Dougherty, D. A., Science, 1996, 271,163..

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some applications related to Chapter 11 material: We will see how the kind of basic science we discussed in Chapter 11 will probably lead to good advances.
Advertisements

Mohammad A. Omary Department of Chemistry, University of North Texas (from my post-doctoral work with Professor John Fackler at Texas A&M University)
Redox Reactions (con’t): eg: Al (s) + Cu 2+ (aq)  Cu (s) + Al 3+ (aq) The fact that this reaction takes place tells us that:  Cu 2+ is a stronger oxidizing.
Coordination Polymers of Silver Arienne King Chem 765: Advanced Polymer Chemistry October 30, 2000.
Infrared Spectra of Chloride- Fluorobenzene Complexes in the Gas Phase: Electrostatics versus Hydrogen Bonding Holger Schneider OSU International Symposium.
Topic: pH and Indicators
This Part 2 of  acids and bases illustrates the implementation of the “Research for the Classroom” program in this 4610/5560 course “Research for the.
Velocity Map Imaging Study of a Mass-Selected Ion Beam: the Photoinitiated Charge-Transfer Dissociation of and Ag + (C 6 H 6 ) Jonathon A. Maner, Daniel.
Some applications related to Chapter 11 material: We will see how the kind of basic science we discussed in Chapter 11 will probably lead to good advances.
学 术 报 告 报告名称: Functional Inorganic Materials: Molecular Recognition, Chiral Separation and Water Oxidation   报告人:Prof.Samar Kumar Das 时间: (周二)
Towards the Synthesis and Characterization of Copper(I)-Arene Compounds Using Phenyl- and Naphthyl-Appended NS2-Macrocyclic Ligands Thora R. Maltais.;
Colin Swenson Tewoderos Ayele University of Utah
Dougherty, D. A., Science, 1996, 271,163..
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Forces & Interactions Magnets and Magnetism.
Investigation of the Effect of Ligands on Metal-to-Ligand Charge Transfer Transitions using d10-complexes of Group 11 Elements Evangelos Rossis, Roy Planalp,
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Pathogen Recognition: TLRs Throw Us a Curve
Name: _______________________________
Combinatorial chemistry
DFT Calculations of Trinuclear Complexes
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Natalie Zeytuni, Raz Zarivach  Structure 
The 3D models in part a are reproduced with permission from Daum, B
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
[Hg3(m-C6F4)3]. Naphthalene p-acid/p-base adduct
The Importance of Metal Aqueous Speciation
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Autoinhibition of kinesin-1 motor
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
Colin Swenson Tewoderos Ayele University of Utah
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
monochrome AgX material
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Flavivirus particle assembly
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Fig. 1 A single amino acid difference in the ATP-binding domain of GSK3α and GSK3β results in structural and topological differences. A single amino acid.
Crystal Structure of the Vanadate-Inhibited Ca2+-ATPase
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Crystal Structure of SRP19 in Complex with the S Domain of SRP RNA and Its Implication for the Assembly of the Signal Recognition Particle  Chris Oubridge,
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Body Mapping. Body Mapping Chemical Body Mapping Activity For this activity at your tables you will do a specific Chemical exposure Body Map Use the.
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The positive (blue) and negative (red) electrostatic potential isosurfaces [obtained using APBS (61) and traced in PyMol (62) at 0.7 kT/e] of cytP450cam.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Mapping the surface interaction profile of the 30S ribosomal subunit on a multifunctional graphene grid. Mapping the surface interaction profile of the.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Department of Chemistry University of Kentucky
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Motif sequence logo and surface analysis of LC8.
Let’s Learn the Basic Colors
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages (October 2001)
Structure of the HLA-DR10 β subunit and ligand binding sites.
Presentation transcript:

Dougherty, D. A., Science, 1996, 271,163.

Red = most negative electrostatic potentials (most basic regions) Blue = most positive electrostatic potentials (most acidic regions) Dougherty et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 93, pp. 10566–10571, October 1996 Chemistry

OR p base p acid Burini; Fackler; Omary; Staples et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11264-11265. TRHg

DFT Calculations of Trinuclear Complexes [Hg(C6F4)]3 [Au(bzim)]3 Electrost. Pot. (a.u.) -0.0300 0.0300

Electrostatic Potential Surfaces [Hg(C6F4)]3 green = positive [Au(bzim)]3 red = negative p-Electrostatic interaction

ADF Calculations {[Au(carb)]3}2 DIMER Green= positive Red=negative

SUPER WHOPPER!! p base p acid p base

SUPRAMOLECULAR CHAIN ASSEMBLIES p base p acid p base p acid Burini; Fackler; Omary; Staples et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11264-11265.

Solid-state example: p acid p base p acid p base p acid Phosphorescence at RT in the solid-state!! = 568 ± 8 ms (RT)

Complexation of [Hg(o-C6F4)]3, 1, with aromatic hydrocarbons… RGB bright phosphorescent emissions for the 1:1 solid adducts Omary; Kassab; Haneline; Elbjeirami; Gabbai Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 2176-2178.

Au3(carb)3.octafluoronaphthalene t = 3.6 ms p acid p base p acid p base

R= e-withdrawing (e.g., CF3) makes it more of a p acid R= e-releasing (e.g., Me; i-Pr; t-Bu)  makes it more of a p base M= Cu; Ag; Au Metal effect??…

red=most negative= strong p base; blue=most positive= strong p acid; DFT-calculated electrostatic potentials mapped on the electron density surfaces of M3Pz3 complexes. Color code: red=most negative= strong p base; blue=most positive= strong p acid; Yellow= neutral/weak p base green=neutral/weak p acid Cu3Pz3 Ag3Pz3, Au3Pz3 Pz ligands here have R=Me groups on them all

All strong p acids But given previous slide we think that the Ag3 compound would be the strongest p acid Calculations done by Alex Gonser, as a CHEM5610 classroom project last year.

SUMMARY Ligand effect: R= e-withdrawing (e.g., CF3) makes it more of a p acid R= e-releasing (e.g., Me; i-Pr; t-Bu)  makes it more of a p base Metal effect: Relative p basicity: Au>Cu>Ag Relative p acidity: Ag>Cu>Au M= Cu; Ag; Au If you want to react with naphthalene (p base), what would you choose for R and M to form an acid-base adduct?

Maha Eldabaja (4610 student here doing research in the Omary group)… Maha Eldabaja (4610 student here doing research in the Omary group)….just got crystals of an adduct for [Ag(3,5-(CF3)2Pz)]3 with naphthalene and found that it has green emission, consistent with naphthalene phosphorescence

(let’s hear it for Maha!!) Maha Eldabaja (4610 student here doing research in the Omary group)….just got crystals of an adduct for [Ag(3,5-(CF3)2Pz)]3 with naphthalene and found that it has green emission, consistent with naphthalene phosphorescence (let’s hear it for Maha!!) Chi2 : 1.032 Durbin Watson : 1.85 Z : 374.2 Pre-exp. 1 : 825.2 ±1.638E+001 Lifetime 1 : 1.575E+004 ms ±6.652E+002 Offset : 26.5 t = ~ 16 ms