Improving Reliability of Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Voting Systems
Advertisements

Welcome Briefing for postal vote opening staff at a combined European Parliamentary and local government election in England (combined issue) Name of trainer.
Making Sure Every Vote Counts in the Digital Era: The Need for Standards Mandating Voter-Verified Paper Ballots Sarah Rovito 2007 WISE Intern August 3,
Will Your Vote Count? Will your vote count? Voting machine choices N.C. Coalition for Verified Voting Joyce McCloy Pros and Cons of voting.
A technical analysis of the VVSG 2007 Stefan Popoveniuc George Washington University The PunchScan Project.
ICT IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS: LESSONS LEARNED Susanne Caarls International Electoral Affairs Symposium May 2012.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Evaluating risk within the context of the voting process Ann McGeehan Director of Elections Office of the Texas Secretary of State.
By Varun Jain. Introduction  Florida 2000 election fiasco, drew conclusion that paper ballots couldn’t be counted  Computerized voting system, DRE (Direct.
Charlie Daniels Arkansas Secretary of State HAVA Compliant Voting Systems Security Considerations General Recommendations to Enhance Security and Integrity.
Election Observer Training 2008 Elections Certification & Training Program
United States Election Assistance Commission Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA.
Vote By Mail A County Perspective Dolores Gilmore, Elections Manager
Guide to the Voting Action Planner Voting is the way we elect government officials, pass laws and decide on issues…
Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.
Ballot Processing Systems February, 2005 Submission to OASIS EML TC and True Vote Maryland by David RR Webber.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
Absentee Ballot Central Count General Introduction Step by step procedure Forms Tool Kit Dale Simmons, Co-General Counsel: (317) or (800)
Election Administration. Ensuring legitimacy of the government Legitimacy: acceptance of the right of public officials to hold office and to promulgate.
Demystifying the Independent Test Authority (ITA)
TOWARDS OPEN VOTE VERIFICATION METHOD IN E-VOTING Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari17’th July2012 Sec Vote 2012.
How Hospitals Protect Your Health Information. Your Health Information Privacy Rights You can ask to see or get a copy of your medical record and other.
E-Voting Dissent Sara Wilson, Katie Noto, John Massie, Will Sutherland, Molly Cooper.
Secretary of State Voting System Security Standards Juanita Woods Secretary of State Elections Division HAVA Information Security.
NIST Voting Data Formats Workshop Gaithersburg October, 2009 Parker Abercrombie EML for Open Voting.
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
Electronic Voting: The 2004 Election and Beyond Prof. David L. Dill Department of Computer Science Stanford University
Trust, Safety & Reliability INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER ERRORS TEXTBOOK: BRINKMAN’S ETHICS IN A COMPUTING CULTURE READING: CHAPTER 5, PAGES ,
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 20 Slide 1 Critical systems development 3.
Panel One Why Audit? Mary Batcher Ernst & Young and Chair of ASA Working Group on Elections.
Idaho Procedures M100 OPTICAL SCAN PRECINCT TABULATOR.
How and what to observe in e-enabled elections Presentation by Mats Lindberg, Election Adviser, Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)
Against E-Voting Ryan Egan, Amber Jones, Alyssa Sankin, Page Stephens, Amber Straight, Philip Sugg, and Diana Troisi Direct recording electronic (DRE)
BY: CHRIS GROVES Privacy in the Voting Booth. Reason for Privacy Voters worry that their vote may be held against them in the future  People shouldn’t.
WHY THE vvpat has failed
Creating Accessibility, Usability and Privacy Requirements for the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) Whitney Quesenbery TGDC Member Chair, Subcommittee.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Audit of Provisional Ballots 2012 Presidential Election Presented by: Gerald Micciulla, CPA, CFE Deputy City Controller.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
Ballot and Voting Judge Operations and Procedures (Election Day)
REFRESHER TRAINING FOR CHIEF JUDGES. NIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION – SET-UP Unpack your Precinct Cart Set up and origanize check-in - wire the Epollbooks.
Performing Risk Analysis and Testing: Outsource or In-house
Evaluating risk within the context of the voting process
EVoting 23 October 2006.
ThreeBallot, VAV, and Twin
E-voting …and why it’s good..
CDF for Voting Systems: Human Factors Issues
Con Electronic Voting Preston Pope, Zach White, Ankit Shrivastava, Max Alexander.
2017 Canvass Observer Training
CONFIDENCE IN COLORADO’S ELECTIONS
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Election Judge Training for Mail Ballot Elections
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Cyber attacks on Democratic processes
What happens on election day?
Election Security Best Practices
Demystifying the Independent Test Authority (ITA)
ISI Day – 20th Anniversary
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
County HIPAA Review All Rights Reserved 2002.
The DRE Debate: Getting “Unstuck”
Central Counting Station & Central Accumulating Station
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Election Security Best Practices
Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team Chair June 1, 2005
Chapter 11: Printers IT Essentials v6.0 Chapter 11: Printers
Taapsi Ramchandani Setting up the vote center 9:30am – 9:45am
Making Every Vote Count
Election Security Presented by: michelle K. tassinari Director and Legal counsel Elections division Office of the secretary of the commonwealth.
Presentation transcript:

Improving Reliability of Direct Recording Electronic Voting Systems Eric Lazarus 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Pro-DRE Pre-DRE technology has huge error rates Accessibility No time to wait for security Easier to count electrons Adding paper will Not add security Make the system less trusted by the public Add cost and complexity These systems are not worse than older technology 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Anti-DRE You cant trust computers You cannot test them You cannot reliably inspect them The current generation is not architected for verifiability or security It would not be hard to do better with crypto, paper ballots, etc. (Study AutoMark!) Small conspiracy theory Bathtub problem 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Anti-DRE: Points of Vulnerability Software Developed (Very High) Terminal Built (High) Software “Built” (Very High) Terminal Shipped (High) Software Certified (Low) Terminal Stored (High) Software Shipped (High) Terminal Software Refreshed (Very High) Terminal Tested (Low) Each technology is different but there are big vulnerabilities at each stage of the process which are not addressed. Ratings reflect my concern areas. Terminal Shipped to Polling Place (High) Terminal Stored at Polling Place (Medium) Terminal Setup at Polling Place (Medium) Terminal Setup at Polling Place (Medium) Polling (Medium) Poll Closing (Low) Votes Transmitted (High) Votes Tallied (Medium) Tallies Transmitted (Low) 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Pro-DRE: The real problems are… Voter Registered Voter Roll Maintained Roll Manipulation Voter Informed of Voting Location Intimidation Voter Checked In Vote Recorded Ballot Box Stuffing Vote Tallied Result Reported Results Audited Result Certified 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Assessment of arguments? Which have merit? Which don’t? How do we create public trust given the debate? 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Election Practices Report Card What do you like? What do you not like? What is confusing? 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

BC Neutral on DRE/VVPT Question Assuming that you are using DRE machines, what can you do? 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Project Goals Bring together the civil rights and computer security community Develop recommendations that would improve the situation – 2004 only 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Recommendations Independent security team Assessment cover Hardware Design Hardware/Firmware Configuration Software Design Software Configuration Election Procedures Physical Security 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Recommendations Implement the critical recommendations Provide thorough training Parallel testing Permanent independent technology panel Standard audit procedures to verify correct operation and uncover security breaches Incident reporting 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Recommendations for 2004 Not bad idea for 2006… We hope that we can exceed this standard FOR MORE INFO... www.votingtechnology.org 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Best thing that can be done 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Outside Expert Engaged an expert in computer security 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Pre-Election Logic & Accuracy Testing User interface testing! Automatic self-test scripts Test audio and other accessibility interfaces. Test all ballot positions in all languages. Test intensively by hand some machines in a realistically simulated election Explain all pre-election testing to those who have come to observe 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Parallel testing “Parallel testing” during Election Day, simulating a real election (poll opening, voting, and poll closing) on a few machines randomly selected from polling places on Election Day. 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Seals Seal with numbered tamper-evident seals and log all physical (paper and electronic) polling place records; then check and log seal numbers when received from polling place. Logged, numbered, tamper-evident seals to prevent use of the voting machines between the time they pass pre-election testing and the poll-opening process. Machine has a unique secure key/password. 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Incident Handling and Reporting Keep sufficient paper ballots on hand at each polling place to ensure no voter is turned away due to system failures. Forward incident reports to the responsible state official(s) and to the Federal Election Commission or to the Election Assistance Commission. Incident reports available to news media and the public 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Brennan Center for Justice Questions? 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice

Interesting things to discuss What do poll watchers need to know? How do we apply the BC recommendations at this point? Tricks for dry run of the election 9/18/2018 Brennan Center for Justice