Ohio Resident Educator Program: Focusing on Years 3 and 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Advertisements

Year 2 Formative Progress Review
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Springboro Community City School District Todd Petrey, Superintendent Jamie Miles, 8 th Grade Science Teacher SEA Vice-President.
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
Dr. Deborah Gober and Dr. Anna Wan Columbus State University
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Teacher Evaluation A Metric for Performance
Transformative Practices Andrea Whittaker, Stanford University Sharon E. Russell, CalStateTEACH Teacher Performance Assessment: Use to Improve Candidate.
Student Success Task Force. 1.Increase college and career readiness 2.Strengthen support for entering students 3.Incentivize successful student behaviors.
Team Teaching Section 2: Traditional Team Teaching.
Mentoring CTE Teachers through the Resident Educator Program: Support for Success Jane Briggs, Lead Mentor, Eastland Career Center Michelle.
Teacher Evaluation Model
1 UW-Whitewater & CESA 2 Licensure Renewal & Support Center.
Resident Educator and Mentoring Programs March 19 th, 2015 Elizabeth Sailer.
EdTPA World Languages NYSAFLT Rochester Regional March 8, 2014 Dr. Nancy Barnett Empire State College MAT Program
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted only pursuant.
Ohio Board of Regents Update OCTEO: October 2013.
Applying for National Board Certification: Applying for National Board Certification: What You Need to Know.
Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) Prepared by the CSUS College of Education for Our Field Partners in the Teacher Preparation Programs.
Pinellas - TNTP Project ESE Advisory Meeting September 17, 2014.
Shared Services for Supporting New Teachers Dr. Thomas G. ReedDr. Thomas G. Reed, Executive Director, Center for Achievement and Leadership Dr. Teresa.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Professional Performance Process Principal Level Meetings October 19 & 22, 2009.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
KSU Faculty Retreat Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Raising Achievement and Improving Graduation Rates: How Nine HSTW Sites Are Doing It Gene Bottoms Southern Regional.
Examining Student Work and Data Professional Learning Community Action Teams PUSD Instructional Services-PLC Action Team Training Fall 2008.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
Orientation 1. 1.A New System for Ohio 2.What is Residency? 3.Why Residency? 4.Ohio Resident Educator Program 5.Ohio’s Resident Educator: “What do I need.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Using Assessment Data Helen Thumann Department of Education.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
PI 34 Synopsis Wisconsin Quality Educator Initiative.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
DR. ELKE SCHNEIDER (PHD) DR. KELLY M. COSTNER (PHD) PROJECT FUNDED BY A US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
Learning Sciences International Develops and provides the 21 st Century Teaching & Learning Series for the CFF initiative. Provides the e MBEDDED L EARNING.
Mentoring and Induction Journey to Excellence Iowa Training Model for Mentors of Beginning Educators.
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide Q & A Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process May 28, 2013.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Name Tags Elizabeth Sailer 2005 Mentor/PC Lori Jones-Parker 2015 Program Specialist Brandi Hutson 2013 Mentor Name Year you started supporting beginning.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
Orientation 1. 1.A New System for Ohio 2.What is Residency? 3.Why Residency? 4.Ohio Resident Educator Program 5.Ohio’s Resident Educator: “What do I need.
Resident Educator Program Orientation. “ How can I be a better educator tomorrow than I am today?” The one question to never stop asking… 2.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
Introductory Training for Establishing and Maintaining Local Professional Development Committees Center for the Teaching Profession ∙ October 2015.
Resident Educator Summative Assessment
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
The School Mentor Updated 2018.
Oregon Teacher Standards & Practices Commission July 24, 2013
Resident Educator Program
Tennessee edTPA Conference
Presentation transcript:

Ohio Resident Educator Program: Focusing on Years 3 and 4

Year 1

Introduction to the Life of Teaching

Year 2

Differentiated Support Provided By Trained Mentors

Year 3

Reflective Practice

Year 4

Reciprocal, Collaborative, Ongoing

Year 3: Resident Educator Summative Assessment (RESA) Purpose: To assess Resident Educators skills and practices as measured by proficiency on the Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Year 3: Resident Educator Summative Assessment (RESA) Developed through collaboration with Stanford University, Teachscape, and Ohio Department of Education with input from RESA Advisory Design Group.

Lesson Plans Instructional Materials Analysis of Student Learning

Student Work Samples Video Clips of Lessons Teacher Reflections

Resident Educator Summative Assessment

Assessment of Artifacts Trained assessors review and score submitted artifacts. Scorer reliability will be checked through random double-scoring of submitted artifacts. Assessors will not score submissions of teachers they know.

RESA Assessors Assessors have 5+ year of teaching experience; are current, retired, and former educators, professional developers, and coaches.

Year in the RE Program Prior Years of Teaching Experience Resident Educators in: Year 3 of RE program Year 2 of RE program AND whose districts/schools have requested credit for 1 year of prior teaching experience and have submitted their names to ODE per the defined process Year 2 of RE program AND whose districts/schools have requested credit for 2 years of prior teaching experience and have submitted their names to ODE per the defined process

Determining Readiness for RESA Employers (districts/schools) determine REs readiness to prepare for and take RESA in Year 3.

Supporting Resident Educators in Year 3 All Year 3 REs must receive support. Year 3 StatusType of Support REs not taking RESA State-trained mentor (one-to-one; RE cohort; co-teaching) REs taking RESAState-trained facilitator

Supporting Year 3 Resident Educators NOT Taking RESA REs not participating in RESA in Year 3 must have an assigned trained mentor.

Supporting Year 3 Resident Educators NOT Taking RESA Mentors will follow a Year 3 Best Practices timeline (similar to Year 2) to support their REs who do not participate in RESA in Year 3.

Year 3 Timeline of Best Practices for REs Not Taking RESA

Supporting Year 3 Resident Educators NOT Taking RESA REs who do not participate in RESA in Year 3 and have completed Year 3 requirements will complete a Year 3 Formative Progress Review in Spring 2014 and begin RESA in Fall 2014.

Supporting Year 3 Resident Educators Taking RESA REs who take RESA in Year 3 will be supported by a state-trained facilitator and are not required to have a state-trained mentor to support them, though a mentor may serve as a facilitator.

Supporting Year 3 Resident Educators Taking RESA Required facilitation training will be online beginning in late summer 2013.

Holds a professional educator license Understands the Resident Educator Program Uses facilitation and questioning strategies Considerations for Selecting a RESA Facilitator

Completes online facilitation training Understands the RESA Provides REs facilitative support per RESA training Expectations for a RESA Facilitator

Year 3 RESA Timeline of Best Practices for REs Taking RESA

RESA Completion If RESA participants are unsuccessful in passing all part of RESA in , they may retake deficient portions in 2014 – Costs to implement RESA (use of software platform; site licenses; assessors; facilitation training, etc.) paid by ODE.

Field Test: 2012 – 2013 Recruitment Spring 2013 Revision Summer 2013 RESA Timeline Spring – Fall 2013

Assessor training: Late Summer through Fall 2013 RESA online facilitation training: Late Summer through Fall 2013 RESA Timeline Spring – Fall 2013

Districts/schools determine REs readiness for RESA Fall 2013 RESA launch date: Fall 2013 RESA Timeline Spring – Fall 2013

Supported through Learning Communities

Resident Educator Program Year 4 More information about professional learning opportunities for Year 4 REs will be provided in Fall Upon successful completion of RESA and all Year 4 requirements, REs may apply for the 5- year professional license. Questions:

Resident Educator License Extension While the RE license is not renewable, it is extendable on a case-by-case basis (per Ohio Revised Code ). A license extension policy will be provided in Fall 2013.

The Challenge for Resident Educators

education.ohio.gov For More Information

@OHEducation Ohio Teachers Homeroom OhioEdDept ohio-department- of-education

Questions