-2005) $a condition reviewed $c 20110101 $f WEST $i issue-level validation $j AzTeS $l tight bindings $z tight bindings v.30-v.35 (1973-1978) $2 pda $5 AzTeS

Problematic holdings

Disclosure Alliance Shared Print Trust participants agree to record their retention decisions in local cataloging records which will then be shared with the broader community. Required: Record information about retention commitments in the MARC record (583 tag) in the library’s local catalog. 2. Required: Share the decision in the Prospector union catalog. If commitments are properly recorded in the 583 tag, these shall be automatically reflected in the regional Prospector union catalog.

Disclosure 3. Optional: Record information in OCLC WorldCat for archived titles for global discovery and resource sharing. A library may define separate OCLC Institution Symbols to identify print archived titles. This is not required, but may be useful for quick identification of archived commitments. 4. Optional: Provide records of Alliance Shared Print Trust commitments to the Center for Research Libraries (CRL) Print Archives Preservation Registry (PAPR) on a periodic basis, as deemed appropriate. This may be done by either the local library or the Alliance depending on workflows and PAPR guidelines.

OCLC Detailed metadata guidelines The OCLC Local Holdings Record Updating service (LHRUS) processes separate holdings records that are compliant with the MARC 21 Format for Holdings Data (MFHD) for the purpose of updating local holdings records (LHRs) in WorldCat. An institution may have one or many LHRs for any given bibliographic record in WorldCat. While LHRs are based on MFHD, there are a few key aspects of OCLC's implementation of the standard that should be noted: WorldCat LHRs are copy-specific, separate holdings records. OCLC does not accept holdings data embedded in bibliographic records. Holdings records sent by libraries may contain any element in the MARC 21 Format for Holdings Data. However, only those data elements defined for use in the OCLC LHR format will be used. Complete information on LHR data elements can be found in OCLC-MARC Local Holdings Format and Standards.

Going Forward Plan ongoing contributions to the Trust Incorporate 583s in preservation workflow Investigate involvement in other commitment to retain initiatives Completeness validation Completeness and condition Expense

Resources MARC 21 583 – Action Note OCLC Detailed Metadata Guidelines www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd583.html Standard Terminology For MARC 21 Field 583:  http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/583terms.html OCLC Detailed Metadata Guidelines https://www.oclc.org/services/shared-print-management/metadata-guidelines.en.html Bib Formats 583 https://www.oclc.org/bibformats/en/5xx/583.html

Thank you!