Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validation of SCIAMACHY polarisation using POLDER as a reference (bonus: reflectance validation) Tiger Team Meeting 23, SRON, 23 May 2006.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
1/26 Multisensors clouds remote sensing from POLDER/MODIS AMS Madison, J. Riedi, 14 July 2006 Cloud Properties Retrieval from synergy between POLDER3/Parasol.
Validation of SCIAMACHY using POLDER as a reference 25 April 2006.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Scanner Characteristics
MERIS US Workshop, Silver Springs, 14 th July 2008 MERIS US Workshop Vicarious Calibration Methods and Results Steven Delwart.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
MT Workshop October 2005 JUNE 2004 DECEMBER 2004 End of OCTOBER 2005 ? MAY 2002 ? Capabilities of multi-angle polarization cloud measurements from.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
Remote Sensing Data Acquisition. 1. Major Remote Sensing Systems.
Investigating the use of Deep Convective Clouds (DCCs) to monitor on-orbit performance of the Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) using Lightning Imaging.
Investigations of Artifacts in the ISCCP Datasets William B. Rossow July 2006.
Zhibo (zippo) Zhang 03/29/2010 ESSIC
SCIAMACHY TOA Reflectance Correction Effects on Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval W. Di Nicolantonio, A. Cacciari, S. Scarpanti, G. Ballista, E. Morisi,
Objectives The Li-Sparse reciprocal kernel is based on the geometric optical modeling approach developed by Li and Strahler, in which the angular reflectance.
CM-SAF Board Meeting, Helsinki, September 2006 CM-SAF TOA radiation status report D. Caprion Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory    J. Kusmierczyk-Michulec G. de Leeuw.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
1 Bertrand Fougnie Patrice Henry, Sophie Lachérade, Philippe Gamet Processing team CNES-DCT/ME Synergic Calibration Crossing Multiple Methods GSICS Annual.
Surface Characterization 4th Annual Workshop on Hyperspectral Meteorological Science of UW MURI And Beyond Donovan Steutel Paul G. Lucey University of.
COMS Visible Channel Calibration Dohyeong KIM Ho-Seung LEE Won-Seok LEE Tae-Hyeong OH Sunmi NA National Meteorological Satellite Center Korea Meteorological.
Visible vicarious calibration using RTM
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
GRWG UV Sub-Group Briefing Report
SADE Export Web Site Claire Tinel, Denis Blumstein, Patrice Henry - CNES Pascale Lafitte - CNES GSICS WG Meeting – Feb 2010 – Claire Tinel / CNES.
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
J. C. Stroeve, J. Box, F. Gao, S. Liang, A. Nolin, and C. Schaaf
Cloud Trends and Anomalies Observed by MISR
Crossing Multiple Methods
Wang Ling, Hu Xiuqing, Chen Lin
Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration with D. Doelling (NASA)
Study of Asian and Australian desert sites for sensor cross-calibration in the VPIR range Patrice Henry, Bertrand Fougnie, Sophie Lacherade, Philippe Gamet,
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
SEVIRI Solar Channel Calibration system
LEO Calibration over Rayleigh Scattering … the ATBD
produced by SBDART model for COMS visible calibration
DCC method implementation in FY3/MERSI and FY2
Meteorological Satellite Center Japan Meteorological Agency
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Using SCIAMACHY to calibrate GEO imagers
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
Activities in the framework of GSICS CNES GPRC Report
Calibration and Performance MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)
Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales - Toulouse - France
CALIBRATION over the Moon An introduction to « POLO »
Combination Approaches
Using the Moon for Sensor Calibration Inter- comparisons
Characterizing DCC as invariant calibration target
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
The Successor of the TOU
Calibration monitoring based on snow PICS over Tibetan Plateau
Update on the GIRO Benchmark
Implementation of DCC at JMA and comparison with RTM
Combination Approaches
LEO Calibration over Rayleigh Scattering …toward the ATBD
Inter-calibration of the SEVIRI solar bands against MODIS Aqua, using Deep Convective Clouds as transfer targets Sébastien Wagner, Tim Hewison In collaboration.
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
The Aqua-MODIS calibration transfer using DCC
Consistent calibration of VIRR onboard FY-3A to FY-3C
Strawman Plan for Inter-Calibration of Solar Channels
Implementation of DCC algorithm for MTSAT-2/Imager
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
Calibration of SEVIRI / MSG2
Toward a synergy between on-orbit lunar observations
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Cloud trends from GOME, SCIAMACHY and OMI
Presentation transcript:

Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL GSICS Annual Meeting 24-28th March 2014, Darmstadt, Germany Deep Convective Cloud BRDF characterization using PARASOL Bertrand Fougnie for CNES Calibration Center (CNES-DCT/SI/MO + support from CNES-DCT/ME)

Introduction PARASOL is an instrument allowing a bidirectional characterization of any targets of the Earth-surface system For many years, DCC are used to monitor the radiometric sensitivity of PARASOL : That’s my powerful white diffuser (see Fougnie et al., IEEE TGARS, 2009) For this reason, a 8-years archive was extracted over DCC This archive was also available to derive this BRDF analysis

The PARASOL instrument 2000 km along-track 1400 km cross-track Satellite POLDER instrument onboard PARASOL : Dec 04 to Oct 13 Camera = wide fov optic + CCD matrix 2D detector array 274x242 pixels fov : ±50° incident angle (i.e. ±60° viewing angle) Large swath: 2200 km for POLDER, 1400 km for Parasol Moderate resolution : about 6 km Multidirectionality : bidirectional + wide fov Multispectral and multi-polarisation PARASOL image zenith viewing angle ⇒ No on-board calibration device 3

Geometrical sampling Access to bidirectional geometries 2005-2008 Blue/green = viewing directions Yellow = solar directions 2005-2008 archive VZA,SZA in [0-70°], step 10° 2005-2012 Archive (orbital drift) 1 daily overpass = 16 viewing angles 1 solar geometry 1 cycle = 16 tracks (days) 16x16 viewing angles 16 solar geometries

The “Mean” DCC Database = full archive 2005-2012 Assume a « mean DCC » : BRDF depends on : * Cloud particle type * Cloud optical thickness * Cloud structure hypothesis = all selected pixels always observe the same « mean DCC » All viewing directions are covered 1 pixel = 16 views per track N pixels = Nx16 views per track 16 tracks per cycle All solar angles are covered : along the year : from 15 to 45° orbital drift after 2009 = access to large angles, up to 60°

Selection of DCC How suitable DCC are selected for PARASOL (not TIR bands) : Operational procedure : every month, acquisitions are collected over oceanic sites in Guinée et Maldives rnua>0.7, neighborhood (5x5) < , 400<Papp< 50hPa "nadir/zenith" geometries : qs<30° et qv<40° (avoiding shadow) This nadir/zenith geometry is for calibration purposes -> here extended to all available angles

Methodology A BRDF structure is initialized with 2°x2° bins for VZA and RAA 10° range for SZA : [20°;30°], [30°;40°], [40°;50°], [50;60°] (to few for [0°;20°]) All Measured reflectance from the archive (all geometries, all dates) is stored in its corresponding (VZA, SZA, RAA) box BRDF assumed to be symetrical to principal plane, i.e. 0°<RAA<180° For each box and each wavelength, are computed : mean TOA reflectance standard-deviation number of pixel per bin Visualization : polar plot 0° 60° 90° 180° RAA VZA

Example for 670nm 30° < SZA < 40° BRDF = 10 to 15% Stddev = 6 to 8% Npix = 100 to 600

Spectral « white » for VIS 15% decrease for NIR Lower BDRF for NIR

Solar range Maximum moves with SZA

Comparison to computation & Model Computation using Discrete Ordinate Code (from Fougnie and Bach, 2009 aznd Lafrance et al., 2002) COT - Optical Thickness Geometry Reference case : CPT=Plate COT=200 ts=20° Phi=45° 670nm Wavelength CPT – Particle type

Comparison to computation & Model Very preliminary comparison : Measurement // Model // Computation principal plane for 670 nm model and computation to be checked…

Conclusion A mean DCC has been elaborated compiling all observations from the PARASOL archive characterization for a large solar range, from 20 to 60° Radiative transfer computation are available  to be compared to the observation On-going : an update of the top-of-cloud particle type considered on the computation  moving from compact hexagonal crystal to a more realistic model IHM (Inhomogeneous Hexagonal Monocrystal, Labonnote, 2001) Compare results to the GSICS reference : Hu’s model (2004) …

Seasonal variation As seen by PARASOL: Difference in selection : not TIR band Geographical area : Maldives + Guinea VZA < 40°, and SZA < 30° To be updated soon to the full PARASOL archive + the full MERIS archive