The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Advertisements

2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
NSSE and MSU Retention Chris Fastnow Office of Planning and Analysis December 4, 2008.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Student Engagement at Towson: NSSE 2005 Telling and Selling the Story Kathryn Doherty, Ed.D. January 11, 2006.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Pilot Test Results (Fall 2001) May 6, 2003 Expanded Dean’s Council.
Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Topic #4 - EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Evidence: PowerPoint of Key Evidence Produced by AC Office of Outcomes Assessments 1.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
Dissertation Findings
NSSE Results for Faculty
UTRGV 2016 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Surprise. Look who’s engaged
2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Imagine Success Engaging Entering Students Innovations 2009
UTRGV 2018 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
The Heart of Student Success
UTRGV 2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
GGC and Student Engagement
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Pilot Test Results (Fall 2001) May 23, 2003 MayDaze

CCSSE (cessie) Provides a new focus on educational practices that research shows are related to student success Conducted out of the University of Texas at Austin Supported by grants from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Lumina Foundation for Education Patterned after NSSE (nessie) conducted out of Indiana University

CCSSE Pilot Institutions and Numbers Pilot Targeted Actual Response Institution Sample Sample Rate Butler County CC 825 514 62.3% Cascadia CC 625 445 71.2% CC of Denver 1,125 536 47.6% Central Piedmont CC 825 981 118.9% Hocking College 825 713 86.4% Johnson County CC 1,125 445 39.6% Kingsborough CC 1,125 1,049 93.2% Kirkwood CC 1,125 1,021 90.8% Montgomery College 825 447 54.2% Richland CC 1,125 826 73.4% Schoolcraft College 1,125 712 63.3% Sinclair CC 1,125 600 53.3% Total 11,800 8,289 70.2%

Procedures CPCC sent UT our class schedule electronically They selected sections including developmental courses and a variety of classes at each campus They provided us a list of selected sections and an alternate list (in case the original list needed subs) Planning and Research staff went to each selected classroom and distributed, monitored and collected the data over a three week period in Fall 2001 Data were returned to UT for analysis UT returned the summarized data to the College in 2002

Findings - Demographics CPCC Respondents University Sample (all institutions) Students (NSSE) Gender: Male 41.2% 44.0% 44% Female 58.8% 56% 56% Race: White 57.0% 61.5% 70% Asian 4.6% 5.2% 6% Latino 4.9% 8.8% 6% Black 17.6% 9.3% 10% Nat. Amer. 3.8% .4% 1% Int’l 11.1% 8.5% 3% Other 4.7% 6.7% na Enrollment Status: Full-time 39.4% 31.5% 79% Part-time 60.6% 68.5% 21%

What was learned from the entire group Almost 80% have home computers with Internet connections 20% have access at work and 70% have on-campus access Only 65% use the Internet at least weekly for class projects or assignments 47% use it several times a week 30% use it often or very often

Learned… continued 56% do not receive financial support from parents 55% do not receive grants or scholarships 75% have no student loans 40% claim paying for college is a significant issue 45% report that their colleges provide the financial support they need to afford their education

Students at-risk of not attaining their educational goals Community college students are 3-4 times more likely to reflect the factors that research indicates put them at-risk. Those are: Being academically under-prepared Being a single parent Being financially independent Caring for children at home Working more than 30 hours a week Being a first-generation college student Being a part-time student Identifying the cost of attending college as a significant issue

At-risk Students 25% of CCSSE respondents fell in the low risk category (0-1 risk factors) 66% were moderate risk students (2-4 risk factors) 9% were high-risk (5 or more risk factors)

High-risk students Are less likely to set transferring to a four-year institution as a primary goal Are more likely to set completing their associate degree as a primary goal Are exerting more effort to succeed (they are overcoming significant challenge to attend college) Are much less likely to come to class prepared More likely to ask questions and participant in class discussions Are more likely to prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

High-risk students Are more likely to report that they “work harder than they thought they could to meet an instructor’s expectations” Are more likely to find exams challenging Are more dedicated to studying Are taking advantage of services offered by the college Are more likely to give high ratings to the importance of tutoring, financial aid, career counseling, etc. Are more likely to participate in study-skills classes, orientation and organized learning communities

At-risk Students Community Colleges are doing a good job of motivating and serving these students Ensuring the success of these students remains one of the critical challenges for community colleges Assisting these students may be one of our most significant potential contributions to our community

Section I: Activities in the Classroom Students were asked “how often” they participated in various activities in the classroom Scale: 1 = never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often and 4 = very often Data for CPCC are compared to the CC sample and to the university sample (NSSE)

College Activities CPCC CC NSSE 1. Asking questions in class/contributing to the discussion 2.94 2.81 2.79 2. Made a class presentation 2.05 2.03 2.17 3. Preparing two or more drafts of a paper before turning it in 2.47 2.54 2.70 4. Working on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources 2.57 2.64 3.01 5. Coming to class without completing reading or assignments 1.97 2.01 2.10 Comparisons: 981 CPCC students, 8,289 community college students and 33,000 first-year university students

College Activities CPCC CC NSSE 6. Working with other students on projects during class 2.55 2.59 2.42 7. Working with classmates outside of class to prepare assignments 1.88 1.92 2.35 8. Teaching/tutoring other students 1.48 1.42 1.63 9. Participating in a community-based project as part of a regular course 1.35 1.33 1.37 10. Using list-serves, chat rooms or the Internet to discuss or complete 2.14 2.07 2.58 an assignment

College Activities CPCC CC NSSE 11. Used email to communicate with the instructor 2.07 1.91 2.77 12. Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 2. 65 2.43 2.56 13. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 2.06 1.98 2.11 14. Discussing ideas from readings/lecture with the instructor outside of class 1.85 1.72 1.74 15. Receiving prompt feedback from an instructor on your performance 2.69 2.58 2.61

College Activities CPCC CC NSSE 16. Working hard to meet an instructor’s expectation 2.54 2.47 2.58 17. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 1.42 1.42 1.51 18. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class. 2.71 2.61 2.73 19. Having serious conversation with students of a different race/ethnicity 2.61 2.39 2.65 20. Having serious conversation with students of different religions, political opinions or personal values 2.53 2.41 2.90

Students have multiple demands on their time and spend limited time on campus. Results indicate that most student-faculty interaction takes place in class. More than 80% of students do not participate in college sponsored extracurricular activities. Therefore, the most powerful engagement strategies likely will center around classroom and classwork.

Impact – Part-time Students Part-time students are least engaged 45% of part-time students (and 29% of full-time students) never worked with classmates outside of class to prepare assignments 51% of part-time students (and 39% of full-time students never discussed ideas from readings or classes with an instructor outside of class. Research shows that these interactions lead to improved learning and higher retention rates

Impact on Transfer Students These classroom activities may impact the progress of our transfer students Community college students rated their interaction with faculty both in and out of class higher than university students However, they ranked interaction with other students lower than university students

College Activities - Developmental vs. Non-Developmental Non-dev. Developmental CPCC Nat. CPCC Nat. 1. Asking questions in class/contributing 2.97 2.81 2.92 2.81 to the discussion 2. Made a class presentation 1.93 1.98 2.17 2.08 3. Preparing two or more drafts of a paper before turning it in 2.23 2.40 2.71 2.69 4. Working on a paper that requires integrating ideas or information 2.46 2.58 2.68 2.70 from various sources 5. Coming to class without completing 1.97 2.03 1.97 1.99 reading or assignments

College Activities - Developmental vs. Non-Developmental Non-dev. Developmental CPCC Nat. CPCC Nat. 6. Working with other students on 2.49 2.54 2.61 2.64 projects during class 7. Working with classmates outside of class to prepare assignments 1.80 1.89 1.96 1.95 8. Teaching/tutoring other students 1.51 1.41 1.45 1.43 9. Participating in a community-based project as part of a regular course 1.30 1.29 1.41 1.36 10. Using list-serves, chat rooms or the Internet to discuss or complete 2.11 2.04 2.18 2.10 an assignment

College Activities - Developmental vs. Non-Developmental Non-dev. Developmental CPCC Nat. CPCC Nat. 11. Used email to communicate with the instructor 2.04 1.88 2.10 1.94 12. Discussed grades of assignments with an instructor 2.59 2.37 2.70 2.49 13. Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor 2.00 1.89 2.12 2.07 14. Discussing ideas from readings/lecture with the instructor outside of class 1.83 1.68 1.87 1.77 15. Receiving prompt feedback from an instructor on your performance 2.70 2.56 2.68 2.60

College Activities - Developmental vs. Non-Developmental Non-dev. Developmental CPCC Nat. CPCC Nat. 16. Working hard to meet an instructor’s expectation 2.40 2.37 2.68 2.60 17. Worked with instructors on activities other than coursework 1.36 1.39 1.47 1.44 18. Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class. 2.68 2.55 2.74 2.66 19. Having serious conversation with students of a different race/ethnicity 2.57 2.34 2.66 2.44 20. Having serious conversation with students of different religions, 2.52 2.38 2.53 2.45 political opinions or or personal values

Mental Activities in the Classroom Students were asked about how often they participated in a list of mental activities in the classroom Activities such as: memorizing facts, analytical skills, critical thinking, and application of new skills or information

Mental Activities by Comparison (n/a)

Mental Activities by Comparison Developmental vs. Non-developmental

Mental Activities by Comparison 1-30 hours vs. 31+ hours

Student Opinions About School Students were asked: Does the college provide the support you need to help you succeed at this college, encourages contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds, helps you cope with your non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.), encourages you to spend significant amounts of time studying and providing the financial support needed. Scale: 1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a lot, 4=very much

Student Opinions About School (n/a)

How Students Spend Their Time Community College students are older They work Have families Take care of dependents Don’t have a lot of time to spend on campus Don’t spend as much time “hanging out” before and after class

Weekly Activities Students were asked about how many hours in a typical 7-day week do you spend doing the following: 0 none 1 5 or fewer 2 6-10 hours 3 11-15 hours 4 16-20 hours 5 21-25 hours 6 26-30 hours 7 more than 30 hours

Student’s Weekly Activities How many hours per week do you do the following: CPCC CC Sample NSSE Preparing for class 1.88 1.92 4.08 Working on campus .15 .25 1.61 Working off campus 3.13 2.82 2.35 Participating in college sponsored activities .23 .26 2.32

Student’s Weekly Activities How many hours per week do you do the following: CPCC CC Sample NSSE Relaxing/socializing 1.97 2.18 4.12 Providing care for dependents 1.41 1.36 1.58 Commuting to and from classes 1.36 1.28 na Participating in community/ campus organizations .82 .61 na

Relationships at the College How would you characterize the quality of relationships? 1=unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation 7=friendly, supportive, sense of belonging Quality of Relationships CPCC CC Sample NSSE With other students 5.41 5.39 5.69 With Instructors 5.67 5.51 5.39 With administrative personnel and offices 4.89 4.89 4.90

Knowledge, Skills and Personal Growth To what extent has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills and personal development in the following areas? Scale: 1 very little 2 some 3 quite a bit 4 very much

Educational and Personal Growth CPCC CC NSSE Acquiring a broad general education 2.91 2.87 3.09 Acquiring job/work-related knowledge/skill 2.62 2.51 2.52 Writing clearly/effectively 2.61 2.64 2.85 Speaking clearly/effectively 2.54 2.54 2.59 Thinking critically/analytically 2.87 2.84 3.09 Solving numerical problems 2.58 2.51 n/a Using computing and information technology 2.58 2.51 2.73 Working effectively with others 2.67 2.69 2.82

Educational and Personal Growth CPCC CC NSSE Voting in local, state or college elections 1.66 1.62 1.94 Learning effectively on your own 2.78 2.73 2.97 Understanding yourself 2.56 2.53 2.87 Understanding people of other racial/ ethnic backgrounds 2.45 2.36 2.58 Developing a personal code of values/ethics 2.18 2.20 2.64 Contributing to the welfare of your community 1.85 1.79 2.15 Developing clearer career goals 2.68 2.63 na Gaining information about career opportunities 2.58 2.54 na

Satisfaction with College Services Students were asked questions so as to link frequency of service utilization with importance and satisfaction. Frequency 1 = rarely/never 2 = sometimes 3 = often Importance 1 = not at all 3 = very Satisfaction 1 =not at all 2 = somewhat satisfied 3 = very satisfied

Academic Advising/Planning

Career Counseling

Personal Counseling

Job Placement Assistance

Peer or Other Tutoring

Skill Labs (Writing, Math, etc.)

Child Care

Financial Aid Advising

Computer Lab

Student Organizations

Transfer Credit Assistance

Services for People with Disabilities

Knowledge, Skills and Personal Growth To what extent has your experience at this college contributed to your knowledge, skills and personal development in the following areas? Scale: 1 very little 2 some 3 quite a bit 4 very much

Acquiring a broad general education 2.91 2.87 CPCC CC Sample Acquiring a broad general education 2.91 2.87 Acquiring job/work-related knowledge/skill 2.62 2.51 Writing clearly/effectively 2.61 2.64 Speaking clearly/effectively 2.54 2.54 Thinking critically/analytically 2.87 2.84 Solving numerical problems 2.58 2.51 Using computing and information technology 2.58 2.51 Working effectively with others 2.67 2.69

CPCC CC Sample Voting in local, state or college elections 1.66 1.62 Learning effectively on your own 2.78 2.73 Understanding yourself 2.56 2.53 Understanding people of other racial/ ethnic backgrounds 2.45 2.36 Developing a personal code of values/ethics 2.18 2.20 Contributing to the welfare of your community 1.85 1.79 Developing clearer career goals 2.68 2.63 Gaining information about career opportunities 2.58 2.54

Retention – What issues would force you to withdraw from this college? Moving/relocating Lack of finances Change in career plans Educational goals change Working full-time Caring for dependents Academically unprepared Mismatch w/ coll. obj. All community college students

Student Engagement Critical to retention and student success Occurs in student services (counseling, advising, financial aid, etc.) Occurs in the classroom (class participation, bonding with students and faculty) Occurs through process – policies that encourage students to stay and don’t make it easy for them to leave

Findings CPCC as a whole, did better on the assessment than most of the community colleges who participated This opened the opportunity for a Met Life grant for us Looking at the differences between our classroom activities and those of the university may help us better understand transfer issues

What the Universities Learned from NSSE Campus Climate Students who report that their school encourages contact with peers from different backgrounds also see their school as supporting: Their academic success Their coping with other responsibilities Their social needs

What the Universities Learned… continued Supportive Faculty Members Students who report that their faculty members are accessible and supportive perceive that their school: Provides the support they need for their academic success Helps them cope with non-academic responsibilities Provides social support

What the Universities Learned…. continued Good Academic Advising Students who report getting high quality academic advising: Are more likely than their peers to interact with faculty members Perceive their institution’s environment is academically and socially supportive Are more satisfied with their overall college experience

Two websites http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse http://www.ccsse.org

The End A copy of this presentation can be found at: http://inside.cpcc.edu/planning And click on “studies and reports”