SAE BAJA TEAM MEMBERS: CHAD CHANDLER JOE COFER NATHAN ERAMIAN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suspension Mechanisms
Advertisements

Steering axis inclination
Getting there in comfort
Suspension.
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Wheel Alignment CASTER.
Team UDFSAE: Suspension Group
Design of a Baja SAE Vehicle
Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher
Rear Suspension Systems
Why do cars need Alignment
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
Case Study Continued. Steering Consideration To design the steering system we must consider the 3-Dimensional geometry of the system.
Ackerman Steering Theory
Transportation Training Wheel Alignment Why Align the Wheels? Correct Wheel alignment is essential to vehicle safety.  Improve Handling Ability  Maximum.
Suspension Design Case Study
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Midterm Report
ODU Formula SAE MAE 435 Final Report 4/23/13. Introduction Charles Pearson The 2013 Michigan FSAE Competition Competition Scoring: Static Events o Design.
1970 Lotus Europa Front Suspension Redesign ME 462 Capstone Design Spring 2007 Sponsor: Bishop Steering Technology Kel Tiedman, Jason Wou Tom Filipucci.
Team Members: Jarret Vian Bryan Rowley John Murray ME 191 Final Presentation Spring 2009.
Drive Train Ryan Barba Patrick Hickey Andrew Hill.
SAE MINI BAJA PROJECT SAE MINI BAJA PROJECT PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY TEAM MEMBERS: MIKE CUNDIFF JAMES GARVIN MIKE KRANDA MICHAEL SINGER CHRIS WALTHERS.
© 2012 Delmar, Cengage Learning Wheel Alignment Service Chapter 68.
Suspension Design Part 1
Dune Buggy Suspension and Steering Design
OneTwoThree FourFiveSix SevenEightNine End Click on the arrow below to continue.
Ashley Wyatt Xavier Thompson Matt Galles Bobby Costen Chris McHugh Randy Fulcher ODU FSAE Car.
BAJA STATUS UPDATE September 27, 2011 FRAME & SUSPENSION Research Phase 100% completed Design Phase 75% completed – Frame Design (CAD) – Suspension Design.
Steering System Ackerman Linkage geometry Road wheel geometry Caster
Finite Element Method Final Project “ Rear Suspension- Double A- Arms” Jaime Taha T.April 29 th 2003.
F13-60-BAJA PROPOSAL SAE SALUKI FRAME DESIGN Team Members Austin Lewandowski (ME) (PM) Thang Tran (ME) Preston Mathis (ME) Keegan Lohman (ME) Kyle Koester.
TEAM MEMBERS: Chad Chandler Joe Cofer Nathan Eramian Francis Hauris Jeff Wong.
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals Chapter 60 Page 875.
SAE Mini Baja GROUP MEMBERS: JOHN MERRITT FRANCES OTHERSEN CHRIS DAVIS
1 Vehicle Stability Function ● Directional Control ● Roll-over Control A functional overview with regard to commercial vehicles AMEVSC-03-04e August 2010.
A-1 ADM740, Appendix A, June 2007 Copyright  2007 MSC.Software Corporation APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ANALYSES.
Suspension D.J. Conroy.
ME 462 Senior Design Project Design of a moonbuggy for the NASA Great Moonbuggy Race Faculty Advisor: Dr. Ramana Pidaparti Marques Franklin.
Suspension Peter Morabito Michael Paliga Brian Ross Drivetrain Kenny Elliot Patrick Mooney Dylan Quinn Frame Dan D’Amico Curtis May Greg Schafran.
Abdelmageed Elmustafa
This mornings 1st assignment Be prepared to answer one of the following slides with your name on it.
Ben Gruenzner Nick Hanson Aaron Pilger Dustin Kalhoff Chris Kost Jason Kuenzli Justin Moe Scott Rector Mike Schmitz Jamie Schlachter Ryan Schommer Ryan.
WyoBaja 2011 SAE Mini Baja Competition Team Leader Suspension Frame
Chapter 25 Wheel Alignment. Objectives Define the term “wheel alignment” Inspect tires, steering, and suspension systems before alignment Check and adjust.
Geometry and Linkage Lecture 1 Day 1-Class 1. References  Gillespie, T., The Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale,
Suspension Cody Dykman Jesse Ramer Jesson Salyards Frame Warren Starbuck Brett Schuler Doug Romoth Drive Train Josh Voorhees Corey Saner Spencer Garland.
SAE Baja - Front Suspension Team
Design of an Off-Road Front Suspension and Steering System
Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670
Team Name TEAM LOGO COLLEGE NAME Virtual Presentation.
Angles and Protractors
CHANGING MODEL TOPOLOGY II
APPENDIX A EXAMPLE ANALYSES
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Mini Baja Suspension Design
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
The Design and Construction of an Ackerman-Steered Robot
Validation through Instrumentation
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Wheel Alignment Fundamentals
LUKE BLOCKER & BRANDT LAMONTE ADVISOR: HO-HOON LEE
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Chapter 47 Wheel Alignment.
Geneva Baja SAE Project Progress Report
Mini Baja Suspension Design
Moonbuggy ME Capstone Design Project SP 2006
Presentation transcript:

SAE BAJA TEAM MEMBERS: CHAD CHANDLER JOE COFER NATHAN ERAMIAN FRANCIS HAURIS JEFF WONG

BACKGROUND Originated in USC in 1976 Competitions include: EVENT POINTS STATIC 300 Design Report 50 Design Evaluation 100 Cost Report 15 Production Cost 85 Presentation DYNAMIC 700 Acceleration 75 Pulling Maneuverability Rock Crawl Endurance 400 TOTAL 1000 Originated in USC in 1976 Run by SAE Competitions include: Dynamic Events Static Events

RESEARCH PHASE STUDY OF PREVIOUS DESIGNS SAE RULES AND REGULATIONS Suspension Frame Drive Train SAE RULES AND REGULATIONS

PREVIOUS FRAME & SUSPENSION PAST DESIGN DISADVANTAGES SIZE WEIGHT MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION

PREVIOUS DRIVE TRAIN CHAIN DOUBLE REDUCTION ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Inexpensive DISADVANTAGES Stretching Failure Exposed to elements ADVANTAGES Consistent Reliable DISADVANTAGES Expensive Bulky/Heavy

DESIGN PHASE CRITERION PRIORITY DESIGN REGIMENTS HANDLING ESSENTIAL Unsprung to sprung optimization Favorable weight distribution Low CG Congruent suspension kinematics AGILITY Great power to weight ratio Efficient gear train Low GVW RELIABILITY HIGH CNC fabricated frame Accurate FEA MANUFACTURABILITY DESIRED Simplistic design Less joints Multipurpose beams

SUSPENSION DESIGN PROCESS Lotus Suspension Analysis Double Wishbone Front Trailing Arm Rear Testing Modes Bump Roll Steer

SUSPENSION DESIGN PARAMETERS Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 520 pounds Weight Distribution Bias (F/R) 45/55 Center of Gravity Height Low as possible Lateral Track Width (F/R) 47/46 inches Longitudinal Wheelbase 60 inches Ride Height 10-12 inches Tire Diameter 23 inches Effective Tire Radius 11.38 inches Static Camber Angle ~ 0 to -1 degrees Static Caster Angle ~ 8 degrees Scrub Radius 0.5 to 1 inches Rack and Pinion Width ~ 10 inches Toe Change in Travel Minimal Roll Axis Inclination Neutral to Slight Oversteer

Autodesk Inventor MODEL FRAME DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN PARAMETERS Autodesk Inventor MODEL Lightweight Compliance with SAE Rules Multipurpose Beams Manufacturable Continuous Runs

DRIVE TRAIN DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN PARAMETERS CVT 10 HP Briggs & Stratton Engine CVT Ratios 3.9 to 1 0.9 to 1 35 mph

DRIVE TRAIN DESIGN RESULTS SOLidworks model GRADEABILITY ~ 50° OPTIMAL REDUCTION 8.29 DYNAMICS 15.7 ft/s²

CURRENT PROJECT STATUS RESEARCH PHASE 100% COMPLETE DESIGN PHASE ~85% COMPLETE PREPARING FOR ANALYSIS PHASE PATRAN/NASTRAN FEA

QUESTIONS ME 435 PROJECTS