Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simona Bettoni and Remo Maccaferri, CERN Wiggler modeling Double-helix like option.
Advertisements

Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.
Electron-cloud instability in the CLIC damping ring for positrons H. Bartosik, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo TWIICE workshop, TWIICE.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
IR Magnets for SuperKEKB KEK, Norihito Ohuchi 1.IR Magnets (ES, QCS, QC1) 2.Interference between Magnet-Cryostats and Belle 3.Summary SuperB.WS05.Hawaii.
Comparison of ECLOUD and POSINST Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts with Emphasis on the Relative Drift and Dipole Contributions Jim Crittenden Cornell.
ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.
LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.
Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.
ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
March 23, 2010 CMAD a tracking and e-cloud beam instability parallel code (M.Pivi SLAC) Taking MAD(X) optics file at input, thus tracking the beam in a.
FCC electron cloud study plan K. Ohmi (KEK) Mar FCC electron cloud study meeting CERN.
Electron Cloud Mitigation Studies at CesrTA Joseph Calvey 10/1/2009.
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
Recent Electron-Cloud Mitigation Studies at KEK E-cloud mitigation mini-workshop on November at CERN Kyo Shibata (for KEKB Group)
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS (Space Charge and Impedance) M. Zobov.
Electron cloud in Final Doublet IRENG07) ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design Workshop (IRENG07) September 17-21, 2007, SLAC Lanfa Wang.
Electron cloud measurement in Cu/Al chambers with/without TiN coating at KEKB positron ring ILC DR Working Group Meeting Kyo Shibata (KEK)
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.
Measurement of the Electron Cloud Density in a Solenoid Field and a Quadrupole Field K. Kanazawa and H. Fukuma KEK June 2009 CTA09 1.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.
Simona Bettoni, Remo Maccaferri Analysis of a proposal for the design of the CLIC damping rings wigglers.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
Electron Cloud R&D at Cornell ILCDR08--7/8/08
Observations and Predictions for DAFNE and SuperB
The Interaction Region
Large Booster and Collider Ring
ILCDR08 10 July 2008 Plan of measuring cloud density in the solenoid field and in the quadrupole field K. Kanazawa (KEK)
Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Electron Cloud Meeting
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Ecloud in quadrupole & Sextupole
First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD
J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
E-cloud instability at CESR TA
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
ILC DR Working Group on Collective Effect: Electron Cloud
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Presentation transcript:

Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015 Followup to Modeling of Electron Cloud Buildup in the Final-focus Quadrupole Magnets of the SuperKEKB Positron Ring (-- Updated/corrected following meeting --) (see Electron Cloud/Impedance meeting talk of 4/22/2015) -- Request from K. Ohmi at IPAC15 for pictures of cloud distributions -- Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015

SuperKEKB Interaction Region (Y. Arimoto et al, IPAC14, WEPRI086) 7-GeV Electrons 4-GeV Positrons The BELLE-II solenoid is offset by 470 mm relative to the IP in the flight direction of the 7-GeV electron beam. The final-focus quadrupole QC1RP for the 4-GeV positron beam is in the region of uniform solenoid field.

SuperKEKB Interaction Region Solenoid and quadrupole magnetic fields QC1RP QC2RP QC2LP QC1LP QC2RE QC1RE QC2LE QC1LE Final-focus Quadrupole Magnets for the 4 GeV Positron Beam QC2RP: 0.410 m 28 T/m QC1RP: 0.334 m 69 T/m QC2LP: 0.410 m 28 T/m QC1LP: 0.334 m 69 T/m The combined BELLE-II detector solenoid and compensation solenoid fields produce a field which varies along the length of QC1RP, ranging from about 0.6 T to about 2.6 T. The direction of the field is rotated 83/2 mrad relative to the positron beam axis.

Electron cloud buildup results with and without quadrupole and solenoidal magnetic fields SuperKEKB Positron Ring Operating Parameters 4 GeV 2500 bunches @ 9.4e10 e+ sz = 6 mm 4 ns spacing BZ is oriented along the BELLE-II axis, i.e. it is rotated around the vertical axis by 83/2 mrad relative to the positron beam axis. The model does not account for the longitudinal variation of BZ , nor for any radial component associated with that variation. B' = 69 T/m BZ = 2 T B' = 0 T/m BZ = 0 T Conclusion: the magnetic fields prevent the cloud from dissipating between bunch passages. Such electron cloud densities are 3-4 orders of magnitude higher than the ring average estimated by the KEK vacuum group.

Snapshots of transverse cloud distribution (Vacuum chamber diameter 21 mm. Unconditioned copper surface.) B' = 69 T/m BZ = 2 T B' = 0 T/m BZ = 0 T The quadrupole symmetry is broken by the rotated longitudinal magnetic field. The magnetic fields causes hot spots near the top of the chamber. With no magnetic field there are hot spots near the sides of the chamber. The hot spots are a factor of six more dense with the magnetic field, reaching more than 2.5x109 electrons in one 1-mm by 1-mm bin. The overall cloud density is a factor of three higher.

since no photon scattering simulation had been done. Large electric field gradients ==> large tune shifts Factor >15 larger than Ohmi estimate at IPAC14 Fractional tune shift = DL*dEY/dY * bY / (4p E/eV) = 2.0e-8 dEY/dY (V/m2) = 0.016 (bY = 3000 m !) Ohmi found a maximum value of 0.001 for excluding ±30 m around the IP (TUPRI020, IPAC14). During a private discussion at IPAC15, SuperKEKB commissioning group leader Funakoshi estimated the beam-beam tune shift in design conditions to be about 0.05. No electron cloud production in the final-focus quadrupoles was taken into account, since no photon scattering simulation had been done.

Yoshihiro Funakoshi Kazuhito Ohmi Commissioning Group Leader Simulation Group Leader

The additional quadrupole field reduces the gradients. Effect of magnetic fields on the tune shifts (Unconditioned copper surface) B' = 0 T/m BZ = 0 T B' = 0 T/m BZ = 2 T B' = 69 T/m BZ = 0 T B' = 69 T/m BZ = 2 T The off-axis solenoidal field causes the high field gradients at the beam. The additional quadrupole field reduces the gradients.

Snapshots of transvers cloud distribution (Vacuum chamber diameter 21 mm. Unconditioned copper surface.) B' = 69 T/m BZ = 0 T B' = 0 T/m BZ = 2 T The quadrupole symmetry is restored when the rotated solenoid compensation field is removed. The rotated solenoidal field causes high cloud densities and electric field gradients at the beam in both planes.

Transverse cloud distributions averaged over the full simulation time of 438 ns (Density (e/m3) in 0.5 ´ 0.5 mm bins) B' = 0 T/m BZ = 0 T B' = 0 T/m BZ = 2 T B' = 69 T/m BZ = 0 T B' = 69 T/m BZ = 2 T

All questions, comments and suggestions are welcome.