by Angela Dispenzieri, A. Keith Stewart, Asher Chanan-Khan, S

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Manage High Risk Myeloma Dr Matthew Jenner Consultant Haematologist Southampton General Hospital UK Myeloma Forum Autumn Day 12 November 2014.
Advertisements

Should We Treat Smoldering Myeloma? YES! Lymphoma Myeloma 2014 Scottsdale, Arizona Rochester, Minnesota Jacksonville, Florida Joseph Mikhael, MD, MEd,
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center Scottsdale, Arizona Rochester, Minnesota Jacksonville, Florida Pomalidomide, Bortezomib.
Long-Term Biological Variation of Serum Protein Electrophoresis M-Spike, Urine M-Spike, and Monoclonal Serum Free Light Chain Quantification: Implications.
Multiple Myeloma Definition:
Serum free immunoglobulin light chain evaluation as a marker of impact from intraclonal heterogeneity on myeloma outcome by Annamaria Brioli, Hannah Giles,
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Multiple Myeloma Precursor Disease JAMA. 2010;304(21):
New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma by Bruno Paiva, Jacques J. M. van Dongen, and Alberto Orfao.
Prognostication of survival using cardiac troponins and N- terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis undergoing.
High-risk smoldering myeloma Philippe Moreau, Nantes.
Multiple Myeloma in Session 2015: An Online Journal Club for Hematology/Oncology Fellows This program is supported by educational grants from Celgene Corporation.
Morie Gertz Chair Dept. of Medicine
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Smoldering Myeloma: To Treat or not to Treat
Treatment of Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis
How I treat extramedullary myeloma
Impact of Post-Transplant Response and Minimal Residual Disease on Survival in Myeloma with High-Risk Cytogenetics  Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Eli Muchtar,
by Robert A. Kyle, Morie A. Gertz, Philip R. Greipp, Thomas E
Clonal competition with alternating dominance in multiple myeloma
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Growth differentiating factor 15 enhances the tumor-initiating and self-renewal potential of multiple myeloma cells by Toshihiko Tanno, Yiting Lim, Qiuju.
by Nataliya Melnyk, and Jonathan Harrison
Dinaciclib, a novel CDK inhibitor, demonstrates encouraging single-agent activity in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma by Shaji K. Kumar, Betsy LaPlant,
T-cell epitopes within the complementarity-determining and framework regions of the tumor-derived immunoglobulin heavy chain in multiple myeloma by Lotta.
The utility of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with POEMS syndrome by Anita D'Souza, Suzanne.
by Rafael Fonseca, Richard J. Bailey, Gregory J. Ahmann, S
Influence of cytogenetics in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone: adverse effect of deletion.
by Thomas Rasmussen, Linda Jensen, Lone Honoré, and Hans Erik Johnsen
Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
A phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib (PX A1) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma by David S. Siegel, Thomas Martin,
Flow cytometric detection of circulating myeloma cells before transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma: a simple risk stratification system by.
Impact of Pretransplant Therapy and Depth of Disease Response before Autologous Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma  Ravi Vij, Shaji Kumar, Mei-Jie Zhang,
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Risk-Adapted Algorithm of Plerixafor Use for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization  Ivana N.M. Micallef,
Rafael Fonseca MD Chair, Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic in AZ What is the optimal therapeutic approach for MM patients with bor-len relapsed/refractory.
Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma
“Update” on “solitary” plasmacytoma
Incidence, clinical course, and prognosis of secondary monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in patients with multiple myeloma by Rishi K.
by Paolo Strati, Michael J. Keating, William G. Wierda, Xavier C
Plasma cell proliferative index is an independent predictor of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma by Mohammed A. Aljama, M. Hasib Sidiqi, Arjun.
CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma by Robert Marcus, Kevin Imrie, Andrew Belch,
A subset of multiple myeloma harboring the t(4;14)(p16;q32) translocation lacks FGFR3 expression but maintains anIGH/MMSET fusion transcript by Madhumita.
An intermediate-risk multiple myeloma subgroup is defined by sIL-6r: levels synergistically increase with incidence of SNP rs and 1q21 amplification.
Integrated mutational and cytogenetic analysis identifies new prognostic subgroups in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by Davide Rossi, Silvia Rasi, Valeria.
Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma by Angela Dispenzieri,
Impact of Post-Transplant Response and Minimal Residual Disease on Survival in Myeloma with High-Risk Cytogenetics  Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Eli Muchtar,
Myeloma: Symptoms to diagnosis Can we do better?
Clinicogenetic risk models predict early progression of follicular lymphoma after first-line immunochemotherapy by Vindi Jurinovic, Robert Kridel, Annette.
Lorem Ipsum Dolor Multiple myeloma: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk‐stratification, and management -Dr. Isha Bansal Moderator: Dr Abhijeet Ganpule Sir.
Volume 73, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Low Levels of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA) Predict Engraftment Syndrome after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in POEMS Syndrome and.
Management of Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma: Updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Guidelines.
Amyloidosis: Recognition, Confirmation, Prognosis, and Therapy
Figure 6 Proposed model of clonal evolution in multiple myeloma
Statistical Considerations in Studies of Late Effects in HCT
by J. Michael Soucie, Paul E. Monahan, Roshni Kulkarni, Barbara A
Diagnosis and Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: Mayo Stratification of Macroglobulinemia and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Guidelines  Stephen.
Management of Newly Diagnosed Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Guidelines 
Incidence of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance and Estimation of Duration Before First Clinical Recognition  Terry M. Therneau, PhD,
Predicted number of joint bleeds according to factor activity level and age group for patients with hemophilia A or B based on a regression model. Predicted.
Outcomes with early response to first-line treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma by Nidhi Tandon, Surbhi Sidana, S. Vincent Rajkumar,
Overall Survival (OS) of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Treated with Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (KRd) Versus.
Survival based on V gene mutation status and CD38 expression among B-CLL patients who stratify to the Rai intermediate risk category. Survival based on.
Comparison of different techniques to identify cardiac involvement in immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis by Mohammed A. Aljama, M. Hasib Sidiqi,
Prediction in idiopathic membranous nephropathy
by Pierre Sesques, and Nathalie A. Johnson
Selinexor and Low Dose Dexamethasone (Sd) in Patients with Lenalidomide, Pomalidomide, Bortezomib, Carfilzomib and Anti-CD38 Ab Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Mean HbA1c (%) and estimated marginal mean SH rate (per 100 patient-years) adjusted for sex, age-group at diagnosis, and diabetes duration, by time period,
11q Deletion (del11q) Is Not a Prognostic Factor for Adverse Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (CLL/SLL)
Cold agglutinin disease
Presentation transcript:

Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: time for a new definition? by Angela Dispenzieri, A. Keith Stewart, Asher Chanan-Khan, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Robert A. Kyle, Rafael Fonseca, Prashant Kapoor, P. Leif Bergsagel, Arleigh McCurdy, Morie A. Gertz, Martha Q. Lacy, John A. Lust, Stephen J. Russell, Steven R. Zeldenrust, Craig Reeder, Vivek Roy, Francis Buadi, David Dingli, Suzanne R. Hayman, Nelson Leung, Yi Lin, Joseph Mikhael, and Shaji K. Kumar Blood Volume 122(26):4172-4181 December 19, 2013 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology

Risk of SMM progression to active MM according to different prognostic systems as compared with risk of progression of MGUS to active MM. Gray shading includes 2-year time point. Risk of SMM progression to active MM according to different prognostic systems as compared with risk of progression of MGUS to active MM. Gray shading includes 2-year time point. (A) SMM risk based on BMPCs ≥ 10%, M protein ≥ 30 g/L.21 Bold solid line, both above threshold; solid line, BMPCs ≥ 10% but M-protein < 30 g/L; dashed line, BMPC < 10% but M-protein ≥ 30 g/L. (B) SMM risk based on BMPC ≥ 10, M protein ≥ 30 g/L, and involved FLC/uninvolved FLC ≥ 8.25 Bold solid line, all 3 factors above threshold; solid line, any 2 factors above threshold; dashed line, any 1 factor above threshold. (C) SMM risk based on involved FLC/uninvolved FLC ≥ 100.26 Bold solid line, above threshold; solid line, below threshold. (D) SMM risk based on absence of CD19 and/or CD45 expression, overexpression of CD56, or weak expression of CD38 and immunoparesis of either of the uninvolved immunoglobulins.31 Bold solid line, both risk factors present; solid line, either risk factor present; dashed line, neither risk factor present. (E) SMM risk based on presence (bold solid) or absence (solid) of more than 1 focal lesion on whole-body MRI.34 (F) SMM risk based on FISH.38 Bold solid line, del17p,or t(4;14); solid line, trisomies alone; dashed line, any other interphase FISH abnormality; dotted line, normal or insufficient interphase FISH. (G) SMM risk based on high-risk interphase FISH [del17p, t(4;14), +1q21, or hyperdiploidy] and high tumor burden (M-protein ≥ 20 g/L).39 Bold solid line, both high-risk factors present; solid line, interphase FISH low risk and tumor high risk; dashed line, FISH high risk and tumor low risk; dotted line, both low risk. (H) MGUS risk of progression to MM based on M protein ≥ 30 g/L, abnormal rFLC, and heavy chain IgA or IgM.60 Bold solid line, all risk factors present; solid line, 2 risk factors present; dashed line, 1 risk factor present; dotted line, no risk factor present. Angela Dispenzieri et al. Blood 2013;122:4172-4181 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology

Distribution and outcomes based on FISH abnormalities among patients with SMM. (A) No interphase FISH abnormalities, white; standard risk: t(11;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) or other/unknown IgH or del 13/13q, light gray; intermediate risk: trisomy without IgH... Distribution and outcomes based on FISH abnormalities among patients with SMM. (A) No interphase FISH abnormalities, white; standard risk: t(11;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) or other/unknown IgH or del 13/13q, light gray; intermediate risk: trisomy without IgH translocation, dark gray; high risk: t(4;14)or del (17p), black. Solid bars, progression from SMM to MM; stippled bars, OS from SMM diagnosis. (B) Duration of time a patient lives with labels ranging from MGUS to SMM to active MM is in part related to interphase FISH. Although individuals harboring trisomies (ii) appear to progress more rapidly through their diagnosis of SMM than patients with normal FISH or non-t(4;14) translocations (i), they survive much longer than those with deletion 17p (iii) and about as long as patients with normal or non-t(4;14) translocations (i). Mo, months. Angela Dispenzieri et al. Blood 2013;122:4172-4181 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology

Present, future, and ideal state for distribution of patients with MGUS, SMM, and MM. Angela Dispenzieri et al. Blood 2013;122:4172-4181 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology

Algorithm for reclassifying SMM and active MM Algorithm for reclassifying SMM and active MM. *Consider including patients with the following FISH: deletion 17p, t(4;14), and 1q21 gains as active MM; this population could account for as many as 30% of SMM patients. §Consider using more than 1 fluorodeox... Algorithm for reclassifying SMM and active MM. *Consider including patients with the following FISH: deletion 17p, t(4;14), and 1q21 gains as active MM; this population could account for as many as 30% of SMM patients. §Consider using more than 1 fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lesion on PET/CT in lieu of MRI. iFLC, involved FLC; uFLC, uninvolved FLC; WbMRI, whole-body MRI. Angela Dispenzieri et al. Blood 2013;122:4172-4181 ©2013 by American Society of Hematology