CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Advertisements

The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Status of CLAS12 PCAL project
Forward TOF Prototyping Ryan Mitchell GlueX Collaboration Meeting November 2005.
CLAS12 Pre-shower S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: YerPhI, JMU, OU, NSU, W&M, Orsay-IPN, JLAB Project overview CLAS12 TWG meeting, February.
1 Tianchi Zhao University of Washington Concept of an Active Absorber Calorimeter A Summary of LCRD 2006 Proposal A Calorimeter Based on Scintillator and.
CLAS12 Pre-shower Calorimeter (PCAL) project Fall of 2010 to fall of 2014, a lot of person-hours S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Hall-B Meeting, March 24, 2014.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
NuMI Schematic View of the MINOS Scintillator System 8 m Scintillator Module WLS Fibers Optical Connector Clear Fiber Ribbon Cable (2-6 m) Multiplex Box.
Status of EIC Calorimeter R&D at BNL EIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting January 13, 2014 S.Boose, J.Haggerty, E.Kistenev, E,Mannel, S.Stoll, C.Woody PHENIX.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
New particle ID detector for Crystal Ball at MAMI-C Daniel Watts, University of Edinburgh John Annand 1, B. Briscoe 3, A. Clarkson 2, Evie Downie 1, D.
Oct C. Smith - PCAL/EC Commissioning 1 PCAL/EC Commissioning Document
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
The Tungsten-Scintillating Fiber Accordion Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the sPHENIX Detector Craig Woody, for the PHENIX Collaboration Physics Department,
Future Beam Test Plans of the GLD Calorimeter Aug 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: Yerevan Physics Institute (Armenia) James Madison.
Design and optimization of Electromagnetic particle Detectors (EDs) in LHAASO-KM2A Xiangdong Sheng, Jia Liu, Jing Zhao on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
T. Sugitate / Hiroshima / PHX031 / Nov.01 The Photon Spectrometer for RHIC and beyond PbWO 4 Crystal Density 8.29 g/cm 3 Radiation length 0.89 cm Moliere.
Hadron Calorimeter HCAL-J GEp Electron Calorimeter BigCal Hadron Calorimeter 1 G. Franklin, Carnegie Mellon University 10/13/2011.
Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan BES III Luminosity Monitor Apollo Go National Central University, Taiwan September 16, 2002.
VVS Prototype Construction at Fermilab Erik Ramberg 26 February,2002 Design issues for VVS Details of VVS prototype design Schedule and Budget Testing.
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
R&D status of the Scintillator- strip based ECAL for the ILD Oct LCWS14 Belgrade Satoru Uozumi (KNU) For the CALICE collaboration Scintillator strips.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
CLAS12 forward detector: Pre-shower S. Stepanyan (JLAB) Collaborating institutions: YerPhI, JMU, OU, NSU, Orsay-IPN Concept, R&D, PED … CLAS12 Detector.
PCAL Strips light transmission properties April 25, 2011April 26, 20111April 27,
DESY Beam Test of a EM Calorimeter Prototype with Extruded Scintillator Strips DongHee Kim Kyungpook National University Daegu, South Korea.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
MAMUD Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, March 29, 2005 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation.
DESY Beam Test of a EM Calorimeter Prototype with Extruded Strip Scintillator DongHee Kim Kyungpook National University Daegu, South Korea.
06 FEB th ACFA Development of fine strip scintillator with extrusion technique SungHyun Chang, DongHee Kim, Jun Suhk Suh, Youngdo Oh, Daejung Kong,
CLAS12 Pre-shower H. Voskanyan (YerPhI)  R&D: Test measurements  Prototype CLAS Collaboration, CLAS12 TWG Meeting February 28, 2007, JLAB.
Performance of Scintillator-Strip Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the ILC experiment Satoru Uozumi (Kobe University) for the CALICE collaboration Mar 12.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for HADES at SIS100 Pavel Tlustý, NPI Řež Motivation Plans Current status Tests Outlook HADES Collaboration Meeting, Sesimbra,
The large-angle photon veto detector for the P326 experiment at CERN R. Fantechi INFN – Sezione di Pisa on behalf of the P326/NA62 Collaboration Villa.
Scintillator and Fiber Test Measurements with Gluing Clas12 upgrade pcal user group May 13, 2009 Clas12 upgrade pcal user group May 13, 2009 Dustin Keller.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLYSTYRENE SCINTILLATOR TECHNOLOGY AND PARTICLE DETECTORS ON THEIR BASES VLADIMIR RYKALIN IHEP, PROTVINO INSTR-14, NOVOSIBIRSK, 24.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Future Beam Test Plans of the Calorimeter Group Aug 学術創成会議 Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu) for the GLD calorimeter group We are planning to have two beam.
IFR Detector R&D status
The New CHOD detector for the NA62 experiment at CERN S
The Electromagnetic Calorimetry of the PANDA Detector at FAIR
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
Scintillation Detectors in High Energy Physics
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Vladimir Rykalin NRC KI IHEP Baksan - 50, Nalchik, June, 2017.
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
Prototype activities update
Central detector for CLAS12: CTOF and Neutron detector
WLS FIBER-SCINTILLATOR GLUING UPDATE
PCAL Cosmic Ray Tests Progress Report C. Smith μ U V W MODULE 2
Electromagnetic Calorimeter for the CLAS12 Forward Detector
SCINTILLATING DIGITAL HADRON CALORIMETER
Tail-Catcher/Muon Tracker Prototype
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
SCINTILLATOR HARDWARE
Vishnu V. Zutshi For the NICADD team.
LHCb HCAL: performance and calibration
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
Study of a Scintillating Digital Hadron Calorimeter Prototype
Efficiency Study of Prototype Scintillator for INGRID
General Introduction to IFR
LC Muon Detector Development Overview
Presentation transcript:

CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL 9/17/2018 CLAS12 Forward Detector Element PCAL Component Testing & Prototyping K. Giovanetti (JMU) Collaborating Institutions: YerPhI (G. Asryan, H Voskanyan), JLab,JMU, OU, NSU, Orsay-IPN 9/17/2018

Design Requirement Review 9/17/2018 Design Requirement Review Comparable geometric coverage for PCAL with respect to the EC, Good resolution/calorimetry up to 10 GeV photons and electrons Improved particle identification ability to enhance final state reconstruction, Information on the longitudinal shower development (5, 5, 8) Fast calorimeter response for use the Level 1 trigger (100 ns), Reasonable Timing (1 ns) Sufficient position information to resolve Event reconstruction derived from component properties and the readout information, Compatibility with the present EC and other CLAS components. Mechanical engineering considerations: support, compatibility, structures (D. Kashy), Constructability (reasonable facilities, manpower and resources to assemble detectors) Reasonable options for testing components to establish PCAL operational parameters, 9/17/2018

EC Achieved Position Resolution 2-3 cm Energy Resolution (10-12)%/√E 9/17/2018 EC Achieved Position Resolution 2-3 cm Energy Resolution (10-12)%/√E PE Yield 3.4 pe/MeV Time Resolution < 0.5 ns DESIGN GOALS  9/17/2018

PCAL / EC Maintain And Improve Performance 9/17/2018 PCAL / EC Maintain And Improve Performance   layers RL cm 1 layer 1 0.42 1.22 Module 3 1.25 1.52 PCAL 15 6.25 18.30 EC fwd EC bkwd 24 9.99 29.28 EC 39 16.24 47.58 total 54 22.49 65.88 Energy GeV 1 5 7 11 Shower Max tmax (RL) 6.8 9.1 9.6 10.2 Distance (cm) 19.9 26.7 28.1 30.0 Distance (layers) 16.3 21.9 23.0 24.6 Containment 2.5 tmax (cm) 49.7 66.7 70.2 75.0 2.5 tmax (fraction) 0.75 1.01 1.07 1.14 9/17/2018

PCAL Design Alternating Pb (2.2mm)/Scintillator (10 mm) 9/17/2018 PCAL Design Alternating Pb (2.2mm)/Scintillator (10 mm) Scintillator Width 4.5 cm 9cm [double width readout] U,V,W Readout Cover the EC ~4m Sides WLS Light Readout 3 fibers 9/17/2018

PCAL: Dimensions & Location 9/17/2018 PCAL: Dimensions & Location 9/17/2018

PCAL Components Maximize Light Yield/ Minimize Cost 9/17/2018 PCAL Components Maximize Light Yield/ Minimize Cost 9/17/2018

PCAL Components Maximize Light Yield/ Minimize Cost 9/17/2018 PCAL Components Maximize Light Yield/ Minimize Cost 9/17/2018

Components Tested Photomultiplier Tubes Type Of WLS Fiber 9/17/2018 Components Tested   Photomultiplier Tubes Type Of WLS Fiber Number Of Fibers/ Scint. Type Of Scintillator 9/17/2018

Test Setup (In The EEL) Rad.Sources: 90Sr and 207Bi 9/17/2018 Test Setup (In The EEL) 4 m long dark box with moving cart and support fixtures (Hall B engineering) Simple DAQ (CODA) – FASTBUS with LeCroy ADC Test Scintillator with Groove(s) FNAL, Kharkov, ELJEN Trigger PMT XP2262 Rad.Sources: 90Sr and 207Bi Cosmic muons Second Trigger PMT Test WS fibers Y11(sc-1, 1.5, 2; mc-1 (mm)) BC-91A, BC-92 (1mm) Test PMTs R7899, R6095, R1450 XP1912, XP2802 9224B 9/17/2018

Fits To ADC Distributions 9/17/2018 Fits To ADC Distributions Hamamatsu R7899EG, Green Sensitive Photocathode Fit to the pedestal and single photoelectron peak FNAL Scintillator With One Grove, Kuraray Y-11 Single Clad Fiber Fit to the pedestal and single photoelectron peak Hamamatsu R6095, 15% QE at 500nm 9/17/2018

Fit To The ADC Distributions From 90sr For R6095 PMT Of Different HV 9/17/2018 Fit To The ADC Distributions From 90sr For R6095 PMT Of Different HV Fit to Slices of Trigger PMT ADC Distribution FNAL Scintillator with 1 Groove Kuraray 1mm, Single-clad WSF PMT Hamamatsu R6095 Number of photo-electrons 800 V 850 V 900 V ADC Trigger PMT 9/17/2018

Fit To The ADC Distributions From 90sr 9/17/2018 Fit To The ADC Distributions From 90sr Scintillator Strips With 3-grooves, Kharkov. ADC Distributions Of R6095 For One, Two, And Three Fiber Readout 1 WSF 2 WSF 3 WSF ADC Trigger PMT 9/17/2018

Absolute Light Yield With Cosmic Muons 9/17/2018 Absolute Light Yield With Cosmic Muons FNAL scintillator, 1 cm thick, with 1mm WS fiber, Kuraray Y-11 s.c., PMT Hamamatsu R6095 7-8 photoelectrons 2 MeV Second trigger counter 9/17/2018

Summary of test measurements 9/17/2018 Summary of test measurements Best PMT is the HAMAMATSU R7899EG, $280/each. HAMAMATSU R6095 [selected with QE>16% at 500nm] Photoelectron yield 25% lower. R6095 is $160 ($180 gain spec). Other PMTs did not perform better and are expensive, >$250 Multi-clad fiber 20% more light vs single-clad fiber 30% more expensive FNAL extruded scintillator with Y-11 fiber has the best light yield, price, $20-$25/meter. Kharkov are close, need R&D to match the FNAL performance. 9/17/2018

Component Recommendation 9/17/2018 Component Recommendation The best combination by the light yield and price is: FNAL scintillator Kuraray Y11 single clad HAMAMATSU R6095. Light yield ~11p.e./MeV (3 fibers) 9/17/2018

Prototype: Box-Prototype 9/17/2018 Prototype: Box-Prototype Small dimensions = on order of 30 cm Full longitudinal structure (5 modules) Mimic UVW readout Beam tests Shower characterization Complete component combined response Explore fiber routing & PMT mounting 9/17/2018

Pre-shower Prototype (Side View) 9/17/2018 Pre-shower Prototype (Side View) WSF (KURARAY 1mm, SC) FNAL scintilliator strip 45X10mm , 3 grooves 2 Lead 2.2mm 9/17/2018

Pre-shower Prototype (Top View) 9/17/2018 Pre-shower Prototype (Top View) 9/17/2018

Box-Prototype: WLS Fiber/ Scintillator 9/17/2018 Box-Prototype: WLS Fiber/ Scintillator Prototype Assembly Fibers are glued in the grooves of FNAL scintillator. This will be the active medium for the sampling calorimeter. 9/17/2018

Box-Prototype: Aligning Scintillator 9/17/2018 Box-Prototype: Aligning Scintillator Prototype Assembly The scintillators are then placed in a supporting structure which holds the scintillator in place while allowing the fiber to be routed to the exterior. 9/17/2018

Box-Prototype: Fiber Routing 9/17/2018 Box-Prototype: Fiber Routing Prototype Assembly The photomultipliers will be mounted along the sides. Each of three sides will have fiber channels to the exterior in order to obtain a three view readout. 9/17/2018

Prototype: Full Scale Match Final Dimensions Of PCAL 9/17/2018 Prototype: Full Scale Match Final Dimensions Of PCAL Explore Construction Methods Assembly Component: Storage, Delivery, Alignment Mechanical Support Fiber: Handling, Gluing & Routing Develop Quality Control Measures Refine Component Testing Methods Large Dimension Attenuation Lengths 9/17/2018

9/17/2018 Prototype: Full Scale The large number of photomultipliers, scintillator strips, the significant length of fiber and the length of the longest pieces create challenges that can be best addressed by building at least partially a full scale prototype. 9/17/2018

Conclusion Components That Meet Design Criteria 9/17/2018 Conclusion Components That Meet Design Criteria Small Prototype Under Construction Significant Advantages Associated With Large Prototype Development 9/17/2018

9/17/2018 END EXTRA Slides follow 9/17/2018

Measurements technique 9/17/2018 Measurements technique For each PMT, a single photo-electron peak position and the width, at given HV, was determined using two Gaussian fit to the ADC distributions of attenuated light For each combination, the average number of photo-electrons was extracted as a function trigger PMT ADC value, the fit function: Fit parameters: c1, c2, c3, and npe 9/17/2018

Fit to the ADC distributions from 90Sr for different PMT 9/17/2018 Fit to the ADC distributions from 90Sr for different PMT Fit to slices of trigger PMT ADC distribution R7899 9.1 pe R6095 6.9 pe Number of photo-electrons XP2802 6.7 pe R1450 5.8 pe FNAL scintillator with 1 groove Kuraray 1mm, single-clad WSF ADC Trigger PMT 9/17/2018

9/17/2018 Fit to the ADC distributions from 90Sr for R6095 PMT at different scintillators Fit to slices of trigger PMT ADC distribution ELJEN 2.2 pe Number of photo-electrons FNAL 6.9 pe Kharkov 6.1 pe Kuraray 1mm, single-clad WSF PMT Hamamatsu R6095 ADC Trigger PMT 9/17/2018

9/17/2018 Fit to the ADC distributions from 90Sr for R6095 PMT of different positions source Fit to slices of trigger PMT ADC distribution Test PMT Kuraray 1mm, SC WSF 90Sr with collimator Number of photo-electrons Kharkov scint. ADC Trigger PMT 9/17/2018

Possible Configurations 9/17/2018 Possible Configurations Number of photomultiplier tubes is determined by the segmentation which is is based on the spatial resolution. Improvements in PMT performance do not result in a reduction of the number of photomultiplier tubes. Improvements in the fiber performance could potentially reduce the number of fibers required. This would reduce redundancy (broken fiber) and most likely uniformity. Number of layers was examined in Monte Carlo simulations and the results summarizing these results suggest 15 layers (5 modules) is the best choice. 9/17/2018

Configurations with 9, 12, and 15 layers 9/17/2018 Configurations with 9, 12, and 15 layers p0 reconstruction efficiency decreases at high energies for 12 and 9 layer modules not enough radiator thickness and some of high energy photons do not convert 12 layers configuration with first 3 layers of lead with double thickness had comparable efficiency but ~10% worse energy resolution 1 module = 3 layers of scintillator-lead 9/17/2018

Different Readout Segmentations 9/17/2018 Different Readout Segmentations Simulations with 15 layers of scintillators and 14 layer of lead Efficiency of reconstruction of two clusters from p0’gg decay decreases for small number of readout segments For p0 energies up to 10 GeV efficiency of two cluster separation is reasonably high for 4.5 cm wide segmentation 9/17/2018

Selection Of The PCAL Components 9/17/2018 Selection Of The PCAL Components Scintillator-WLSF-PMT combination with reasonably high photo-electron statistics at low cost Choice for the scintillator, WLS fiber, and PMT is : Fermi Lab extruded scintillators, 4.5x1 cm2 with 3 grooves Kuraray, 1mm diameter Y11 single clad HAMAMATSU R6095 selected with Q.E.>16% @ 500 nm Expected photo-electron yield ~11p.e./MeV for 3 fibers (yield for EC readout from the test measurements was ~8.4p.e./MeV) 9/17/2018

9/17/2018 9/17/2018

All single strips U-double V&W-single W-single V-single U-single 9/17/2018 All single strips U-double V&W-single W-single V-single U-single W-single, U&V-double V-single, U&W-double 9/17/2018

Measurements technique 9/17/2018 Measurements technique For each PMT, a single photoelectron peak position and the width, at given HV, was determined using two Gaussian fit to the ADC distributions of attenuated light For each combination, the average number of photo-electrons was extracted as a function trigger PMT ADC value, the fit function: Fit parameters: c1, c2, c3, and npe 9/17/2018

Pre-shower components for test 9/17/2018 Pre-shower components for test 9/17/2018