Teacher Effectiveness and the Equitable Distribution of Effective Teachers 2009 National Forum on Education Policy Education Commission of the States July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

1 (c) 2008 The McGraw Hill Companies Redesigning Teacher Salary Structures School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 12.
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
NCLB, Highly Qualified and IDEA 2004 How it all fits together and What it means for you. RIDE Spring Leadership Conference May 11, 2006 Grossi/Olsen 2006.
1 Title I Hiring Requirements for Paraeducators and Parental Notification of Teacher and Paraeducator Qualifications Regional Technical Assistance Sessions.
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Hawaii Department of Education Hawaiis NCLB – Title IIA Highly Qualified Teacher and Equity Plans Leadership Update - Outreach September/October 2007.
Mississippi Special Education Advisory Panel Annual Report to the State Board of Education July 2009.
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS BETWEEN GROUPS Charleston, West Virginia October, 2003.
Title I, Part A District Budget Planning The “Small” Stuff Julie McGuire, MEd Federal Funds Coordinator Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Highlights from the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Highly Qualified Teacher Update Chris Johnson CTE Consultant August 2012.
Helping State Leaders Shape Education Policy Presentation Prepared for Panel Discussion Colorado Association for Teacher Educators Spring 2004 Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
No Child Left Behind Application Title II, Part A Virginia Department of Education April 2007.
Updated Principal Training October 15, 2014 Part 3 Attestations – Section 1119 Hiring requirements & Use of Funds Part 2 GA PSC CAPS Tool Part 1 HiQ Overview.
HQ Teachers Professional Development Guidance. TSR Reporting  In fall of 2006 TSR was modified to show up to 7 subject assignments per teacher. In any.
ENSURING EQUITABLE ACCESS TO EXCELLENT EDUCATORS November 17, 2014.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Educator Preparation, Retention, and Effectiveness Ed Fuller University Council for Educational Administration and The University of Texas at Austin February.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
Title I Update  Preliminary Allocations were released to LEAs and Superintendents 2 weeks ago.  No word on final allocations, yet.  Submitted our FLEX.
Research conducted by SRI International California State University, Office of the Chancellor | Policy Analysis for California Education | University of.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality PAFPC Conference April 6, 2011 Don McCrone Program Manager.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
KENTUCKY BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 1, 2015 Equitable Access To Effective Educators.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Title II A: Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting The primary goal of the program is to provide professional development to increase student achievement.
Charter School Leadership Institute October 7, 2015 Title IIA Improving Teacher Quality.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
OUR MOVEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE BIG PICTURE. 2 OVERVIEW Theory of Change Programmatic Approach.
1 Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher.
WISCONSIN STATEWIDE TITLE I NETWORK CESA #2 AND THE WISCONSIN DPI Title I “Quick Start” Title I Quick-Start.
Application for Funding for Phase II of the Education Fund under the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Program CFDA Number:
PAFPC CONFERENCE MAY 4, 2015 DON MCCRONE PROGRAM MANAGER TITLE II, Part A, Improving Teacher Quality 1.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Title II, Part A: Tying Needs Assessments to Effective Uses of Funds Virginia Department of Education Title II, Part A, University Series February 9, 2016.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Strategies for Promoting Equity with Diverse Student Populations: Students in Rural Communities 1.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
Effective Educators Title II, Part A
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
Equitable Access to Excellent Educators
Excellent Educators for All Initiative
Equitable Access to Excellent Educators
Title I A Comparability Report
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
TEACHER QUALIFICATIONS AND EQUITABLE ACCESS UNDER ESSA
Beth Joseph Angela Landry
North Carolina Positive Behavior Support Initiative
Schoolwide Programs.
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Effectiveness and the Equitable Distribution of Effective Teachers 2009 National Forum on Education Policy Education Commission of the States July 10, 2009

2 NCLB and Equitable Distribution of Teachers Sec 1111 State Plans, (b)(8)(C) –Requires states to identify the specific steps they will take to ensure that: both schoolwide programs and targeted assistance schools provide instruction by highly qualified instructional staff poor and minority children are not taught at higher rates than other children by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of-field teachers –States must publicly report on the measures used to evaluate progress with respect to such steps Sec 1112 Local Education Agency Plans, (c)(1)(L) –Requires LEAs to provide an assurance that through incentives for voluntary transfers, the provision of professional development, recruitment programs, or other effective strategies, that low-income students and minority students are not taught at higher rates than other students by unqualified, out-of-field, or inexperienced teachers

3 ARRA and Equitable Distribution of Teachers Title XIV State Fiscal Stabilization Fund: Sec 14005: State Applications, (d)(2) Assurances, Achieving Equity in Teacher Distribution –States applying for State Fiscal Stabilization Funds must provide an assurance that they will take actions to improve teacher effectiveness and comply with section 1111(b)(8)(C) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(8)(C)) in order to address inequities in the distribution of highly qualified teachers between high- and low- poverty schools, and to ensure that low-income and minority children are not taught at higher rates than other children by inexperienced, unqualified, or out-of- field teachers. State Fiscal Stabilization Fund Guidance –As part of its application for Stabilization Funding, a State must assure that it will implement strategies to: Increase teacher effectiveness and address inequities in the distribution of highly qualified teachers

4 Proposed Teacher Effectiveness Assurance Metrics Number and percentage of teachers in highest-poverty and lowest-poverty schools in the state who are highly qualified Number and percentage of teachers and principals rated at each performance level in each LEAs evaluation system Number and percentage of LEA teacher and principal evaluation systems that require evidence of student achievement outcomes Note: Metrics will be made available for public comment in the Federal Register. In Phase Two applications for stabilization funds, states must provide plan for collecting and reporting metrics.

5 Teach For America Teachers: Highly Qualified and Effective Teach For America teachers are highly qualified (Title I regs) –Teachers participate in an alternative route to certification program where they receive high-quality professional development that is sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused in order to have a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction, before and while teaching; participate in a program of intensive supervision that consists of structured guidance and regular ongoing support for teachers or a teacher mentoring program; assume functions as a teacher only for a specified period of time not to exceed three years; and demonstrate satisfactory progress toward full certification as prescribed by the State Teach For America teachers are effective –Most rigorous research has found that corps members impact on student achievement exceeds that of experienced and certified teachers in the same schools. –Evidence of corps members positive impact spans all subject areas and grade levels, from pre-K through high schools.

6 Effectiveness at the high-school level Researchers used NC end-of-course student exam data from 2000 through Researchers found that Teach For America corps members were, on average, more effective than non-Teach For America teachers in all subject areas, especially in math and science. That was true even when Teach For America corps members were compared with experienced, fully certified teachers. These findings were confirmed in a 2009 update of the study, which employed a larger sample of corps members and additional comparison groups. In all cases, the positive impact of having a Teach For America corps member was at least twice that of having a teacher with three or more years of experience relative to a new teacher. Making a Difference? The Effects of Teach For America in High School The Urban Institute/CALDER ( )

7 Effectiveness at the elementary- and middle-school levels Researchers used random assignment of students to teachersresearch methodology widely regarded as the gold standard. Researchers found that students of Teach For America corps members attained greater gains in math than did students of other teachers, including veteran and certified teachers, and scored about the same as students of other teachers in reading. The study also found that corps members were working in the highest-needed classrooms in the country, where students begin the year, on average, at the 14 th percentile against the national norm. The Effects of Teach For America on Students Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. (2004)

8 Teach For America Regions In the school year, over 7,300 first- and second-year Teach For America corps members will teach in 35 regions across the country.

9 Growing Our Scale and Impact: Corps Members Teach For America is striving to reach even greater national scale, more than doubling our corps member and alumni base by the year Corps Growth 9 By 2015 we project that we will have 13,000 corps members reaching more than 800,000 students across 48 communities

10 Growing Our Scale and Impact: Alumni As we strive to strengthen our alumni network and achieve our leadership initiative goals, we are even more compelled by the prospect of what our alumni will accomplish when we begin to see the impact of a larger, more successful corps with greater support as alumni At the same time, we will have built an unprecedented pipeline of leadership advocating for low-income students, with over 40,000 alumni driving change from inside and outside the education system. Alumni Growth

11 For More Information Michele McLaughlin Vice President for Federal and State Policy Teach For America (202)