Standards and the International Polar Year Standards and the International Polar Year Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa National Snow and Ice Data Center IEEE GRS-S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Advertisements

SCAR Feature Type Catalogue
Antarctic Digital Database A Paul R Cooper (GIS Manager)
A Roadmap of Open Source components for GI Web Services and Clients A Paul R Cooper MAGIC.
Geoscience Information Network Stephen M Richard Arizona Geological Survey National Geothermal Data System.
Developing the ICSU World Data System (WDS) Mustapha Mokrane ICSU Secretariat Science and Information Technology Officer.
Subject Based Information Gateways in The UK Coordinated Activities in The UK Within the UK Higher Education community, the JISC (Joint Information Systems.
Smart Qualitative Data: Methods and Community Tools for Data Mark-Up SQUAD Libby Bishop Online Qualitative Data Resources: Best Practice in Metadata Creation.
Geographic Interoperability Office ISO and OGC Geographic Information Service Architecture George Percivall NASA Geographic.
Status Report GEO Task AR Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa Ryosuke Shibasaki.
IPY and Semantics Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Paul Cooper Peter Pulsifer Paul Overduin Eugeny Vyazilov Heather lane.
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
Information and Business Work
NERC Data Grid Helen Snaith and the NDG consortium …
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards 9/6/04 Briefing on Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC)’s Web Services (OWS) Initiative.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
The IPY Data and Information Service—How do we get there? IPY Data Workshop Cambridge, England 3 March 2006 World Data Center for Glaciology, Boulder Facilitating.
Interoperability ERRA System.
Business Analysis and Essential Competencies
The Potentials and Limitations of Coastal Web Atlases Valerie Cummins, Director Coastal Zone ‘07, Oregon.
COINE Cultural Objects in Networked Environments.
Data and information—the legacy of the IPY Mark A. Parsons
1 The NERC DataGrid DataGrid The NERC DataGrid DataGrid AHM 2003 – 2 Sept, 2003 e-Science Centre Metadata of the NERC DataGrid Kevin O’Neill CCLRC e-Science.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
Documenting Inuit Knowledge Using Distributed Information and Multimedia Interfaces Knowledge Preservation and Sharing through Partnership Pulsifer, Peter.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
19/10/20151 Semantic WEB Scientific Data Integration Vladimir Serebryakov Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of Science Proposal: SkTech.RC/IT/Madnick.
The Digital Library for Earth System Science: Contributing resources and collections Meeting with GLOBE 5/29/03 Holly Devaul.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
Problems/Disc. Adoption of standards Should there be standards? (not a big problem – responsibility lies with data centre – onus not on scientist) (peer.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Making Geological Map Data for the Earth Accessible OneGeology: assisting Geological Surveys worldwide to interoperate seamlessly on the Next Generation.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 1, 2004 Descriptive Metadata: “Modeling the World”
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
MEDIN Work Plan for By March 2011 MEDIN will be 3 years into the original 5 year development plan started in Would normally ask for continued.
INTO THE NEW YEAR January 3, Objectives Reaffirm principles –China’s interest in exploring ESIP structure prompted review of ESIP evolution (more.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
IPY Data Management Mark A. Parsons co-chair IPY Data Policy and Management Subcommittee eGY Meeting Boulder, Colorado, USA 13 March 2006 World Data Center.
1 Understanding Cataloging with DLESE Metadata Karon Kelly Katy Ginger Holly Devaul
Breakout # 1 – Data Collecting and Making It Available Data definition “ Any information that [environmental] researchers need to accomplish their tasks”
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Public Access and Spatial Metadata Values: Semantic Network Services Response to EU Directives Maria Rüther Federal Environment Agency,
Open Geospatial Consortium Overview and why we are adopting the standards.
International Polar Year Data Management CODATA06 Beijing, China 25 October 2006 Mark A. Parsons IPY Data Policy and Management Sub-committee IPY Data.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
1 e-Arts and Humanities Scoping an e-Science Agenda Sheila Anderson Arts and Humanities Data Service Arts and Humanities e-Science Support Centre King’s.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
May 2010 GGIM, New York City The National System for Coordination of Territorial Information SNIT NSDI of Chile.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
International Polar Year Data Management Activities at NSIDC Mark A. Parsons PoDAG Boulder, Colorado 16 February 2005 World Data Center for Glaciology,
Collection Description considerations in the nof-digitise programme Sarah Mitchell Programme Manager New Opportunities Fund.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
IFLA: International Advocacy Programme. Address the information gap of library workers at community, national and regional levels Build capacity among.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
Informatics for Scientific Data Bio-informatics and Medical Informatics Week 9 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information.
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
Grid Services for Digital Archive Tao-Sheng Chen Academia Sinica Computing Centre
Priorities for International Development of e-Infrastructure and Data Management in Global Change Research Presentation by Robert Gurney, University of.
Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE]
RDA US Science workshop Arlington VA, Aug 2014 Cees de Laat with many slides from Ed Seidel/Rob Pennington.
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
COMPASS: A Geospatial Knowledge Infrastructure Managed with Ontologies
eGY Planning Meeting Boulder, February 2005
Presentation transcript:

Standards and the International Polar Year Standards and the International Polar Year Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa National Snow and Ice Data Center IEEE GRS-S liaison to ISO TC211 A Paul Cooper British Antarctic Survey SCAR liaison to ISO TC211

Summary The IPY is a major international, interdisciplinary scientific event. The IPY is a major international, interdisciplinary scientific event. The size and scope of the IPY provide unprecedented opportunities and challenges. The size and scope of the IPY provide unprecedented opportunities and challenges. Standards will play an important role in achieving the goals of the IPY. Standards will play an important role in achieving the goals of the IPY.

What is IPY? An intense, internationally coordinated campaign of research in polar science An intense, internationally coordinated campaign of research in polar science Covers a wide range of scientific disciplines, including the social sciences Covers a wide range of scientific disciplines, including the social sciences Emphasis on public education and training of the next generation of engineers, scientists, and leaders. Emphasis on public education and training of the next generation of engineers, scientists, and leaders.

Background to IPY First IPY in 1882/83, 2 nd in 1932/33 First IPY in 1882/83, 2 nd in 1932/33 The 3 rd IPY became the IGY in 1957/58 The 3 rd IPY became the IGY in 1957/58 – Fostered a new era in Antarctic collaboration – Resulted in The Antarctic Treaty – Left a network of World Data Centres Fifty years later, IPY 2007/08 Fifty years later, IPY 2007/08 – Simultaneous with eGY, IHY and International Year of Planet Earth

World Data Centres 52 WDCs located in Europe, South Africa, Russia, Japan, India, China, South America, Australia, Canada, and the United States 52 WDCs located in Europe, South Africa, Russia, Japan, India, China, South America, Australia, Canada, and the United States Discipline based Discipline based – E.G. Antarctic Glaciological Data Center Provide access to data and publications Provide access to data and publications Often hosted within larger archives or bodies Often hosted within larger archives or bodies – National Snow and Ice Data Center – Scott Polar Research Institute Active in international standards coordination Active in international standards coordination

Size and Scope of IPY 60 nations 60 nations – most have representation on TC211 Estimated 50,000 participants Estimated 50,000 participants – includes technicians, crew, etc., in addition to scientists Vast in scientific scope: genomic sequences to the geoelectric circuit Vast in scientific scope: genomic sequences to the geoelectric circuit Very wide range in knowledge of and involvement with standards Very wide range in knowledge of and involvement with standards

Goals of the IPY Have an interdisciplinary emphasis, with active inclusion of the social sciences Have an interdisciplinary emphasis, with active inclusion of the social sciences Link researchers across different fields to address questions and issues lying beyond the scope of individual disciplines Link researchers across different fields to address questions and issues lying beyond the scope of individual disciplines Strengthen international coordination of research and enhance international collaboration and cooperation Strengthen international coordination of research and enhance international collaboration and cooperation

Goals of the IPY - continued Leave a legacy of observing sites, research facilities, data, and systems to support ongoing polar research and monitoring. Leave a legacy of observing sites, research facilities, data, and systems to support ongoing polar research and monitoring. Engage the awareness, interest and understanding of schoolchildren, the general public and decision-makers worldwide. Engage the awareness, interest and understanding of schoolchildren, the general public and decision-makers worldwide. Effective data management important to all of these goals. Effective data management important to all of these goals.

Data Management and the IPY To achieve its aims, IPY must build a strong, cross disciplinary international data sharing community. To achieve its aims, IPY must build a strong, cross disciplinary international data sharing community. Data products must be accessible Data products must be accessible Data products will need to be at many levels Data products will need to be at many levels – Raw data products for domain experts – Consolidated products for researchers in other fields – Summary information for policy makers

IPY Data Management Workshop Held at the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, England 3-4 March 2006 Held at the British Antarctic Survey in Cambridge, England 3-4 March 2006 Hosted by NSIDC and the IPY Programme Office Hosted by NSIDC and the IPY Programme Office Recommendations from this workshop form the basis of this presentation Recommendations from this workshop form the basis of this presentation

The IPY DIS The primary goal of the workshop was to develop an implementation plan for the IPY Data and Information Service The primary goal of the workshop was to develop an implementation plan for the IPY Data and Information Service Includes a Data Coordination Office Includes a Data Coordination Office – assistance with standards compliance – development of union catalog Education – Data Stories Education – Data Stories Innovative data discovery and access Innovative data discovery and access

Models for Data Discovery Central catalogue service Central catalogue service – Single point of failure – Would not serve community-specific needs Multiple catalogs interconnected through XML-based metadata harvesting protocols Multiple catalogs interconnected through XML-based metadata harvesting protocols – Information shared through union catalogue – Individual catalogs harvest metadata they require – Can develop discovery and access interfaces most appropriate to each community – Capture user interaction patterns to enhance future use

Enabling Interoperability The IPYDIS must encourage interoperability at all levels. The IPYDIS must encourage interoperability at all levels. At its most basic, interoperability is the ability for different software and hardware to share and use data At its most basic, interoperability is the ability for different software and hardware to share and use data – definition belies the complexity of the problem, especially when sharing data across cultures and scientific disciplines.

The Standards Suitable standards exist for many of the components needed for an IPY system Suitable standards exist for many of the components needed for an IPY system – Existing standards may need extending – Some new standards may be required IPY is in a position to influence standards development IPY is in a position to influence standards development – Via national standards bodies e.g. BSI, ANSI, DIN e.g. BSI, ANSI, DIN – Via Liaison bodies e.g. SCAR, WMO, IEEE, UNEP e.g. SCAR, WMO, IEEE, UNEP

Why Geospatial Standards? Most environmental data are geospatial. Most environmental data are geospatial. Many other data have a geographic component. Many other data have a geographic component. Geography is a common linking theme between disciplines. Geography is a common linking theme between disciplines. Geospatial Standards (ISO, OGC) are mature and have many implementations. Geospatial Standards (ISO, OGC) are mature and have many implementations.

Recommendations Require projects to provide ISO compatible metadata using XML-based transport formats where possible. Require projects to provide ISO compatible metadata using XML-based transport formats where possible. Assist in developing and encouraging community-specific profiles of ISO Assist in developing and encouraging community-specific profiles of ISO In cases where ISO is inappropriate or inadequate (e.g. artifacts, multimedia) the IPYDIS should encourage the use of international library and archival standards. In cases where ISO is inappropriate or inadequate (e.g. artifacts, multimedia) the IPYDIS should encourage the use of international library and archival standards.

IPY DIS Services Data Discovery Data Discovery Mapping services Mapping services Data delivery services Data delivery services Service chaining Service chaining – Image processing – Reprojection, reformatting

What We Have WMS, WFS and WCS well specified by OGC WMS, WFS and WCS well specified by OGC WMS delivers maps via simple URL requests WMS delivers maps via simple URL requests – Suitable for data exploration – OGC SLD and ISO (Portrayal) WFS, WCS deliver data via XML requests WFS, WCS deliver data via XML requests – Suitable for detailed analysis Use needs to be refined in light of other standards Use needs to be refined in light of other standards – ISO and ISO (Feature Catalogue and Data Dictionary) – ISO and ISO (Data quality principles and evaluation)

Need Steps Data Discovery services Data Discovery services – Tailored to specific disciplines – Requires adequate metadata (and ISO 19139) Semantic interoperability Semantic interoperability Need services built on standards such as Need services built on standards such as – ISO (Feature Catalogues) – ISO (Data Dictionary) – ISO and ISO (Metadata) – ISO (Services) – NWIP on Cross-Domain Vocabularies

Semantics Metadata and data standards, while essential, only partially address the issues of interoperability in the cross-cultural, interdisciplinary IPY domain. Metadata and data standards, while essential, only partially address the issues of interoperability in the cross-cultural, interdisciplinary IPY domain. Technical terminonolgy is often discipline specific Technical terminonolgy is often discipline specific Semantic interoperability desirable when a large range of disciplines are attempting to share data and information. Semantic interoperability desirable when a large range of disciplines are attempting to share data and information.

Statement of Problem Each science domain or community develops its own terminology to describe concepts, resources (objects, data) and relationships Each science domain or community develops its own terminology to describe concepts, resources (objects, data) and relationships Data discovery and data sharing depend critically on being able to attach unambiguous meaning to the terms used to describe domain knowledge Data discovery and data sharing depend critically on being able to attach unambiguous meaning to the terms used to describe domain knowledge Different domains have used different means of codifying domain knowledge Different domains have used different means of codifying domain knowledge

Knowledge Organization Systems Controlled vocabularies Controlled vocabularies – Glossaries, Dictionaries, Thesauri – Gazetteers Classification Schemes Classification Schemes – Taxonomies – Feature catalogs Ontologies Ontologies

Ontologies Expressed in a formal conceptual language (UML, ERD, RDF, OWL,...) Expressed in a formal conceptual language (UML, ERD, RDF, OWL,...) Uses symbols, text, rules, axioms to express: Uses symbols, text, rules, axioms to express: – classes (conceptualizations of objects) – instances of classes – properties of classes – relationships between classes

Process There is no one correct way to model a domain There is no one correct way to model a domain – there are always viable alternatives. Ontology development is necessarily an iterative process. Ontology development is necessarily an iterative process.

Approaches – Top Down Rarely based on consensus of community Rarely based on consensus of community Our intent is to draw upon existing domain knowledge representations in each IPY discipline Our intent is to draw upon existing domain knowledge representations in each IPY discipline – Investigate tools for bringing these knowledge bases into a common system

Approaches – Bottom Up System for assigning subject metadata System for assigning subject metadata – tagging interface, folksonomy – High level terms from defined domain specification – Leave discovery to web services such as Google – Analyze relationships of tags and users to extract a light ontology – Allow community review and editing

Recommendations The IPYDIS should encourage the development of formal semantic approaches to interoperability (e.g., ontologies) in areas where needed. The IPYDIS should encourage the development of formal semantic approaches to interoperability (e.g., ontologies) in areas where needed. This will require a phased, community-based approach that could include formal use cases and informal approaches to soliciting community input (e.g. wikis, social book marking, etc.) This will require a phased, community-based approach that could include formal use cases and informal approaches to soliciting community input (e.g. wikis, social book marking, etc.)

Final Words Many nations around the world will be cooperating Many nations around the world will be cooperating Many organizations with different infrastructures Many organizations with different infrastructures IPY systems must be open IPY systems must be open Specify interoperability at the interfaces Specify interoperability at the interfaces Must not depend on proprietary software or other intellectual property. Must not depend on proprietary software or other intellectual property.

Summary The IPY is a major international, interdisciplinary scientific event. The IPY is a major international, interdisciplinary scientific event. The size and scope of the IPY provide unprecedented opportunities and challenges. The size and scope of the IPY provide unprecedented opportunities and challenges. Standards will play an important role in achieving the goals of the IPY. Standards will play an important role in achieving the goals of the IPY.

Resources