The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Advertisements

THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
The Super Circular – “Omni Circular”
New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 “The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21 st Century Education Program” Presented.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
New Responsibilities of Pass Through Entities Under the Uniform Grant Guidance Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
PRESENTED BY MICHAEL BRUSTEIN, ESQ. NEVADA AEFLA DIRECTORS A DISCUSSION OF FEDERAL ISSUES NOVEMBER 28, 2012 HYATT PLACE.
Subrecipient Monitoring and Common Findings By USDE Kristen Tosh Cowan, EsquireTiffany R. Winters, Esquire
The Impact of OMB Circulars (Super or Otherwise) on Federal Programs Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
OnTrack Financial and Grant Compliance. Welcome The OnTrack Policies and Procedures is a draft and a living document. It may be changed based on UWGC.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
How To Ensure Your Agency Has A Strong Subrecipient Monitoring System Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Cindy Rhoads UGG Manager Division of Federal Programs.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Subrecipient Monitoring
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
GEPA Appeal: Who? What? When? Why? Where?
NCJA’s National Forum Financial Management Training
Uniform Grant Guidance (UG) – Subrecipient Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Award Identification Requirements October 25, 2016, AGA Central Pennsylvania.
THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FEDERAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
How to Draft & Update Compliant Policies & Procedures
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
“Are You Ready for WIOA?”
TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FORUM
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
Your Policies and Procedures are Compliant
WIOA: Fiscal & Legal Issues
Audits under the New EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance
“The Georgia and Maine Stories” Impact on Recent Judicial Precedent on Federal Grants Management Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie Graham,
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
How To Conduct a Control Self-Assessment
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Grants Management 101 Part A
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures
How to Conduct a Control Self- Assessment
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
A Tutorial on Grants Management Rules Under EDGAR
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective
Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement
Presentation transcript:

The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring Steven Spillan, Esq. sspillan@bruman.com www.bruman.com

Key Definitions in 2 CFR Part 200 Pass-through entity (200.74) - non-federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal program. Subrecipient (200.93) - a non-federal entity that receives a subaward from a pass-through entity to carry out part of a federal program. Contractor (200.23) – means an entity that receives a contract.

Subaward vs. Contract (200.330) It does not matter what the agreement is called…it matters what it DOES Subaward Contract Allowable activities based on applicable statute, local plan, State rules Management Rules: Applicable federal rules (Part 200, Program rules) State law/policies & procedures Allowable activities based on terms & conditions of the contract Terms of the contract State/local contract law

Subrecipients (200.330(a)) Determines who is eligible to participate in a federal program Has its performance measured against whether the objectives of the federal program are met Is responsible for programmatic decision-making & complying with federal program requirements Uses the federal funds to carry out a program as compared to providing goods or services for a program

Contractors (200.330(b)) Provides the goods and services within normal business operations Provides similar goods or services to many different purchasers Operates in a competitive environment Provides goods or services that are ancillary to the operation of the federal program Is not subject to compliance requirements of the federal program

Why Worry About Subrecipient Monitoring? 2 CFR § 200.331 & 34 CFR § 76.770 Both rules make one thing perfectly clear: The Pass-Through is responsible for ensuring grant funds are spent according to applicable laws & regulations

What are the minimum requirements? 34 CFR § 76.770 - State shall have procedures for: Reviewing and approving applications for subgrants and amendments to those applications; Providing technical assistance; Evaluating projects; and Performing other administrative responsibilities necessary to ensure compliance with applicable statutes and regulations

2 CFR § 200.331 Five areas of concern: Subaward requirements Risk assessment Specific Conditions Monitoring Enforcement

Subaward – Required Info Subrecipient name (must match name associated with unique entity identifier) Subrecipient unique entity identifier Federal Award Identification Number (FAIN) Federal Award Date Period of performance state and end date

Required Info (cont.) Amount of federal funds ‘obligated by this action’ By this specific subaward agreement Total amount of federal funds ‘obligated to the subrecipient’ Amount listed above + previous amounts under same award Total amount of the federal award Both amounts listed above + amount yet to be awarded

Required Info (cont.) Project description for FFATA purposes Name of federal awarding agency, pass-through entity, and contact official CFDA Number and Name must identify the dollar amount made available under each federal award and the CFDA number at time of disbursement Is the award for “R&D” The indirect cost rate for the award

Required Info (cont.) All requirements imposed by the pass-through ensuring award is used in accordance with all applicable requirements Any additional requirements that the pass-through entity imposes in order to meet its own responsibility to feds

Required info (cont.) Negotiated indirect cost rate Noting that the subrecipient permits the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the subrecipient's records and financial statements Appropriate terms & conditions concerning closeout of the subaward

Risk Assessment The Pass-through must evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward

Risk Factors Subrecipient’s prior experience with the grant program Results of previous audits New personnel or substantially changed systems Results of federal monitoring

Specific Conditions If necessary (based on risk), conditions include (200.207): Require reimbursement Withhold funds More detailed reporting Additional monitoring Technical or management assistance Prior approvals

Monitoring Pass-through MUST monitor its subrecipients to assure compliance and performance: Review financial and programmatic reports Ensure corrective action Issue a “management decision” on audit findings (six month deadline under §200.521)

Monitoring Tools Providing subrecipients with training and technical assistance on program-related matters Performing on-site reviews of the subrecipient's program operations

Monitoring Schedule? Federal rules say nothing of timing Many states employ “risk matrix” to determine monitoring schedule Look at various risk factors, including when the last monitoring visit took place Schedule accordingly

Monitoring (Single Audits) Verify that every subrecipient is audited as required by Subpart F of Part 200 If a subrecipient does not meet the audit threshold, arrange for “agreed-upon procedures” on specific areas: activities allowed or unallowed allowable costs/cost principles eligibility reporting

Additional Monitoring Concerns Mandatory Written Policies/Procedures Cash Management (200.302(b)(6)) Allowability (200.302(b)(7)) Inventory Management (200.313(d)) Procurement (200.318(a)) Conflict of Interest/Gratuities (200.318(c)(1)) Travel (200.474(a)) Mandatory Disclosures Conflicts of Interest (200.112) Fraud (200.113) Procurement and Equipment Thresholds Methods of Procurement (200.320) Equipment definition and Disposition (200.313

Additional Monitoring Concerns (cont.) Time Distribution Records (200.430) Standards for Documentation (200.430(i)): Records must accurately reflect the work performed Prior Approvals (200.407) Use of grant agreements; Cost sharing or matching; Program income; Budget and plan revisions; Real property, Equipment, and Other Capital Expenditures; Fringe benefits; Pre-award costs; Travel costs.

Enforcement (200.338) Temporarily withhold cash payments pending correction Disallow all or part of the cost Wholly or partly suspend the award Recommend suspension/debarment Withhold further federal awards “Other remedies that may be legally available”

Termination (200.340 and 200.341) The pass-through may terminate the award “for cause,” notice and opportunity for hearing

Need More Assistance? You know who to call…

Legal Disclaimer This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice or a legal service.  This presentation does not create a client-lawyer relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC and, therefore, carries none of the protections under the D.C. Rules of Professional Conduct.  Attendance at this presentation, a later review of any printed or electronic materials, or any follow-up questions or communications arising out of this presentation with any attorney at Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.  You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.