Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
How does Wisconsin Use Indistar to Establish Goals and Track Results? Aundrea Kerkenbush, MS Education Consultant; Title I WI Department of Public Instruction.
Developing, Implementing, and Monitoring Interventions Janice Garland Lynn Sodat OSI Focus Schools Conference September 17-18, 2012.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDRESSING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES AND ENGLISH LEARNERS January 11, 2012.
MS SOARS November 18, Agenda Overview Indicators Wise Ways Expectations Upcoming training 2.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Webinar Early Childhood, Special Education, Title Program Services Kansas State Department of Education Pat Hill
Assessing Indicators and Creating a Plan Session #2.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 4 January 7, 2014 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Lighting Our Path to Stellar Learning. The Goal The ultimate goal in school improvement is for the people associated with the school to drive its continuous.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 1 October 21, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Division Liaison Update Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary January 7, 2013.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 2 November 14, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Training Division Leadership Support Team (DLST) Meeting The College of William and Mary September 16, 2013.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 3 December 12, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
WVDE System of Support Michele Blatt Office of School Improvement.
Virginia Tiered System of Supports Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia.
Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
ACADEMIC REVIEW: GOAL IS TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC SUPPORT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO HELP THE SCHOOL IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
November 7, 2013 Dr. Kathleen Smith Office of School Improvement Virginia Department of Education Academic Review and School Improvement Plans.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Collecting and reporting compliance across SEA departments Center on Innovations in Learning Academic Development Institute Stephanie Benedict.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Update Division Leadership Support Team Meeting The College of William and Mary March 31, 2014.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Michele Hayes, Kansas Learning Network Director
Providing Support to Focus and Tier III Schools
Division Liaison Update
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Reading Well by Third Grade
Guest and Leadership Team Access
Indistar® Guest Page As of 5/8/2014.
ESSA Committee of Practitioners
Response to Intervention in Educational Transformation Schools
Data-Based Decision Making
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Roles and Responsibilities
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Lessons from Virginia: Growing a System of Support for Capacity Building Indistar® Summit III April 10, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement Virginia Department of Education

School Designation Type of OSI Support The Virginia Department of Education’s Office of School Improvement (OSI) is responsible for supporting schools that do not meet requirements per the Regulations Establishing Standards for Accrediting Public Schools in Virginia and/or the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) flexibility waiver requirements. School Designation Type of OSI Support Accredited with Warning Academic Review visits Regional high school liaisons Indistar® Web-based improvement planning tool Differentiated Technical Assistance Conditionally Accredited Alternate Governance Committees Indistar® Web-based improvement planning tool Focus Schools Division liaisons Differentiated Technical Assistance School Improvement Grants (SIG) Recipients – Priority Schools Lead turnaround partner (LTP) facilitators Title I and non-Title I Schools that did not meet an annual measurable objective 523 schools representing 106 school divisions are currently using the Indistar® Web-based planning tool.

One set of indicators will not meet the varied needs of Lesson #1 One set of indicators will not meet the varied needs of low-performing schools.

The OSI has collaborated with the Center on Innovations in Learning (CIL) to create specialized sets of indicators. Each set of indicators is designed to meet the needs of specific groups of schools. Elementary and middle schools that did not meet a state and/or federal benchmark Priority schools and School Improvement Grant (SIG) schools FY 2009 SIG recipients High schools that did not meet state and/or federal benchmarks 11/11/2018

Lesson #2 Although school teams need autonomy in selecting indicators, the state educational agency should provide guidance.

Targeted Intervention Indicators All schools required to complete an improvement plan using the Indistar® Web-based planning tool must include the following targeted intervention indicators. TA01 The school uses an identification process (including ongoing conversations with instructional leadership teams and data points to be used) for all students at risk of failing or in need of targeted interventions. TA02 The school uses a tiered, differentiated intervention process to assign research-based interventions aligned with the individual needs of identified students (the process includes a description of how interventions are selected and assigned to students as well as the frequency and duration of interventions for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students). TA03 The school uses a monitoring process (including a multidisciplinary team that meets regularly to review student intervention outcome data and identifies “triggers” and next steps for unsuccessful interventions) for targeted intervention students to ensure fidelity and effectiveness. Display the list of indicators

He is a third-grade student at Happy Hills Elementary which has been identified as a focus school based on Proficiency Gap Group 2. Based on the Happy Town adaptive reading assessment, he has been identified for Tier 2 interventions. The results of the Happy Town mathematics diagnostic assessment indicate that he needs Tier 3 interventions. His teacher provides him with the following research-based interventions included in his Individualized Intervention Plan (IIP): Roaring Reader intervention program – small group lessons led by his classroom teacher 3 to 4 days per week during the 120 minute language arts block. Small group math lessons led by his teacher 3 to 4 days per week and 15-20 minutes per day on the Magnificent Math computer adaptive program. On a monthly basis, his teacher meets with the administrative team to analyze his intervention data and review work samples. On a quarterly basis, the student support team meets with his teacher and mother to review his response to interventions included in his IIP. On a quarterly basis, his principal shares the results of all Tier 2 and Tier 3 students with the division leadership team. Meet Evan TA01 TA02 TA03

Lesson #3 A division leadership team’s improvement efforts must be intentional and congruent with the indicators selected by the school.

Division Leadership Teams Local education agencies with identified low-performing schools are required to convene a division leadership team comprised of administrators and other key staff representing: Title I Instruction Special education English language learners Identified principals The division leadership team is tasked with developing, implementing, and monitoring an improvement plan aligned with the needs of its lowest-performing schools.

Question: What district improvement indicators could the Happy Hills Elementary School is identified as a focus school due to Proficiency Gap Group 1. The school improvement team identified a need for teachers to plan units of instruction in reading based on student data. As a result, the following rapid improvement school indicator was selected for inclusion in the school improvement plan: ID13 – Instructional teams meet for blocks of time (4 to 6 hour blocks, once a month; whole days before and after the school year) sufficient to develop and refine units of instruction and review student learning data. Show worksheet and sample district plan Question: What district improvement indicators could the Happy Hills division leadership team include in their improvement plan to support the school’s selected indicator?

Sample Worksheet for Aligning Division- and School-Level Improvement Plans

Lesson #4 Division- and school-level teams must continually analyze data associated with their respective improvement plans, and use this information to make informed decisions regarding instruction and revision to tasks.

Decisions Division School Indistar Data Focus Questions Division leadership teams meet with school leadership teams to review data related to tasks included in the division- and school-level improvement plans as well as the data included in the Virginia Department of Education-approved data query system. These data will be used to revise the plans as appropriate. Decisions made as a result of these discussions must be entered into the meeting minutes for the division leadership team. Focus Questions Based on the data, what school-level tasks were successful? Division-level tasks? Based on the data, what are the major areas of concern for students who received Tier 2 interventions in reading? In mathematics? Based on the data, what are the major areas of concern for students who received Tier 3 interventions in reading? In mathematics? Based on the data, what are the major areas of concern for students representing the identified proficiency gap groups? What additional support is needed from the division to support intervention efforts for Tier 2 and Tier 3 students? 6) What tasks need to be added, revised, or discontinued in the school-level plan? Division-level plan? School Division Data + Discussions Decisions = Continuous Improvement Decisions Display pages 18-22 of the focus school guide Indistar Data

Lesson #5 The Indistar® Web-based planning tool should be the “one-stop shop” for improvement planning and other requirements.

How does Virginia use Indistar® to support its ESEA flexibility waiver requirements?

Answers: Indistar® is the required improvement planning tool for identified focus and priority schools as well as any Title I school that did not meet an annual measurable objective. The division- and school-level plans will be the key to monitoring each local educational agency’s compliance with the ESEA flexibility waiver provisions. In Virginia, both plans are submitted via the Indistar® Dashboard. All required documents for focus and priority schools are maintained on the Indistar® Dashboard. Examples include: Meeting agendas and minutes Leading and lagging indicator reports Data query system approval forms

The Indistar® Web-based planning tool serves as a “one-stop shop” for Virginia schools that are receiving services from the Office of School Improvement. A variety of essential reporting documents are posted on the dashboard for school and division leadership teams to use. 11/11/2018

School and division leadership teams submit the required reporting documents via the Indistar® Dashboard. 11/11/2018

Additional documents to help school and division leadership teams with developing and implementing their improvement plans are posted under the tab, “Doc and Links”.

If you build it, they will come! Lesson #6 If you build it, they will come!

Good News Travels Fast! Thirteen (13) Virginia school divisions are using Indistar® on a voluntary basis.