CMC: Who we are and how we can collaborate with the

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Anna Mathis, VA Program Coordinator RiverTrends: Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring.
Amy Sheldon Watershed Coordinator February 3, 2004.
CBP Website Redesign Geography Summit May 29, 2007.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Georgia Adopt-A-Stream Introduction Georgia Adopt-A-Stream 2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. SW Suite 1462 East Atlanta, Georgia
Chesapeake Bay Program: Governance and Goals Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March 7, 2013.
19-Aug-2003MWMC presentation to NWQMC1 Our vision for monitoring in Maryland … The MWMC envisions a time when monitoring methods, programs, projects, and.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
The Regional Environmental Centre Centrul Regional de Mediu Save Our Streams in MOLDOVA Victor Cotruta REC Moldova.
Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.
Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Nicholas DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Environmental Protection Agency The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next The New.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
Mary Apostolico Potomac Watershed Manager. Current Authorities for TMDL Process Federal Clean Water Act, § 303(d) - TMDL List & TMDL Development §303(e)
WWF-Canada and the Gulf of Maine Council Jennifer Smith Manager, GIS/Conservation Planning WWF-Canada Northwest Atlantic Ecoregion Program Salem, MA June.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Environmental Literacy
Athabasca Watershed Council Athabasca Watershed Planning and Advisory Council Water for Life.
Office of Greenways & Trails
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
IWCAM DEMONSTRATION PROJECT – DRIVERS RIVER WATERSHED, JAMAICA
Multi-year Trends and Event Response
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
Local Government Engagement and Communication Strategy
2A. Develop a Formal Action Plan: Objectives
Measuring Health & Wellbeing
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Environmental Literacy
Pacific Northwest Conservation Blueprint
December 14, 2017 Christine brittle, Ph.d.
Chesapeake Bay Program Office and Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Assessing PA’s Lake Erie Tributaries
Strategic Communications Plan: Initial Findings
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Program
Program Manager, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Program Manager, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Commonwealth of Virginia
FISH HABITAT OUTCOME Gina Hunt MD. Department of Natural Resources
Canadian Parks Council
The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and What’s Next
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Biennial Work plan Updates
Achieving the Goal of Stewardship
I AM RACHEL FELVER. Hello!
MDE’s Phase III WIP Inventory 2018 Fall Regional WIP Meetings
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
A Company Perspective on Linking Science, Management and Policy for Addressing Issues of the Delaware Estuary. Ralph G. Stahl, Jr., Ph.D., D.A.B.T. DuPont.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Abby Kinchy Presentation for the Teach-In on Disappearing Data
Communicating River Data to the Public: the Animas River Community Forum Monitoring Gaps Analysis Committee Chara J Ragland, Ph.D., Querencia Environmental.
Presentation transcript:

CMC: Who we are and how we can collaborate with the Stream Health Workgroup Anne: Stream Health Workgroup Meeting: October 25, 2016 Lea Rubin and Danielle Donkersloot of the Izaak Walton League of America Photo courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program

Izaak Walton League of America A conservation organization interested in protecting natural resources and promoting outdoor recreation. Lea or Danielle

Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring Julie

Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Nissa

IAN Themes COMMUNICATING SCIENCE EFFECTIVELY REPORTING ECOSYSTEM STATUS TEACHING & TRAINING CATALYZING CONSERVATION OUTCOMES ADVANCING CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION BUILDING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS CREATING GOOD CITIZENSHIP MODELS Caroline

CBP monitoring sites First we can look at what traditional monitoring already exists… The Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Long-term water quality monitoring program has supported the assessment of Bay health, reinforced science-driven management, and led to understanding ecosystem response to natural and anthropogenic drivers. However, looking at this map you can see that this network, cannot monitor everywhere, all the time, and sometimes relies on one monitoring site to represent a large area of the watershed. Then, where do you think volunteer and non-traditional data could fill in?

Preliminary site coordinates of non-traditional monitoring If you look at this map of monitoring groups that participated in our census this past spring you can see the possibilities of adding a significant amount of data to the monitoring network. Look how dense some of those monitoring points are, these groups are achieving spatial coverage that traditional monitoring can only day dream about. The non-traditional monitoring groups at the purple points on the map represent a large array of data collectors. On this map we have volunteers of a home owner association collecting bacteria data on the streams in their community to encourage safe disposal of horse manure. There are paid RiverKeepers who go out weekly on their tributary and collect samples with the same rigor as the CBP. And there is a research university tracking stream health recovery from acid rain in the Blue Ridge headwaters. All this data is of value and when we know of what quality it is, the uses for it can be applied in innumerable ways. One of which could be for the CBP to do their assessment work. Lea: Now, here is Nick DiPasquale, the executive director of the CBP, and a huge supporter of the Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative, who is going to speak to you about why the CBP has decided to invest in integrating volunteer and non-traditional monitoring data into the CBP.

Nontraditional and Volunteer Monitoring Groups

Vision Our Vision: Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative envisions a Chesapeake community where all data of known quality are used to inform watershed management decisions and restoration efforts. The Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative envisions a Chesapeake community where all data of known quality are used to inform watershed management decisions and restoration efforts. And, therefore… Photo courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program

Mission Our Mission: Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative works with diverse partners to collect and share new and existing water quality data. Through this collaboration, we aim to develop a comprehensive understanding of Chesapeake Bay Watershed health. Our mission is to work with diverse partners to collect and share new and existing water quality data. Through this collaboration, we aim to develop a comprehensive understanding of Chesapeake Bay Watershed health. In order to do this… Photo courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program

Needs within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed to make this happen Comparability Quality Assurance Technical Support Share Data Collaboration There are needs of the Chesapeake monitoring community that must to be met. Available, consistent and comparable field and lab methodologies A quality assurance program Technical support and resources for volunteer and non-traditional monitoring groups A central hub to share volunteer and non-traditional data in the Bay watershed that is user friendly and accessible to monitors and data users Collaboration and communication between state and federal environmental agencies and the diverse monitoring groups that will make up the cooperative Photo courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program

Comparability: consistent and comparable field and lab methodologies Based on the survey this summer, we determined the most popular physical, chemical, and biological parameters being monitors in the Bay watershed. Based on the most popular parameters measured and the most popular methods, coming soon, are visually appealing, and user friendly methods manuals that can be used by any monitoring group in the watershed to promote consistent and comparable methodologies.

Quality Assurance: to classify data of known quality Increasing QA standards

Technical support: and resources Quality Assurance Project Plans Data Quality Rubric Training Equipment QA trouble shooting Data interpretation and report card workshops Photos courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program

Share Data: A central database for Chesapeake volunteer monitoring data

Winter Spring Summer Timeline 2016 2017 Today Methods Manuals Quality Assurance Project Plans Data Quality Rubric Training Equipment Database Data Interpretation Workshops

States indicated priority areas and potential uses Data gaps Under-represented areas Impaired waters Higher frequency data required to get a more complete story of stream, river, or bay health BMP effectiveness BMP implementation plans Report cards Targeted restoration/“pollution hotspots” Lea

Biological Nontidal Monitoring CMC Project leads for biological monitoring:

Key Action 1: Limestone Streams Coastal Plain Streams

Key Action 8 BMP Effectiveness

Key Action 1 Training/training needs

Key Action 12 Training and Education

Sign up for our Newsletter @ Thank you! Project Coordinator: Lea Rubin, lrubin@iwla.org IWLA Clean Water Program Director: Danielle Donkersloot, ddonkersloot@iwla.org Sign up for our Newsletter @ ChesapeakeMonitoringCoop.org Photo courtesy of the Chesapeake Bay Program