Nevada Public Land Management Task Force Final Report, SJR 1 of the 78th Nevada Legislature and Implementation through Federal Legislation Churchill County.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
Advertisements

AN M3 EAGLE LLC PROPOSAL. Acting Field Manager Coeur d’Alene Field Office (208)
Prepared by Clive J. Strong Idaho Deputy Attorney General For 2011 CWAG Annual Conference.
January 7, 2015 Preliminary Report: State Recreation and Habitat Lands Legislature Would Benefit From Additional Information About Detailed Outcomes And.
Presented By: Gareth Leonard (DEP) Presented To: Florida Oceans and Coastal Council Date: October 30, 2012 DRAFT.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Office of Valuation Services (OVS) IRWA Federal Agency Update March 26, 2014.
Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.
BLM and DOE Coordination through the Uranium Leasing Program Presented by Mitchell Leverette, Bureau of Land Management Washington, DC.
SOUTH COAST RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVISION BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Palm Springs-South Coast Field Office California Desert District.
The Georgia Land Conservation Program glcp.org Preserving our natural resources for generations of Georgians to come.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Present-Use Valuation Program Tony Simpson NC DOR Property Tax Division.
U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Division of Fluid Minerals, 1.
April 8, Budget Committee Meeting Budget Overview and Discussion.
BIA Providers Conference: Federal Incentives & Loan Programs for Energy and Mineral Projects Presentation by: Payton Batliner – Economic Development Specialist.
Oregon’s Statewide Land Use Planning Program A Framework for Community Decisions Richard Whitman – Director Oregon Department of Land Conservation and.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Conservation means development as much as it does protection … I recognize the right and duty of this generation to develop and use the natural resources.
1 | US DOE Geothermal Programeere.energy.gov Public Service of Colorado Ponnequin Wind Farm Geothermal Technologies Program Regulatory Roadmap NEPA Historical.
Jason King, P.E. State Engineer WSWC/NARF Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Right Claims August 25-27, 2015 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe’s.
Authority for establishing these trusts is included in sections 14, 16, and 17 of the Enabling Act of 1889 and in the Morrill Act of 1862 and University.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision for the Las Vegas and Pahrump Field Offices Muddy Mountains.
Wildlife Agencies Government Organizations that Work for Wildlife.
NEW FEDERAL RULES FOR GEOTHERMAL LEASING AND PERMITTING Utah Geothermal Working Group Meeting Salt Lake City March 14, 2007 Kermit Witherbee and Al Mckee.
©2011 Cengage Learning. Chapter 15 ©2011 Cengage Learning REQUIRED GOVERNMENT REPORTS.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
Southern Ute Indian Tribe
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Overview and Progress Marci Henson, Program Manager August 22, 2013.
OFFICE OF PROGRAM POLICY ANALYSIS & GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY The Legislative Sunset Review Process Darwin Gamble, Senior Legislative Analyst OPPAGA February.
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Winnemucca District Draft Resource Management Plan and Draft Environmental Impact Statement.
© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
1 Overview of Mineral Taxes in Colorado State Severance Tax and Federal Mineral Lease Revenue House and Senate Finance Committees Marc Carey and Jason.
111 Right for Yerington. Right Place. Right Time. Right People. Right Way. Proposed Acquisition of BLM-Administered Land To Transfer to the City of Yerington.
111 Right for Yerington. Right Place. Right Time. Right People. Right Way. Proposed Acquisition of BLM-Administered Land To the City of Yerington.
Session 21 (R) Utility Scale Solar Development Land and Permitting Issues March 30, 2016.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY (FY )
NO NET LOSS of PUBLIC HUNTING LANDS in FLORIDA June 2008 Update.
MAPPS BLM Update Washington, DC, March 2017
Overview of Arizona State Trust Land
Environmental Quality Board
Pisgah Mountain Area. Map by the Harvard Forest staff of the
Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan California Department of Fish and Game Inland Deserts Region Bobcat photo by Gerald and Buff.
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH
Deep Creek Lake PRB Meeting Budget Update 25 April 2016
FY 2018 Budget Review Process and Schedule
The Community Preservation Act in Northborough
Land Cover in the US (fig 8-21 page 214)
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
Community Shaded Fuel Break Project
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and
Addressing Costs of Methane Waste and Future Policy Actions
Short Term Rentals City Council Briefing February 20, 2018
BLM Wind Energy Program
Kitsap County 2019 Annual Budget
The Community Preservation Act in Topsfield – August 31, 2004
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Successor Agency to the PCDC FY 2017 Recommended Budget
Policy and Communications on Resource Development in a Time of Public Uncertainty Stephen L. Wust, Ph.D. Chief Geologist New Mexico State Land Office.
Bell Times Analysis Task Force Budget
Evanston FY 2018 Proposed Budget Presentation October 16, 2017.
Alaska Roadless Rulemaking
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
I-81 Corridor Improvement Plan
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Base Wars:  Fighting the Fort Carson Base Expansion in Colorado The Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site Expansion   By: Kimmi Clark Lewis, Rancher R-CALF USA Property.
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Utility Scale Development:
the New Mexico State Land Office
Clear Creek County 2020 Proposed Budget
Presentation transcript:

Nevada Public Land Management Task Force Final Report, SJR 1 of the 78th Nevada Legislature and Implementation through Federal Legislation Churchill County Public Meeting Churchill County Commission Chamber Fallon, Nevada Mike Baughman, PhD, CEcD President Intertech Services Corporation January 18, 2017

Nevada’s economy is constrained by limited state and private owned land

AB 227, passed in the 2013 Session of the Nevada Legislature, established the Nevada Land Management Task Force Seventeen member Task Force is comprised of one county commissioner from each Nevada county Task Force required to produce a study specifically covering three main things: an economic analysis including costs and revenues associated with transferring federal lands to the State of Nevada a proposed plan for the administration and management of any lands transferred an identification of the lands that Task Force determines would be included in any potential transfer The Task Force presented its Final Report and Recommendations to the Legislative Interim Committee on Public Lands August 1, 2014. Task Force Background

Key Task Force Recommendations Lands to be Excluded from Transfer Current Congressionally designated wilderness areas National Conservation Areas Lands currently administered by: Department of Energy Department of Defense Department of Interior – Bureau of Indian Affairs Department of the Interior – U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Department of the Interior – National Park Service Areas of Critical Environmental Concern designated by BLM to protect the desert tortoise Key Task Force Recommendations

Key Task Force Recommendations Lands to be Transferred in Phase I Description Estimated Acreage BLM Checkerboard 4,230,600 Identified by BLM as Suitable for Disposal 1,000,000 Existing BLM R&PP Leases 200,000 Existing BLM ROW Grants 255,000 BLM Split Estate 300,000 BLM Designated Solar Energy Zones 60,395 Existing BLM Geothermal Leases 1,045,079 Approved and Proposed Congressional Transfers of BLM Land 250,000 Total Estimated Phase I Acreage 7,281,074 Key Task Force Recommendations

BLM Checkerboard Lands

Why BLM Checkerboard Lands are Logical First Step The checkerboard land pattern is difficult to manage for both the private land owners as well as the BLM. There are no United State Forest Service (USFS) lands within the checkerboard, which minimizes the number of federal agencies to be dealt with. There are no federally designated wilderness areas or wilderness study areas within the checkerboard land pattern. There are few wild horse management areas within the checkerboard land pattern. The Union Pacific Railroad mainline, Interstate 80, U.S. 95, and U.S. 93 transportation corridors lie within the checkerboard land pattern. There are an estimated 233,600 acres of BLM administered checkerboard land within Churchill County Why BLM Checkerboard Lands are Logical First Step

Five Year Observed High, Observed Low and Average Net Revenue and FTEs for Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico and Utah State Trust Land Management (2008-2012) 5-Yr. Observed High 5-Yr. Observed Low 5 Yr. Average Net Revenue $639,11,910 $25,591,016 $223,111,851 Total Acres Managed 9,302,255 2,449,255 6,021,441 Revenue/Acre $72.40 $16.78 $36.79 Expense/Acre $9.00 $1.45 $3.73 Net Revenue/Acre $72.26 $10.00 $28.59 Acres Managed/FTE 74,616 9,266 44,275

Beneficiary Amount Received Common Schools (K-12) $544,244,931 University of New Mexico $9,9482,298 New Mexico State University $2,955,919 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology $1,558,074 New Mexico Military Institute $23,094,438 Miner’s Hospital $7,401,699 Behavioral Institute $2,986,671 State Penitentiary $11,416,378 School for the Deaf $11,635,495 School for the Visually Impaired $11,613,393 Water Reservoirs $7,278,813 Distribution of Net Revenues Derived from New Mexico State Trust Lands: Selected Beneficiaries (2012)

Estimated Net Revenue from Expanded State Land Ownership in Nevada Using Four Other State Models Net Revenue Per Acre Total Net Revenue Assuming 7.2 Million Acres of BLM Land Transferred to Nevada Total Net Revenue Assuming 45 Million Acres of BLM Land Transferred to Nevada Four State Avg. Net Revenue/Acre Model $28.59 $205,848,000 $1,286,550,000 Four State Low Observed Net Revenue ($16.78) and High ($9.00) Observed Expense/Acre Model $7.78 $56,016,000 $350,100,0001 1/ While an expanded state land base in Nevada would likely contain mineralized areas and potential for fossil fuel production, the likelihood that such resources would be located within most of the nearly 48 million acres now administered by BLM is not great. As a consequence, a significant (yet admittedly unknown) portion of the public lands in Nevada would not have the potential to generate net revenues of the magnitude observed for other states considered in this study.

BLM Nevada Revenues and Expenditures FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 5-Yr. Avg. Revenue Non-ONRR $47,456,580 $27,170,048 $26,463,030 $23,882,418 $25,114,972 $30,017,409 ONRR Revenue $30,717,807 $39,683,895 $26,151,969 $17,281,366 $20,891,112 $26,945,229 Total Revenue $78,174,387 $66,853,943 $52,614,999 $41,163,784 $46,006,084 $56,962,639 Expense n/a $97,657,000 $109,657,000 $108,379,000 $108,142,000 $105,958,750 Net Revenue -$30,803,057 -$57,042,001 -$67,215,216 -$62,135,916 -$54,299,047 Total Acres Managed 47,808,114 47,806,738 47,805,923 47,7940,96 47,783,458 47,799,665 Revenue Per Acre Managed $1.64 $1.40 $1.10 $0.86 $0.96 $1.19 Expense Per Acre Managed $2.04 $2.29 $2.27 $2.26 $2.22 Net Revenue Per Acre Managed -$0.64 -$1.19 -$1.40 -$1.30 -$1.03 Total FTEs 697 701 755 786 790 745 Acres Managed Per FTE 68,591 68,198 63,319 60,806 60,485 64,279 Grazing Revenue $1,736,900 $1,718,401 $1,713,409 $1,937,754 $1,886,517 $1,798,596 No. of Grazing Authorizations 516 555 536 570 546 AUMs Authorized 1,133,094 1,138,147 1,138,171 1,333,346 1,291,610 1,206,873 Price per AUM $1.35 Timber Revenue $22,405 $30,665 $29,078 $26,581 $27,267 $27,199 Oil, Gas and Geothermal Lease Revenue (BLM) $1,245,616 $167,828 $642,010 -$174,777 $1,039,054   $583,946 Sale of Land and Minerals (SNPLMA sales Included) $35,120,737 $14,520,137 $14,795,398 $9,702,808 $10,649,922 $16,957,800 Fees and Commissions $3,560 $2,577 $2,998 $2,314 $1,302 $2,550 Rights of Way Rent $5,398,217 $7,030,419 $6,322,440 $7,461,663 $7,742,420 $6,791,031 Rent of Land $1,155,870 $1,165,915 $213,145 $1,034,525 $118,502 $737,591 Recreation Fees $2,743,664 $2,530,780 $2,741,286 $3,874,883 $3,641,559 $3,106,434 Other Revenue $29,611 $3,326 $3,266 $16,667 $8,429 $12,259 Sources: ONRR Revenue date from Department of Interior, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Annual Revenue Reports, 2008-2012; Expense and FTE data from BLM Nevada State Office, correspondence dated February 18, 2014 from Robert M. Scruggs, Deputy State Director, Support Services, response to FOIA request; all other data from U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Public Land Statistics, annual reports 2008 – 2012. BLM Nevada Revenues and Expenditures

Key Task Force Recommendations The following will be transferred from the federal government to the State of Nevada: Surface estate Subsurface estate Federally held water rights appurtenant to transferred lands The following lands should be considered for transfer from the federal government to the State of Nevada in subsequent phases: Other BLM administered lands United States Forest Service lands Lands deemed to be surplus by the Bureau of Reclamation Other federally managed and administered lands Key Task Force Recommendations

Key Task Force Recommendations The transferred lands will be held by the State of Nevada in trust and managed for long-term sustainable net revenue maximization for the following beneficiaries: Public K-12 education Public higher education Public specialized education (schools for deaf and blind) Public mental health services Public medical services Public programs for candidate and listed threatened or endangered species recovery plan development and implementation Local government to mitigate the loss of PILT, at minimum Key Task Force Recommendations

Key Task Force Recommendations The following principals will guide State management of transferred lands: All transferred land subject to applicable State and local statutes, regulations, ordinances, and codes All transferred land subject to valid existing federal, state, and local permits; land use authorizations; rights of access and property rights Administration and management, including disposal, of transferred land by the State of Nevada subject to review by the governing board of local government(s) within which land to be disposed of is located for consistency with master plans, ordinances and land use policies. Costs incurred by the State of Nevada to administer land transferred to the State to be covered by gross revenue derived from managing said land Key Task Force Recommendations

Nevada State and Local Permitting Capacity: No Additional NEPA or CEQA-Like Needed

Preliminary Business Plan Concepts No General Fund Expenditures to Manage Transferred Lands Portion of Transferred Lands Collateralized Short to Intermediate Term Debt for Land Management Start- up Capital Four-State, Five-Year Average Expense Per Acre of $3.73 Estimated First Year Expense for 7.2 Million Acres Estimated at $26,856,000 (includes $2,304,000 for wildfire suppression) First Year Sale of Select Parcels to Generate Start-up Capital and Repay Debt First Year Sale of 30,000 Acres at Assumed $1,000/acre Yielding $30 Million Plus Other On-Going Revenues (rents, royalties, fees, etc.) Land sales in Las Vegas Valley and Reno-Sparks areas would likely result in higher values per acre. Preliminary Business Plan Concepts

“The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) today (11/30/2016) sold 135 acres in 12 parcels for $24,903,000 during a competitive public land sale. The agency offered 182.93 acres, in 16 parcels, under the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA).  Parcels offered for sale varied in size from 1.25 to 37.5 acres and were located in the Las Vegas Valley.” Source: https://www.blm.gov/press-release/land-sale-generates-almost-25-million-projects Carson City District Office has identified 76,900 acres suitable for disposal in Churchill County in the November 2014 Draft Resource Management Plan BLM Land Sales

Task Force Considered Costs of Wildfire Suppression 2006-2015 BLM Nevada Wildfire Statistics Average annual acres burned is 212,629 or .44% of 47.8 million acres of BLM land in Nevada .44% of 7,200,000 acres is 31,680 acres of lands transferred to Nevada in Phase 1 Based on Nevada Division of Forestry wildfire cost data, wildfire protection and suppression cost for transferred lands budgeted at $0.32 per acre owned or $2,304,000 per year for 7,200,000 acres Task Force Considered Costs of Wildfire Suppression

Urges Congress to enact legislation transferring title to certain public lands to the State of Nevada in accordance with the report prepared by the Nevada Land Management Task Force SJR 1 includes all recommendations of the Nevada Land Management Task Force presented to the Legislature’s Interim Committee on Public Lands SJR 1 Passed the 78th Nevada Legislature Overview of SJR 1

H.R. 1484, Honor the Nevada Enabling Act of 1864 Act, introduced into 114th Congress by Congressman Amodei Phase I – 7.2 million acres to State of Nevada Phase II – Balance of non-exempt federal lands transferred to State of Nevada within 10 years Proposed legislation to be introduced into 115th Congress Reports to Congress submitted by State of Nevada every fours years for 20 years following Phase I transfer Identify lands conveyed to date Describe annual State revenues and expenses in managing conveyed lands Include recommendation by Board of Examiners for additional federal lands to be conveyed to the State Recognition by State of all valid existing rights and uses on, permits for and public access to the conveyed lands Federal Legislation

Nevada Land Status

For Additional Information Copies of all Task Force materials including the full July 18, 2014 final Task Force report entitled, Congressional Transfer of Public Lands to the State of Nevada: A Report of the Nevada Land Management Task Force to the Legislative Committee on Public Lands, can be viewed at the Nevada Association of Counties website under the following Nevada Land Management Task Force link: http://www.nvnaco.org/images//final%20nv%20land%20mgmn t%20task%20force%20report%20%28print%20version%29.p df SJR 1 can be viewed at: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/78th2015/Bills/SJR/SJR1 .pdf For Additional Information