Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator Status and General Plans John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 PEP-II in Run 7 and Transition Planning John T. Seeman Assistant Director PPA/LCLS.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Synchrotron Radiation Absorption and Vacuum Issues in the IR at PEP-II and a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Turnaround time in modern hadron colliders & store-length optimization
Top-Up Injection Schemes
Jim Crittenden CHESS Simulation Working Group 30 March 2015
ILC - Upgrades Nick Walker – 100th meeting
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
John T. Seeman DOE PEP-II Operations Review April 26, 2006
SuperB Injection, RF stations, Vibration and Operations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
Beam Loading Effect in CEPC APDR
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
PEP-II Status and Plans e+e- Factories Workshop
Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Design of Interaction Region
Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
BEPCII Background Issues: Collimators and Masks
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
Cost Algorithm for a Super-B Factory
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Injection design of CEPC
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Beam-beam simulations
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory John Seeman, SLAC October 11, 2014 HF2014 Beijing

Abstract: Top Injection for PEP-II Top-off injection was developed in PEP-II from the linac injector to allow constant luminosity with the BaBar detector being fully operational during injection. The electron beam top-off was developed initially as its lifetime was the shortest and thus made the luminosity nearly constant. Second, the positron beam top-off was developed making the luminosity fully constant. Either electrons or positron could be injection up to 30 Hz if needed, deciding pulse-by-pulse which beam (bunch) was desired. Technical details of PEP-II top-off will be presented. The implications for top-off into a circular Higgs factory will also be discussed. The injected beam emittances and septum parameters are presented.

Topics for Top-up Injection for Higgs Factory What is needed for Top-Up injection PEP-II /BaBar top-up injection Required injection parameters for a Circular Higgs Factory Inital injector parameters Detector masking

Definitions (for this talk) Trickle injection = Top-Off = Top-Up

PEP-II Overview

PEP-II Parameters for 3.1 GeV x 9.0 GeV Units Design April 2008 Best 2008 Potential I+ mA 2140 3210 3700 I- 750 2070 2200 Number bunches 1658 1722 1740 by* mm 15-25 9-10 8.5 Bunch length 15 11-12 9 xy 0.03 0.05-0.06 0.07 Luminosity x1033 3 12 20 Int lumi / day pb-1 130 911 1300 4 times design 7 times design

Technical Items Needed for Top-Up injection Measure each bunch charge in real time and determine when it needs refilling. In the injector time a bunch to deliver it to the needed particular bunch (bucket) in the ring. Inject the bunch(es) into the collider with very low losses. Determine the injected beam backgrounds in the particle physics detector and find cures using collimation. Develop methods to monitor relevant backgrounds in real time for accelerator operators to tune on. Develop trigger masking for the detector physics taking by turn and with azimuthal variation.

PEP-II / BaBar Top-Up (Trickle) Injection Energy = 3.5 x 9 GeV Circumference = 2200 m One collision point (IR) at Lum = 1.2 x 1034 Full energy injection from Linac+Damping Rings Number of bunches = 1732 / ring Beam currents = 2.1 A x 3.2 A Particles = 1.0/1.5 x 1014 / beam (HER/LER) Lifetimes: Vacuum = ~10 hours Touschek = ~3 hours (LER) Luminosity = ~1 hour Lost particles per second = 4.2 x 1010 / second Top-up injection = one bunch / pulse Injection rate: ~3-15 Hz (30 Hz max) Particles per injection: 3 to 9 x 109 / pulse Bunch injection controller: pick the lowest bunch Injection efficiency = ~ 80% Injection kicker pulse length = 0.4 msec Ring path length = 7.3 msec PEP-II BaBar

Running before Trickle (Continuous) Injection

Continuous Injection for PEP-II

Trickle Injection lengthened the average fill length

PEP-II Run Time Changes with Top-Up Injection

Top-Up Injection increased Higher Average Luminosity

Trickle or Continuous Injection In PEP-II

PEP-II/BaBar Top-Up Injection (Accelerator) Improved peak and average luminosity. Before Top-Up Injection After Top-Up Injection

PEP-II/BaBar Top-Up Injection and Detector Trigger Masking One turn BaBar trigger masking: Mask all of ring a few tens of turns. Mask injected bunch area for 1250 turns or about 0.9 msec.

BaBar Vetoes versus bunch number and turn number.

CEPC Accelerator Parameters

CEPC Injection Phase Space Septum blade Stored Beam Orbit Injection orbit bx at injection septum (stored) = ~200m bx at injection septum (injection) = ~30m exstored (stored) =6 nm exinj (injected) =40 nm sxstored at septum (stored) = 1.1 mm sxinj at septum (injected) = 1.1 mm Xs = Septum blade thickness =~ 5 mm Xc = septum clearance distance = ~6sx Xinj < Ax Xinj = 4sinj+Xs+Xc = ~16 mm Ax = machine aperture > ~20 mm Stored beam Injection bump on Injection bump xc Injected beam (+/- 2 sxinj) xinj Ax Injection bump off (~one turn later) xinj

Electron and Positron Production CEPC stores about 2 x1013 e+ per ring. CEPC with 1 hr lifetime needs 1.25 x1013 e-/e+ per hour or ~3.5 x109 e+ and e- per second at full energy. Past: CERN: LEP injection complex delivered ~1011 e+ per second. SLAC: SLC injection complex delivered ~6 x 1012 e+ per second.

Option 1: “Ramped Storage Ring” as a CEPC Injector Top-up injection = 50 bunches / pulse / beam Slow ramp due to magnet laminations Injection rate: Once every 4 minutes. Particles per ring injection: 8.4 x 1011 / pulse Particles per injected bunch: 1.7 x 1010 / pulse Bunch injection controller: Fill all bunches at once Tailor each bunch separately. Ring path length = 182 msec Injection kicker pulse length = 182 msec. Kickers = 13 stronger than PEP-II but long flat top.  Luminosity varies from 100% to 74% over 8 minutes with 4 minutes per ring. CERN LEP: 26.7 km Ramping speed is 0.5 GeV/sec  120 GeV in 4 minutes. 120 GeV DR 1.5 GeV 3 GeV Injector Storage Ring e- CEPC Linacs e+

Option 2: “Synchrotron” as a CHF Injector Top-up injection = 50 bunch / pulse Cycle rate = 3 Hz Injection rate: 1 Hz e+, 1 Hz e-, 1 Hz e- to make e+ Particles per injection:4 x 109 / pulse over 50 bunches with 90% injection efficiency  8 x 107 /bunch  means low instability effects and RF. Bunch injection controller: Tailor the charge of each bunch Magnet laminations same as AC transformers. Injection kicker pulse length = 183 msec (= 53 km) Kickers = 13 stronger than PEP-II but 7 times slower. Ring path length = 183 msec (53 km)  Luminosity stays within 0.12% of the peak. Cornell synchrotron: 768 m Sine wave-magnet excitation 0.2 GeV to 12 GeV in 8.3 msec at 60 Hz. Does not affect CESR storage ring operation just 2 m away. 120 GeV 2 GeV DR CHF Synchrotron e- e- e+

Detector Masking Detectors for CEPC need to mask injection bunches. Ramped storage ring injector: Mask all of ring for ~10 msec every 4 minutes. But luminosity is only constant to ~16%. Synchrotron injector: Mask all of ring for ~10 msec at 1 Hz but injected bunch and injection charge is 200 times smaller and luminosity is constant to 0.1%. Need to make initial full design of a full energy 1 Hz synchrotron injector.

Conclusions Top-up injection will work for a Circular Higgs Factory. A full energy injector is needed because of beam lifetime. A synchrotron injector will work the best but is more than is needed. (60 Hz) A rapidly ramped storage ring is adequate. (4 sec) A slowly ramped storage ring injector doesn’t make the luminosity constant enough. The detectors will need to mask out the buckets with damping injected bunches during data taking.