Categorical and coordinate spatial relations from different viewpoints in an object location memory task Ineke J. M. van der Ham, Jessie Bullens, Maartje.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Slipping and Drifting: Using Older Users to Uncover Pen-based Target Acquisition Difficulties Karyn Moffatt and Joanna McGrenere Department of Computer.
Advertisements

Background The Self: Strongly influences cognition and behaviour [1,2,3] Directs our attention [1] Triggers elaboration of information [2,3] Is this elaboration.
Hearing relative phases for two harmonic components D. Timothy Ives 1, H. Martin Reimann 2, Ralph van Dinther 1 and Roy D. Patterson 1 1. Introduction.
Results and Discussion Logan Pedersen & Dr. Mei-Ching Lien School of Psychological Science, College of Liberal Arts Introduction A classic finding in Psychology.
Anxiety Increases Age Differences in Memory Jane Student and Dr. Julie Earles Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Why do people forget?
Elizabeth M. Payment, Lisa Emery & Erica Camp Decisions in the Dictator Game were dependent on offer types., and this finding was slightly more pronounced.
Eye-witness testimony
The Impact of Criterion Noise in Signal Detection Theory: An Evaluation across Recognition Memory Tasks Julie Linzer David Kellen Henrik Singmann Karl.
Design of icons for use by Chinese in Mainland China Interacting with computers 9(1998) Yee-Yin Choong, Gavriel Salvendy Report: Yang Kun, Ou.
Jessie Bullens The role of landmarks in the development of object location memory.
Jessie Bullens The role of landmarks in the development of object location memory.
References 1 Brown, A. S., & Murphy, D. R. (1989). Cryptomnesia: delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
 The results of Experiment 2 replicated those of Experiment 1. Error rates were comparable for younger adults (2.4%) and older adults (2.1%).  Again,
Inductive reasoning and implicit memory: evidence from intact and impaired memory systems Authors: Luisa Girelli, Carlo Semenza and Margarete Delazer.
Audiovisual benefit for stream segregation in elderly listeners Esther Janse 1,2 & Alexandra Jesse 2 1 Utrecht institute of Linguistics OTS 2 Max Planck.
Asymmetry in Auditory Priming: Evidence from the Perception of Words, Sounds, and Talkers Julio González Álvarez 3rd Iberian Conference on Perception –
Hemispheric Differences in the Recognition of Environmental Sounds Julio González a and Conor T. M c Lennan b a Universitat Jaume I, Castellon de la Plana,
Experience and retrieval mode as potential modulating factors in gender differences in distance knowledge of a daily environment. Maartje de Goede | Albert.
Cross-Language Neighborhood Effects in Bilinguals: An Electrophysiological Investigation Krysta Chauncey 1, Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger.
An Electrophysiological study of translation priming in French/English bilinguals Katherine J. Midgley 1,2, Jonathan Grainger 2 & Phillip J. Holcomb 1.
The reproduction of movements sequence organized by simple rule by left and right hand Lyakhovetskii V.A., Bobrova E.B., Bogacheva I.A. Pavlov Institute.
Mapping words to actions and events: How do 18-month-olds learn a verb? Mandy J. Maguire, Elizabeth A. Hennon, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta M. Golinkoff,
Results Attentional Focus Presence of others restricted the attentional focus: Participants showed a smaller flanker compatibility effect for the error.
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
LEXICAL LEARNING AND GENERALIZATION IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME Abstract LEXICAL LEARNING AND GENERALIZATION IN CHILDREN WITH DOWN SYNDROME Elbouz M.
The Self-Reference Effect on Memory in Early Childhood Sheila J. Cunningham and David J. Turk University of Aberdeen, Scotland University of Aberdeen INTRODUCTION.
Questions about Memory 1. Do we learn only with intention – or also without intention? We learn with and without intention. 2. Is learning influenced by.
THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON AUTOMATIC AND CONTROLLED PROCESSING IN MISPERCEIVING A WEAPON J. Scott Saults, Bruce D. Bartholow, & Sarah A. Lust University.
The strategies of coding in spatial memory V.A. Lyakhovetskii 1, E.V. Bobrova 2 1 St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University 2 Pavlov Institute of Physiology.
Incidental self-reference effects in memory Sheila J. Cunningham University of Abertay Dundee, Scotland.
The reconstruction of coding scheme through errors distributions Lyakhovetskii V.A., Karpinskaya V.Ju*, Bobrova E.V. Pavlov Institute of Physiology of.
The role of working memory in eye-gaze cueing Anna S. Law, Liverpool John Moores University Stephen R. H. Langton, University of Stirling Introduction.
Disrupting face biases in visual attention Anna S. Law, Liverpool John Moores University Stephen R. H. Langton, University of Stirling Introduction Method.
The role of visuo-spatial working memory in attention to eye gaze Anna S. Law, Liverpool John Moores University Stephen R. H. Langton, University of Stirling.
Introduction Method Experiment 2 In spoken word recognition, phonological and indexical properties (i.e., characteristics of the speaker’s voice) of a.
The influence of forgetting rate on complex span and academic performance Debbora Hall, Chris Jarrold, John Towse and Amy Zarandi.
How Does Multiple Group Membership Affect Face Recognition in Asian Participants? Sarah Pearson, Jane Farrell, Christopher Poirier, and Lincoln Craton.
Anxiety Increases Adult Age Differences in Memory Julie L. Earles, Ph.D. and Alan W. Kersten, Ph.D. Class of 2005 Harriet L. Wilkes Honors College of Florida.
COGNITIVE LEVEL OF ANALYSIS An Introduction. Cognitive Psychology studies: how the human mind comes to know things about the world AND how the mind uses.
Visuospatial Bootstrapping in older adults and MCI Clara Calia1, Stephen Darling 1, Richard J. Allen 2, Jelena Havelka 2, Giulia De Feudis3, Antonella.
Emotion Knowledge in Maltreated Preschoolers
Alison Burros, Kallie MacKay, Jennifer Hwee, & Dr. Mei-Ching Lien
Do preferences for exceptions to the rule vary by context?
Feature Binding: Not Quite So Pre-attentive Erin Buchanan and M
British face stimuli Egyptian face stimuli
Logan L. Watts, Ph.D. Baruch College, CUNY
Kimron Shapiro & Frances Garrad-Cole The University of Wales, Bangor
David Marchant, Evelyn Carnegie, Paul Ellison
1 University of Hamburg 2 University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg
Effects of Working Memory on Spontaneous Recognition
Mental Rotation of Naturalistic Human Faces
Neurofeedback of beta frequencies:
Performance-Related Sustained and Anticipatory Activity in Human Medial Temporal Lobe during Delayed Match-to-Sample Rosanna K. Olsen,1 Elizabeth A. Nichols,1.
Mothers' Vocabulary and Autonomy-Granting Behaviors as Predictors of Gains in Children's Vocabulary Competence from Age 3 to Age 4 Sara L. Sohr-Preston.
Spatial Memory and Multisensory Perception in Children and Adults
It is not that participants forget the rules.
Alison Burros, Nathan Herdener, & Mei-Ching Lien
The Effects of Musical Mood and Musical Arousal on Visual Attention
Jessie Bullens prof. dr. Albert Postma
The involvement of visual and verbal representations in a quantitative and a qualitative visual change detection task. Laura Jenkins, and Dr Colin Hamilton.
Dissociated developmental trajectories for conceptual and perceptual sensibility in eyewitness testimony? Valentine Vanootighem*, Hedwige Dehon*, Laurence.
Social context influence emotional language comprehension
Psychological Research Areas
Experiment Basics: Designs
Dense Regions of View-Invariant Features Promote Object Recognition
Stephanie Lidd and Jamie Tauber
Experiment Basics: Designs
Judging Peripheral Change: Attentional and Stimulus-Driven Effects
Neural Correlates Underlying The Effect of Value on Recognition Memory
Questions about Memory
Presentation transcript:

Categorical and coordinate spatial relations from different viewpoints in an object location memory task Ineke J. M. van der Ham, Jessie Bullens, Maartje de Goede & Albert Postma Helmholtz Institute, Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands Introduction Categorical relations are encoded during scene perception, because changes in categorical relations (eg. left of and above) improve performance in change detection compared to coordinate changes (only varying distance) [1]. In the current study this effect is tested in an object location memory setting and from different angles. The coordinate subsystem for object recognition is viewpoint dependent, while the categorical subsytem is viewpoint independent [2]. We expect to see this difference in viewpoint dependency in object location memory as well. Additionally, children were tested to examine the developmental processes in this task. The results can contribute to the ongoing debate on the development of categorical and coordinate relations [3,4] Results-adults Main effect of angle size (p<.01) and distracter type (p<.001). Interaction of angle size and distracter type (p<.05); increase for coordinate distracters with large angle. Fig. 3 Error rate for adults Results-children Main effect of angle size (p<.01), distracter type (p<.001), and age group (p<.001) Fig. 4 Error rates for A) 5 year olds, B) 7 year olds, and C) 10 year olds Methods Adults: 40 participants (20 female), age=22.1 (SD=2.1) Children: 20 (10 female), age=5.9 (SD=0.5) 20 (10 female), age=7.9 (SD=0.4) 19 (9 female), age=10.1 (SD=0.5) Trial design: -memorize room with objects (15 s) -target object on screen (2 s) -room without 6 target objects from - same viewpoint - small angle change - large angle change Stimuli: 20 rooms, each with 6 target objects, distracter locations are either both coordinately different (coo) or categorically different (cat) Fig. 1 Trial components: room with objects, target objects, view of the room during testing phase, without the target objects and with the 3 possible locations. Memorizing full room target object repeated for 6 objects, with three different viewpoints empty room with three location options Fig. 2 Trial sequence for each room A B C Discussion The adult results show a categorical advantage for all three angles. Therefore the findings on categorical coding during scene perception [1] can be extended to object location memory for scenes. Categorical performance is not influenced by angle change, while coordinate performance decreases for the large angle. This is in line with the viewpoint dependency hypothesis [2]. The categorical subsystem is viewpoint independent, while the coordinate subsystem is viewpoint dependent. The children results show an increase in overall performance with age, while the categorical advantage is present in all age groups. The viewpoint dependency was not found here, a potential explanation is that a floor effect in performance has reduced the influence of angle on distracter type. References [1] Rosielle et al. (2002). Psychon Bull Rev, 9, 319-326 [2] Burgund & Marsolek (2000). Psychon Bull Rev, 7, 480-489 [3] Reese & Stiles (2005). Neuropsychologia, 43, 517-529 [4] Bullens & Postma (2008). Cognit Dev, 23, 38-47  c.j.m.vanderham@uu.nl  +31 (0)30 253 3569 NWO Grant 051-14-027