VALIDATION OF MOIST HEAT STEILIZATION

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validating Sterilization of Medical Devices
Advertisements

Regulatory View of Microwave Pasteurization Gregory J. Fleischman, Ph.D. Institute for Food Safety and Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration
CESO Education Day November 30, 2004 Shawn Kenny Manager, Central Processing Department University Health Network – Toronto General Hospital.
Irradiator Specification Installation Qualification (IQ) + Software validation Operational Qualification (OQ) Performance Qualification (PQ) Demonstrate.
WHO - PSM Water –part 3 Workshop on GMP and Quality Assurance of HIV products Shanghai, China 28 Feb - 4 March 2005 Maija Hietava M.Sci.Pharm Quality Assurance.
VALIDATION – ARE WE DOING ENOUGH David McNamara Manager – CSSD Holy Spirit Northside Private Hospital SRACA (NSW) Conference 10 th November 2011.
Sterilization - validation, qualification requirements
World Health Organization
A VISUAL AID TO PYROMETRY COMPLIANCE (A Guide To An Acceptable TUS Report) February 2010.
World Health Organization
ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION VALIDATION
Clean? Disinfect? Sterilize? What does it all mean??
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
MEDICAL DEVICE STERILIZATION
SELECTING AND MANAGING CONTRACT STERILIZERS AND TESTING LABORATORIES
STERILIZATION The complete destruction of all living organisms and their spores or their complete removal from the formulation. All parenterals, as well.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
World Health Organization
Autoclave Validation Presented by Paul Yeatman BSc. Microbiologist.
Validation of Autoclave And Dry Heat Sterilization
Qualification of HVAC systems
QC | Slide 1 of 16 June 2006 Good Practices for Quality Control Laboratories P art 4: Inspecting the laboratory Supplementary Training Modules on Good.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
A Seminar on 1.  Why to validate?  Parts of Equipment Validation  Who should do Equipment Validation?  Equipment qualification  Typical process flow.
Domina PLUS B WORKING DIAGRAMS TROUBLESHOOTING INTERNAL VIEWS WIRING DIAGRAMS INSTALLATION 03 PREVIOUS MODEL.
Basic Principles of GMP
Rocky Mountain RAPS Process Validation Presentation 6/7/06 By Clay Anselmo.
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
Introduction To the pr EN ISO Project norm
Presented by Steven P. Feltman Food Safety and Quality Specialist.
World Health Organization
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
Physical and Chemical Control of Microorganisms. Control of Microorganisms by Physical and Chemical Agents.
Sterilization of Medical Devices: Bodhisatwa Das.
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
WFHSS 2015 Lille/France Klaus Roth SMP GmbH Prüfen Validieren Forschen Hechingerstrasse Tuebingen Germany Validation of hydrogene peroxide Sterilizers.
Sterile product validation
Biological indicators role in CSSD equipment qualification and monitoring Paulo Roberto Laranjeira 1.
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice
Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals1 CLEANING VALIDATION Microbial Monitoring Anthony M. Cundell Ph. D. Associate Director, QA Microbiological Development & Statistics.
Wet Packs: Strategies for Prevention and Resolution
Sterile Products Lab PHT 434
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION - Autoclave Dr. L. Prabakaran Prof. & Head R. R. College of Pharmacy Bangalore -90.
Temperature mapping of storage areas Technical supplement to WHO Technical Report Series, No. 961, 2011.
BSB Biomanufacturing CHAPTER 4 GMP – Documentation Part I (SOP)
Laboratory equipment Lecture (5).
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
World Health Organization
Sterilization Types & Control
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
به نام خدایی که در این نزدیکی است
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
Critical GMP Validations for Drugs/Biologics Ⅰ
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS INVOLVED IN SOLIDS,LIQUIDS.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
Quality Systems in a Production Facility
Sterilization process
Progress Test 4 Review Part B.
VALIDATION OF MOIST HEAT STEILIZATION
How to Conduct a Sterilization Failure Investigation
Sterile Products Lab PHT 434
Sterilization and disinfection
VALIDATION OF MOIST HEAT STEILIZATION
A. Sterilization Ibrahim A. Alsarra, Ph.D. King Saud University
 Define: The stirring heating plate or heated stirring heating plate has been developed to heat and mix fluids contained in laboratory receptacles such.
Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products: Practical Examples
SID & GP MINPROMTORG OF RUSSIA Corporate Communication Center
Presentation transcript:

VALIDATION OF MOIST HEAT STEILIZATION JM Tech. Do-Young Ahn 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Definition  Sterilization “The act or process, physical or chemical, that destroys or eliminates all viable microbes including resistant bacterial spores from a fluid or a solid.” Examples of sterilization methods are : steam treatment at 121℃, dry heat at 230℃, flushing with a sterilizing solution such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or ozone (O3), irradiation, and filtration. Sterility “The reduction of anticipated levels of contamination in a load to the point where the probability of survival is less than 10-6.” 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Definition D-value The time in minutes required for a one-log or 90% reduction of a specific microbial population under specified lethal conditions. For steam sterilization it is determined at a constant temperature z-value The number of degree of temperature change necessary to change the D-value by a factor of 10. Z-value measures the rate of change in the D-value as a function of temperature. Z=(T2-T1)/Log(D2/D1), D값을 1/10로 단축시키는데 소요되는 온도상승값 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Definition F value(lethal rate, instantaneous Fo) The F value is a measurement of sterilization effectiveness. F(T,z) is defined as the equivalent time at temperature T delivered to a container or unit of product for the purpose of sterilization, calculated using a specific value of z. Fo value(accumulated Fo) The term "Fo " is defined as the number of equivalent minutes of steam sterilization at temperature 121.1°C delivered to a container or unit of product calculated using a z-value of 10°C. Fo =  10^((121-T)/z)*t 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Methodology Overkill Sterilization Provides a minimum 12 log reduction of a resistant BI w/ a known D-value of not less than 1 minute. Required minimal information on the bioburden Bioburden/Bioindicator Sterilization Provides a probability of survival of less than 1 in 106 for the bioburden as demonstrated using a resistant BI w/ a known D-value. BI may not be inactivated Requires information on the numbers and heat resistance of the BI. Requires ongoing monitoring or control over bioburden. 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Methodology Bioburden Sterilization Provides a probability of survival of less than 1 in 106 for the most resistance bioburden expected in the load. Requires information on the numbers and heat resistance of the BI. Requires ongoing monitoring or control over bioburden. 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Sterilizer Cycle Gravity Displacement Difference of density Density of air at 20℃ = 1.2 g/ℓ Density of steam at 100℃ = 0.6 g/ℓ Effectiveness of air elimination depends on the rate of steam supply Air pocket : too rapidly Diffusion into the steam : too slowly, more difficult to remove Specially designed steam trap permitting the passage of large volume of air 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Sterilizer Cycle Prevacuum cycle A more effective method By means of a mechanical vacuum pump or a steam eductor Vacuum as low as 15~20 mmHg, apply for 8~10 min. Pulsing cycle A series of alternating steam pulses followed by vacuum excursions Air-steam mixture Terminal sterilization of large volume parenterals Air injection required to compensate the great expansion of air or nitrogen in the head space above the liquid Well mixed chamber : fan, raining effect by external pump w/ cooling 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Cycle Development Consider factors into account Nature of the load : porous materials, heat sensitivity of the products Type of the sterilizer Employed containers and closures Heat stable product : overkill approach Heat liable product : bioburden approach Bioburden studies : number of microorganisms D-value studies : only highly resistant spore formers, BIER(biological indicator evaluator resistometer) Inoculate the spore into the actual solutions For solid materials, precut strips 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Preparing for Validation Temperature sensing devices :  T type thermocouples(copper-constantan) encased in flexible sheaths  Premium grades of wire having 0.1℃ accuracy Temperature standards  RTD traceable to the National Bureau of Standards , IPR, HTR Calibration of thermocouples At two temperatures : 0 ℃, 130 ℃ Correction factors Stability : 0.03℃ Accuracy : 0.5℃ 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Preparing for Validation Autoclave Validation nozzle and adaptor Data logger : digital output and multi-channel device BIs or biological challenges Loads 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Validation Protocol Protocol should include Objectives of the validation Responsibilities of validation personnel and operating department personnel Identification and description of the sterilizer and its process control Identification of SOPs :equipment Calibration of instrument : SOPs and/or description Identification and calibration of the temperature monitoring equipment 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Validation Protocol A description of the following studies Bioburden determination studies(if applicable) Empty chamber heat distribution studies Container mapping studies(if applicable) Loaded chamber heat penetration studies Microbiological challenge studies Evaluation of drug product cooling water(if applicable) Integrity testing of vent filter Acceptance criteria References Review and approval 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Heat Distribution Studies To demonstrate the temperature uniformity and stability of the sterilizing medium throughout the sterilizer Conduct on both the empty and loaded chamber with max. and min. load configurations Acceptance criteria : Less than ±1℃of the mean temperature Conduct 3 runs to obtain consistent results Distribution of the thermocouples : geometrical representatives, exhaust drain, adjacent to the control sensor At least 10 probes, normally 15~20 probes Temperature uniformity of the heat distribution studies may be influenced by Type Size Design Installation of the sterilizer 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Heat Distribution Studies At loaded chamber heat distribution test, the thermocouples should be positioned in the same locations used for empty chamber heat distribution Avoid contacting solid surfaces Do not place within any containers Data should be obtained at regular intervals 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Container Mapping To determine the coolest point within the liquid filled container Temperature mapping should be conducted on all the different container types, sizes and fill volume to be validated The number of the thermocouples used depends on the container volume Possible to use a single thermocouple at different positions, and can be conducted in a smaller autoclave or retort Penetration thermocouples should be positioned at the cold spot having lowest temperature or Fo Container mapping studies can be conducted in a small autoclave or retort. The temperature profile of the container should remain constant among different sterilizing chamber. 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Heat Penetration Studies To determine the coolest point(s) within the specified load and configuration, and to assure that these points be consistently exposed to sufficient heat lethality Prior to conduct heat penetration studies, determine max. and min. load configurations Probed container at the cold spot should be distributed uniformly throughout the load Penetration thermocouple are positioned at points within the process equipment suspected to be the most difficult for steam heat penetration 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Heat Penetration Studies Lethal rate can be determined from the temperature data by the following formula : L = log-1(To-Tb)/z = 10^((To-Tb)/z) A summation over time of the lethal rate at a series of temperature(accumulated lethality) Fo =  10^((121-T)/z)*t Regard to product stability 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Microbial Challenge Studies Biological challenges are employed during heat penetration studies in order to demonstrate the degree of process lethality provided by the sterilization cycle Microorganism frequently utilized Overkill : Bacillus stearothermophilus and Clostridium sporogenes Bioburden : Calibrated BIs from environmental and process isolates such as E. coli Type of BI : Spore strips or spore suspension into the suspending medium Microbial challenge studies are conducted concurrently with the heat penetration studies 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Validation Report Common elements of all reports : Identification of the task report by number Reference to protocol A brief summary of the range of operational conditions experienced and how they were controlled A procedure for maintaining control within the approved range A summary and analysis of the experimental results A brief description of any deviation Conclusion Review and approval Cycle development reports are not usually a part of the validation report 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Maintenance of Validation A routine calibration program for all instruments critical to the operation of the sterilizer and its support system A preventative maintenance program including periodic operational rechecks and comparison to OQ record Routine monitoring of bioburden and periodic BI challenges(optionally) Operating records and equipment logs Process and equipment change control procedures including review to establish whether additional validations are required On-going validation 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization

Moist Heat Sterilization Controversial Issues Incubation of the sterility test : 7 days vs. 14 days USP provide information concerning critical parameters for Parameteric Release Reduction extent and frequency of revalidation Verification of D-value of BIs Use of alternative to B. stearothermophilus as a BI 2018-11-13 Moist Heat Sterilization