Using outcomes data for program improvement Kathy Hebbeler and Cornelia Taylor Early Childhood Outcome Center, SRI International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

1
© 2008 Pearson Addison Wesley. All rights reserved Chapter Seven Costs.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1 Computer Systems Organization & Architecture Chapters 8-12 John D. Carpinelli.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Myra Shields Training Manager Introduction to OvidSP.
Properties Use, share, or modify this drill on mathematic properties. There is too much material for a single class, so you’ll have to select for your.
Objectives: Generate and describe sequences. Vocabulary:
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Properties of Real Numbers CommutativeAssociativeDistributive Identity + × Inverse + ×
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Board of Early Education and Care Retreat June 30,
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Supported by 1 1 kids learn from people who care welcome! velkomin!
1 Aberdeen City Probationer Teacher Induction Programme.
1 Click here to End Presentation Software: Installation and Updates Internet Download CD release NACIS Updates.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
EU market situation for eggs and poultry Management Committee 20 October 2011.
Bright Futures Guidelines Priorities and Screening Tables
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
VOORBLAD.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Factor P 16 8(8-5ab) 4(d² + 4) 3rs(2r – s) 15cd(1 + 2cd) 8(4a² + 3b²)
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
CONTROL VISION Set-up. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 5 Step 4.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Adding Up In Chunks.
Understanding Generalist Practice, 5e, Kirst-Ashman/Hull
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
Note to the teacher: Was 28. A. to B. you C. said D. on Note to the teacher: Make this slide correct answer be C and sound to be “said”. to said you on.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
1 Using one or more of your senses to gather information.
Analyzing Genes and Genomes
1 Let’s Recapitulate. 2 Regular Languages DFAs NFAs Regular Expressions Regular Grammars.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
Essential Cell Biology
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chlorplasts
Target Setting for Child Outcomes Conference Call October 30,
1 What Counts: Measuring the Benefits of Early Intervention in Hawai’i Beppie Shapiro Teresa Vast Center for Disability Studies University of Hawai`i With.
Data, Now What? Skills for Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Data Analysis for Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data 1.
Using data for program improvement Early Childhood Outcomes Center1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
Using COS Data to Inform Program Improvement at All Levels Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and nurture.
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, NECTAC/ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Ann Bailey, NCRRC Presented.
What the data can tell us: Evidence, Inference, Action! 1 Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
EIA: Using data for program improvement
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Using outcomes data for program improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
Data Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Using Data for Program Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Using outcomes data for program improvement Kathy Hebbeler and Cornelia Taylor Early Childhood Outcome Center, SRI International

Topics to be covered on today’s call 1.Basic steps in using data for program improvement process 2.Key concepts in using outcomes data for program improvement at the state or local level 3.Additional resources for you

Question 1 Which of the following best describes the hat you are wearing on this call –State administrator –Program administrator –Teacher/provider –Family member –TA provider –Other 3 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Question 2 How would you describe your current use of child outcomes data for program improvement? a.Not using – data are not good enough yet b.Not using but the data are credible c.Just beginning to use the data d.Have some experience using the data e.Well on our way in using the data f.My position does not involve using data 4 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

5 Working Assumptions for Program Improvement There are high quality services and programs in your _____[state, region, district, etc.]. There are [a few/some/many] children who are not getting the most appropriate services and programs for their needs. If we can identify weak points and find ways to improve their services/programs, these children will experience better outcomes.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 6

COMS Quality Indicators: Using Data 12.State agency makes regular use of information on child outcomes to improve programs. 13.Local programs make regular use of information on child outcomes to improve programs. 7 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Steps in Using Data for Program Improvement 1.Formulate your questions 2.Analyze your data 3.Interpret your data – generate hypotheses –Do you need more information (maybe analyze more data) to understand what you have found? 4.Identify a course of action based on findings. 5.Implement the action to address the findings. 6.Repeat process. ***PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT IS A CYCLE*** 8 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Continuous Program Improvement Plan (vision) Implement Check (Collect and analyze data ) Reflect Are we where we want to be? Is there a problem? Why is it happening? What should be done about it ? Is it being done? Is it working? What should be?

Different hypotheses lead to different solutions Working assumption: There is something that can be changed and we need to identify what it is and make the changes. Possible hypothesesPossible solutions

EIA* E vidence I nference A ction 11Early Childhood Outcomes Center *also known as FMA (Findings, Meaning, Action)

E vidence Findings are the numbers –10% of children scored…… –45% of children made progress The numbers are not debatable (assuming the numbers are correct…) 12 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

13 Early Childhood Outcomes Center Outcome C: Takes Actions to Meet Needs

Question 3 Which of the following is not an evidence statement? a.Program 3 is the highest in SS1 b.Program 6 is the highest in SS2 c.Program 9 has lower scores because it serves children with more severe needs d.For Program 11, both Summary Statements were over 60%. 14 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

I nference The interpretation put on the numbers Is this evidence: –Credible? (Based on valid data?) –Good news? Bad news? –News we can’t interpret? Does it raise more questions? 15 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

I nference Inference is debatable and reasonable people can reach different conclusions from the same set of numbers Stakeholder involvement can be helpful in making sense of findings To interpret meaning, sometimes we analyze data in other ways (ask for more findings) 16 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Question 4 What else would you like to know about the five programs in your state with the lowest percentages for SS 1 or SS 2? a.The disabilities of the children served by the different programs b.The progress category distribution c.The racial and ethnic makeup of the children served. d.Other targeted follow up questions 17 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Question and answer/evidence from these data Which program has the lowest SSs? Answer: Program 9 has the lowest percentage for SS1 and the second lowest for SS2. This is not debatable – but what is the inference that follows from the evidence? 18 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

19 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

20 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

21 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

22 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

23 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

24 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

25 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Targeted follow up Questions for Program 9 Review of a sample of entry and exit data and staff interviews found: About half of the children enrolled in the program are from families whose home language is Spanish There is a shortage of Spanish speaking providers Data collection procedures were followed, but assessments did not include family input for many Spanish speaking families Providers reported heavy workloads and frustration with language challenges 26 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Possible inferences based on the available data for Program 9 a.SS data are not credible. b.Children are not making gains comparable to those seen in other programs because they have more support needs around language. The SS results are what we would expect. c.Children are not making gains comparable to those seen in other programs because of the lack of Spanish speaking providers. This needs to be addressed and we would expect the SS results to improve when we do. d.Another inference (Describe:_____). 27 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

A ction Given the inference attached to the evidence, what should be done? Possible actions: –Continue to work to improve the quality of the data –Accept the data as credible and develop recommendations to address what was learned Action is always debatable – and often is Another role for stakeholders 28 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Possible inferences based on the available data for Program 9 a.SS data are not credible. b.Children are not making gains comparable to those seen in other programs because they have more support needs around language. The SS results are what we would expect. c.Children are not making gains comparable to those seen in other programs because of the lack of Spanish speaking providers. This needs to be addressed and we would expect the SS results to improve when we do. d.Another inference (Describe:_____). 29 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Steps in Using Data for Program Improvement 1.Formulate your questions 2.Analyze your data 3.Interpret your data – generate hypotheses –Do you need more information (maybe analyze more data) to understand what you have found? 4.Identify a course of action based on findings. 5.Implement the action to address the findings. 6.Repeat process. ***PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT IS A CYCLE*** 30 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

QI 12. State agency makes regular use of information on child outcomes to improve programs. a)State regularly implements a stakeholder process that includes families for considering the implications of child outcomes and other data. b)As appropriate, state identifies some local programs for targeted support and then works with these programs to jointly develop action plans. c)State identifies statewide systemic goals for improvement. d)State develops a comprehensive plan for program improvement. 31 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

QI 12. State agency makes regular use of information on child outcomes to improve programs. e)State implements and evaluates program improvement activities on a regular cycle. f)State provides support to local programs related to use of child outcomes data. g)State has policy or guidance that addresses local program responsibilities with regard to use of data for program improvement. 32 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

33

QI13. Local programs make regular use of information on child outcomes to improve programs. a)All local programs regularly implement a stakeholder process that includes families for considering the implications of child outcomes data and other data. b)Local programs use data to develop a comprehensive plan for program improvement. c)All local programs implement and evaluate program improvement activities on a regular cycle. 34 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

35 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

Resources on the ECO website Slides and materials from the Using Data Call Series Evaluating SPP/APR Improvement Activities document Slides and materials from workshops on using child outcomes data for program improvement COMS framework 36 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

37 Find more resources at: www. the-eco-center-org Thank you!!