An Osborn Education. Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting it Together ….Student + Teacher Standards = ?
Advertisements

STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
NIET Teacher Evaluation Process
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Office of Transformation Rhode Island Academy for Transformative Leadership An Overview of The Aspiring Turnaround Leaders Program Partnering.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Minneapolis Public Schools QComp An Overview of Quality Compensation In Minneapolis Bill Gibbs Site administrator Kenny School Former district QComp Coordinator.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Teachers Lead, Students Learn A landmark teacher contract that takes the transformation of Baltimore City Public Schools to the next level September 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
South Carolina TAP: A National Leader in Outcomes Based Teacher Incentive Programs.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
Maryland’s Race to the Top Application From National Leader to World Class August 11, 2010 Submitted on behalf of 843,861 public school students R e d.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
R.B. STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL REFINING OUR FOCUS BULLDOG 20/20 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
High Performance Leaders in Irving Independent School District (IISD) Administrator’s Leadership Conference August 3, 2010 Leadership 1.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Office of Service Quality
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Sustainable Educator Evaluation and Compensation Supported by the Teacher Incentive Fund Improved educator performance = Increased student growth seec.nefec.org.
Scripting a Lesson Scoring a Lesson Lesson Evidence
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Scripting a Lesson Scoring a Lesson Lesson Evidence
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

An Osborn Education

Comprehensive Reform in Education Putting the Pieces Together… The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District The Nation The Nation The State The State The District The District

The Nation College - and career-ready students Great teachers and leaders Raise the bar and reward excellence Equity and opportunityPromote innovation

The State Todays achievement for the State of Arizona in the Race to the Top (RTTT) competition is a very significant and important milestone in Arizonas comeback. The conditions are in place to transform Arizona schools for decades to come. Governor Jan Brewer, July 27, 2010 Standards and Assessments Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems Great Teachers, Great Leaders Supporting Struggling Schools RACE TO THE TOP

The District AZ Ready for Rigor Project TIF Student AchievementTeacher EffectivenessPrincipal Effectiveness Overall School Effectiveness In May, 2010 the staff at each Osborn school came to consensus to join the AZ Department of Education, ASU, The National Institute for Excellence in Teaching and 16 other districts to apply for a USDOE Teacher Incentive Fund Grant.

Osborns commitment to TAP aligns to and strongly supports national and state goals for educational reform.

Teacher Excellence Student Achievement Opportunities for All Teacher Advancement Program: A New Direction for Success

Why Tap? The goal of TAP is to increase student achievement through teacher quality. Each Osborn school is now part of a comprehensive reform effort with a history and a future Each Osborn school is now part of a comprehensive reform effort with a history and a future We are part of something which goes far beyond our district We are part of something which goes far beyond our district You and your school leadership team will be a significant part of this new endeavor You and your school leadership team will be a significant part of this new endeavor

Why TAP… a National Perspective President Obamas address to the nation on education reform President Obamas address to the nation on education reform – Proclaimed that to complete our race to the top requires recruiting, preparing, and rewarding outstanding teachers. – Singled out the promising work of the Teacher Advancement Program – Hailed TAP for making an unprecedented commitment to ensure that anyone entrusted with educating our children is doing the job as well as it can be done.

TAP Elements of Success Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Performance- based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth

Performance- Based Compensation Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Ongoing Applied Professional Growth TAP Elements of Success Based on comprehensive research Multiple Career Paths Performance- based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths

TAP Elements of Success Opportunities for additional responsibility and compensation Multiple Career Paths Master Teacher Mentor Teacher Career Teacher

Research Supporting Multiple Career Paths Effective leadership is characterized by collective responsibility. (Elmore 2000) Effective leadership is characterized by collective responsibility. (Elmore 2000) Collective leadership through consensus of teachers rather than mandate is more effective. (Darling-Hammond, Bullmaster & Cobb 1995) Collective leadership through consensus of teachers rather than mandate is more effective. (Darling-Hammond, Bullmaster & Cobb 1995)

Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Performance- Based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth TAP Elements of Success Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Multiple Career Paths Instructionally Focused Accountability Performance- based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth

TAP Elements of Success Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Weekly on-site professional development, teacher-led and job embedded

Research Supporting On-going Embedded Professional Growth Student achievement and teacher learning increases when professional development is teacher-led, ongoing and collaborative. (Desimone, Porter, Garet, Yoon, & Birman, 2002; Smylie, Allensworth, Greenberg, Harris, & Luppescu, 2001). Student achievement and teacher learning increases when professional development is teacher-led, ongoing and collaborative. (Desimone, Porter, Garet, Yoon, & Birman, 2002; Smylie, Allensworth, Greenberg, Harris, & Luppescu, 2001). Schools that regularly link teachers to other teachers to form a supportive community are capable of successfully reforming teaching and learning. (Fullan 2001) Schools that regularly link teachers to other teachers to form a supportive community are capable of successfully reforming teaching and learning. (Fullan 2001)

TAP Elements of Success Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Performance- Based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Multiple Career Paths Performance- based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Instructionally Focused Accountability

TAP Elements of Success Multiple evaluations Multiple evaluations Trained and certified evaluators Trained and certified evaluators Cluster training and individualized classroom support Cluster training and individualized classroom support Fair evaluations based on clearly defined, research- based standards Instructionally Focused Accountability

Research Supporting Instructionally Focused Accountability The challenge of creating an effective teacher accountability system is to improve the quality of teacher instruction, and thereby raise student achievement. Odden and Clune (1998) The challenge of creating an effective teacher accountability system is to improve the quality of teacher instruction, and thereby raise student achievement. Odden and Clune (1998) States and school districts need to identify the knowledge and skills that a teacher needs to teach successfully, and then create standards and rubrics to measure teaching performance. Odden, Milanowski & Youngs (1998) States and school districts need to identify the knowledge and skills that a teacher needs to teach successfully, and then create standards and rubrics to measure teaching performance. Odden, Milanowski & Youngs (1998)

Shared Leadership TAP Leadership Team Members Shared Leadership PrincipalPrincipal Assistant Principal Master Teachers Mentor Teachers Others critical to a successful implementation of TAP

Purpose of TAP Leadership Team The Leadership Team is responsible for overall implementation of the TAP System and monitoring specific TAP processes in their school.

TAP Leadership Team Member Responsibilities TAP Principal Selects Master and Mentor Teachers Selects Master and Mentor Teachers Leads development of school plan Leads development of school plan Facilitates TAP Leadership Team Meetings Facilitates TAP Leadership Team Meetings Monitors cluster and classroom activities Monitors cluster and classroom activities Conducts classroom evaluations and conferences Conducts classroom evaluations and conferences Coaches Master and Mentor Teachers in classroom instruction, cluster implementation and coaching of teachers Coaches Master and Mentor Teachers in classroom instruction, cluster implementation and coaching of teachers

TAP Master and Mentor Teacher Facilitate Cluster (Team) Meetings Facilitate Cluster (Team) Meetings Conduct Evaluations and Conferences/Coaching Conduct Evaluations and Conferences/Coaching Provide Individualized Teacher Support Provide Individualized Teacher Support Participate on Leadership Team Participate on Leadership Team * Master and Mentor Teachers effectiveness evaluated annually through staff surveys Basic Job Responsibilities – Master and Mentor Teacher

TAP Elements of Success Performance-based Compensation Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Performance- Based Compensation Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Instructionally Focused Accountability Multiple Career Paths Ongoing Applied Professional Growth Performance- based Compensation

Tied to responsibilities, instructional performance and student achievement growth TAP Elements of Success The system for determining performance based compensation is comprehensive The system for determining performance based compensation is comprehensive Teacher performance is determined in three ways: Teacher performance is determined in three ways: – Skills, knowledge and responsibilities – Individual student achievement growth – School-wide student achievement growth Performance- based Compensation

Research Supporting Performance-based Compensation Studies show that neither years of experience nor advanced degrees can predict increased student achievement. (Greenwald, Hedges & Lane 1996) Studies show that neither years of experience nor advanced degrees can predict increased student achievement. (Greenwald, Hedges & Lane 1996) Performance award programs are successful when integrated with strong leadership, professional development, reliable analysis of student performance and strong feedback. Performance award programs are successful when integrated with strong leadership, professional development, reliable analysis of student performance and strong feedback. (Odden & Kelly 1996; Odden 2000) (Odden & Kelly 1996; Odden 2000)

Proposition 301 Federal Race to the Top Grant Federal Teacher Incentive Fund Grant How will teacher and principal performance- based awards be funded?

What two things will the TAP system help Osborn improve ? Quality of Instruction Student Achievement