All About Resources: Standard III

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Substantive Change Requesting Commission Approval of Substantive Changes at Institutions MSCHE Annual Meeting December 2009.
Advertisements

 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.
ONE-STOP SHOP: INTEGRATED ONLINE PROGRAM REVIEW AND BUDGET PLANNING Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D. Director, Institutional Research Barry Gribbons, Ph.D. Assistant.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Accreditation Institute – 2013 Pearl Cheng – Trustee, Foothill-De Anza Community College District Dolores Davison – Foothill Community College Richard.
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Total Cost of Ownership for Technology Resources at Mission College Description and Recommendations.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation through the lens of Distance Education Marina Aminy, Ph.D. Interim Dean of Online Education and Learning Resources.
Funding Technology at Mission College Challenges and Recommendations.
Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.
Budgets, Dialog and Sustainability Chris Hill, Grossmont College Virginia May, Sacramento City College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College.
Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
ACCREDITATION STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 2012.
Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.
The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.
MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE Accreditation Self Study Report 2011 presented by Rebecca Teague, Accreditation Liaison Officer Steering & Standard Chair Committee.
Regardless of Location or Means of Delivery: Meeting the Standards for Every Student Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College.
Standard III Resources Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Feb , San Diego, CA Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC At-large.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Classified Leadership Institute 2016 Hope Ell Theresa Rees Misty Burruel Sherrie Guerrero ACCREDITATION, PROGRAM REVIEW, AND THE CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONAL.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
Accreditation Update August 24, 2016 Susan Mills, Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Integrated Planning Randy Lawson 411 Training April, 2016.
Institutional Self Study in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Laney College 900 Fallon Street Oakland, CA Accrediting Commission for Community.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Associated Students Training October 1, 2015
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Learning by Doing: Participating on an Evaluation Team
Senate and Union Purview
Leadership and Governance: Understanding Standard IV
Focused Midterm Report
Curriculum and Accreditation
The Infrastructure of Accreditation:
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Standard III – Resources
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Zaida O’Connor, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, College of the Canyons
Accreditation 101 Tim Brown, ACCJC Commissioner
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Standard III Resources
Accreditation and curriculum
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
The City University of New York Performance Management Process (PMP)
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
ACCREDITATION 101 Sam Foster, ASCCC Area D Representative
Accreditation in multi-college districts
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Overview of accjc stanard IV
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Accreditation Standards
Program Development, Reduction, and Review: Faculty Take the Lead
Principles of Budget Processes
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

All About Resources: Standard III Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary Sam Foster, ASCCC South Representative Zaida O’Connor, College of the Canyons

Let’s Get to Know Each Other What is your role on your local campus/district? Are you from a single- or multi-campus district? How soon is your next accreditation visit? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Do you have sites away from the main campus that offer courses? Do you have significant distance education/online offerings? Do you offer any correspondence courses? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

If This Applies, It’s A Correspondence Course 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Objective Discuss effective practices in utilizing resources to meet Standard III including how distance education and off campus courses are supported. 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Standard III All About Resources How are we using our resources to support the mission of the college? How is it documented? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Exploring Standard III: Resources Description III.A Human Resources III.B Physical Resources III.C Technology Resources III.D Financial Resources 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Which substandard do you feel most confident about? Human Resources Physical Resources Technology Resources Financial Resources 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Which substandard do you feel you need the most help with? Human Resources Physical Resources Technology Resources Financial Resources 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Which substandard was the easiest to integrate with distance education? Human Resources Physical Resources Technology Resources Financial Resources 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Which substandard was the most challenging to integrate with distance education? Human Resources Physical Resources Technology Resources Financial Resources 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Human Resources (Standard III.A) Administrator Roles Faculty Roles Single- or Multi-College District 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Major Components of Standard III.A Qualifications and hiring criteria for faculty and administrators and staff Evaluations of faculty and staff Appropriate staffing levels for full time and part time faculty, administrators and support personnel Professional development and support 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA A Deeper Look Evaluations Is the use of distance education a component of evaluation for faculty that teach using that methodology? Are results of outcome assessments used to improve teaching and learning? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Appropriate Staffing Levels Who determines this? How is it documented? Professional Development and support for all personnel Who determines what is needed? Are Board members included? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Documentation is Crucial 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Physical Resources: Standard III.B Is this just the job of the facilities personnel? What role do faculty and other staff have in meeting this standard? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Consider these questions about physical resources How is access to facilities and the quality of those facilities assured, especially for off-site locations? What about facilities and equipment to support distance education? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA What are your plans for maintaining and updated facilities resources? What are your long range capital plans to support improvement of resources (Master Plan)? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Technology Resources: Standard III.C What are the roles of faculty, staff, and administrators in addressing this standard? Does your institution have a technology plan? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

A Deeper Look at the Technology Standard Does your institution have adequate technology? How do you know? Who decides? When do you upgrade technology? Is there a plan? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA How are faculty and staff trained to use technology? How are the needs of faculty responsible for distance education courses accounted for? What is your overall plan for technology? How do you know it’s working? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA About That Tech Plan … 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Financial Resources: Standard III.D Description III.D.1-3 Fiscal Resources: Planning III.D.4-10 Fiscal Resources: Fiscal Responsibility and Stability III.D.11-15 Fiscal Resources: Liabilities III.D.16 Fiscal Resources: Contractual Agreements 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Planning How is it done and what does it include? Does planning drive the budget? What evidence supports that? What is the role of faculty and the college governance structure? How is allocation among multiple sites determined? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Financial Responsibility and Stability How are funding priorities established? Do those doing the planning have access to accurate financial information? How is the financial record keeping evaluated? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Liabilities: Why should we care? Can we pay our bills? Are there short term and long term plans to address our liabilities? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Documenting Our Good Work 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Documenting Our Good Work What are types of evidence that can be used to support Standard III? What items are more difficult to document? Are there any creative ways that have been used to document relevant activity? 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Standard III in Summary We must continue to utilize our resources to achieve our college mission. We must document how we do it. 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Available Resources from ACCJC Accreditation Reference Handbook Checklist for Evaluating Compliance with Federal Regulations and Related Commission Policies Eligibility, Candidacy, and Initial Accreditation Manual Guide to Evaluating & Improving Institutions Guide to Evaluating Distance Education and Correspondence Education 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

Available Resources from ASCCC Effective Practices in Accreditation ASCCC Accreditation Committee web page 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA

2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA Questions? Dolores Davison (davisondolores@foothill.edu) Sam Foster (SFoster@fullcoll.edu) Zaida O’Connor (zaida_ocon@yahoo.com ) 2017 ASCCC Accreditation Institute, Napa, CA