October 23-26, 2012: AOMIP/FAMOS meetings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parameterization of orographic related momentum
Advertisements

Meteorologisches Institut der Universität München
Salt rejection, advection, and mixing in the MITgcm coupled ocean and sea-ice model AOMIP/(C)ARCMIP / SEARCH for DAMOCLES Workshop, Paris Oct 29-31, 2007.
HYCOM and the need for overflow/entrainment parameterizations.
Temperature and salinity variability of the Atlantic Water in the Eastern Eurasian Basin between 1991 and 2011 Meri Korhonen R/V Akademik Fedorov, August.
Исследование изменчивости системы океан- лед Северного ледовитого океана на основе совместного моделирования Е.Н.Голубева и Г.А.Платов Institute of Computational.
Decadal changes in ocean chlorophyll
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
Challenges in Modeling Global Sea Ice in a Changing Environment Marika M Holland National Center for Atmospheric Research Marika M Holland National Center.
EGU 2012, Kristine S. Madsen, High resolution modelling of the decreasing Arctic sea ice Kristine S. Madsen, T.A.S. Rasmussen, J. Blüthgen and.
Numerical International Polar Year Andrey Proshutinsky and AOMIP group, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop, February.
Atlantic water transports to the Arctic and their impact on sea ice
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Downscaling Future Climate Scenarios for the North Sea 2006 ROMS/TOMS Workshop, Alcalá de Henares, 6-8 November Bjørn Ådlandsvik Institute of Marine Research.
Validation Analysis of the 0.72˚ HYCOM/CICE run Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Pam Posey, Joe Metzger, Alan Wallcraft, and Eric Chassignet.
The Gent-McWilliams parameterization of ocean eddies in climate models Peter Gent National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Validation of decadal simulations of mesoscale structures in the North Sea and Skagerrak Jon Albretsen and Lars Petter Røed.
Arctic System Model workshop III Montreal, Canada, July 17 th, :50 – 11:10 Ocean/Atmosphere observations A. Proshutinsky, WHOI a)Model forcing validation.
The dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice module in the Bergen Climate Model Helge Drange and Mats Bentsen Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center Bjerknes.
Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb.
Experience with ROMS for Downscaling IPCC Climate Models 2008 ROMS/TOMS European Workshop, Grenoble, 6-8 October Bjørn Ådlandsvik, Paul Budgell, Vidar.
Changes to the KPP Vertical Mixing Parameterization
Hydro-Thermo Dynamic Model: HTDM-1.0
Sea ice modeling at met.no Keguang Wang Norwegian Meteorological Institute.
Climate forcing of C. finmarchicus populations of the North Atlantic WHOI PIs: D. McGillicuddy and P. Wiebe UConn PI: A. Bucklin Rutgers PIs: D. Haidvogel.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
KORDI’s observation project focusing on the tropical western Pacific Jae Hak Lee () Jae Hak Lee ( 李載學 ) Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute.
NUMERICAL STUDY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN OUTFLOW WITH A SIMPLIFIED TOPOGRAPHY Sergio Ramírez-Garrido, Jordi Solé, Antonio García-Olivares, Josep L. Pelegrí.
Adjoint modeling in cryosphere Patrick Heimbach MIT/EAPS, Cambridge, MA, USA
Interannual to decadal variability of circulation in the northern Japan/East Sea, Dmitry Stepanov 1, Victoriia Stepanova 1 and Anatoly Gusev.
Coastal Oceanography Outline Global coastal ocean Dynamics Western boundary current systems Eastern boundary current systems Polar ocean boundaries Semi-enclosed.
Freshwater transformations in the Beaufort Gyre and model intercomparison results Andrey Proshutinsky, Rick Krishfield, John Toole Woods Hole Oceanographic.
15 Annual AOMIP Meeting. WHOI, 1- 4 November 2011 Numerical modeling of the Atlantic Water distribution in the upper Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity studies.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
The North Atlantic Inflow to the Arctic Ocean from observations and high ‐ resolution modelling Yevgeny Aksenov 1, Sheldon Bacon 1, George Nurser 1, Vladimir.
Numerical modeling of Atlantic and Pacific waters dynamics Elena Golubeva Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics Siberian Branch.
Dmitry Dukhovskoy, Andrey Proshutinsky and Mary-Louise Timmermans Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies Florida State University Acknowledgement:
1 Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean – can we estimate the heat supplied through its inflow? Ursula Schauer + Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller, Eberhard Fahrbach,
E. Golubeva, G.Platov, M.Krayneva, D.Yusupova Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, SB RAS Novosibirsk,
Climate System Research Center, Geosciences Alan Condron Peter Winsor, Chris Hill and Dimitris Menemenlis Changes in the Arctic freshwater budget in response.
Coordinated experiments to identify roles of different factors in the ocean dynamics and hydrography Andrey Proshutinsky 1, Eiji Watanabe 2, Elena Golubeva.
Impact of sea ice dynamics on the Arctic climate variability – a model study H.E. Markus Meier, Sebastian Mårtensson and Per Pemberton Swedish.
Gent-McWilliams parameterization: 20/20 Hindsight Peter R. Gent Senior Scientist National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Global Warming And the Planetary Water Cycle Ruth Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Ruth Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Global Warming.
ESSL Holland, CCSM Workshop 0606 Predicting the Earth System Across Scales: Both Ways Summary:Rationale Approach and Current Focus Improved Simulation.
Guoping Gao 1, Changsheng Chen 1, Andrey Proshuntinsky 2 and Robert. C. Beardsley 2 1 Department of Fisheries Oceanography University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.
Impacts of Vertical Momentum Mixing in an Arctic Ocean Model Youyu Lu 1, Greg Holloway 2, Ji Lei 1 1 Bedford Institute of Oceanography 2 Institute of Ocean.
A Dynamical Model of the Beaufort Gyre: A Balance between Ekman Pumping and Eddy Fluxes Jiayan Yang & Andrey Proshutinsky Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
On (in)correctness of estimating heat flux across a single section Wieslaw Maslowski Naval Postgraduate School AOMIP Workshop, Woods Hole, MA, October,
Outline of the talk Why study Arctic Boundary current? Methods Eddy-permitting/resolving simulations Observational evidence Mechanisms of the current.
Changsheng Chen 1, Guoping Gao 1, Andrey Proshuntinsky 2 and Robert C. Beardsley 2 1 Department of Fisheries Oceanography University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.
Intercomparison of ocean circulation in regional Arctic Ocean models at increasing spatial resolution – Preliminary Results Robert Osinski, Wieslaw Maslowski.
Coupling ROMS and CSIM in the Okhotsk Sea Rebecca Zanzig University of Washington November 7, 2006.
Modeling Seasonal to Decadal Climate Variability using the Regional Arctic System Model W. Maslowski 1 and the RASM Team (25+ researchers from 10 institutions)
ASOF II Objectives What are the fluxes of mass, heat, liquid freshwater and ice from the Arctic Ocean into the subpolar North Atlantic? How will anticipated.
Studies on Atlantic Water circulation in the Arctic Ocean:
Impacts of Climate and basin-scale variability on the seeding and production of Calanus finmarchicus in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank Avijit Gangopadhyay.
Mesoscale eddies and shelf-basin exchange in the western Arctic Ocean
Gennady A. Platov, Elena N. Golubeva, Victor I. Kuzin
Nguyen, An T. , D. Menemenlis, R
Coordinated water circulation experiments in 2013
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Effects of Glacial Melting on the East Greenland Current
The Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 Simulations
John (Qiang) Wang, Paul G. Myers, Xianmin Hu, Andrew B.G. Bush
Xuezhu Wang, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Thomas Jung,
Deep Circulation Changes in density cause ocean currents Cold Warm
Secondary Circulation in the Danish straits
Presentation transcript:

October 23-26, 2012: AOMIP/FAMOS meetings Workshop #16 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole   Simulation of the variability of the Atlantic Water circulation in the Arctic Ocean: Model sensitivity studies Elena Golubeva Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics, SB RAS Novosibirsk, Russia

Atlantic Waters enter the Arctic ocean through the Fram Strait and Barents Sea and bring warm and salty water into the Arctic Ocean forming the so-called Atlantic layer. Currently assumed (after Rudels et al.,1994) that Atlantic waters in the Arctic move in the cyclonic sense as a boundary current topographically steered along continental slope and ridges. However, the numerous observational data collected during the last decades do not answer the question about the stability of this path. Are there other possible pathways of the Atlantic water? How important are the exchange processes between the boundary current and the interior of the Arctic Ocean or the arctic shelves?

Numerical model can be powerful tool for the circulation investigation, but first we are not sure that it simulates the correct circulation. According to our modeling experience numerical results are very sensitive to Atmosphere forcing Numerical grid resolution Sub-grid processes parameterization Advection numerical scheme Initial T-S-condition

CICE 3.14 ICMMG regional ocean model Atmosphere forcing NCEP/NCAR, CORE1,CORE2,…….. 1948-2011 CICE 3.14 ICMMG regional ocean model

RUN 1 1948-2011 Atm.Forcing- CORE2, PHC for initial T and S Numerical grid: 34-50км , 32 vertical levels

?

Averaged over region temperature change during the numerical run. What was wrong with 1985?

100 m 400 m 1000 m Back to the historical data Arctic circulation based on the density observational data for 1955 -1956 A.F.Treshnikov,G.I.Baranov,1972

Sensitivity to numerical grid resolution 34-50км , 32 vertical levels 14-19км 38 vertical levels

14-19км 38 vertical levels

Numerical grid resolution: 34-50км , 14-19км 32 vertical levels 38 vertical levels Temperature and velocity distribution at the depth of 400 m for 1975.

The AW circulation path in numerical model based on the coarse numerical grid is very unstable. Temperature distribution in the Atlantic layer is very sensitive to the numerical grid resolution. The main direction of the AW path in numerical model used 34-50 km resolution is similar to results for 14-19 km resolution. Thank you! Проблемы моделей