WARD 5 ETOBICOKE- LAKESHORE TOWN HALL MEETING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Municipal Board Making Your Case to the Board Presented by: William Barlow, Chair Lori Lavoie, Vice Chair.
Advertisements

Introduction and overview Care Act What is this module about?  Part 1 of the Care Act and its statutory guidance  Who’s it for?  Adult social.
TOWNSHIP OF BECKWITH OFFICIAL PLAN REVIEW OFFICIAL PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: AUGUST 24, 2010 OPEN HOUSE NO. 3 AGENDA  What is an Official Plan?  The Official.
1 Procedural Issues: Adoption, Amendment, Enforcement, and Appeals.
Legislative Rule-Making Process. Three Different Processes Higher Education 29A-3A-1 et seq State Board of Education 29A-3B-1 et seq All other state agencies.
Ontario Bar Association Institute 2015 The Development Permit System Katarzyna Sliwa Davies Howe Partners LLP.
An Overview of the Hearing Process Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April
1 Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 A strategic view.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Comments on Spatial Land Use Management Bill, 2012 (SPLUMB) 21 August 2012 Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning.
COMMENT ON THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM 21 AUGUST 2012.
The new VicSmart process and provisions. What is VicSmart? VicSmart is a fast planning permit process A decision is expected to be made in 10 days All.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Planning Law Update The South East Ontario Municipal Law Seminar October 21 and 22, 2015.
Zoning pt. III. Intensity Regulations Meant to dictate the intensity of use Different standards for different use districts –Minimum lot size –Minimum.
San Antonio Unified Development Code Group 17. Numbering and Referencing The numbering system is consistent with the system used throughout the City's.
Secondary Dwelling Units Orchard Park/Sherwood Forest Ratepayers Association Community Meeting January 29, 2014.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Ted Allen Supervising Prosecutor Region of York September 2014.
MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION TO PLANNING & ROLE OF THE PLANNER INTRODUCTION TO THE IRISH PLANNING SYSTEM 24 TH MARCH 2015 Please note this is an information.
A PRESENTATION BY AYNSLEY ANDERSON AND LAUREN MARTIN OF BARRISTON LLP Aggregates 101 Pit stop(ped) at the OMB.
A good day to the Administrato rs of the South Eastern Education District!
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
Aggregates 101 Grey County Planning Process for Pits and Quarries April 24, 2015 Scott Taylor, MCIP, RPP Senior Planner.
Bill 73 & Dispute Resolution. ADR authorized for Planning Disputes prior to Bill : Sewell Commission recommended that OMB consider alternate ways.
WELCOME TO EVIDENCE 2016 Miiko Kumar. What is evidence law about? Where is evidence law from? Where is evidence law now? What are the aims of the laws.
Introduction to the planning system for elected members​
Background Background 16 April Act came into operation.
O.M.B. Consultations MPP Glen Murray March 15th, 2017
Overpayment Process Training October 2008.
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
National Small Business Amendment Bill
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
PROCEDURAL BASICS FOR THE MEETINGS OF MALAYSIAN PARLIAMENT
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Bill [B 75–2008]
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Proposed Rule Changes Overview Stan Floras Tribunal Counsel
LPAT’s Function in the Ontario Planning Process
The Local Planning Appeal Support Centre Our Early Days
WHAT THE CHANGES WILL MEAN FOR MUNICIPALITIES
Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
Proposed Changes to Draft Official Plan Downtown Policies
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Municipal Regulation of Cannabis
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
School Community Councils
Presentation to Local Authorities
Freedom of Information Act 2014
Neighbourhood Meeting Mountainside Community Centre
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Neighbourhood Meeting Mountainside Community Centre
DRDLR RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE SPATIAL PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL B National Assembly Portfolio Committee on Rural.
Amendments to the Rental Housing Act, 1999 (Act No. 50 of 1999).
PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON SPORT AND RECREATION ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE SASREA APPEAL BOARD.
Catholic School Councils: Making a Difference 1.1
Key Elements and Changes to Ontario’s Planning Process
Amendments to the Liquor Bill, 2003
Making Local Government a Participatory Sport
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
Amendments to the Liquor Bill, 2003
Overview introduction transition provisions
Presentation transcript:

WARD 5 ETOBICOKE- LAKESHORE TOWN HALL MEETING WELCOME WARD 5 ETOBICOKE- LAKESHORE TOWN HALL MEETING

AGENDA  Welcome and Introductions Presentation by Special Guest speaker on the new Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) Q & A period on Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT)   Presentation by Councillors Staff on Accessing Committee of Adjustment & Toronto Local Appeal Board Planning Reports and Applications General discussion on applications and their status in the planning process.

DISCLAIMER Presentation contents provides background information about land use and development law and policy. The contents do not represent legal or professional advise and is not to be relied as such. If legal advice is required for a specific issue or circumstance please consult legal counsel.

LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL TRIBUAL (LPAT) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD as of APRIL 3rd , 2018 LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL TRIBUAL (LPAT) replaced ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB)

The Bill received proclamation on April 3rd, 2018. ABOUT BILL 139 BILL 139: BUILDING BETTER COMMNUNITIES AND CONSERVING WATERSHEDS ACT, 2017 Received Royal Assent on December 12th, 2017. It will reform the land-use planning system in Ontario, creating the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) replacing Ontario Municipal Board (OMB). The Bill received proclamation on April 3rd, 2018. BILL 139

BUILDING BETTER COMMUNITIES AND CONSERVING WATERSHEDS ACT, 2017 Bill 139 – Components: Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017 (“LPAT Act”) Local Planning Appeal Support Centre Act, 2017 Amendments to the Planning Act Amendments to the Conservation Authorities Act Amendments to other legislation required for the enactment of the LPAT Act. Province’s Policy Objectives: “Giving Communities a Stronger Voice” “Faster, Fairer and More Affordable Planning Appeals” “Sheltering Major Planning Decisions from Appeal” “Free Legal and Planning Support” Timing Royal Assent – December 12, 2017 Royal Proclamation – anticipated for Spring 2018

LOCAL PLANNING APPEAL SUPPORT CENTRE ACT, 2017 Establishes the Local Planning Appeal Support Centre (the "Centre") The Centre to provide legal and planning support services to the public who want to participate in Tribunal appeals. Support provided may include: general information on land use planning; guidance on Tribunal procedures; and other services prescribed by regulation Criteria TBD for eligibility testing to receive support services from the Centre.

PLANNING ACT CHANGES - SUMMARY: The OMB will be replaced with the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (“LPAT”) Deference to local and provincial decisions by changing the Standard of Review for some appeals New Appeal Tests for Official Plans, Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendments. Greater weight to be placed on written record in the applications process and what is presented and considered by Council Case management will be mandatory for the majority of cases Oral hearings of appeals are no longer as of right. If Oral submissions given: (i) no person involved in the hearing may adduce evidence.; and (ii) oral submissions will be time limited by a regulation (75 minutes) The protection of “Major Transit Station Areas” from appeal

APPEALS – NEW STANDARD OF REVIEW (APPEAL OF APPROVAL) Appeal of Official Plan and Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law or Zoning By-law Amendment adopted by municipal council or approval authority MUST MEET the new Test: Appellant must explain in the appeal may how the adopted or approved application (or some part of it) is: (i) Inconsistent with a policy statement issued under s.s. 3(1) of the Planning Act; (ii) Fail to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or (iii) Fails to conform with upper-tier municipalities OP or an applicable OP If the Notice of Appeal does not meet the test LPAT under statutory obligation to dismiss

APPEAL – NEW STANDARD OF REVIEW (DUAL TEST) (APPEAL OF A REFUSAL OR NON-DECISION) Private appeals of OPA and ZBLA applications that council/approval authority refuses or fails to make a decision, may only be made if meet the Dual Test Dual Test (2 steps) 1) Explain how existing parts of the OP or ZBL to be affected by the amendment are: Inconsistent with a policy statement issued under s.s. 3(1) of the Planning Act; Fail to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or (iii) Fails to conform with upper-tier municipalities OP or an applicable OP. AND 2) Demonstrate how the requested Amendment is: Consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3(1) of the Planning Act’ Conforms with and does not conflict with provincial plans; Conforms with an upper tier municipalities OP or applicable plans. If the Notice of Appeal does not meet the test LPAT under statutory obligation to dismiss

LPAT APPEAL - TWO-STAGE PROCESS Stage 2 Appeal: New Standard of Review or Dual Test Applied If met LPAT makes Decision TEST MET: Municipality has 90 days to Reconsider Stage 1 Appeal: New Standard of Review or Dual Test Applied Council Decision TEST NOT MET: Appeal Dismissed

SUMMARY OF LPAT APPEAL STEPS 1. Notice of Appeal 2. Notice of Appeal Screened for Validity 3. Enhanced Municipal Record 4. Appellant’s Appeal Record & Case Synopsis 5. Respondent’s Appeal Record & Case Synopsis 6. Mandatory Case Management Conference Other Parties/Participants apply for status (30 days prior to Case Management Conference) 7. Hearing

HEARING – ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND PARTICIPANTS A person other than an appellant that wishes to participate in an appeal to the LPAT must, at least 30 days before the case management conference, make a written submission to the LPAT (and serve in on the relevant municipality or approval authority) respecting whether the decision (or failure to make a decision) meets the New Standard of Review LPAT has discretion to decide whether any person making a submission will be granted party status or the opportunity to otherwise participate in the appeal

MAJOR TRANSIT STATION AREA POLICIES Section 16 of the Planning Act, empower municipalities to designate areas as a "protected major transit station area.“ Largely no appeals with respect to Major Transit Station Area Policies including policies: establishing the boundaries of the area; the planned number of residents and jobs,; the permitted land uses, the maximum densities authorized or the minimum or maximum building heights No appeals of zoning by-laws establishing permitted uses, minimum or maximum densities or maximum building heights within major transit areas. However can appeal height limits where the maximum height permitted on a site would result in a building not satisfying the minimum density

OTHER APPEAL RESTRICTIONS A 2-year moratorium on Secondary Plan amendments No appeal of any decision of the Minister of Municipal Affairs approving an Official Plan or Official Plan Amendment

LPAT - TIME LINES FOR APPEALS (LPAT Act, 2017 (O.Reg. 102/18) 12 months Failure of an approval authority to make a decision on official plans or plans of subdivision 10 months Decisions made by municipality or approval authority on official plan or zoning bylaw; Failure of a municipality to make a decision on official plan or zoning by-law 6 months Appeal of new decision Failure of municipality or approval authority to make a new decision Any other Planning Act appeal *Timelines excludes certain time during periods of adjournment

Thank You! Q & A’s

ACCESSING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

Thank You! Q & A’s